Exactly. Society needs to universally know where the line is drawn and enforce it, and not change it based on arbitrary feelings.
The Left change the rules because they feel like being more Degenerate.
The Right changes the rules, and makes things too strict, because sex makes Christians feel uncomfortable.
Examples:
For the left; "Anything goes" and they blatantly violate laws that protect underage children.
For the right; they think a 16-19 year old is still a child, and will jail a law-abiding college freshman for consensually dating a 17 year old high school senior (yes this actually happens, sadly), even though they are NOT breaking any laws.
Actual law:
Age of consent is 16 in most states, with protections for teenagers who date within their age group (15-19).
a 16 year old can legally open a bank account, work a job, get a trade certification, graduate high school early if they excel, attend college or precollege early, start a business, take psychology courses, and get married. All legal. Sounds like a young adult to me.
"Students will learn what you teach them". Raise legal-aged young adults wisely and you get responsible teenagers who can be trusted to safely transition into young adulthood and make wise choices..
Shitty parenting (being too loose, or being a helicopter parent) does the opposite.
I don’t want a tiktok addict either. Sorry, but I just can NOT stand the same sound effects for 1,000,000,000 different videos being replayed over and over again
I beg to differ. Anyone can fall prey to excessive social media consumption. I believe people use social media platforms as distractions from their real-life problems. Social media platforms tune their algorithms to keep these people engaged for longer stretches of time. Likes and upvotes are the equivalent of receiving gifts and giving gifts; Or receiving approval and giving approval. It is a constant stream of dopamine and serotonin.. an addictive social media cocktail.
It’s due to unnatural hormonal weight gain, too many random tattoos (the more a female has the more f*cked up she is) and “embracing” your “curves” (fat) is more ideal than actually keeping yourself fit and working out for your body type.
Women who do male-based workouts (think CrossFit) will look more meaty, because females aren’t shaped like males so we need to target our bodies differently. This all comes from the “men are equal to women” mindset.
You say they are home alone with their wine and cats? I think it is not cats but rather their dogs who like peanut butter they have named either Skippy of Jiff.
I hate the term "influencer". It sounds like they came up with the term themselves. They're "influencers" like drug dealers hanging around middle schools are "influencers". I wish they'd all get arrested.
Another video circulating social media - which was screenshot from yet another livestream the influencer reportedly did - showed alleged text messages between Strickland and one of the parents.
The parent allegedly messaged Strickland: 'What's up? [redacted] just called me and [redacted] they was [to] make sure we wasn't made about you showing them [sic] boys your tits. I told them heck no, I ain't. I'm proud proud of them, so you cool with me.'
Strickland allegedly replied back: 'I figured you didn't care, but just wanted to make sure. Probably shouldn't have done it. [Redacted] so that's my fault, but I just wanted to make sure y'all wasn't upset about it.'
The father allegedly replied: 'Nah, you good, someone done got mad [sic] they had to pay to see them and the boys didn't'
Definitely. Also, not sure why she thought it was acceptable.
Obviously if I were the kid I'd be like "yeah! Woo!"
But as an adult, the inappropriate behavior of someone in a power position over you, while also exposing you to social media (which was not a thing when I was a kid) is just all kinds of fucked up.
I just don't know how someone goes "wow! There's kids! Let's flash them!" and not be talking about Xbox kids playing Call of Duty and referring to flash grenades.
I'm sure those boys spent countless hours virtually murdering people in call of duty, but if they see a beautiful woman then apparently she needs to be arrested.
Pornography is the distribution of sexual material.
Exploitation means to take resources from someone.
By dictionary definition she did neither.
She wasn't doing anything sexual in those videos.
Women breastfeed babies and even children up to age 7.
If she had forced herself onto the boys physically then definitely, she would need to be charged with a crime.
If there was any evidence of her doing any actual harm to the children, then she would need to be punished.
If there is a psychological report from a counselor where the children say they were harmed or felt uncomfortable, then she would need to be punished.
She's an idiot to have livestreamed it, however.
By all means stop pedo's, but know the difference between what is natural and benign vs what is actually harmful.
You can't have a free society and punish simple nudity. Doesn't work that way.
Don't grandstand about freedom and civil rights when you punish people for exercising them.
Additionally her actions are covered by free speech laws.
It's the intent that matters. Someone's bathing attire slipping off after plunging off the high dive is practically a right of passage. That's an innocent mistake. But intentionally exposing yourself is something else entirely. If a man can get arrested for flashing his penis to children, a woman would face the same consequences as flashing her breasts. Equality, bitch.
At least you acknowledge the swimming pool 'right of passage'.
A woman's breasts are used to nourish a child.
"Biology, bitch."
What about boys who go to the beach where women happen to be walking around in Gstrings? Should we arrest all of them too? Where do you draw the line, and how do you effectively deal with the situation? Punishment is only one tool.
If we go too far left, then we get an perverse 'anything goes' society. Everything falls apart then.
If we go too hard right, you get riyad where women get thier hands cut off for not wearing a burka and daring to look at or hold hands with anyone outside of an arranged marriage under shariah law.
Or, god forbid, abstinence until 30.
Worth noting that in biblical times and even the early 1900's prior to city life/industrialization, teenage marriage was common here in the United States. 16 to 18 year olds were trained in farming and vocational school and were ready to raise a family. It wasn't 'morality' that changed people's minds as such, it was economics.
I agree that pedophiles need to be punished, but my concern is the collateral damage that's being done in the war against pedos.
There are people who ARE obeying the law who are still being jailed.
Like an 18 year old who graduates from high school, goes to college, dates a former 28 year old teacher. Both above legal age. Both dating OUTSIDE of any professional relationship. Both still punished.
Or Josh Hawley (whom I respect) damning a 19 year old for sending nudes to an 18 year old. Both above legal age.
There are countless cases like this if you do your research.
The war on pedo's is becoming the new 'MeToo'. How many men's lives were destroyed due to excessive punishment or false accusations, or women 'changing thier minds' after a hookup?
Again, I emphasize that I agree pedophilia needs to be dealt with.
In the case of this woman on tiktok banning her account and sending her to court-ordered counseling would have been sufficient.
She had no physical contact with the children. If she had forced anything then THAT would warrant jail time.
If a woman was breastfeeding a 7 year old would that also be illegal?
How about a father who takes his 10 year old son to hooters restaurant after a baseball game?
Breastfeeding a 7 year old isn't illegal, but it's something that shouldn't happen.
A father taking his son to Hooter's is a degenerate.
The heck with her and the father whom endorsed it. A bunch of yall ready to string up groomers and predators when they're guys, but make excuses when it comes to women.
Either call it down the middle or shut your mouths.
Sending her to court mandated counseling and banning her tiktok account would be the more appropriate response. The social fallout to her reputation has already happened.
It’s people like this that cause trauma to others. She’s a sick individual for purposely exposing herself to children. Sounds like daddy issues with this one.
But naked men in a parade, twerking in front of children is just fine.
She should have bought a permit.
Isn't that the truth.
Exactly. Society needs to universally know where the line is drawn and enforce it, and not change it based on arbitrary feelings.
The Left change the rules because they feel like being more Degenerate.
The Right changes the rules, and makes things too strict, because sex makes Christians feel uncomfortable.
Examples:
For the left; "Anything goes" and they blatantly violate laws that protect underage children.
For the right; they think a 16-19 year old is still a child, and will jail a law-abiding college freshman for consensually dating a 17 year old high school senior (yes this actually happens, sadly), even though they are NOT breaking any laws.
Actual law: Age of consent is 16 in most states, with protections for teenagers who date within their age group (15-19).
a 16 year old can legally open a bank account, work a job, get a trade certification, graduate high school early if they excel, attend college or precollege early, start a business, take psychology courses, and get married. All legal. Sounds like a young adult to me.
"Students will learn what you teach them". Raise legal-aged young adults wisely and you get responsible teenagers who can be trusted to safely transition into young adulthood and make wise choices..
Shitty parenting (being too loose, or being a helicopter parent) does the opposite.
There have always been female pedos.
Guessing it's part of the plan.
I don’t want a tiktok addict either. Sorry, but I just can NOT stand the same sound effects for 1,000,000,000 different videos being replayed over and over again
Entertainment for the sub-80 IQ crowd.
I beg to differ. Anyone can fall prey to excessive social media consumption. I believe people use social media platforms as distractions from their real-life problems. Social media platforms tune their algorithms to keep these people engaged for longer stretches of time. Likes and upvotes are the equivalent of receiving gifts and giving gifts; Or receiving approval and giving approval. It is a constant stream of dopamine and serotonin.. an addictive social media cocktail.
Oh no...oh no...oh no, no, no, no, no....
It’s due to unnatural hormonal weight gain, too many random tattoos (the more a female has the more f*cked up she is) and “embracing” your “curves” (fat) is more ideal than actually keeping yourself fit and working out for your body type.
Women who do male-based workouts (think CrossFit) will look more meaty, because females aren’t shaped like males so we need to target our bodies differently. This all comes from the “men are equal to women” mindset.
Good comment.
100 percent this.
You say they are home alone with their wine and cats? I think it is not cats but rather their dogs who like peanut butter they have named either Skippy of Jiff.
big deal ...show me your tits...lol
Me too
She’s… not all that
no but to teenagers tits are tits lol
haha yep
https://files.catbox.moe/05crqx.PNG
Really shows what some filters and camera angles can do for an uggo...
I hate the term "influencer". It sounds like they came up with the term themselves. They're "influencers" like drug dealers hanging around middle schools are "influencers". I wish they'd all get arrested.
She has man hands.
Another video circulating social media - which was screenshot from yet another livestream the influencer reportedly did - showed alleged text messages between Strickland and one of the parents.
The parent allegedly messaged Strickland: 'What's up? [redacted] just called me and [redacted] they was [to] make sure we wasn't made about you showing them [sic] boys your tits. I told them heck no, I ain't. I'm proud proud of them, so you cool with me.'
Strickland allegedly replied back: 'I figured you didn't care, but just wanted to make sure. Probably shouldn't have done it. [Redacted] so that's my fault, but I just wanted to make sure y'all wasn't upset about it.'
The father allegedly replied: 'Nah, you good, someone done got mad [sic] they had to pay to see them and the boys didn't'
Some of the most eloquent vernacular. These people are stupid.
Definitely. Also, not sure why she thought it was acceptable.
Obviously if I were the kid I'd be like "yeah! Woo!"
But as an adult, the inappropriate behavior of someone in a power position over you, while also exposing you to social media (which was not a thing when I was a kid) is just all kinds of fucked up.
I just don't know how someone goes "wow! There's kids! Let's flash them!" and not be talking about Xbox kids playing Call of Duty and referring to flash grenades.
They don't learn too many skills, either, with a cig in one hand and a beer in the other most of the time.
Typical draconian conservatism.
I'm sure those boys spent countless hours virtually murdering people in call of duty, but if they see a beautiful woman then apparently she needs to be arrested.
Pornography is the distribution of sexual material.
Exploitation means to take resources from someone.
By dictionary definition she did neither.
She wasn't doing anything sexual in those videos.
Women breastfeed babies and even children up to age 7.
If she had forced herself onto the boys physically then definitely, she would need to be charged with a crime.
If there was any evidence of her doing any actual harm to the children, then she would need to be punished.
If there is a psychological report from a counselor where the children say they were harmed or felt uncomfortable, then she would need to be punished.
She's an idiot to have livestreamed it, however.
By all means stop pedo's, but know the difference between what is natural and benign vs what is actually harmful.
You can't have a free society and punish simple nudity. Doesn't work that way.
Don't grandstand about freedom and civil rights when you punish people for exercising them.
Additionally her actions are covered by free speech laws.
It's the intent that matters. Someone's bathing attire slipping off after plunging off the high dive is practically a right of passage. That's an innocent mistake. But intentionally exposing yourself is something else entirely. If a man can get arrested for flashing his penis to children, a woman would face the same consequences as flashing her breasts. Equality, bitch.
At least you acknowledge the swimming pool 'right of passage'.
A woman's breasts are used to nourish a child.
"Biology, bitch."
What about boys who go to the beach where women happen to be walking around in Gstrings? Should we arrest all of them too? Where do you draw the line, and how do you effectively deal with the situation? Punishment is only one tool.
If we go too far left, then we get an perverse 'anything goes' society. Everything falls apart then.
If we go too hard right, you get riyad where women get thier hands cut off for not wearing a burka and daring to look at or hold hands with anyone outside of an arranged marriage under shariah law.
Or, god forbid, abstinence until 30.
Worth noting that in biblical times and even the early 1900's prior to city life/industrialization, teenage marriage was common here in the United States. 16 to 18 year olds were trained in farming and vocational school and were ready to raise a family. It wasn't 'morality' that changed people's minds as such, it was economics.
I agree that pedophiles need to be punished, but my concern is the collateral damage that's being done in the war against pedos.
There are people who ARE obeying the law who are still being jailed.
Like an 18 year old who graduates from high school, goes to college, dates a former 28 year old teacher. Both above legal age. Both dating OUTSIDE of any professional relationship. Both still punished.
Or Josh Hawley (whom I respect) damning a 19 year old for sending nudes to an 18 year old. Both above legal age.
There are countless cases like this if you do your research.
The war on pedo's is becoming the new 'MeToo'. How many men's lives were destroyed due to excessive punishment or false accusations, or women 'changing thier minds' after a hookup?
Again, I emphasize that I agree pedophilia needs to be dealt with.
In the case of this woman on tiktok banning her account and sending her to court-ordered counseling would have been sufficient.
She had no physical contact with the children. If she had forced anything then THAT would warrant jail time.
Penis != Breasts. Men have breasts and they are not charged for walking around shirtless. That is not equality.
Oh fuck off, you obstinate cunt. I shouldn't have to explain to you the difference between a woman's breasts and a dude's flabby chest.
You need to go back to school to learn the difference between a penis and breasts. Take some anger management lessons while you are at it.
I do agree that intent matters but you have to measure that.
Is she sexualizing (injecting sexual energy on purpose) a child or just being a mindless idiot and joking around on tiktok?
If she's intentionally grooming that would be illegal.
Just joking around and not crossing any physical or emotional boundaries, and the kids happen to see tits? Not illegal.
OK, groomer.
Grooming is wrong.
If a woman was breastfeeding a 7 year old would that also be illegal?
How about a father who takes his 10 year old son to hooters restaurant after a baseball game?
Breastfeeding a 7 year old isn't illegal, but it's something that shouldn't happen.
A father taking his son to Hooter's is a degenerate.
Sick little faux diva. She should do time. Send rhe fucking message it's wrong.
You hedonistic fucks that need all this attention with your social media. Sick of it.
S
In other news,
A tribe of women in the amazon jungle walk around nude in front of their children and no psychological harm is done.
And Women breastfeed babies.
By all means, stop pedo's but know what's actually healthy vs unhealthy.
Still, she gets the darwin award for being dumb.
If the boys were 16, not a big deal.
Boys seeing boobs doesn't do damage.
If she physically forces herself on them, then that would be wrong.
An Amazon tribeswoman isn't sexualizing a stranger's children and live streaming it on TikTok.
What she did was wrong and was also against the law.
"An Amazon tribeswoman isn't sexualizing a stranger's children and live streaming it on TikTok."
This is true.
When you don’t respect yourself and have zero morals, this is how you act. I am glad the authorities had some common sense.
Man... I wish I was there...
...id uhh... Have given them a stern talking to... I guess...
Who would allow themselves to be influenced by anyone on TikTok or FB?
The heck with her and the father whom endorsed it. A bunch of yall ready to string up groomers and predators when they're guys, but make excuses when it comes to women.
Either call it down the middle or shut your mouths.
If a group of 7th graders went to see ancient renaissance paintings at an art gallery on a history trip would that be considered pornography also?
More collateral damage in the war against pedo's.
Focus on the real targets, the ones who do serious damage, the elderly men who traffick young girls. not idiots on tik tok who flash a titty.
Sending her to court mandated counseling and banning her tiktok account would be the more appropriate response. The social fallout to her reputation has already happened.
What about at beaches then? It should be illegal as well IMHO.
What should be illegal at beaches??
Exposing breasts and bums.
Do you mean that thong/string bikinis should be illegal?
In my opinion, yes.
Na, you should be illegal at the beach
Womens nipples shouldn’t count as nudity in my opinion
It’s people like this that cause trauma to others. She’s a sick individual for purposely exposing herself to children. Sounds like daddy issues with this one.