Same. I know NASA is fake and what they say is "space" is fake. I'm leaning more towards Flat Earth than towards what they taught me in public school. But I'm open-minded and don't have to "know" until it's proven to me satisfactorily one way or another. With how deep those DUMBs go, it seems we have a lot to learn about what is above us and below us.
I never went far down this rabbit hole but some of their arguments are interesting. There was a thermal video on gab yesterday where the man was showing clouds behind the moon. Which does seem strange. The math is what really seems to make it illogical but then the math is so perfect it almost makes me wonder if it's made up. I'll never be in space so I'll never know.
The point is, checking things, proving things to yourself. Just remaining in the dark is lazy, and cowardly frankly. Science is real, and so are lies....learn to differentiate, just like you did with covid.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation." -
And now you see why what q told us this shit should always be questioned....neil & nasa, those are satanist, satan is the prince of lies, so they always lie. Never listen to anything they say, period.
From my experiments I felt like I could see a curve, but there are atmospheric disturbances that can make it seem as though there is especially when using a camera mounted on a rocket.
Those of us who have navigated using the stars know that it is not flat. I don’t think flat earthers are ‘retarded’ though and questioning narratives and so-called facts is great, but I know from experience they are wrong.
Of course. I didn't think of that one. Simple examples that one theory explains and the other doesn't is grounds for immediate rejection of the latter.
Yes, a sextant helps to give you a position, whether on land or at sea, what’s your point? Add some space and time into the equation.. try creating a parallax using the same near-horizon constellations when you cross the Atlantic and you’ll see the conundrum of the flat earth model.
Why is the moon round then? And the sun... Venus...Mars...I could go on. Why would our planet be a different shape from all the rest? How is that logical?
(A hollow core makes perfect sense, though. No idea who, if anyone, has actual facts about it, but it sure is a fun concept.)
This vid has a 5 min intro I would suggest skipping, but this guy discusses the seismology of a hollow earth. The scientific data seems to fit with a hollow model better. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zb2xMtRxVgM
Makes plenty of sense IF Earth is flat...God created the Earth for us and there are planets with other shapes......this is one of the dumbest arguements made to counter FLAT EARTH.....
NOT saying Flat Earth is true, saying that this arguement is bogus.
Another type of dumb argument.....make a dumb argument and then claim that if one doesnt believe that aruguemnt then there is nothing else that can be done.......
Im sure there are MUCH better ways to show evidence of the world being round other than "All these other things we see in the sky are round, so this must be as well"
If the Earth is flat it doesnt mean other objects in the sky we choose to call planets must be round.
It seems to fit really well with the Aether theory of existence. As above so below right?
So what we see as matter/atoms are Aether (flow/energy) flowing in the form of a toroidal flow pattern (vortexes on the top/bottom flowing outwards and back around if that makes sense). The same pattern as the magnetic field around a magnet.
The largest toroidal flow pattern would be the universe itself (some scientists seem to think the universe is in a giant toroidal shape, Itzhak Bentov, Nassim Haramein, etc.
We see Black Holes sometimes have galactic jets coming from the poles (what would happen if you accelerate matter/energy really fast into the poles of a toroidal flow pattern, and it can't all make it in, some would be ejected really fast in a narrow band right at the center of that vortex. Pulsars have jets of energy coming outwards right in that same way.
In the case of planets, it would make perfect sense that matter would start to coalesce right on the outer part of that toroidal pattern leading to a hollow space inside.
However nothing would be completely hollow. And I don't know the correct terminology to attempt to describe what that would be at the very center. Perhaps a singularity? Something extremely energy dense. Something "not of this world". Not matter, but the source of matter/the flip-side of matter. Spirit. Pure potential. The non-manifest.
Terrible at attempting to actually articulate/describe what I'm trying to say, but hopefully someone will find this interesting.
I've seen many things from the thunderbolts project but this is the first I've heard about see the pattern. Just checked them out and I already can tell they're awesome! Thanks so much for that!
Yeah he is very good at breaking things down into understandable parts, and goes in depth on topics. Vey smart guy I can’t believe he doesn’t get more views yet. He does do guest videos on thunderbolts too. All good stuff the Electric Universe Theory is cutting edge
Hey, for you and for others to see. This is a great channel definitely worth archiving in case something ever happens to it (a large Aether Physics playlist on youtube just got wiped the other week). I'm archiving the entire channel to my local drive.
If the channel ever disappears don't hesitate to ask and I'll send you a copy of all the videos. (This goes for anyone reading this.)
Ball earth skeptics do not believe the earth is a BALL about 26,000 miles. We have no idea the shape , flat, egg, bowl or even a globe 1000 times bigger.
We just know it is not what we are taught .
Im watching your video. Now watch this one, please. I’m always open to a compelling argument. I’m not sure if the earth is flat or a different shape - I think nasa is lying about a lot. The question is why?
Most flat earthers don’t care one way or the other, the issue is the intent to occlude the truth. Dig into tartaria and you’ll see the extent people go through to hide facts.
Please. I humbly beg you. And thanks for sharing your info too.
many years ago, I was asked to join the flat earth society by a guy wearing a tshirt that said he was in the flat earth society. I asked him about it. he said it was a joke to see how many people take it seriously. I guess that joke got out of hand.
40-50% of the earth’s crust is flat with a slope of less than 2’. Abyssal Plains. Bolivian salt flats are 4000 square miles with less than 3’ slope. Air pressure cannot be maintained against a vacuum without a container. Michelson Morely experiment (validated in 1986) proved that the earth doesn’t rotate. Aery’s experiment failed to proved earth earth rotation. Just sayin - either its a much larger planet in a geocentric universe or a flat earth.
I once reluctantly started watching a video of "100 flat earth proofs". I watched the first two or three, and it was the most horrible pile of bull. Stopped watching, it was just a joke. Very simple geometry misunderstandings etc. For me this is proof that it is driven by paid shills. "People fight it so that makes it true!"
Ya I had no idea who that guy was, he didn't mention he's a freemason good to know. lol. But science and geometry are the same for all of us. Freemasons are notorious for worshipping this stuff (the creation), I don't. I just like to know the whole truth :)
Im not in disagreement with you. I think Randall’s work is really important. I’ve also met Mason who would at least appear to be decent people. I don’t think being a Mason automatically makes you a worshiper of Satan. Lots of the founding fathers were masons. I just think masonry is used to conceal more nefarious stuff at the higher levels.
It's funny how both Pepes and Normies, can have almost polar opposite views on lots of recent events. But then both groups can then sound a bit like a chorus agreeing that Flat Earth is for idiots. Seems strange.
Are you absolutely serious? Mate there is dust in the air. How can you see through thousands of kilometres of dust, refracted light, and all sorts of atmospheric disturbances? I can’t even see the mountains across unless it’s 100% clear. You have to be more honest than that.
There are pictures out there of the Alps taken from Spain. And opposite shores across large lakes that should be impossible to see. I don't know what it means, but it's certainly interesting.
Like 'trust the science'?
I'm keeping an open mind on Flat vs Globe!
Same. I know NASA is fake and what they say is "space" is fake. I'm leaning more towards Flat Earth than towards what they taught me in public school. But I'm open-minded and don't have to "know" until it's proven to me satisfactorily one way or another. With how deep those DUMBs go, it seems we have a lot to learn about what is above us and below us.
Me too
I never went far down this rabbit hole but some of their arguments are interesting. There was a thermal video on gab yesterday where the man was showing clouds behind the moon. Which does seem strange. The math is what really seems to make it illogical but then the math is so perfect it almost makes me wonder if it's made up. I'll never be in space so I'll never know.
It’s the only way. Open minds and open hearts.
The point is, checking things, proving things to yourself. Just remaining in the dark is lazy, and cowardly frankly. Science is real, and so are lies....learn to differentiate, just like you did with covid.
Easy way to tell that stuff like Flat Earth and Hollow Earth are bullshit: YouTube doesn't ban videos promoting it.
Actually FE is highly suppressed and our government Actually runs the FE society as disinformation against the real FE people. So, there is that.
Oh so now there's "real" flat Earth vs fake? Flat Earthers, the ultimate goalpost movers.
The flat earth society has always been controlled op.
Lol.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation." -
Truth.
Just remember, EVERYTHING you think you know is a lie. To be a globalist you also need to be an evolutionist which means you came from an ape.
I didn't think there was any potential credibility to flat earth until google started censoring it and slapping misinformation labels on it.
Now I just question everything and admit that I don't know the truth about our universe
Is this a joke? Maybe the shape of the planet really doesn't mean that much to me and I don't mind saying I don't know?
Neil deGrasse Tyson one of "the" science talking heads, Says you can't see the "curve" even at airplane heights.
And now you see why what q told us this shit should always be questioned....neil & nasa, those are satanist, satan is the prince of lies, so they always lie. Never listen to anything they say, period.
From my experiments I felt like I could see a curve, but there are atmospheric disturbances that can make it seem as though there is especially when using a camera mounted on a rocket.
If pro FE shit gets locked/deleted than so should this shit.
Yes, everything is a lie except the earth is indeed round.
How can you trust nothing of what is forced on us except this?!
A disk and a sphere are both round.
Those of us who have navigated using the stars know that it is not flat. I don’t think flat earthers are ‘retarded’ though and questioning narratives and so-called facts is great, but I know from experience they are wrong.
Just observing how the stars are different between the North and South hemispheres is enough to put the idea to rest.
No flerf will ever address this issue because it is impossible.
Also, this.
Of course. I didn't think of that one. Simple examples that one theory explains and the other doesn't is grounds for immediate rejection of the latter.
https://youtu.be/xnbs1s8DKVs
sextant works on flat and ball earth.
Yes, a sextant helps to give you a position, whether on land or at sea, what’s your point? Add some space and time into the equation.. try creating a parallax using the same near-horizon constellations when you cross the Atlantic and you’ll see the conundrum of the flat earth model.
https://youtu.be/rUINzxXlIlo
To those here who do think the earth is flat...
Why is the moon round then? And the sun... Venus...Mars...I could go on. Why would our planet be a different shape from all the rest? How is that logical?
(A hollow core makes perfect sense, though. No idea who, if anyone, has actual facts about it, but it sure is a fun concept.)
Why would God make the Earth flat but everything else round? Flat Earth tards never seem to want to answer that one.
This whole topic makes me feel like I'm too dumb for this world.
This vid has a 5 min intro I would suggest skipping, but this guy discusses the seismology of a hollow earth. The scientific data seems to fit with a hollow model better. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zb2xMtRxVgM
Makes plenty of sense IF Earth is flat...God created the Earth for us and there are planets with other shapes......this is one of the dumbest arguements made to counter FLAT EARTH.....
NOT saying Flat Earth is true, saying that this arguement is bogus.
If you think that's a dumb argument, I don't think there's anything else I can say that you'll believe either.
Another type of dumb argument.....make a dumb argument and then claim that if one doesnt believe that aruguemnt then there is nothing else that can be done.......
Im sure there are MUCH better ways to show evidence of the world being round other than "All these other things we see in the sky are round, so this must be as well"
If the Earth is flat it doesnt mean other objects in the sky we choose to call planets must be round.
It’s a dumb argument.
Not as dumb as thinking something round is flat lmao
That’s a really dumb statement
https://youtu.be/KAqzze-_WRU
It seems to fit really well with the Aether theory of existence. As above so below right?
So what we see as matter/atoms are Aether (flow/energy) flowing in the form of a toroidal flow pattern (vortexes on the top/bottom flowing outwards and back around if that makes sense). The same pattern as the magnetic field around a magnet.
The largest toroidal flow pattern would be the universe itself (some scientists seem to think the universe is in a giant toroidal shape, Itzhak Bentov, Nassim Haramein, etc.
We see Black Holes sometimes have galactic jets coming from the poles (what would happen if you accelerate matter/energy really fast into the poles of a toroidal flow pattern, and it can't all make it in, some would be ejected really fast in a narrow band right at the center of that vortex. Pulsars have jets of energy coming outwards right in that same way.
In the case of planets, it would make perfect sense that matter would start to coalesce right on the outer part of that toroidal pattern leading to a hollow space inside.
However nothing would be completely hollow. And I don't know the correct terminology to attempt to describe what that would be at the very center. Perhaps a singularity? Something extremely energy dense. Something "not of this world". Not matter, but the source of matter/the flip-side of matter. Spirit. Pure potential. The non-manifest.
Terrible at attempting to actually articulate/describe what I'm trying to say, but hopefully someone will find this interesting.
You are probably closer than most on this. Some good channels to check out are ‘see the pattern’ and ‘thunderbolts project’
I've seen many things from the thunderbolts project but this is the first I've heard about see the pattern. Just checked them out and I already can tell they're awesome! Thanks so much for that!
Yeah he is very good at breaking things down into understandable parts, and goes in depth on topics. Vey smart guy I can’t believe he doesn’t get more views yet. He does do guest videos on thunderbolts too. All good stuff the Electric Universe Theory is cutting edge
Hey, for you and for others to see. This is a great channel definitely worth archiving in case something ever happens to it (a large Aether Physics playlist on youtube just got wiped the other week). I'm archiving the entire channel to my local drive.
If the channel ever disappears don't hesitate to ask and I'll send you a copy of all the videos. (This goes for anyone reading this.)
I wouldn't dismiss that outright...not sure it would be my first guess, but if you have more info on that, I'd be happy to look at it.
Kek! No worries fren.
To all of you claiming that FE is legit because Big Tech censors it:
Have you ever considered that this is done on purpose so that FE is lumped in with other “conspiracy theories” like Q so that Q can be discredited?
Speaking of Q, he explicitly said that the earth isn’t flat, so take what you will from that.
Ball earth skeptics do not believe the earth is a BALL about 26,000 miles. We have no idea the shape , flat, egg, bowl or even a globe 1000 times bigger. We just know it is not what we are taught .
Im watching your video. Now watch this one, please. I’m always open to a compelling argument. I’m not sure if the earth is flat or a different shape - I think nasa is lying about a lot. The question is why?
Most flat earthers don’t care one way or the other, the issue is the intent to occlude the truth. Dig into tartaria and you’ll see the extent people go through to hide facts.
Please. I humbly beg you. And thanks for sharing your info too.
https://youtu.be/Ye0Dldqmt3I
many years ago, I was asked to join the flat earth society by a guy wearing a tshirt that said he was in the flat earth society. I asked him about it. he said it was a joke to see how many people take it seriously. I guess that joke got out of hand.
40-50% of the earth’s crust is flat with a slope of less than 2’. Abyssal Plains. Bolivian salt flats are 4000 square miles with less than 3’ slope. Air pressure cannot be maintained against a vacuum without a container. Michelson Morely experiment (validated in 1986) proved that the earth doesn’t rotate. Aery’s experiment failed to proved earth earth rotation. Just sayin - either its a much larger planet in a geocentric universe or a flat earth.
What I want to know is: “what’s happening in Antarctica?
https://youtu.be/DoX27ItX22M
I once reluctantly started watching a video of "100 flat earth proofs". I watched the first two or three, and it was the most horrible pile of bull. Stopped watching, it was just a joke. Very simple geometry misunderstandings etc. For me this is proof that it is driven by paid shills. "People fight it so that makes it true!"
The earth is central and stationary.
https://files.catbox.moe/evxafz.mp4
That and young Earth. To paraphrase Bruno "your god is too small."
Oh man Randall Carlson has entered the chat
Randall Carlson rules, but he’s also a high ranking Freemason which makes some people here upset. Just good for thought.
Ya I had no idea who that guy was, he didn't mention he's a freemason good to know. lol. But science and geometry are the same for all of us. Freemasons are notorious for worshipping this stuff (the creation), I don't. I just like to know the whole truth :)
"Oh no, we have to ban geometry because mason's use it" would be peak retardation.
Im not in disagreement with you. I think Randall’s work is really important. I’ve also met Mason who would at least appear to be decent people. I don’t think being a Mason automatically makes you a worshiper of Satan. Lots of the founding fathers were masons. I just think masonry is used to conceal more nefarious stuff at the higher levels.
To anyone with an interest in this subject (for, against, neutral), please join us on flatearthresearch to exchange and explore our views further!
This was a little “numerology” for my taste, and of course doesn’t establish the shape of anything - but i do enjoy greek-style geometery.
It's funny how both Pepes and Normies, can have almost polar opposite views on lots of recent events. But then both groups can then sound a bit like a chorus agreeing that Flat Earth is for idiots. Seems strange.
There is a very simple proof that the Earth is not flat.
What is the highest point on earth? Mount Everest
If the Earth is flat and Mount Everest is the highest point on earth, then everyone on a flat earth should be able to see Mount Everest.
Oh, you can't see Mount Everest? Guess the Earth isn't flat...
Are you absolutely serious? Mate there is dust in the air. How can you see through thousands of kilometres of dust, refracted light, and all sorts of atmospheric disturbances? I can’t even see the mountains across unless it’s 100% clear. You have to be more honest than that.
There are pictures out there of the Alps taken from Spain. And opposite shores across large lakes that should be impossible to see. I don't know what it means, but it's certainly interesting.
That is interesting because how does that work unless light curves?
And yet you can't see the opposite shore of Lake Tahoe with binoculars.
But you can still see it…
Humidity+ distance . That's why you can see farther in dry air like the desert.
I don't believe in Flat Earth, but I do believe the Earth is hollow! Hell is inside the Earth and you sure don't want to go there!
Agreed and look up ‘expanding earth’ for some great visuals
Up until a year ago, I would have called you out as uninformed. After digging deeper, I think you are right.
Earth doesn't need to be a Ball to have a Hell bellow.
Does if inside of earth!
Yes there are a multitude of other scientific methods to show as well. My personal fav is the magnetic field of the earth itself.