EPA gets handed a shit sandwich by SCOTUS
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
This is huge beyond huge. This precedent ruling will effect EVERY Federal agency!
Cya BATFE
Wonder how the CDC and FDA feel right about now?
Insert Spider-man after the snap.
These agencies contain the bureaucrats that think they run government. They add penalties (like a tax) on us for doing things against what they call regulations. We should have had a ruling like this a long time ago. I think the commies are in charge of most of these types of agencies.
I think you might be right the CDC and FDA should, hopefully, be looking cautiously over their shoulder. At least I hope they are.
Wonder if the FDA will regret their historic overreach of the last few years? Spoiler: THEY WILL
They're gonna be cramming through as much bullshit as they can.
What about the NIH (in addition to the CDC) - and the jab mandate?
Does this KILL the Jab Mandate?
It's already dead they just don't know it. I have my Certificate of Victory I.D hanging on the wall.
FDA, FBI, CIA, etc ...
Wondering about this because in the decision, they narrowed their focus on just a single practice of the EPA. Wondering how this will truly impact the other agencies in the manner that we hope. Does this mean that a suit has to be brought to the SCOTUS every time? Like CDC/Mandates, IRS/Tax Code...etc. Hoping someone can explain further...
From what I understand, yes, that basically how she goes for starters.
I’m just a nurse, but I understand this ruling to give the case study for all future grievances against federal over reach?
What this means:
It literally was this way already.
This ruling is a nothing burger.
Any and all examples of "vague" authority granted to executive agencies will still be subjective and require the courts to intervene. It already was this way. That's what this case was an example of.
This case doesn't set a precedent like you all think it does. The precedent was already set, and the major questions doctrine remains as subjective as it always was.
What was the case precedent?
You should look up the major questions doctrine, non-delegation principle, and major rules doctrine. All different words for the same thing.
This type of ruling is nothing new.
So can you give specifics? For those of us who are trying to decipher the fall out?
I'm not sure what you want me to say.
The court has long-ruled that any delegation of powers by Congress must be specific. If it is overly vague and an agency exploits that, it is to be assumed that the exploitation was not what Congress intended and disallowed.
Of course, what is considered vague and an exploit is determined by whatever court hears that case at the time. It's always a case-by-case basis, and it's mostly just them making it up as they go along. Precedents only go so far as no two cases are the same.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/supreme-court-deals-biden-climate-agenda-serious-blow-epa-decision
Praise the Lord. What a great Independence Day gift.
Thanks, I forgot to nab the link before I closed it.
Mods, respectfully ask for a sticky on this story. It's very important.
Here's the official ruling for lawfags: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf
Now it comes down to the non-delegation elements of this ruling and how much precedent is set here in regards to impacting other federal agencies. I don't know the answer to that as I'm still reading through the ruling, but depending on the nature of this ruling, it could have a massive impact (or none at all) on the administrative state.
Exactly. The way I read it, the SC was very careful about this but I hope I'm reading it wrong.
Goodbye Big Gov! 👋
If this isn’t a habbening I don’t know what is. Holy crap
Praise our Lord!
This week alone has been the biggest contraction of centralized power I have seen in my lifetime maybe.
Silly SC; everyone knows liberals, and by definition liberal agencies, don't like bread! Gorsuch concurs without the bread pointing out the peoples representatives (States) get to make such policy. Kagan dissent is liberal drivel; Congress nor their expert agency(s) have not demonstrated any expertise; except for putting on clown shows, engaging in graft and corruption and committing crimes against humanity.
Got to upvote for the title.
Americans get shit sandwich as white replacement immigration continues.
Would be nice to see SC ruling on illegal immigration also, if we want to have a true win.
Link?????
That is a big boom once more. Passing around the hopium today!
I've really been enjoying the Supreme Court just lobbing bombs on liberals over the past two weeks. Just hugely entertaining
Best title caption my friend, by far. Lol!!!