I never thought I'd enjoy Fact checkers 👀😎
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Where were these 700,000 manufacturing jobs created? China, India, Vietnam? Definitely not in America. Creating jobs in other countries doesn't count.
…jobs, yes—specifically for children. Because Joe loves the children and is always thinking of them. Locked in some decrepit sweatshop somewhere Building Back Better!
Finally getting around to those shovel-ready jobs.
Be careful with supporting this. I don't think Twitter should be creating 'context' to be inserted in people's tweets, however enjoyable it is to see them do it to Biden.
In many situations, facts and context can be created by cherry picking and specific wording to create the impression that it is fact and not opinion.
It just isn't necessary, and gives Twitter much power to leverage their own views by piggybacking off the popularity of others.
What I mean is if Twitter issued their own tweet saying their take on this, nobody would see it or care. Who cares what Twitter thinks. But forcing their take on it into the person's tweet is a whole different thing.
For the more logical mind, prone to research, you are 100% correct. This 'Twitter context' is unnecessary and...morally corruptible.
But the masses have been trained for decades to rely on context being handed to them. You are not going to change that behavior overnight. Q did not change that behavior in the masses in 5 years. Q was not going to turn Walmart Karens into 4chan/8kun bread bakers en masse.
So much effort would not have been made to Flip major Media companies if Q thought they had a more effective and smoother (read: least loss of life) method to compete with those "trusted Voices". No. Instead, commandeer those trusted voices and use them.
I believe Twitter FactCheckingâ„¢ will be rendered unnecessary post Great Awakening.
This.
Remember the 80% is trained from birth to not be critical of authority and to not-think and only feel emotions. From movies to video games, all media was built on a cycle to reduce the human mind that consumed it to an easily-manipulated child-like state that thought with very strong emotions, and no real logic.
The fact logic is not taught in k-12, when even basic logic is ESSENTAL, far more so than Algebra, is not a mistake.
If people are not taught things like 1 black cat pisses on rugs doesn't mean all black cats piss on rugs, and basic statistics reality that correlation doesn't nessicarily mean causation, why would they learn? They would use the "common" sense of a peasant lynch mob, which historically were wrong 80% of the time or abouts, not the logical reason of proper examination.
No this is good.
As long as Mr. Musk does this to EVERYBODY EQUALLY, its acceptable. The key is everybody equally.
The problem with old Twitter is they were doing it only to the right/conservative side of the political split, creating an unequal, two-tiered system.
Mr Musk claims they took over twitter to fight misinformation AND end censorship. This is an interesting take as long as its applied equally.
Exactly.
While it is funny to see these losers get fact checked…we gotta think bigger picture.
If this system is what it claims to be: readers submit "context" and then other readers get a chance to vote on it being "helpful" or not, with only the most "helpful" being shown, then it's acceptable.
The reason I say this is because it is essentially the same thing as a high-ranked reply, especially comparable to a system like Reddit or here that orders replies/comments by "upvotes."
What I like about this new wave is that it doesn't explicitly say if something is true or false. It doesn't just say "mostly false; missing context." It simply provides the additional context.
But, no, it's not perfect. The primary issue with it is the "Reddit effect." That is: if a user comments something that seems intelligent in the way it's worded, often making superficial connections or false analogies to things the reader already understands, but is actually objectively untrue, it will get upvotes. Then new readers will see the upvotes, which lend it credibility, and will be more likely to upvote it further.
Readers now read this and are "primed" by this genuine misinformation. Then they get weirdly defensive to the comment reply that tells the guy he's wrong and explains why, downvoting him. It's like people convince themselves immediately, then reject being "proven wrong" just after.
Reddit is MUCH worse than that.
On reddit a political bot, or paid poster posts a "propaganda reply" challenging the thing/spewing the party line, and then that same actor then uses a bot farm to mass up-vote that comment so it gets overwhelming top visibility. And honestly if a comment gets more than 100 upvotes, organic user voting cannot over come that comment at the point, and they cannot extinguish that bad comment without a brigade of some kind, which are absolutely against Reddit's TOS. And reddit puts a lot of admin resources into finding out who is brigading downvotes and banning them.
They are most likely mass-upvoting using bots, though I cannot rule out that reddit secretly charges fees in back-channel "handshake" deals from all kinds of state and NGO actors, that one can pay reddit for upvotes as long as a you a CCP-friendly leftist.
And NEVER forget Reddit has a minority ownership by the CCP's front TenCent, which is also the largest % shareholder, which operates using "activist minority shareholder" tactics to amplify their voice and bully around the larger body of un-unified reddit shareholders. So effectively Reddit is a CCP organization pretending to be an American social media platform.
I'm sure they are. But I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about a very specific effect that occurs when you have a system like Reddit's (or here's) that props up comments that based on "upvotes."
All the political stuff is true, but it's different. The effect I'm describing occurs even on completely innocuous posts about random technical subject.
If the qualifying statement is irrefutably true, it is not "their take" but fact. I see no harm in this whatsoever, and since we war against falsehood and propaganda, I think it's great. We ARE, after all, on the Great Awakening website. So, what aspect of awakening normies is off limits???
I don't want twitter inserting their take on my tweets or anybody else's. I don't care what Twitter thinks. You might like this fact check, and I do also, but Twitter could change tomorrow. I think I made my point very clear. It is unnecessary for Twitter to insert Twitter's take in people's tweets.
Fair enough.
This numbskull wouldn't know a fact if it pulled his pants down and hit him with a hammer.
How many sheeple will read that shit and believe it. There are still way too many people sound asleep who will believe this.
Be careful with this. When you will write about Pizzagate they will link you to this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory
Saying how it was discredited by the Washington D.C. police. But how is it possible to discredit it without quoting investigation and showing its effects, and how is it possible to make investigation in ONE MONTH (thats how quickly DC police commented on this) on allegations as complex as deeply entrenched elite pedophile ring protected by corruption within many elements of the system?
Yeah..its bullshit narrative. But they want you to buy it.
How that fact check feel, Joe?
lmao what a faggot
Jeff Tiedrich has entered the chat
https://www.apzoblog.com/jeff-tiedrich-biography-wikipedia-family-net-worth-popularity/
The tweet isn't conflating those things though. "Created" means to make something new that didn't exist before. This "fact-check" is rhetorical nonsense.
There are questions to have, such as who "we" is, how they were created, and where those jobs actually are located.
But the tweet is not trying to trick you into thinking the lost jobs magically appeared back - it clearly says new jobs were created. If this is the new Twitter, this is honestly embarrassing.
Biden is counting jobs lost that then came back in the "700,000 new jobs created." That is important context.
If I steal your TV, then give it back to you a few months later, I'm not donating a TV to you. If I did this and tweeted "I donated a TV to a person without one," the additional context of "he first stole this TV from this person" would be completely warranted.
This analogy makes no sense. You're saying Biden stole the jobs lost under Trump? What, he, a private citizen holding no office, put them in a big sack with a dollar sign on them, next to all his color televisions?
What the tweet is saying is that a man stole your TV, and then a different man claims to have made a new TV and given it to you. The fact-check is saying that the second man is just returning the TV stolen from you by the first-man, while also making and distributing over twice as many TVs as were stolen.
I don't think you actually think Trump stole tvs or jobs from you, so your analogy just kind of sucks
The democrat party stole the jobs lost under Trump. They were always going to naturally come back.
If you claim "well, that's not Biden personally" then, sure, but then neither were the regaining of the jobs, even if it occurred while he was in office. He can't have his cake and eat it, too.
What are you talking about?? Yes, someone can take credit for things that happened while they were leader, while dodging the blame for things that happened while they had no leadership roles. Your classic cake analogy is grievously misapplied.
I guess you can argue it doesn't matter who is President, but if that's the case, it doesn't really matter if Trump gets elected again, does it?
The democratic party was responsible for the destruction of jobs during the plandemic, regardless of who was President at the time. The democratic party is now also trying to take credit for the "creation" of jobs that they destroyed, regardless of who was President at the time.
Biden has nothing to do with any of this, but he's trying to take credit for it in this tweet.
It does matter who the President is. But that doesn't mean everything that happens, good or bad, gets attributed to the President. Things happening while you are President does not mean you get credit for them. Sometimes things happen irrespective of you, and sometimes things happen despite you.
You are a bad takes machine.
Joe Biden hasn't created a single good thing is his distorted life.
Hence my saying that there are things to question in the tweet, such as the "we", but what the Twitter fact-checker is going after is silly, and makes the entire exercise seem silly. Which could be the point! Destroy any faith in the fact-check system by just repeatedly breaking it until everyone is glad to see it go.
Could be . . . I just think it's way past time to just continue allowing the White House poseurs to lie to the country with no repercussions.
Forcing them to backtrack, and ultimately stop doing this at all, is very important.
Then you should want a fact-check that actually makes sense, actually checks facts and exposes lies, and doesn't make the fact-checking apparatus seem silly and broken.
I get that you like fact-checking being used against a guy you don't like, but it's not a victory of it's a bad fact-check that makes the fact-checkers seem disconnected and make Biden seem hinged by comparison.
Are you selling the weed you're smoking?
So Braindead Joe is just "a guy I don't like" and not a life-long corrupt pervert who is a globo-libtard puppet who has given away billions of our tax dollars and destroyed this country while continuing Obummer's separatist campaign, while lying constantly to the American citizens???
If you think Biden could EVER "seem hinged," you are in the wrong place.
Seeming hinged is not the same as seeming hinged to you. You have to remember that millions of voters disagree with you, and the way you see the world is not universal. You have to remember this if you ever want to affect the kind of change you want to see.
My point was that it's a bad fact-check that makes fact-checking look bad and Biden look good and put-upon by comparison. You don't have to agree that it looks that way to you or that that is reality - I am trying to warn y'all how normies can interpret this. But whatevs
I hear you, fren. This one doesn't bother me, as the White House lies must be exposed at every turn.
Moving on!