Not a "3-way" if you consider Russia and Belarus is fighting NATO, which has 30 government members. It's really 2 against 30 + 1 (Ukraine). Who's the bully here?
Biden declares they will end the pipeline if russia moves into ukraine and there is lotsof noise in the german congress of something happening at the end of this month.. further noise our agencies are warning other agencies of imminent action. .
I realize this is not your writing or even your belief. Nevertheless, from the link provided:
"Russian President Vladimir Putin insisted that the former Soviet republic never be permitted to join NATO."
This is seeped with loaded allusions. The Russian Federation is just as much a former Soviet government as the United States being a former British colony. Secondly, Putin did insist, but did not erroneously mentioned with the "former Soviet Republic", but with Warsaw Pact member States. For them to remain NEUTRAL, thereby not joining NATO, to which was concluded in an Agreement (international contract) NATO would lawfully abide by. They instead violated the entire Agreement.
I'm sensing by observing the further receding waters of the lock-downs, CDC removing vax☠xination and mask requirements, and corporate removal of vac☠cination requirements that something 'else' is afoot. Recently, my wife who has had to take weekly 'COVID' tests, ad nauseum as a result of her refusal to violate her 'temple', and consequently was restricted from any promotional job, is now clear to transfer within the company. Even new hires are now not required to have the 'COVID' vac☠xination jab.
What does this mean? Did we win? NO.
Their goal in population reduction has not come close to meeting their at least 4-billion population reduction. The financial Cabal has shifted the war front to Ukraine and now the threat and perhap the FF of nuclear weapon contamination with food shortages to kill more people.
I read the recent TGP article about mosquitoes being used as a new means of vax☠xinating. I am not disregarding this, but the article gave me the impression that the proof of concept was obtained only through extremely high number of mosquito bites. As a consequence the high number of mosquitoes needed, it doesn't sound plausible for most real world situations. The girl's arm for example was completely swollen by the large number of mosquito bites. I understand she had to leave her arm in the mosquito cage for a long time too. Who is going to be bit this many times? Albeit, I knew of a farmer who got his tractor stuck in his field and my brother-in-law was called to pull him out. When Donny got there he saw this poor guy jumping around swatting at all the mosquitoes swarming him. The farmer had to be taken to the hospital because he was bitten so much. Donny laughed about the situation because to a farmer getting your tractor stuck in the mud is plain foolishness. You never want your neighbor to ever know this. Donny told me this story and said to me the most funny part was that he was out there for more than 2 hours getting his neighbor's tractor unstuck and claimed not once did he get bit by a mosquito. Now that is how a farmer will insult another.
It's a good point. Does Russia have a defense compact with Belarus? I don't know right off hand, but I suspect there is one. Why? Recall in the early stages of the Russian special operation in Ukraine there was most certainly military advancements toward Kiev through Belarus territory.
From the perspective of NATO violating the agreement resulting form the dissolution of Warsaw Pact nations, it was agreed former Warsaw Pact nations would remain neutral and forbidden to join NATO. Because of the violations, I believe Russia secured defense compacts with any former Warsaw governments wanting to remain outside of the NATO hegemony and to protect them from overthrow (ergo, Soros sponsored 'color' revolution). Belarus fits this profile better than any other former Soviet 'sphere' nation.
If my assertion is correct, then NATO may have a problem with this. How does one continue an obvious proxy war without it going direct? That is the question that should be considered. Does NATO want to go to war directly with Russia? IMHO, I don't think so. NATO wants to continue bleeding Russia as much as possible to exhaust them financially before destroying them. This is their thinking at least. So far, this has failed miserably. This thinking also all depends on the uni-polar financial world order, but BRICS is now a formidable answer to the western equation of exhausting Russia financially. The question becomes-- Is the world enough financially uni-polar to destroy Russia financially? Russia is no longer based on the Rothschild fractional reserve banking system.
You bring up a really good point. Maybe the Belarus' announcement is an indication of future moves? Likewise to the referendums held in Novorossiya, will Belarus soon have a referendum to become part of the Russian Federation? This being done for protection? Recall that President Lukashenko has survived one Soros sponsored 'color' revolution.
A mutual aid treaty forces one country to help another without the input of a president or legislature. If there is no treaty, a president or legislature could decide to help another country voluntarily.
Wouldn't be surprised if a couple more non NATO countries step up. Show of force, NATO will step down. Zelensky will disappear In some fashion. Everyone moves on.
I agree. Everyone knows Zelensky is pocketing billions of dollars. EU is sick of it. They reluctantly continue to play along though believing Zelensky is a necessary evil for now. Zelensky is a huckster, showman, and a panderer. And the EU members detest him. All of them wish him to be gone as soon as possible.
Keep poking the Bear morons and you will learn what "Fuck around and find out " is all about. FAAFO!
Turning the war into a 3-way.
Not a "3-way" if you consider Russia and Belarus is fighting NATO, which has 30 government members. It's really 2 against 30 + 1 (Ukraine). Who's the bully here?
What about the us attacking a nato member? The 5th?
Please provide more information here.
https://www.history.com/news/nato-article-5-meaning-history-world-war-2
Biden declares they will end the pipeline if russia moves into ukraine and there is lotsof noise in the german congress of something happening at the end of this month.. further noise our agencies are warning other agencies of imminent action. .
I realize this is not your writing or even your belief. Nevertheless, from the link provided:
"Russian President Vladimir Putin insisted that the former Soviet republic never be permitted to join NATO."
This is seeped with loaded allusions. The Russian Federation is just as much a former Soviet government as the United States being a former British colony. Secondly, Putin did insist, but did not erroneously mentioned with the "former Soviet Republic", but with Warsaw Pact member States. For them to remain NEUTRAL, thereby not joining NATO, to which was concluded in an Agreement (international contract) NATO would lawfully abide by. They instead violated the entire Agreement.
I'm sensing by observing the further receding waters of the lock-downs, CDC removing vax☠xination and mask requirements, and corporate removal of vac☠cination requirements that something 'else' is afoot. Recently, my wife who has had to take weekly 'COVID' tests, ad nauseum as a result of her refusal to violate her 'temple', and consequently was restricted from any promotional job, is now clear to transfer within the company. Even new hires are now not required to have the 'COVID' vac☠xination jab.
What does this mean? Did we win? NO.
Their goal in population reduction has not come close to meeting their at least 4-billion population reduction. The financial Cabal has shifted the war front to Ukraine and now the threat and perhap the FF of nuclear weapon contamination with food shortages to kill more people.
And gmo mosquitoes weaponized to vaccinate people. Can't forget those..
I read the recent TGP article about mosquitoes being used as a new means of vax☠xinating. I am not disregarding this, but the article gave me the impression that the proof of concept was obtained only through extremely high number of mosquito bites. As a consequence the high number of mosquitoes needed, it doesn't sound plausible for most real world situations. The girl's arm for example was completely swollen by the large number of mosquito bites. I understand she had to leave her arm in the mosquito cage for a long time too. Who is going to be bit this many times? Albeit, I knew of a farmer who got his tractor stuck in his field and my brother-in-law was called to pull him out. When Donny got there he saw this poor guy jumping around swatting at all the mosquitoes swarming him. The farmer had to be taken to the hospital because he was bitten so much. Donny laughed about the situation because to a farmer getting your tractor stuck in the mud is plain foolishness. You never want your neighbor to ever know this. Donny told me this story and said to me the most funny part was that he was out there for more than 2 hours getting his neighbor's tractor unstuck and claimed not once did he get bit by a mosquito. Now that is how a farmer will insult another.
Also sikorski saying thanks, us!
Russia has some solid allies.
America has a solid international deep state syndicate
Watch then for a similar announcement from NATO.
NATO may not want a direct conflict with Russia... but they very well could go after Belarus.
If Belarus deploys 100,000 troops in Ukraine, NATO may decide to fight Belarus forces directly, either in Ukraine itself or from surrounding nations.
I could see Belarus joining Russia if threatened by NATO. They probably already have a defence alliance.
I’m pretty sure they do.
It's a good point. Does Russia have a defense compact with Belarus? I don't know right off hand, but I suspect there is one. Why? Recall in the early stages of the Russian special operation in Ukraine there was most certainly military advancements toward Kiev through Belarus territory.
From the perspective of NATO violating the agreement resulting form the dissolution of Warsaw Pact nations, it was agreed former Warsaw Pact nations would remain neutral and forbidden to join NATO. Because of the violations, I believe Russia secured defense compacts with any former Warsaw governments wanting to remain outside of the NATO hegemony and to protect them from overthrow (ergo, Soros sponsored 'color' revolution). Belarus fits this profile better than any other former Soviet 'sphere' nation.
If my assertion is correct, then NATO may have a problem with this. How does one continue an obvious proxy war without it going direct? That is the question that should be considered. Does NATO want to go to war directly with Russia? IMHO, I don't think so. NATO wants to continue bleeding Russia as much as possible to exhaust them financially before destroying them. This is their thinking at least. So far, this has failed miserably. This thinking also all depends on the uni-polar financial world order, but BRICS is now a formidable answer to the western equation of exhausting Russia financially. The question becomes-- Is the world enough financially uni-polar to destroy Russia financially? Russia is no longer based on the Rothschild fractional reserve banking system.
You bring up a really good point. Maybe the Belarus' announcement is an indication of future moves? Likewise to the referendums held in Novorossiya, will Belarus soon have a referendum to become part of the Russian Federation? This being done for protection? Recall that President Lukashenko has survived one Soros sponsored 'color' revolution.
A mutual aid treaty forces one country to help another without the input of a president or legislature. If there is no treaty, a president or legislature could decide to help another country voluntarily.
Wouldn't be surprised if a couple more non NATO countries step up. Show of force, NATO will step down. Zelensky will disappear In some fashion. Everyone moves on.
I agree. Everyone knows Zelensky is pocketing billions of dollars. EU is sick of it. They reluctantly continue to play along though believing Zelensky is a necessary evil for now. Zelensky is a huckster, showman, and a panderer. And the EU members detest him. All of them wish him to be gone as soon as possible.
Theyed still be fighting russia..
Did not expect that!