FEMA or whatever agency handles disasters these days, says they will send out an alert informing the population to take their iodine tablets, should nuclear fallout be a concern. But when did they tell people to have some on hand?
Organ harvesting. I saw a documentary on a tibetan tribe being tricked into "selling" their kidneys and wanted to see if that stuff was happening in the states. I looked for organ donations on craigslist and ended up finding a guy who was looking for kidney donors. I strung him along for a while, trying to get as much info as I could. He was going to fly me down to Miami and have a surgeon take it out. He said he donated his and it was the best decision he ever made. I asked for pictures of the surgical scar, the surgeons name, etc. He started to catch on that I was skeptical and changed his stance. He then slipped up and said I didn't want the money. This whole time, it was assumed I was donating my kidney. I called him out and said he should be turned into the cops. He got mad and tried making the case he was a good guy. Organ harvesting is happening all over the world. Just gotta look.
Also the moon landing (as we know it) was staged in a studio.
He was a disciple of Huxley, who in turn was part of the British establishment. The two debated what the dystopian future would look like in their private correspondence, with Huxley basically telling Orwell (pen name) that Orwell's vision of the future required overt control over the population. Huxley stated that the people would be happily subjugated, no need for overt enslavement of the people. They would own nothing and be happy..
Best doc I've seen regarding the moon missions being faked. Worth a watch. Debunks a lot of "proofs".
Watch the doc American Moon, you can find it on YouTube. I believe there is a route that can avoid the worst parts of the van Allen radiation belts, but that's not the route the Apollo missions took. They went straight through the bad parts and then back through the same parts. Up until 1969, even months before it, the radiation was a real concern. There was no solution. People started stepping down in the months leading up to the mission. Then suddenly they just quit talking about the belts and pretended it was no longer a problem. Then they staged the moon landing. Whether or not we went with another crew and landed there or not is a different debate.
Think about it. Google already knows everything anyone does, who they talk to, where they go, etc. That information is available but not admissable. Create some new tech that can identify people and then you have a way to use the surveillance Google has on hand. A digital camera has fingerprints. Has for a long time.
X-22 report has been around for about 10 years now, I think. Those of us that have listened for a long time have had to endure a lot of incorrect predictions. His sources are so different than other people's though. He's a good follow, just long winded. He used to do two 1-hour reports each day, for years. He did a geopolitical report and a financial report. Not sure if he's still doing that. Best thing I garnered from Dave was an introduction to Harley Schlanger from La Rouche PAC. Check him out if you haven't heard of him.
For what it's worth, back in the early 2000s, folks were leaving messages in his comments sections or wherever they could get visibility, that he worked for mossad and wouldn't touch Israel. I personally don't know, nor do I really care. Information is information, you have to do your own due diligence no matter the source. But he's been suspected of being a foreign agent for a LONG time.
A breakdown of the sequence of events by Tracy Beanz
https://rattibha.com/thread/1163574214030438402?lang=en
And for what it's worth, I think frazzle drip is probably Frazzled.rip
Unfortunately what Quixotic is explaining is a legitimate concern. The quality of sourcing in this subculture has dramatically declined as the platforms have been systematically targeted.
It used to be the responsibility of the OP to do their own research, or at least link to a source that "baked the bread".
Now the movement is fragmented, making it easier to spread disinformation where people readily spread it due to confirmation bias. Someone probably read that headline and is now telling their friends as if it's fact. That's the state of the movement. We need higher standards.
Dr. Ardis seems like a good guy, but a lot of his theory was based on googling stuff. Too much speculation to believe that he cracked some sort of code. I do appreciate all his work and his theory needs to be explored further, but let's not jump to any conclusions just yet.
Arterial blood is bright red (loaded with oxygen). If they got shot in the leg and there's bright red blood, likely a femoral artery. Going to need a tourniquet. I see they got a guy doing makeshift tourniquets in the pic. Did they drag these people off the subway car? Did they get shot where they stand/lay? Where's the trail of blood? Blood on their shoes? Going to be a lot of blood if it's arterial.