Never Forget Aluminum airplanes can cut through Steel
(media.greatawakening.win)
✈️ Planes vs Steel ✈️
Comments (33)
sorted by:
It was so strong that the nose popped out the other side intact.
"The Nose Out Shot."
Not that unusual when you take into account quantum weirdness.
Carter, in english
You don't need to cut the steel. If that plane were going 500 MPH, sure, the wing would have been shredded, but that light pole would have gone flying.
You also don't need to melt steel. A good campfire will get steel soft enough to bend by hand.
I'm open to the idea that 9/11 isn't as advertised, but you don't help the argument with fallacious reasoning like this.
It would just mean the aluminum shreds that much quicker.
If that wing was a solid single billet of aluminum, Id say it's worst testing it out. But its not. It shouldnt take much to realize planes are built to be as light as possible. The skeletal frame of the wing mashing through the exterior of the building plus everytjing else in the building, not going to cut steel beams.
Also think of it this way. Steel is harder than dirt. When planes crash to the ground, the wings leave little damage to dirt. If speed and wieht were a factor there would be 50ft deep craters when a plane crashes.
Thank you. Take your hammer and smash a lead bullet with it. Now shoot that lead bullet at a steel plate.
It's not the same thing. In addition to the properties of the materials, there's also the force per area consideration. In the case of a bullet, it's has a small surface area but tremendous force, so it punctures.
In the case of Aluminum v. steel, aluminum can easily puncture steel... if you make it small enough and apply enough force, like an aluminum needle shot from a railgun. In a one to one comparison however, aluminum is far weaker than steel. No aluminum airplane wing is going to go through a steel beam, no matter how fast it's going. It just isn't small enough (too much surface area) and isn't going fast enough (not approaching the speed of light). In the case of a wing, it's also not solid, but a shell. Most of the wing is hollow.
If the airplane above hit that lamp post at high speed it would be obliterated. It would probably knock the lamp post over (because of the strength of concrete) and would probably bend the steel in the post, but it would destroy the wing long before the lamp post broke. The lamp post also isn't solid, and built into a lattice to enhance it's strength, like the beams of a building are.
These both sound dangerous. In any case, what happens?
The lead bullet punches right through the steel. There are other considerations i.e. the comment above this one, but the weight and mass of that plane traveling at 500 miles an hour, hitting something that wasn't designed for side impact.
The fact all 3 buildings fell that same day in the same exact manner is all the smoking gun you need
Speed is also a factor, but carry on...
So then what made a perfect imprint of a plane on the side of the building and then threw an airplane engine out the other side?
I agree. Planes can go through windows.
Missiles are made out of aluminum too, lol
Modern airliner wings are composite.
buuuh buuuh buuuhhh popular mechanics faggots told me it could...
Like butter cutting through a knife. Ooops, dyslexia on this one. 😊
It looks like that light poles structural integrity is ruined. Put a lot of weight on it now.
Steel pole, aluminum pole or something else? I'd love to know what that pole is made of. Do you know?? Maybe Building 7 falling at gravity speed might be a better target.
A quick search says that it's probably tensioned concrete with internal steel cabling, but they can also be aluminium, fibreglass, carbon fibre or plastic.
Note that this plane was likely only moving at taxi speed, and aside from bending at the base, the pole appears undamaged.
Stop! 2 different aircraft impacting 2 different buildings in 2 different locations creates the exact same damage pattern? Never. You also have to ask yourself, why do they always make a water feature memorial in the exact footprint at questionable building failures like OKC and WTC?
A Kite Plane Must Hit Steel
This documentary contains a segment on aluminium vs steel at about 43:00, but the whole documentary is worth a good watch.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IAyW1Lsqf0sH/
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7xlfhu
The first link doesn’t work.
Thanks, corrected (missing characters)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IAyW1Lsqf0sH/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4MOULvOxvI
How old was that plane?
Looks like the 70s, idk. Gee, I wonder why they don't make aluminum bullets? lol
In all fairness it doesn't matter what it's made of. At high enough speeds anything can cut through anything else.
9/11 was an inside job.