Anyone who’s very vulnerable. Whitmer placed young, healthy psychopaths with covid in nursing homes to beat up on the elderly. She’s earned the death penalty, in my book.
That is not the unforgivable sin. Denying the works (blasphemy against) of the Holy Spirit is the 1 unforgivable sin. It is only through the Holy Spirit that anyone is saved for He is the one who leads us to Jesus. If you deny His works or blaspheme Him, God will respect your free will and He will not lead you to Him who died on the cross and rose again 3 days later. That's why it's unforgivable, because in the sin there is no salvation. Jesus can forgive all but that one sin.
Of course it isn't His voice, it's my voice. Doesn't change the truth of what I am saying. It's Scripturallly sound and an accurate, albeit brief, explanation of the unpardonable sin.
Truly I tell you, people can be forgiven all their sins and every slander they utter, but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; they are guilty of an eternal sin.” He said this because they were saying, “He has an impure spirit.”
Mark 3:28-30 NIV
What kind of monsters!??? Who the HELL would do this to little ones!?? I swear - it seems like the people who go into "education" these days literally are evil. Like they HATE children.
Damn right. And if they get a conviction for Child Cruelty then their chances of keeping any children of their own they may have in future are thankfully much reduced.
How is this much different than telling young children that they are going to suffering and damnation if they don't conduct a ritual that may or may not be legitimate?
Does she deserve to be fired? Yeah probably. But this level of response is over compensation. It's not like they tortured them physically and harvested their blood.
Based on the definition, coercing children into accepting Jesus in their heart to gain "eternal salvation" is a ritual despite some loosely interpreted suggestions Jesus made. In the end it's disingenuous. It robs children of their choice to choose Him freely of their own will, by using fear to get them to conform. You don't see it that way because you agree with it...
But at least we agree, at worse a fire worthy offense, though I don't think it's beyond forgiveness pending an apology and facing the anger of the parents.
We all make decisions in life, and everyone is motivated to act in a way they feel will benefit them, while at the same time, to avoid certain behaviors they feel will lead to harm.
The Christian who encourages their child to follow Christ in order to reap something positive, is no different from the parent who tells their child to avoid drugs. Both are motivated to protect their child and help them. No one would accuse the parent who tells their child to avoid drugs is abusing them, even if the idea of taking drugs and ending up dead or suffering is something the child fears when learning about drugs. Why? Because the intent of the parent is not to terrorize, but to protect and help the child achieve what's best for them. The parent's actions are done out of love, and the goodness of their heart. In the same way, a Christian parent does this when they encourage a child to follow Christ.
In no way can you draw a parallel that it's the same as someone putting on a mask and deliberately causing harm to a child. The intent of these "teachers" was to scare and terrify the children. The intent of the Christian is not to scare their child but for them to find peace and contentment - which was the intent of Jesus as well. And the intent of the parent who teaches their child about drugs, or murderers or the dangers of fire is not to scare them, but for them to avoid danger and actually benefit from the teaching.
Additionally, in the video, the perpetrators are in control of act - and as the perpetrators, they are outside of the outcomes - they are entirely removed from the terror they're inflicting on the child. In the case of the Christian parent, they too are subject to the same scenarios as their child. In other words, the parent must also follow Christ or be subject to a similar outcome - which again is similar to the parent who warns their child about drug use.
So your suggestion that this video is akin to a Christian teaching their child about Jesus is simply, wrong.
It's dumb but it's not felony child abuse. I mean certainly they should not be involved in child care, but it's in no way equivalent to other felony crimes.
Yeah. This seems more like one man's joke is another man's gone too far. I don't agree with it, but this isn't a real crime and will likely get the case tossed out.
Articulate how scaring children with a fake mask is "felony child abuse". It's not even misdemeanor worthy. Having your license pulled until you face scorn from the parents, maybe. But anything more than that is massive over compensation.
You realize that by scaring a child during their formative years inflicts trauma that could remain dormant for years and expressed in very serious ways later in life. Frightening children is also what the likes of MK Ultra do before they condition them. They actually have a name for it which is Trauma induced mind control. Fuck these child care workers - they shouldn’t be anywhere near children.
Oh... But I thought Jesus magically protected everyone and fixed everything...
Guess He only does it for some?
I'm aware of what damage CAN happen. But what MK Ultra also does is KEEP IT A SECRET.
The parents are aware of what happened and can educate their children. Also, there's prayer.
If children are as fragile as you suggest, then we might as well lock them in basements for the first 13 years of their lives. Sometimes I forget which site I'm on with how much hyperbolic exaggerated virtue signaling takes place.
"it would be better to tie a milstone around your neck and jump into the ocean than to harm the little ones."
i believe that hurting children is the only unforgivable sin.
Anyone who’s very vulnerable. Whitmer placed young, healthy psychopaths with covid in nursing homes to beat up on the elderly. She’s earned the death penalty, in my book.
Animals too.
That is not the unforgivable sin. Denying the works (blasphemy against) of the Holy Spirit is the 1 unforgivable sin. It is only through the Holy Spirit that anyone is saved for He is the one who leads us to Jesus. If you deny His works or blaspheme Him, God will respect your free will and He will not lead you to Him who died on the cross and rose again 3 days later. That's why it's unforgivable, because in the sin there is no salvation. Jesus can forgive all but that one sin.
Does rejecting the Trinity doctrine count as denying the Holy Spirit?
Yes, the Holy Spirit is the one who leads us to faith in Jesus. If you deny His works then faith in Jesus becomes impossible.
No.
well, its my unforgivable sin. God can sort em out.
Yeah, do us all a favor and stay away from political office.
The simple truths taught by Yeshua were always enough by themselves to walk with the Father.
I believe the words Yeshua spoke and I trust that I know the voice of my shepherd when I hear it, and what you are saying is not my shepherd's voice.
Of course it isn't His voice, it's my voice. Doesn't change the truth of what I am saying. It's Scripturallly sound and an accurate, albeit brief, explanation of the unpardonable sin.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%2010&version=KJV
This is a parable that will help with discernment of the truth if the hirelings and wolves ever usurp the voice of the church.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+15&version=KJV
This parable will help understand the views the Father has of his sheep and of sin and sinners.
In the end, Jesus will decide what's "unforgivable". Not you or any man.
Truly I tell you, people can be forgiven all their sins and every slander they utter, but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; they are guilty of an eternal sin.” He said this because they were saying, “He has an impure spirit.” Mark 3:28-30 NIV
https://bible.com/bible/111/mrk.3.28-30.NIV
No. I'm right. It's what Scripture says. I got my info from the source.
Poor babies. God's working as we speak, taking out the demonic trash.
What kind of monsters!??? Who the HELL would do this to little ones!?? I swear - it seems like the people who go into "education" these days literally are evil. Like they HATE children.
its because they do hate them
They've sold their souls to Satan.
Hate to be a party-pooper, but Satanists view Halloween as very special and increase their Satanic rituals involving children.
Its like the people who go to work in nursing homes and then beat the patients
Saw the apology video of the mask-wearer. Too little, too late.
Same as wearing a rubber Biden mask.
No. That IS worthy of felony child abuse..
Correct.
now do drag queen strippers.
Good. These people are sick. They deserve jail time for what they did to those poor kids
Halefukinlujah. Those were some evil women.
Damn right. And if they get a conviction for Child Cruelty then their chances of keeping any children of their own they may have in future are thankfully much reduced.
Oh, https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/emotional-abuse
Hey kids…today we’re going to learn about trauma!!!
What the heck? And then screaming at the kids? Chasing them?? Freaking weird.
How is this much different than telling young children that they are going to suffering and damnation if they don't conduct a ritual that may or may not be legitimate?
Does she deserve to be fired? Yeah probably. But this level of response is over compensation. It's not like they tortured them physically and harvested their blood.
Conduct a ritual? What - like spell casting? What are you on about - Harry Potter?
Regardless - I agree it's wrong, and definitely shows how f*cked up these people are - but they should just get fired and call it a day.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ritual
Based on the definition, coercing children into accepting Jesus in their heart to gain "eternal salvation" is a ritual despite some loosely interpreted suggestions Jesus made. In the end it's disingenuous. It robs children of their choice to choose Him freely of their own will, by using fear to get them to conform. You don't see it that way because you agree with it...
But at least we agree, at worse a fire worthy offense, though I don't think it's beyond forgiveness pending an apology and facing the anger of the parents.
We all make decisions in life, and everyone is motivated to act in a way they feel will benefit them, while at the same time, to avoid certain behaviors they feel will lead to harm.
The Christian who encourages their child to follow Christ in order to reap something positive, is no different from the parent who tells their child to avoid drugs. Both are motivated to protect their child and help them. No one would accuse the parent who tells their child to avoid drugs is abusing them, even if the idea of taking drugs and ending up dead or suffering is something the child fears when learning about drugs. Why? Because the intent of the parent is not to terrorize, but to protect and help the child achieve what's best for them. The parent's actions are done out of love, and the goodness of their heart. In the same way, a Christian parent does this when they encourage a child to follow Christ.
In no way can you draw a parallel that it's the same as someone putting on a mask and deliberately causing harm to a child. The intent of these "teachers" was to scare and terrify the children. The intent of the Christian is not to scare their child but for them to find peace and contentment - which was the intent of Jesus as well. And the intent of the parent who teaches their child about drugs, or murderers or the dangers of fire is not to scare them, but for them to avoid danger and actually benefit from the teaching.
Additionally, in the video, the perpetrators are in control of act - and as the perpetrators, they are outside of the outcomes - they are entirely removed from the terror they're inflicting on the child. In the case of the Christian parent, they too are subject to the same scenarios as their child. In other words, the parent must also follow Christ or be subject to a similar outcome - which again is similar to the parent who warns their child about drug use.
So your suggestion that this video is akin to a Christian teaching their child about Jesus is simply, wrong.
It's dumb but it's not felony child abuse. I mean certainly they should not be involved in child care, but it's in no way equivalent to other felony crimes.
Wrong.
Wrong.
Yeah. This seems more like one man's joke is another man's gone too far. I don't agree with it, but this isn't a real crime and will likely get the case tossed out.
Wrong.
Articulate how scaring children with a fake mask is "felony child abuse". It's not even misdemeanor worthy. Having your license pulled until you face scorn from the parents, maybe. But anything more than that is massive over compensation.
You realize that by scaring a child during their formative years inflicts trauma that could remain dormant for years and expressed in very serious ways later in life. Frightening children is also what the likes of MK Ultra do before they condition them. They actually have a name for it which is Trauma induced mind control. Fuck these child care workers - they shouldn’t be anywhere near children.
Oh... But I thought Jesus magically protected everyone and fixed everything...
Guess He only does it for some?
I'm aware of what damage CAN happen. But what MK Ultra also does is KEEP IT A SECRET.
The parents are aware of what happened and can educate their children. Also, there's prayer.
If children are as fragile as you suggest, then we might as well lock them in basements for the first 13 years of their lives. Sometimes I forget which site I'm on with how much hyperbolic exaggerated virtue signaling takes place.
Don’t let the door hitcha ✌️
Wrong.