Knowing that the vaxxes are killing and maiming people will end any hope science based thinking prevailing?
You mean the kind of science that makes observation and gathers data in order to reach generalized conclusions, like the vaxxes are killing an maiming people? That science?
Man, sometimes it's excrutiating how far behind these people are and their stupid "please like and accept me" disclaimers at the beginning are the worst.
One angle is to let them label us conspiracy theorists, but then we label them conspiracy deniers.
With “Trust the Science”, I think the rhetoric there is: “Trust is an act of Faith. I prefer to Verify the Science.”
With “Hate Speech”, I think the rhetoric is: “Free Speech is all speech, even speech you hate.”
The trick is not to get into the weeds with liberals because they think in catchphrases. You have to counter a catchphrase with another catchphrase. A liberal won’t know what to say if you frame their trust in science as an act of religious faith and then take the intellectual high ground of “Verify the Science”. They have no catchphrase counter to this and will likely change the subject to Roe vs. Wade or something.
I bet that if this was posted to c/Conspiracies the retards there would say it was photoshopped or made by a narrative-swinging bot. Even though stuff like this should be welcome there. Ironic how people post off-topic stuff in GAW that belongs in Consp but would be banned from Consp for being too accurate. And then it gets shadowbanned here for not having a Q reference.
Science is a method to build a model. A map of reality based on inductive reasoning. "Trust" is not a word I'd use. The map is not the territory.
I forget where I first read about it, but the geocentric model of the solar system, with the sun and planets orbiting the earth and moving around in little circles as they did is mocked these days. It's not how things really are, hahaha. But the part everyone leaves out is that it worked. It could accurately predict where the planets would appear in the sky fairly far into the future. Should people trust it? Well, you could trust it to tell you where to look in the sky for Jupiter in six months. Try sending a probe and it will fail spectacularly.
Science is a tool, much like a hammer. Use it with care and skill and you can build great things. Use it for gay sex you can be Paul pelosi.
It would be interesting to see the replies, but I belive this post was written by one of us. Trying to squeeze in doubt in their closed minds. I do however belive that doubt already is there, they are just not ready to discuss it yet. When they are, they will blame Trump.
Knowing that the vaxxes are killing and maiming people will end any hope science based thinking prevailing?
You mean the kind of science that makes observation and gathers data in order to reach generalized conclusions, like the vaxxes are killing an maiming people? That science?
Man, sometimes it's excrutiating how far behind these people are and their stupid "please like and accept me" disclaimers at the beginning are the worst.
We need to make "conspiracy theorist" a positive moniker for normies. They care too much about what other normies think.
It's also sad that they think they followed the science. Since there is nothing scientific about propaganda defended by censorship.
One angle is to let them label us conspiracy theorists, but then we label them conspiracy deniers.
With “Trust the Science”, I think the rhetoric there is: “Trust is an act of Faith. I prefer to Verify the Science.”
With “Hate Speech”, I think the rhetoric is: “Free Speech is all speech, even speech you hate.”
The trick is not to get into the weeds with liberals because they think in catchphrases. You have to counter a catchphrase with another catchphrase. A liberal won’t know what to say if you frame their trust in science as an act of religious faith and then take the intellectual high ground of “Verify the Science”. They have no catchphrase counter to this and will likely change the subject to Roe vs. Wade or something.
Nice, I'm going to use this.
I bet that if this was posted to c/Conspiracies the retards there would say it was photoshopped or made by a narrative-swinging bot. Even though stuff like this should be welcome there. Ironic how people post off-topic stuff in GAW that belongs in Consp but would be banned from Consp for being too accurate. And then it gets shadowbanned here for not having a Q reference.
I never understood why smart people couldn’t see through the whole trust the science push?
You can make a spreadsheet say anything you want it to say.
Science is a method to build a model. A map of reality based on inductive reasoning. "Trust" is not a word I'd use. The map is not the territory.
I forget where I first read about it, but the geocentric model of the solar system, with the sun and planets orbiting the earth and moving around in little circles as they did is mocked these days. It's not how things really are, hahaha. But the part everyone leaves out is that it worked. It could accurately predict where the planets would appear in the sky fairly far into the future. Should people trust it? Well, you could trust it to tell you where to look in the sky for Jupiter in six months. Try sending a probe and it will fail spectacularly.
Science is a tool, much like a hammer. Use it with care and skill and you can build great things. Use it for gay sex you can be Paul pelosi.
Lol. Well said.
Look up the theory of stupid on YouTube it explains it well.
Lol that looks like one of my posts… make them think
Spoiler alert: It has EVERYTHING to do with the "vaccines".
Hope it has nothing to do with the vaxxines? You already know, just admit you are stupid and start the process of fixing it.
It would be interesting to see the replies, but I belive this post was written by one of us. Trying to squeeze in doubt in their closed minds. I do however belive that doubt already is there, they are just not ready to discuss it yet. When they are, they will blame Trump.
They sure are right about the latter.
He equates taking a newly developed experimental jab with science-based thinking. He bought a pig in a poke and he thinks he's a sharp customer.
That right there is a good template for us to use as undercover anons.
Plant the seeds
Lololololol
"I hope it's not the vaccines because it would be the end of science thinking"
Ooooohhhh nooooo
Hopefully they can trust the science longer on this one 😂
Ya Think! You should have been Questioning things way sooner..