Ok, so once again, I am posting about the term ""PHOBE""....
Phobe, as an end attachment to any word, such as HOMO, ends up meaning ""Afraid of Homosexuals"" according to the LEFTISTS in society who are too STUPID to understand that it is NOT FEAR, but sheer Disgust that is being shown....
Nobody FEARS homosexuality, it is simply a DISGUTING thing.....
So to CORRECT that, I suggest either of Two Endings, such as::
GREEK; AIDIA, meaning Disgust, would become Homoaidia or Homoaidias..... Greek Translation αηδία ai̱día αηδίας [rare] ai̱días disgust
But then LATIN is more flexible, it has THREE possivle endings to chose from:: -FOEDUS or TAETER or TETER
Latin;
Latin Translation Homofoedus.... foedus adjective -- foul, hideous, ugly, filthy, horrible
Homotaeter.... taeter adjective -- offensive, repugnant, nasty, sickening
Homoteter.... teter adjective -- repugnant, nasty, sickening, offensive
Lets start setting this RIGHT in our Language, so we can begin the reversal of the MESS that the LEFTISTS have made across these past two, three, four decades....
Are you a Phobia-a-phobe?
Istaphobic-phobiphobe
Nailed it
No, that would be silly, and childish, and as a Man I put away silly Childish things some 30+ years ago.....
I used to feel this way but then I looked at other terms such as hydrophobic- simply a term for a substance that repels or fails to mix with water. It doesn't always mean fear of something. Either way they can call me whatever they want. I stopped caring about their opinions long ago.
We need to stop using their language, that's fore sure.
Homotaeter sounds like "homo hater." Maybe we could just call them "Taters."
I'm being silly, but I agree. No patriot should use their made-up words in conversation. Changing the language was a tactic people bought into because seemingly intelligent people on TV were pushing it.
Whenever I get called a phobe I just say "I don't fear you, I pity you." For some reason they never respond well to that but oh well.
I do the same. I know their lives suck.
Snap outta it bro...start'n to sound like a phobeaphobe!
Beat me to it. Glad I checked all the comments before I repeated your thought
🤣
Miso= hate in Greek, hence misogyny, misanthropic.
Yes.
And that's exactly why I excluded that word or prefix from my comments....
I don't hate the Homos, I pity them because I know they have some deep seated mental Issues, which there may not be any repair for, but I am sure that affirmation or assurance or even encouragement of those Mental Insanities is not a good thing and should be avoided as much as possible.....
I find those things Disgusting, but I don't Hate them for it....
So true!
Well if you're going to go that far, then "homo" means literally "one's self."
Therefore "homophobia" literally translates to "fear of one's self."
If you're going to pick apart the linguistics, be consistent.
So by that, Homosexual means Self Love, as in someone stuck on Masturbate....
So where would you go for the meaning of Man on Man and Woman on Woman, but generic as in meaning both sexes, other than Lesbo or Sodomite?
Because Gay doesn't mean anything more than Happy.....
I wouldn't. Words are our bitches, they do what we say or they get the hose again. Regardless of the Latin roots, the real-world definition of "homophobia" is disgust toward homosexuals because that's what society has decided to call the concept.
If that's you, then by all means, embrace the term "homophobe."
By the way, "sodomy" is another example that trips you up. The definition of sodomy is "non-vaginal sexual intercourse." Ever give or receive oral sex? Ever get adventurous with your SO and tried anal? Well, that's sodomy by the technical definition, making you a sodomite.
But we've decided that "sodomite" means something specific, and that's lucky for the people who hate them.
Interesting points, is there more you might know, like maybe clue me in on Gomorrah??
Sure! According to Ezekiel, Sodom and Gomorrah were not destroyed because of homosexuality. Ezekiel 16:49-50
Yup, 50 gives a connection to other things....
50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.
Not true.
Ezekiel 16:48-50
48 As I live, saith the Lord God, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters.
49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.
50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: herefore I took them away as I saw good.
In fact, in previous verses in this chapter, Ezekiel is condemning Jerusalem for committing even more abominable sins than Sodom and Gomorrah, engaging in idolatry and child sacrifice in spite of their covenant with God and straight up calls Jerusalem a harlot AKA whore.
Ezekiel 16:35-37
35 Wherefore, O harlot, hear the word of the Lord:
36 Thus saith the Lord God; Because thy filthiness was poured out, and thy nakedness discovered through thy whoredoms with thy lovers, and with all the idols of thy abominations, and by the blood of thy children, which thou didst give unto them;
37 Behold, therefore I will gather all thy lovers, with whom thou hast taken pleasure, and all them that thou hast loved, with all them that thou hast hated; I will even gather them round about against thee, and will discover thy nakedness unto them, that they may see all thy nakedness.
In the Book of Jude, the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah are made perfectly clear-
Jude 1:7
Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
I love this post so much. Been saying this for years.
Same same 😆
I thought this was great.
I made a shorter version of your post that fits TS and other forums with a 500 count limit. Here it is: ..................
Taking back our language means using correct words that reflect the ideas we want to convey
Phobe = fear
Many words have this as a suffix that don't truly represent our position on an expressed condition
There are suffix possibilities that better represent our repugnance about a subject
Latin foedus -foul/hideous/ugly/filthy/horrible
taeter -offensive/repugnant/nasty/sickening
teter -repugnant/nasty/sickening/offensive
A position isn't always about fear-don't allow them to twist your words
You forgot to add in TETER(Teh-tehr) and Taeter(Yeah, TATER)....
They were in there. I just forgot to add spacing so it all ran together.
I fixed that.
Thanks for the heads up.
Oh, I guess I was speed reading.....
Yes, and "homo" means "one's self."
If you're going to pick apart the linguistics, be consistent.
Painting your opposition as psychologically skewed is the whole sleazy point.
Aha! So it IS possible, in your opinion, that someone who is insane, knows that they are in fact Insane??
Am I right???
Life long question, right there.....
If insanity percieved itself as insane, then it wouldn't be so insane now would it.
Which is why, insanity perceives itself as something else.
That's a good summation....
I suppose it might be a shock to their system to be told that they are insane....
Learn the “phobes” that they “have” and accuse them of it. Call them out for the Hoplophobia, tokophobia, ecclesiophobia afflicted pediphobic pedophile supporters they are.
That Comment wins the Interwebernets from me for this week....
Unironically, I'm also annoyed by this, even if it's a bit pedantic.
Keep in mind It'd be awfully hypocritical for me to be anti gay, seeing as I've been in a monogamous gay relationship (sixteen years and counting, whoohoo!), but it's hard not to see where the repugnance to homosexuality comes from when it's been used as a shield for some of the most abhorrent behavior I've ever seen adults engage in...
Well, on my part I'm actually intending it to be very pedantic....
I guess I'm just like that....
Congrats on the 16 Years....
Well, lets see how long this test runs.....
nah, it bugs me, too. it's obnoxious, inaccurate, and lazy.
I take no offense by the way. it's hard not to be skeptical of such things these days.
The problem is people don't fucking try in relationships like they should. (rise in divorce rates, etc.)
Yeah I got into a big long discussion on FB in a Group, with lots of Socialists but some, I suppose were LGB, but the Mods were just stupid.....
Someone started posting about Rights, and that's when I stepped in.....
I tried to explain lots of things, like Right to Privacy, they came back with ""It's a Right to have a Parade"".....
The rest went directly downhill from there.....
So things moved to Right to get Married, I tried to explain that yes, that is in fact a Right, except that they could not FORCE Christians into allowing something that the Christian God said is Forbidden, and that they might want to try Scientology or Buddism or Islam or something else....
I got banned, then I started getting banned from FB for things at still don't make sense.....
sounds like you got brigaded...
I never understood wanting to get married somewhere that doesn't want to marry you. I mean, there's the control angle, obviously, which is evil, but otherwise it's just stupid.
They make up all sorts of words. "Sex" as a noun refers to whether the animal is a male or female. "To have sex" is short for "sexual congress" or "sexual relation" and thus requires a male and female. Two males cannot have sex with each other, and thus "homosex" cannot exist.
The correct term is "sexual perversion" or "sodomy".
Good Point....
Does this make Joe a Potaeter?
I guess it does....
what about homocidal
No, I think that would mean likely to be, instead of what I was trying to show as being more correct....
Frankly I like HomotaEter, as it directly means Disgust of Homos...
It also fits with TransTaeter or we could go with HomoFoedus, which also sounds like A Homo is a Foe to us....
But that's still too close to us being Afraid of IT/Them, which we are not....
I've never used any such term nor will I, no one is afraid of queers.
You invent a foreign language solution to a problem not in existence, very few of 'us' ever do use such stupid language terms you of course realize.
No of course Normal People don't use this shit on a daily, or even ever, BUT, IF we should need a Solid word to rely upon, for some stupid reason, such as in some odd situational Argument, wouldn't it be good to have a Different Word to use, other than theirs?
That's there game and I don't play it. "You're a XXX-PHOB!" I just say don't drag me into your psychosis.They for some reason don't like the fact I don't take the bait and call them fucking crazy at the same time.
Another Good point made....
Incoming collab with Clif High?
Sorry, but not sure if that's a Person or a thing, or what.....
Person. Check him out on Rumble
Oh him....
The WOO guy....
Yeah I agree. I never say it. People always look at me weird but I always say, anit- _____. It's the best way to explain what I mean. I'm not afraid of trans people so I say, anti-trans. I'm both afraid of and against mosquitoes so yeah I'm an antimosquitophobe.
Anti-Mosquito-Fear....
Interesting....
But, yeah, I might have to adapt your method of speaking and just say things like Anti-____.....
Good Idea.....
Fear of words = Verbophobia.
I'm learning some new words today, fer sure fer sure....