PROOF Apollo 11 was 100% REAL!! 🤭 Bitchute link. Start watching at 1:45
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (74)
sorted by:
Thank you...Been looking for something like this...Fantastic...👌👍
With pleasure fren
👌🙏🏻...Im trying to tell 'people' on another thread about NASA who are "otherwise" convinced...😉
https://youtu.be/NQII-O6Nn2U
watch this first space walk video. at the 37s mark or so the guy turns his head and waves to the camera....except the helmets on those suits don't turn. Total California Raisins. The stop motion animator got a little too creative.
Lol. Thermal glove!
I was looking this up, and there are lots of results are saying those suits could in fact turn their heads. (this was a google search). Here's on example (it's Quora) https://www.quora.com/Could-astronauts-ever-swivel-their-helmets-independently-from-their-body-during-spacewalks
Searching yandex with the same prompt, there was nothing relevant that showed up.
My conclusion: Google meddling in the truth yet again and is on to this notion.
FE is a CIA psyop designed to provoke noise during a logical discussion.
Everyone immediately jumps into the FE-thread (sensitive topic derailed). Then all participants are labeled "FE-tard". No more discussion of the original idea.
Most I know don't believe that it is a round ball/pear . We just know it is not what they show and tell us.
correct.
It's agent smith syndrome in real-time.
Yet when I doubt Artemis I get called a flerfer!
Only way to challenge their beliefs is to ridicule them.
What would you reckon is the most accurate model for our world?
Hollow Earth. It is backed up by math and explains why satellites never go directly over the poles, why there are no satellite images of the South Pole Station, and why the Inuit and Taymyr cultures both believe in a warm paradise to the north, where there is only ice and cold (supposedly) for thousands of miles.
The only website that really talks about it is Biblioteca Pleyades. It's a lot to digest but for geography nerds like me it's a treasure trove.
I find the hollow earth theory fascinating. Very interesting to consider the Inuit and Taymyr legends.
If I recall correctly, at one point drilling one of those super deep holes in Russia, they struck salt water? The ocean on the inside? Very interesting.
Also in certain NASA experiments (so take with a grain of salt), they were able to demonstrate that in zero g, spinning bodies of water will form voids in the center, perhaps due to centrifugal force. Perhaps the same happens with planetary bodies?
There are two books I recommend on this subject.
The Kingdom of Agarttha, and the Smoky God.
Also Rear Admiral Richard Byrd wrote about hollow earth in his lost journal later published by his son. Absolutely fascinating perspective.
Iron republic , also good read
Hey thank you
Describing the shape of the earth is another topic. Also a way heavier topic for your brain to actually think about. Not because it’s too complicated to understand. It’s actually much more simple than the model you have in your head right now.
I’m not trying to brag in any way, but aslong you think in terms of big bang, space, universe, planets etc… than you won’t be able to understand our true nature and and world we’re living in. Because all of that was designed to deceive us all.
Best way to describe it is, everything is the opposite of what you think it is.
Let me tell you something very simple but also it sounds ver crazy: There’s No Space
Space only exists in Hollywood movies.
Try to wrap you head around that one first. And ask me more later.
Oh I've heard all of the theories. I find this stuff very interesting.
I'd like to read some elaboration on what you think the model is.
Since I’m autistic about this subject I’ll make another thread later and I’ll tag you in it.
But tell me first!
Would you be able to imagine that this earth itself is actually endless instead of “space” itself?
I have a very active imagination and I enjoy analyzing these theories.
My one counterpoint would be to point out the billions of dollars that seem to go towards black budget projects, particularly with the Navy and the Air Force, including several space planes such as the Star-Raker and other, and even more advanced propulsion systems such as the Magnetic disruption field described in regards to the famous TR3-B, the magneto hydrodanamic drives patented by Mr. King, and score upon scores of other questionable reports.
And keep in mind, there are so many eyewitnesses to black triangles it's not even funny. I've even seen one.
Why all the money if there's no way out?
And allow me to answer my own question: Perhaps it's all just air dominance, and perhaps there is no space as you suggest, but rather, shit that's just really high up there. Or it could just be money laundering.
It's an extremely interesting concept, especially when you factor in propaganda programs and long periods of time. As you correctly point out, there is a large decades long effort to communicate to the populace ideas about space. The question is, are those notions springing forth from scientific research or intentional misdirection?
Recall what that one CIA director said about their disinformation campaign.
We've caught NASA lying before, and their antics are sometimes quite hilarious. I particularly enjoy the women using hair gel to make their hair stick straight out in a ridiculous attempt to simulate zero gravity. And also the one individual adjusting the trajectory of another doing a backflip, supposedly in zero gee, by tugging on what appears to be a wire attached to his belt holding him up, like in a Hollywood set. I'm sure you're aware of what I'm mentioning.
If I were a betting man, I would posit that the Earth is a planet, and that their is space, but that the information surrounding space is mostly false. Queue Van Allen radiation belt discussions. Did we go to the Moon? Maybe. Did they show us what happened on the Moon (provided they did actually go)? No. Absolutely not. Why would they? Armstrong is a liar. It's clear as day.
But note I make this claim from my heavily indoctrinated point of view, with imperfect and incomplete information.
Regardless, I would be overjoyed to see you post some more content. I find all of this extremely fascinating.
Cool to hear that you have an active imagination!
I’m not disproving clearly existing technology.
If you want my thoughts on that check my previous post
“There Are No Aliens” https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTfnwXmn/there-are-no-aliens/
Definitely it’s a money scheme. Most interesting part it’s more important for them to deceive us. They need us distracted so they can hide our history from us.
If you truly have an active imagination, you would be more amazed about the hidden history of earth! Let me share a 6hour long documentary about the Lost History of Flat Earth
Keep in mind the the earth is not a disk in space, it’s flat and endless.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/n9q6RKTLfar1/
I know it’s a very long docu, but once you start it you’ll get hooked.
It start with our past in 1800, and it shows you how absurd our current written history is.
fake space huh? I dunno. I'm more of an Electric Universe fan myself.
Our world is quite electric, you’re definitely not far from it. In our world the higher you go the more charged electric particles you will find. The lower you go the more less charged particles you will find.
The world is basically like gigantic battery with the poles up and down.
When the air is ionized enough lightning can find it’s way down to earth.
Exactly right - the earth has its own charge field. Let’s of good stuff over on the thunderbolts project channel, I like it bc it’s a nice non-political break from info but still interesting and well researched
Satellites are not in space?
99% of internet goes through under sea cables.
https://youtu.be/yd1JhZzoS6A
And when you point your dish antenna to the sky and get TV, how do you explain that?
From a television transmitter mast.
Very good question!
Here explains it how they do it 😉
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTkVjumf/real-satellites-of-nasa-/.
The bible and the Jewish have one.
All I hear is what is this? and what is that? Do yourself a favor and go look at the hardware in person. I watched the Atlas five launch vehicle fly. Power beyond comprehension. It flew and so did many more. They got better as they went along. Except for one failed mission.Even bringing along a car to drive on the moon. The cars which my uncle helped design and build. I guess I may be missing something but this video proves absolutely nothing.
I have to disappoint you fren. All of that happened in a Hollywood studio…
Yea... I didn't get these new "truthers" they are sceptic of Gov, big biz,and establishment . But believe everything about space they are told by same people.
That’s why I’m telling many pedes over here, that they’re far from awake, same applies for myself.
TY! I put a bad analogy on here the other day and it didn’t fare well. But the moon landing/globe belief is like the “Santa Claus” for adults... may be still a bad analogy but I enjoyed the clip! Definitely some much needed GA
This is GOLD!!! Well... about a third gold...they ran out of tape. 😂
Oh FFS.
No air, not altimeter. Used a radar instead.
No windows? Bullshit, windows were on the other side of the ship.
Painfully easy to debunk bullshit.
How much electric power you think a radar back in 70's might have used? More than a car battery? That's all it had. And how much energy you think is needed to broadcast from the moon?
296 amps a hour . Radar, broadcast video and sound. I don't buy that.
Can you explain to me how electricity works in space, without earth’s magnetic field?
You know a solar flare can act as an EMP and knock most of our electric grid off. So what type of Ozone layer does the moon has to block radiation from the sun so no electric equipment gets fried or humans don’t cook as of they’re in a microwave.
What type of cooling did they use?
I hope you understand the importance of an ozone layer
Earth’s ozone layer reach out from 15 to 40 km away.
The moon is 384.400 km away from earth.
Bingo.
Congrats for your diploma, I bet you worked your ass off for it.
Still now days there’s no technology that can explain how to go through the Van Allan Radiation Belt. Without harming humans and electric equipments. Or even sending signals through it…
I was accepted into MIT and a couple other places full scholarship before I could legally drive. Studied quantum mechanics, nuclear chemistry, biochemistry and other stuff to get multiple degrees, including programming. (Never applied to Brown, but then I wasn't looking at electronics.) Your pedigree is nice, but I still have the same question as OP above- how does electricity work out in space, in a vacuum? How does a planet with no atmosphere welcome a manned lander?
How does a rocket lander set itself down without making a new crater underneath?
How do we get treated to a live interactive feed from Mars when it takes a day for data to travel one way?
Why the heck does everybody in space walk like they're underwater?!
Oh, I know. Reminded of a quote that I can't quite place atm - turns out that in all the history books, the good guys always won, what a coincidence!
That's BS
Can you tell me where to find that?
https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/ApolloLMRadarTND6849.pdf
https://www.quora.com/How-much-power-was-required-to-transmit-a-video-signal-from-the-Moon-to-Earth-in-1969
#owned
Interesting read. Still same question ( I could not find in info you linked) Everything I see to power a radar is measured in Milliwatts. Moon lander>>>> Power- 28 V DC, 115 V 400 Hz AC , Batteries - two 28–32-volt, 296 ampere hour silver-zinc.
Doesn't seem like anuff power.
Electricity doesn’t work in space, to much radiation
Electricity only works here on earth
Look into the Mars landers not actually being on Mars. Up here in Northern Canada somewhere iirc.
Exactly!
PS. You’ve watched to much Wall-E
CT my
pmsl with the commentary.
Hu?