DJT indirectly supporting and pointing towards SCOTUS Brunson v Adams 22-380 case?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Our only form of recourse in a federal election has been removed
Our only form of recourse in a presidential election that we never knew about has now been removed.
All the more reason for SCOTUS to rule in favor of the Brunson case!
Remember that Brunson v Adams is a 1A claim! Right to petition the government for the redress of grievances under First Amendment was first used to abolish slavery.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXCgXbz0/scotus-22380-brunson-v-adams-rig/
They have also just removed this power from Kamala in 2024+
Hold up. Yeah, they did. I don't want this to go to 2024, though.
A power that never existed.
Why?
Interesting substituting OMINOUS for OMNIBUS. Just 2 letters difference. One is missing a B and the other has an extra O. A B and an O. I wonder if BO could ever mean anything? cough.
There’s too much still to be revealed…it will either get postponed or thrown out
Anger intensifies. The fire is rising.
Well boss, you say the word and we will make the adjustments. Just say the word.
IMO, DJT is running the show behind the scenes!
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXet46rq/scotus-brunson-v-adams-22380-cas/
I can't get the Brunson case out of my head. I'm not high on hopium. But something just feels right about this angle they are taking. It's something more people could do. "we have all we need". Maybe we should stop waiting for those we elected or "tried" to elect to make a move. We have more power than they do.
If law still applies, and commie law is totally different than our Constitutional law, then the Constitution has to be changed by a very difficult process and requires 2/3 of the States' agreeing with the change. I do not know if the vice president challenging the Electoral College votes is a constitutional right or a man passed law. But the commies don't care either way, they will change it the way they want to and we will have to abide by their decisions--as everything else that happens. Our political representatives are feckless in their job. And of course, no matter who we put in tends to feel the same way. They are not our leaders, they work for us and are supposed to represent us, but they don't, they all seem to represent themselves and the communist party. This swamp runs very deep.
I sent my letters. You all should consider doing it also. The mail campaign has you send a copy of your letter to the brothers so they know how many were sent.
It may mean nothing, but it cant hurt.
Under the Constitution, the President of the Senate does not have any explicit authority to do what DJT suggests Pence should have done. Doing so would have been a violation of the Constitution. After the state legislatures permitted their governors to send unlawfully appointed Electors, the only legal body remaining to remedy such illegal acts, is the Court.
Neither the President of the Senate, nor is Congress a judicial body. SCOTUS. And we we've been waiting on them for far too long...
You may be right about this but I still think that a simple investigation before certifying the election should have been the bare minimum done by the Congress, especially considering that 100 members of Congress claimed election fraud and irregularities backed by evidence!
AND you have NARROWED DOWN THE ESSENCE OF THE BRUNSON CASE!!!
Well Done!!!
Congress only possesses investigatory powers in respect to matters of crafting legislation. Again, it's not a judicial body, except in only two cases: judges of Congressional elections and impeachment. That's it. Every other matter of a judicial nature, under the Constitution, is left to the Courts, SCOTUS in particular, to handle.
However, the Constitution does authorize Congress with the power to establish lower courts and tribunals, such as one for settling election disputes... short of an amendment to the Constitution, that would be the quickest, best, constitutionally legal remedy for 2020, 2022 and all future disputes.
Ok. So what Congress did in the disputed 1876 presidential election was not required to be done in 2020?
https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/educational-resources/disputed-election-1876
What Congress did in 1876-77, was create a special judicial Tribunal to settle the Hayes/Tilden election dispute. It was actually a correct constitutional, legal remedy, albeit it should have just gone to SCOTUS, but understandably with a Republican favored Court, it would have appeared to be quite partisan. They did the best that could have been done, expect that there should NOT have been sitting Congressmen on the Committee (Tribunal). Even though the Constitution didn't explicitly forbid legislators from being on the Committee (Tribunal), it was certainly a breach of the separation of powers. Ultimately didn't matter because it was an equal number of Republicans (controlled Senate) and Democrats (controlled House), so that was all a was and it came down to the Justices, as it really should have been. Was just Congress trying to take power for itself since there was a vacuum. Sadly, because the people tolerated it, Congress unlawfully gave itself even more unconstitutional power in 1887.
Ok. So in your opinion, SCOTUS will throw away the Brunson case?
They should hear it, but my expectation is that they won't.
Ok. So you also believe that the relief sought by Brunson is correct. It may not happen because of other factors. But on face of it, the case has enough merit to be ruled in favor of Brunson!
We are NOT talking about POWER per se, BUT the Power of BOTH Houses to do their due diligence AND THAT IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT...Both Chamber DID NOT DO "DUE DILIGENCE"
No, we're talking about AUTHORITY, as explicitly delegated in and by the Constitution. Congress has no authority to adjudicate presidential Electoral disputes because the Constitution doesn't give it any.
"Due diligence" means following the Constitution. Congress attempting to usurp the law to wield power it is not authorized with, would be the exact opposite of due diligence. Same applies to the President of the Senate.
If you don't like what the Constitution says or doesn't say, then your problem is with the law. Work to get it changed. But don't lie about it actually says and doesn't say.
Life is still too comfortable for the majority of Americans. I hate to say it, but we need societal collapse, mass hunger, ect. before anything happens. Right now, life is still pretty good for most, and there's still too much to lose for everyone. If you start organizing in a meaningful way, you're going to face what the January 6 political prisoners are facing, 10 fold, if they even allow you to live. Chances are you'll end up dead. Until there's little left to lose, not much significant will happen to alter the status quo.
You’re 1000% correct and anyone who tells you that you are a doomer is a retard. Normies are worthless. Anything less then societal collapse will keep them asleep
When people have nothing to lose, they will lose it.
Unfortunately, you are correct.
Timing is everything! Let's see what happens!
I sure the hell hope so.
Not sure my faith will hold.
However I extremely have faith in God 🙏🙏.
As I DO in the Faith of God... HOWEVER, I do believe that the SC's will come to what sense they have left BECAUSE their asses are on the line...
does this country need an uprising (civil war) to correct the wrongs in the states...do they?
Do they NOT realize that there are more of us than the FEDERAL Gov put together?
Remember back in the '80s (I think?) that the semi-trucks WITH trailers shut down DC? I do...and the SC's know history and they know that history WILL NOT BE KIND TO THEM...and there has been a SC Justice who regretted what he did when passing Madelyn O' Hares abortion case... ...HE REGRETTED THE DECISION TO THE DAY HE DIED!!!
NOTE (for historical purposes): these are broad stroke(s) of what took place BUT if there are any corrections...well, one knows what to do... TANGO YANKEE!!!
I hold hope you are correct.
...valid observation...
Still not sure where you stand.
...I have no confidence in the American legal system....
Nope they are compromised.
...absolutely....