I honestly don't care if someone is gay or not. I've known a lot of gay people in my life, and most are perfectly normal, hard working and genuinely nice people. Several of them were married couples, or had been together as couples for years. I never judged one of them, nor had any right to.
I do draw the line at Drag Queen Story Hour for children, or holding a Drag Queen strip show for children at a local bar. Pride parades are fine... but not people dressed in thongs or completely naked parading through towns in front of children. I don't honestly care what adults do at an adults-only festival or event. I do care if it involves under-aged kids. I also care when kids are being brainwashed by school teachers and administrators.
I think most gay people are just as sickened by what we are seeing as the rest of us obviously are. It's the tiny minority that keep pushing this garbage. They are doing it to DIVIDE people. They want to increase hatred... and polarize a discussion so there is no middle ground. That's why they keep pushing the extremes.
THEY happen to be the main stream media, some of our elected officials, BIG TECH and some of our city officials or school administrators. As soon as possible, we need to remove those people from power and label them what they are; hate mongers and pedophiles.
do draw the line at Drag Queen Story Hour for children, or holding a Drag Queen strip show for children at a local bar. Pride parades are fine... but not people dressed in thongs or completely naked parading through towns in front of children.
Although, i have to say, I was reading some studies the other day and apparently gay marriages have a higher chance of success, just speaking from a statistical standpoint...?
1 in 5 Americans who claim to be single has been involved in a consensual, open relationship.
Around 4% to 9% of American adults engage in some sort of open relationship.
In a study of 2,270 respondents, 4% reported being in an open relationship.
Respondents who are male, gay/lesbians, bisexuals, and who identified as “other, non-Hispanic” make up the majority of individuals who have engaged in an open relationship.
32% of gay respondents reported being in an open relationship compared to 22% of bisexual participants, 5% of lesbian participants, and 14% of respondents who identified as “other.”
Having sex with partners outside the marriage is less likely to be the cause of a split and is in fact encouraged by a subset of the gay community, so I'm sure that skews those statistics.
In a study of 86 gay couples that was published in 2010, nearly 50% of the relationships were open relationships before the first year was up.
Beyond Monogamy: Lessons From Long-Term, Non-Monogamous Male Couples
Anecdotally, we used to live in Denver, CO and our next door neighbors were gay and in an open relationship for over 20 years before getting married once it became legal. They mostly had quit sleeping with each other unless they tag teamed another partner, and they loved to tell us these kinds of details. The main reason they married was for financial purposes and that was according to them. They were already co-owners of their home and the marriage allowed the partner with better healthcare benefits to sign up the other on their plan.
Oh, it could be. I'd argue we are close right now in America. Ever read brave new world? Everyone had a right to each other's bodies. That's where we are headed with this oppressor/oppressed bullshit. Remember Sodom? Those men believed they had a right to the bodies of the visitors. In ancient Rome they practiced pederasty in which older men had a right to young boy's bodies. It has happened before and can happen again. This is what validating "minor attracted persons" is all about. Minors can't consent. They want a right to children's bodies.
Liberalism had made tolerance of the "different" a law of the land. Sin is deserving of shame. People should be ashamed of their sin. We are past a point of civil penalties for homosexual acts, but we could get to a place of rarity an obscurity to make civil penalties common place again.
God prescribed the death penalty for adultery, which is fine when it's super rare across your culture, but if it's common place, that simply isn't feasible. The death penalty is still accepted in places across America for murder, but it will take awhile for people to back the death penalty for doctors that perform abortions. The overturning of Roe is too new.
It took time for the gay agenda to get as far as it has, and as the perversions intensify, so too does the backlash. But it will take time and revival to codify God's sexually laws back to the civil sphere.
Not from gay individuals who always exist in every society. From a specific Queer Theory program that channeled from postmodern thinkers, through academia, to the popular culture and a compliant media who wants to reshape our perception of reality as a web of power struggles between groups of powerful and powerless, between language usages, between sets of moral assumptions, etc. This is the slippery slope you're looking for.
This is pretty much the mod policy. Fuck groomers. They're just mentally ill losers with epic internet porn addictions. But gays have existed throughout history, and they can be based, too.
Watch what this controlled burn did. These stupid discussions have somehow been everywhere lately, all pushed by a shill army (all comments, no quality post history) all getting users to attack each other over this dog shot all over every thread for the past three days. Now those shills are sent packing and we can get back to our business.
Would you draw the line at male-to-male sexual harassment?
I'm a big, burly, dark-skinned dude who doesn't give a care in the world about dicks, yet except for twice, every time I've been sexually harassed(or assaulted) it's been by dudes. It was the worst in the Army, which is extra gay cause we're supposed to be on the same team.
I honestly don't care if someone is gay or not. I've known a lot of gay people in my life, and most are perfectly normal, hard working and genuinely nice people. Several of them were married couples, or had been together as couples for years. I never judged one of them, nor had any right to.
I do draw the line at Drag Queen Story Hour for children, or holding a Drag Queen strip show for children at a local bar. Pride parades are fine... but not people dressed in thongs or completely naked parading through towns in front of children. I don't honestly care what adults do at an adults-only festival or event. I do care if it involves under-aged kids. I also care when kids are being brainwashed by school teachers and administrators.
I think most gay people are just as sickened by what we are seeing as the rest of us obviously are. It's the tiny minority that keep pushing this garbage. They are doing it to DIVIDE people. They want to increase hatred... and polarize a discussion so there is no middle ground. That's why they keep pushing the extremes.
THEY happen to be the main stream media, some of our elected officials, BIG TECH and some of our city officials or school administrators. As soon as possible, we need to remove those people from power and label them what they are; hate mongers and pedophiles.
And how do you think we got here exactly?
https://comparecamp.com/open-marriage-statistics/
Having sex with partners outside the marriage is less likely to be the cause of a split and is in fact encouraged by a subset of the gay community, so I'm sure that skews those statistics.
In a study of 86 gay couples that was published in 2010, nearly 50% of the relationships were open relationships before the first year was up.
Beyond Monogamy: Lessons From Long-Term, Non-Monogamous Male Couples
https://www.thebodypro.com/article/beyond-monogamy-lessons-long-term-non-monogamous-male-couples
Link to the pdf of the study-
http://thecouplesstudy.com/wp-content/uploads/BeyondMonogamy_1_01.pdf
Anecdotally, we used to live in Denver, CO and our next door neighbors were gay and in an open relationship for over 20 years before getting married once it became legal. They mostly had quit sleeping with each other unless they tag teamed another partner, and they loved to tell us these kinds of details. The main reason they married was for financial purposes and that was according to them. They were already co-owners of their home and the marriage allowed the partner with better healthcare benefits to sign up the other on their plan.
Oh, it could be. I'd argue we are close right now in America. Ever read brave new world? Everyone had a right to each other's bodies. That's where we are headed with this oppressor/oppressed bullshit. Remember Sodom? Those men believed they had a right to the bodies of the visitors. In ancient Rome they practiced pederasty in which older men had a right to young boy's bodies. It has happened before and can happen again. This is what validating "minor attracted persons" is all about. Minors can't consent. They want a right to children's bodies.
Liberalism had made tolerance of the "different" a law of the land. Sin is deserving of shame. People should be ashamed of their sin. We are past a point of civil penalties for homosexual acts, but we could get to a place of rarity an obscurity to make civil penalties common place again.
God prescribed the death penalty for adultery, which is fine when it's super rare across your culture, but if it's common place, that simply isn't feasible. The death penalty is still accepted in places across America for murder, but it will take awhile for people to back the death penalty for doctors that perform abortions. The overturning of Roe is too new.
It took time for the gay agenda to get as far as it has, and as the perversions intensify, so too does the backlash. But it will take time and revival to codify God's sexually laws back to the civil sphere.
Not from gay individuals who always exist in every society. From a specific Queer Theory program that channeled from postmodern thinkers, through academia, to the popular culture and a compliant media who wants to reshape our perception of reality as a web of power struggles between groups of powerful and powerless, between language usages, between sets of moral assumptions, etc. This is the slippery slope you're looking for.
This is pretty much the mod policy. Fuck groomers. They're just mentally ill losers with epic internet porn addictions. But gays have existed throughout history, and they can be based, too.
Richard Grenell: a prime example of based.
^^^ THIS THIS THIS ^^^
This whole post thread is fuking stupid by the way.
Lets get back to Research please.
Watch what this controlled burn did. These stupid discussions have somehow been everywhere lately, all pushed by a shill army (all comments, no quality post history) all getting users to attack each other over this dog shot all over every thread for the past three days. Now those shills are sent packing and we can get back to our business.
Thieves and murderers had existed throughout history too. Sinners are sinners. But that's not really the point you're attempting to make, is it...
And someone being gay isn't killing you or stealing your property.
Incredibly shitty analog and you should be ashamed.
Strawman.
Also, incredibly shitty assertion of what you think sin is and you should be ashamed.
Man can sin against himself. Man can sin against his neighbor. Man can sin against God.
Different levels of punishment sure, but nevertheless still sin, and as several here have asserted "all sins are equal" are they not?
Would you draw the line at male-to-male sexual harassment?
I'm a big, burly, dark-skinned dude who doesn't give a care in the world about dicks, yet except for twice, every time I've been sexually harassed(or assaulted) it's been by dudes. It was the worst in the Army, which is extra gay cause we're supposed to be on the same team.