I tried telling my father about the twin towers and he started going off as if he knew how structures collapse. He had a tone of talking down to me saying "The fuel weakens the steal, do you know that?" I was like uhh yeah I understand how heat makes steel weaker.
He wouldn't listen to a damn word I said. He just kept repeating that the weight of the floors above would cause each level to fall down. I kept saying yeah so why didn't they fall to the side at all? Why did it look like a controlled demolition?
I want a short maybe 10 minute video by an expert explaining how this could not occur unless it was a controlled demolition.
Building 7 was the biggest red pill for me personally. When I showed it to my husband, he said he didn’t even remember seeing that when it happened. It was a big red pill for him too!!
Tower 7
Building 7.
The Gov and NIST said it was due to office fires softening the steel, then some how it fell at free fall speed (10.2 secs) meaning nothing stood in its path of resistance and the only way that could happen is if the columns were taken out. Oh and when architects asked how that could happen and wanted guidance on how not to happen again, NIST said sorry that's a secret! Every place that was initially hit, WTC 1 and 2 and Pentagon, then finally WTC 7 ALL housed vital data on missing trillions, data on scandals like Enron, BCCI and more.
Here's the recent University of Alaska's report into WTC 7 and how it was impossible for it to fall as per the NIST official report! https://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7/
Told one of my brothers years ago. He talked down to me also. Even yelled "so my friends went & 1 died to fight the war for a lie???! I was like yep.... and he was pissed. Never spoke of it again. Guess i should have remembered that when i became the true black sheep over covid and the deep state!
If your father is unwilling to watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
Then maybe some other videos at https://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth may be helpful.
Found SEVEN:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJPuWy9utss
Thx
SEVEN Official Trailer | A Dylan Avery Film on Building 7
This looks very well produced. I'll try to find the movie. Surprised amazon is hosting it and youtube hasnt' blocked anything about 9/11
PS A myth that you can tell your Father is that by the time the aircraft hit they would be carrying roughly 40% - 50% full fuel. No airlines fills the tanks full for every flight, it would be calculated on the time of the flight, predicted fuel burn rates, a minimum needed for diversion and a minimum safe amount on landing. Minus the amount they had burned up during transit to the buildings.
Given that most of the fuel was burnt in the resultant outside fireball, there was little to none left to burn the steel girders and supports. Firefighters actually made it to the floor that was hit with little trouble in the way of fire, they were killed when it was demolished.
If your Father thinks that aviation fuel, basically kerosene can melt steel, it's probably best he never lights a wood burning stove!
It was Thermite (military grade nano thermate) that took down those buildings, and a missile that hit the Pentagon.
Show him the 60 second clip of wtc 7. Remind him it was not hit by a plane.
Then bring him to ae911truth.org
The architects and engineers are authoritative when it comes to building structures and demolitions.
Equal and opposite forces. As the upper floors "crushed down", the lower floors "crush up" as they each destroy one another. At best, if 30 floors crushed down then the lower 30 floors would crush up. That would be 60 floors of destruction.
It's worth nothing that the lower the floor, the stronger and more sturdy was the steel and concrete that it was comprised of, as it had to be able to be load bearing for the 10/20/30/40/50/60/70/80/90/100 floors above it. So the upper 30 floors would be the WEAKEST structurally.
It's just like the classic scenario of the semi truck smashing into a Volkswagen Beetle. While the Beetle gets demolished, it used its force to damage the semi.
Depending on which tower, which were hit at different floors, the most damage it could do, assuming all else equal, is destroy the equivalent number of floors.
Anyway, it's basic physics and any legit physicist agrees this is the case.
Fire had absolutely nothing to do with anything. He can watch any number of AE911Truth's videos which parade dozens of engineers, physicists and architects across the screen who say no fire could have ever been hot enough to melt any of the steel. In short, you need a FOUNDRY to melt steel.
I just found this, looks solid so far.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UwYfWiJ0Vfx6/
Good video. Steel buildings don't go away at freefall speed. Huge problem with the official narrative. As controversial as the subject is, DEW are worth considering. Either way, the deep state or whoever did this, has a problem now that these obvious contradictions are easily proven, and the discussion is gaining more traction.
It's almost like they don't care. They knew people would debunk it.
The collapsing part of it isn’t even the craziest part of it, how in the hell was there insurance on the WTC complex when none of the buildings were even built? What happen to the missing $2,000,000,000,000? So many many inconsistencies, like that did not look like a plane hitting the pentagon.
There's always this: soften him up first with a flanking maneuver. Get him out of fight-or-flight mode.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JU7zLTQm/an-anon-posted-about-lucky-larry/c/
Then Bldg 7.
At what temperature does jet fuel burn?
At what temperature does steel melt?
As Q would say, reconcile.
Get them think about structural integrity of their own house when a hurricane is passing by .....
The math is so obviously simple ... Only in Cali it does not compute.
There's also the fact that it's nearly impossible to fly an airliner into a building, especially doing it twice. If someone can't comprehend the impossibly of that along with the impossibility of he buildings collapsing from being hit by a plane then I'm not sure there's any hope for them
How do you explain the amount of people in NYC that watched the 2nd plane hit the 2nd tower? Plus videos?
A little more hard to prove but none the less.
Boeing Honeywell ‘Uninterruptible’ Autopilot System.
https://21stcenturywire.com/2014/08/07/flight-control-boeings-uninterruptible-autopilot-system-drones-remote-hijacking/
“On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet.
“The aircraft was remotely flown by NASA research pilot Fitzhugh (Fitz) Fulton from the NASA Dryden Remotely Controlled Vehicle Facility. Previously, the Boeing 720 had been flown on 14 practice flights with safety pilots onboard. During the 14 flights, there were 16 hours and 22 minutes of remotely piloted vehicle control, including 10 remotely piloted takeoffs, 69 remotely piloted vehicle controlled approaches, and 13 remotely piloted vehicle landings on abort runway.”
I’ve been told that they have equipped Boeings airliners with these for sometime before 9/11.
Could you use droned aircraft, that are piloted by a computer? I don't know much on the subject. I have read that AF1 travels with jets that are drones?
Correct. The official speeds and loads quoted go way out of range for these type of aircraft, imagine believing that they could carry on flying them so far over VMO that they would even stay intact, let alone be able to control them. Flying such an aircraft by an amateur would see them over controlling, it would take the slightest touch for the aircraft to respond.
To hit both towers with this size of aircraft equates to a newly passed driver, driving their car at 120 mph through their open garage doors and out the other side without touching the sides of the garage, first try! Pilots have tried to replicate the attack, especially the Pentagon and failed time and time again, and these pilots have 1000's of hours on type!
And don't get me started on the Pentagon aircraft, a descending 8000' per min 270' turn at the speeds quoted to hit level would be impossible! The aircraft would have ripped itself to pieces, many aerodynamic forces like wing flutter and roll would have seen that thing rip itself to bits. Let alone the ground effect of such an aircraft pulling itself into the ground on approach to the Pentagon!
Astonishingly, the official report stated speeds that at the heights quoted the engines couldn't output enough thrust at near sea level to obtain, they must have been taking the piss when they wrote it!
You splashed cold water on his programming. And shook his mental state. I've seen this first hand with coworker a few years ago. He absolutely would not entertain the mear idea that this was an inside job. He needs time to adjust. Alot of people are struggling with hard truths. They are coming so fast they can't Center themselves. Good job keep up the pressure. A warm comfortable cocoon is being pulled away. They don't like it. ⁷
If they don’t know by know it’s hopeless sorry to say
Buildings 5 and 6 fell?
Haha, McCaffery's condo fell down as well. Introducing the memory hole. Tada.