Whistleblower disguising it as a setting in the future. Dang near everything in that book had already been happening when he wrote it. Most especially the fake wars and wholesale rewriting of history.
He was friends with all those progressive commies if I'm not mistaken. Sure he writes about anti-communism but we all know socialism is communism light. Orwell and Huxley both wrote for tavistock institute. Orwell was a self-described democratic socialist.
Everyone who is "popular" via repetition is mostly a handler of Satan. Just look at who is popular now. Kim Kardashian, LiL Naz, Cardi-b, Demi Lovotto is back with a new degenerate antichrist album cover. ... To be famous or popular is to just be a handler programmer of the masses IMO.
Current official members of the "Democratic Socialist Party"
A. Ocasio-Cortez
Rashida Tlaib
Cori Bush
Jamaal Bowman,
Bernie Sanders calls himself a “Social Democrat” He is also the only Senator that is a member of the “Congressional Progressive Caucus” created in 1991.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is made up of nearly 100 members. It is chaired by Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), alongside CPC Deputy Chair, Congresswoman Katie Porter (CA-45), and CPC Whip, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (MN-05).
The name "Socialist" was replaced by "Social Democrats" because many American associated the term "socialism" with Marxism–Leninism. So to trick them they changed the name.
After the the 1972 Convention, the majority (Unity Caucus) Michael Harrington, resigned his membership in SDUSA and he and some of his supporters from the Coalition Caucus soon formed the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee (DSOC).[9] Many members of the Debs Caucus resigned from SDUSA and some of them formed the Socialist Party USA.[10] The changing of the name of the SPA to SDUSA and the 1973 formation of DSOC and the SPUSA represented a split in the American socialist movement.
I've wondered this exact thought myself. I think it's either 2 or 3; his novel, 1984, is too dead-on-balls accurate to what became their playbook. Definitely not 1 (a truther ahead of his time), IMHO.
I was always told he was a higher up in one of the mason/brotherhood type orgs so he was in on it at first. Whether he defected or was doing his job idk, some claim he was killed for his revelations while in hospital?
Not always, but in this case its an accurate write-up, from what I know. I would be very surprised to find there were any skeletons in his cupboard. There were, and still are, a lot of decent people in the world.
Someone suggested his book 1984 was originally titled 1948, but he was being monitored and pressure from _ prompted a numerical shift. Likely a mix of all three choices 1,2 &3.
The answer to OP's question can be found in this superb docu/drama film (link below) that reconstructs Orwell's life using only things he wrote as the dialogue. As he was a superb essayist and journalist he captured how his life unfolded in literature, leaving us with a record of from where and how his ideas were formed. From being a military policeman and watching a condemned man hang, to reading knowingly false propaganda on BBC News, to being shot in the throat whilst fighting in the Spanish civil war, his life experiences shaped him in profound ways until the entirety of it all came together in the writing of 1984.
My God, he wasn't anything other than a man who observed ground politics, and saw what it was, and said so. He was around before most of us were around. He wrote "1984" with the original title of "1948", but his publishers thought that was too edgy. No asset. No truther. Just Orwell.
Milton William Cooper Aka Bill copper, the guy that predicted 9/11 months before it happened and knew it would be blamed on Bin Laden spoke about Orwell. He stated that Orwell was a intelligence officer in the royal service and as a result had access to top secret stuff with in the British government. He said Orwell was a whistleblower and his way of doing it was fiction novels. Bill Cooper has been dead accurate on things including school shootings, 9/11 and the fake alien distraction. I believe his take on Orwell. Bill Cooper wasn’t a fan of Alex Jones. Called him out on his bull shit.
He wasn't any of these, this is just rewriting the past in the light of the present, something which never works. He was a journalist, author and social commentator.
He was a disciple of Huxley, who in turn was part of the British establishment. The two debated what the dystopian future would look like in their private correspondence, with Huxley basically telling Orwell (pen name) that Orwell's vision of the future required overt control over the population. Huxley stated that the people would be happily subjugated, no need for overt enslavement of the people. They would own nothing and be happy..
and amping it up to horrifying extremes so people could see it....
sounds like some kind of plan.
He was friends with all those progressive commies if I'm not mistaken. Sure he writes about anti-communism but we all know socialism is communism light. Orwell and Huxley both wrote for tavistock institute. Orwell was a self-described democratic socialist.
Everyone who is "popular" via repetition is mostly a handler of Satan. Just look at who is popular now. Kim Kardashian, LiL Naz, Cardi-b, Demi Lovotto is back with a new degenerate antichrist album cover. ... To be famous or popular is to just be a handler programmer of the masses IMO.
Current official members of the "Democratic Socialist Party"
Bernie Sanders calls himself a “Social Democrat” He is also the only Senator that is a member of the “Congressional Progressive Caucus” created in 1991.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is made up of nearly 100 members. It is chaired by Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), alongside CPC Deputy Chair, Congresswoman Katie Porter (CA-45), and CPC Whip, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (MN-05).
List of all Congress Members part of this "OFFICIAL" commie club. https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members
In 1972 The Socialist Party of America changed its name to “Social Democrat”, by a vote of 73 to 34. Replacing the socialist label with "social democrats," was meant to disassociate the ideology of SDUSA with that of the Soviet Union.” Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1972/12/31/archives/socialist-party-now-the-social-democrats-usa.html?
The name "Socialist" was replaced by "Social Democrats" because many American associated the term "socialism" with Marxism–Leninism. So to trick them they changed the name.
After the the 1972 Convention, the majority (Unity Caucus) Michael Harrington, resigned his membership in SDUSA and he and some of his supporters from the Coalition Caucus soon formed the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee (DSOC).[9] Many members of the Debs Caucus resigned from SDUSA and some of them formed the Socialist Party USA.[10] The changing of the name of the SPA to SDUSA and the 1973 formation of DSOC and the SPUSA represented a split in the American socialist movement.
Nice idea, OP! A great topic for discussion, and I can't wait to see what people come up with!
I've wondered this exact thought myself. I think it's either 2 or 3; his novel, 1984, is too dead-on-balls accurate to what became their playbook. Definitely not 1 (a truther ahead of his time), IMHO.
I was always told he was a higher up in one of the mason/brotherhood type orgs so he was in on it at first. Whether he defected or was doing his job idk, some claim he was killed for his revelations while in hospital?
I believe he died within a year or so of the publication of 1984
Two Minute Video:
GEORGE ORWELL’S FINAL WARNING: DON’T LET THIS HAPPEN. IT DEPENDS ON YOU!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gGD9wP5tNqSm/
thanks for that link. amazing.
Don't think there was anything dodgy about him. Interesting read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell
Nobody wanted to print Animal Farm so doubt very much that #2 or 3 apply. I go with #1.
Wikipedia is not exactly gospel truth.
Not always, but in this case its an accurate write-up, from what I know. I would be very surprised to find there were any skeletons in his cupboard. There were, and still are, a lot of decent people in the world.
Someone suggested his book 1984 was originally titled 1948, but he was being monitored and pressure from _ prompted a numerical shift. Likely a mix of all three choices 1,2 &3.
Liberty lover!
The answer to OP's question can be found in this superb docu/drama film (link below) that reconstructs Orwell's life using only things he wrote as the dialogue. As he was a superb essayist and journalist he captured how his life unfolded in literature, leaving us with a record of from where and how his ideas were formed. From being a military policeman and watching a condemned man hang, to reading knowingly false propaganda on BBC News, to being shot in the throat whilst fighting in the Spanish civil war, his life experiences shaped him in profound ways until the entirety of it all came together in the writing of 1984.
This is an excellent and rewarding watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6txpumkY5I&ab_channel=AlbionNoise
My God, he wasn't anything other than a man who observed ground politics, and saw what it was, and said so. He was around before most of us were around. He wrote "1984" with the original title of "1948", but his publishers thought that was too edgy. No asset. No truther. Just Orwell.
Milton William Cooper Aka Bill copper, the guy that predicted 9/11 months before it happened and knew it would be blamed on Bin Laden spoke about Orwell. He stated that Orwell was a intelligence officer in the royal service and as a result had access to top secret stuff with in the British government. He said Orwell was a whistleblower and his way of doing it was fiction novels. Bill Cooper has been dead accurate on things including school shootings, 9/11 and the fake alien distraction. I believe his take on Orwell. Bill Cooper wasn’t a fan of Alex Jones. Called him out on his bull shit.
He wasn't any of these, this is just rewriting the past in the light of the present, something which never works. He was a journalist, author and social commentator.
I’ve assumed he was a controlled asset. Curious to see what others think.
He was a disciple of Huxley, who in turn was part of the British establishment. The two debated what the dystopian future would look like in their private correspondence, with Huxley basically telling Orwell (pen name) that Orwell's vision of the future required overt control over the population. Huxley stated that the people would be happily subjugated, no need for overt enslavement of the people. They would own nothing and be happy..
Sometimes I think Orwell must have been a time traveler.
How are 2 and 3 not the same. You are controlled if they have satanic karma over you.
I believe he’s #2 option
controlled asset
family was deep in