Maybe others have examined this in more detail than me. I see that there were requests from "the Biden team" during the campaign. Prior to swearing in, the Biden team were not government entities, but private parties.
If requests were made from someone getting a government paycheck, that would be a direct violation of the constitution.
The Biden team prior to the Jan 2020 swearing in, and the DNC are not government entities. While it smells like shit, accusations of collusion to subvert the Constitution is not gonna stick.
Not sure of the legalities of it and frankly don't care and here is why. We see nearly every crime imaginable, especially treason, every week for many years and nothing happens to those committing these crimes in the public sphere.
The " just-us " system is not to bring justice to us, it is to protect them from justice by handcuffing us. A good criminal knows u don't even need to cover your tracks if you can just control the mechanism that would ultimately kill or put you away.
At least this twitter revelation may open some more normies and retards to the fact that if social media does this, then maybe their beloved TV is doing it too. They need to stop looking at the word " conspiracy " as a nutter's term and realizing reality is exactly that. 1 Big Conspiracy to enslave us.
Just-us...aptly describes the justice system we are under...clever.
I fear even this won't wake up my normie retards. Blind ideology is not logic driven.
Some clever sod once said 'you cannot reason someone out of a position if they did not arrive at it with reason'.
So I guess the corrollary (sp?) is that if they got there by fear and propaganda then that's what you have to use to get them out of it. As in, 'they have to be shown'.
When you decide to campaign and run for president you become a political candidate, you are no longer a private citizen. Do you not head that political party? Campaigning and running as a presidential candidate has rules.
You cannot pay and use campaign or governmental funds to censor information that violates the first amendment and influences an election, especially the global crimes being comitted by the Biden crime family found in the laptop (these are major crimes). The censorship allowed a bought and paid for puppet/administration to be installed owned by foreign entities through corrupt business dealings.
Foreign entities used the biden admin to overthrow the government. Twitter was complicit in censoring election fraud evidence and the Hunter Biden laptop. And you can bet that the FBI/CIA was also making requests to censor that information.
There were tons of people who said that if they had heard the information about the laptop before the election, they never would have voted for Biden.
Undisclosed in-kind campaign contributions are still massive violations and everyone complicit would still be in deep shit. No matter how you slice it laws were definitely broken.
Yes, if disproportionate services are offered or rendered to the different campaigns, that would clearly be an in-kind contribution.
It might be difficult to prove in court. But the court of law isn't the point. The point is the court of public opinion.
From a historic perspective, the rise of Hitler comes to mind. The majority of his rise to power was either legal or in a grey area. That, combined with forced compliance of corporations and media, some false flags and presto! We have a new form of government.
"I'm not gonna talk about that" may not qualify as a campaign contribution. I don't know.
At the least, they were complicit in a coup. Treason!
Good luck finding a jury that will agree with that. I want to see someone hang, but it's not going to happen with this info dump. Not yet anyway. I hope there's more to come.
Did you not see the reference to DNC as well?
The DNC is a private, not government organization
Ok then, so I guess it's legal then. /s
Its election interference. It was a true story they subverted and made sure it could not get shared around. Although we know that Biden stole the election if this story had gotten out before the election only the die hards would have voted for Biden and the cheating would have had to increase. Also it is a violation of the first amendment when Biden made demands for conservatives to be banned because he didnt like what they were saying.
Did the requests come from Biden while he was a government employee or a private citizen?
Corporations may not be allowed to violate the constitution specifically since they enjoy person hood under the law in the United States of America. China can keep wechat.
I don't see how that applies. I'm seeing accusations of treason and first amendment violations being thrown around here but the communists are gonna skate on this technicality.
Maybe I am going about this the wrong way. Twitter violated their agreement with the user for a "terms of service" violation (inciting violence) {more like inciting Truth} An image cannot incite violence, and Kanye had just called for peace and said he loved jews and nazis. It was more just a blatant example of Twitter not upholding their stated principles and willingness to remove content at will and without proper cause meaning that they cannot claim to be a free speech platform meaning other stuff.
Platform vs publisher violations may be relevant. No one is literally going to hang for that but we might see some clarification of the utility classification of social media. Not as satisfying as executing communists, though.
I am 100% interested in getting the Law as straight forward as possible so that it can be understood by someone as dumb as me. I have 0% interest in anyone getting killed over it. Honestly, we are losing the best gift given to man and they are convincing us that it can be given away. Bullshit! My panties in a wad because corporations have an obligation to uphold the standards they claim and government has a responsibility to enforce that for the protection of the people the very thing they use to get people to give away their absolute best chance at life for the idea of a safe space. It wasn't ok when @jack did it it isn't ok now.
Here is what a "Biden Partisan" has to say about the issue:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FjA2s0gXEAE7vAr.png
That said, keep in mind the issue is not whether Twitter violated First Amendment, but rather whether 2020 was stolen. Yes, we know there are hundreds of evidences, but we just got one evidence that even the left cannot refute, straight from the horse's mouth.
I would agree that the censorship permitted the willfully ignorant to remain willfully ignorant, but even this does not "steal the election". Stealing the election is ballot tampering. The censorship is information warfare. Now... if a foreign national was involved in this censorship that would be "foreign interference".
Luckily, its not the standard that the most cynical of us hold themselves to, but rather what the majority of normies feel when they realize they were lied to and bamboozled by the most vilest of creatures, that counts.
My guess - this ties in with the Scotus case 380-22, giving them the backing they need to rule it correctly. Public perception (optics) is everything.
No, it IS stealing the election. Biden would not have been eligible to become president at all if the information came out about his corrupt business dealings. He's pretty much a foreign asset. If the main population found out he would have been declared a national security threat. There would have been immense pressure for the DOJ to launch an investigation.
I think you have hit closest to what actual legal violations occurred. IMO, being generally pissed off won't take anyone down. People have to be taken out with legal force, one at a time if necessary. The fact that the left skates on technicalities is a consequence of politicians also being lawyers. They write their own backdoors.
Not sure what you mean. I think banning Kanye was wrong. He posted a fusion symbol of a swastika and a star of David. I thought the symbol itself and the concept it represents was interesting, personally, but maybe that's why I get banned from social media so much. Check out the retard down voting my posts here for my wrongthink.
Biden was the Democrat nominee, that makes it election interference at the very least.