Yeah what about the radiation. Nagasaki and Hiroshima were up and running days after. Where's the nuclear fallout and radiation? Where is the cancer and health problems due to radiation? They have the longest average lifespan there and you don't see anybody suffering from health issues they say radiation would cause. Something doesn't add up.
But there were problems to the unborn. In short, women who were pregnant near those bombs had higher rates of babies with anencephaly and mental retardation. They often did not survive into adulthood. However, babies who were conceived after the detonations did not have these malformations.
Children of the Atomic Bomb: An American Physician's Memoir of Nagasaki, Hiroshima, and the Marshall Islands is a good source if you want more info.
First of all, the threat from fallout was overblown by popular media (and still is). All along, the government has emphasized survivability in the face of nuclear weapons (fallout shelters, etc.). It is the popular media that has promoted the "We are better off dead" line of thinking.
Not letting fear control your thinking is good. But don't let ignorance control your thinking. That is no better.
Well, I don't fear radiation, LOL. I've seen radiotherapy work wonders. I agree there is much fearmongering over radiation.
As for the nuked cities being up and running in a few days - the most dangerous of radioisotopes have such short half-lives that they are significantly reduced after 72 hours. A 'simple' fission bomb will produce more radioactive fall out than would a pure fusion weapon; however, since fusion weapons don't (reportedly... [cough] ahem [/ahem]) exist. On the other hand, thermonuclear weapons (fission-fusion type) tend to cause more fallout than an atomic bomb (fission only) as more of the fissile material undergoes fission due to the fission-fusion-fission design. Even for these, the most dangerous of the fallout decays within 72 hours to a week at most.
What does a Geiger counter and/or neutron detector detect? Work adjacent to anyone who was MUNSS or eve talk to them... is their work pointless?
He thinks that all tests were lies, all math is bogus and incapable of knowing explosive yield, and that because we use TNT as a yield measurement it clearly means they don't exist.
"There is no such thing as a nuke. It is a manufactured explosion designed to convince people that men have the right to take control of a woman’s body."
~signed, some fat ugly chick with really bad hair.
The videos of those tests are about as laughably fake as the Apollo missions buddy. Only 1 reporter was allowed to take pictures. And what about all the nasty fallout that's supposed to be there? The towns was back up and running 3 days later.
That's probably because you don't know anything about the "official narrative." Read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone and you will have all the info. The tests were real (I have a sample of trinitite from the Trinity event.) The bombings were real (my father saw the ruins of Nagasaki). And the threat is real (I spent half my career working in strategic defense with a Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information clearance).
The reason they use tons of TNT as a characterization is (1) people can relate to TNT, and (2) before they set off the Trinity device, they conducted a "full scale" explosion of thousands of tons of TNT to calibrate the Trinity results. I kinda bet you didn't know that, did you?
I'll let you in on a secret. Nukes don't exist. I'd bet my life on that too. There is a reason they know exactly how much tnt it's equivalent to.
Hmm. So what about radiation? What about fissile material? Nuclear power plants? Fission? Fusion? Alpha radiation? Smoke detectors?
What caused corneal burns in Hiroshima? What was the source of the radiation-induced cataracts in Nagasaki survivors?
How did Henry Daglin and Louis Slottin die?
TNT didn't and doesn't produce radiation.
I'm not saying you're wrong, just curious how these things are otherwise explained.
Yeah what about the radiation. Nagasaki and Hiroshima were up and running days after. Where's the nuclear fallout and radiation? Where is the cancer and health problems due to radiation? They have the longest average lifespan there and you don't see anybody suffering from health issues they say radiation would cause. Something doesn't add up.
I don't let fear control my thinking.
But there were problems to the unborn. In short, women who were pregnant near those bombs had higher rates of babies with anencephaly and mental retardation. They often did not survive into adulthood. However, babies who were conceived after the detonations did not have these malformations.
Children of the Atomic Bomb: An American Physician's Memoir of Nagasaki, Hiroshima, and the Marshall Islands is a good source if you want more info.
https://www.aasc.ucla.edu/cab/200708230012.html
First of all, the threat from fallout was overblown by popular media (and still is). All along, the government has emphasized survivability in the face of nuclear weapons (fallout shelters, etc.). It is the popular media that has promoted the "We are better off dead" line of thinking.
Not letting fear control your thinking is good. But don't let ignorance control your thinking. That is no better.
Well, I don't fear radiation, LOL. I've seen radiotherapy work wonders. I agree there is much fearmongering over radiation.
As for the nuked cities being up and running in a few days - the most dangerous of radioisotopes have such short half-lives that they are significantly reduced after 72 hours. A 'simple' fission bomb will produce more radioactive fall out than would a pure fusion weapon; however, since fusion weapons don't (reportedly... [cough] ahem [/ahem]) exist. On the other hand, thermonuclear weapons (fission-fusion type) tend to cause more fallout than an atomic bomb (fission only) as more of the fissile material undergoes fission due to the fission-fusion-fission design. Even for these, the most dangerous of the fallout decays within 72 hours to a week at most.
What does a Geiger counter and/or neutron detector detect? Work adjacent to anyone who was MUNSS or eve talk to them... is their work pointless?
Nor do internal combustion engines. There is a reason they know exactly how many horses it’s equivalent to.
Kek. Good analogy.
Wat
He thinks that all tests were lies, all math is bogus and incapable of knowing explosive yield, and that because we use TNT as a yield measurement it clearly means they don't exist.
Huge-ass eye roll.
He's right. Nukes don't exist. We've been lied to for a very long time.
"There is no such thing as a nuke. It is a manufactured explosion designed to convince people that men have the right to take control of a woman’s body."
~signed, some fat ugly chick with really bad hair.
The videos of those tests are about as laughably fake as the Apollo missions buddy. Only 1 reporter was allowed to take pictures. And what about all the nasty fallout that's supposed to be there? The towns was back up and running 3 days later.
Sorry if I don't believe the official narrative.
Okie dokie. Good for you for questioning the official narrative.
That's probably because you don't know anything about the "official narrative." Read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone and you will have all the info. The tests were real (I have a sample of trinitite from the Trinity event.) The bombings were real (my father saw the ruins of Nagasaki). And the threat is real (I spent half my career working in strategic defense with a Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information clearance).
The reason they use tons of TNT as a characterization is (1) people can relate to TNT, and (2) before they set off the Trinity device, they conducted a "full scale" explosion of thousands of tons of TNT to calibrate the Trinity results. I kinda bet you didn't know that, did you?
I'm with you brother. I just heard that they scared the baby boomers in school with "duck and cover" propaganda frequently.
Yes, Stars are just tnt factories. Come on man!
or x grams of plutonium = x pounds of tnt and solve for x?
https://rumble.com/v1o41hu-the-nuclear-hoax-what-really-happened-to-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html