So i've watched every McCullough, Korry, Cole, Malone, etc... interview and podcast. All of them say that the problem with the vaccine is that the vaccine is replicating the wrong part of the virus, the spike protein, which is causing all the blood clots. I understand all of that, but i believe McCullough and some others still say that its ok for people over 65. If the problem with the spike is that it causes the blood clots, why would it be safe for people over 65? As you get older your body’s ability to create plasmin (the natural enzyme that breaks down blood clots) diminishes, while the ability and rate of creating clots increases. For a very long time, this idea of over 65 confused me. The only thing i can think of is hormones. Older people do not have hormones, like testosterone, like the young and healthy.. but older people still have a harder time creating plasmin.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
If anybody tells me there's a safe way to pick up a rattlesnake I'm not sticking around long enough to learn the technique. If there's rattlesnakes around I'm getting the hell away from them. I'm not an expert. The people giving the lessons may or may not be experts - I don't know. But I've heard enough stories about people being bitten by rattlesnakes that I have developed a sense that makes me want to get away from them.
Yes, that's a great analogy.. but I just get frustrated when I hear the doctors that say don't get the jab but if your over 65 it's probably safe.. without saying why. That's all.
Well that's a pretty darn good analogy...
The same people who did gain of function research are also providing the “vaccines”. It’s a scam.
Personally I don't care who would say it is safe to take these clot shots...run as fast and as far as you can away from it. A lot of the rubbery clots being pulled out of corpses are not from blood. I have listened to so many reports from different doctors that it does start to become overwhelming...so safest thing is to avoid ANY vaccination, stay away from hospitals and learn how to alternatively treat any ailment you might get. Sorry if that doesn't answer your question...but I just would not even entertain a suggestion to take these death jabs.
Controlled opposition is a mother-fucker.
They give enough truth for you to bite but the real (whole) truth isn't represented.
This is old data, but 65+ do not have excessive myopericarditis. Young men have 20 times the expected rate, but they say "this is fine." https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-08-30/03-COVID-Su-508.pdf
Maybe they are still stuck believing most conspiracy theories are only theories.
Perhaps they see some of the dangers the shot is causing like infertility and they can't deny that issue so they want to hurry up and speak about it. It is an emergency when women of childbearing age are out there injecting themselves with something that's going to cause infertility among the masses. But overall they're not convinced this is a kill shot and since the older crowd is not having any more babies, it is not their priority.
Those comments about the 65 y/o age group by Dr McCullough and others.
As previous anons have mentioned, it's an arbitrary example. Those Doctors also mention treatment of patients, who are not Vaccinated, with the safe, effective early treatments and recommend that nobody should get Vaccinated if they choose not to.
They also mention often that if people have to be Vaccinated because of pressure from employers, that these people should way up the risk benifits ratio. They would see the risks far outweigh any possible benifits.
Those Doctors recommend people should decide if it is possible to seek different employment to avoid being Vaccinated.
It can leave people in a very difficult situation,but they have to realise they may need to make uncomfortable decisions to stay unvaccinated.
"but i believe McCullough and some others still say that its ok for people over 65", have you tried to confirm if that is true or not?
The number 65 is arbitrary in the larger context of this, and is just a "chosen" number by entities in power dealing with old people.
It is for example also linked to an age that goes with other programs determined by age, for example Adult Day Service Centers (ADSCs), which is for those aged 65 and above.
The pharma and medical industry often has these three categories in regard to adults: 19 through 26, 27 through 64 and 65 and above.
That age number has been displayed all over the place, HHS, CDC, NHS, etc., are you sure it it was "McCullough and some others" (which is also really vague)?
Yes, I've literally heard McCullough say it many times.. in interviews. Not in presentations, but layed back interviews.
I will admit, I would say the old people around me that have taken the Vax and the boosters do appear to be fine.. I don't talk to many people anymore, but I do know that 3 of my friends in thier 30's did have some issues with the jab.. just trying to understand this old person concept with the jab
I think it is just being ignored, old people die right, so none of them are being attributed to the vax. My experience, since taking the clotshot, my FIL has a blood clot to the brain, he is currently dying in hospital, my mother has blood clots and pericarditis, my aunt collapsed going from one room to another in her home, she was dead of a sudden heart attack before my uncle could even reach her after hearing the noise of her falling over. Both my mother and MIL tell me almost weekly of some friend or friends husband has died of a heart attack but they are all 75 plus and no one cares, its just been put down to oh well, old people die.
And to me the only logical explanation is hormones, testosterone.. something like that... but it still doesn't explain the blood clotting part. Older people have a higher risk for blood clots, so why ok for them?
McCullough is far and away the most credible...and he is still saying this crap. I suspect there is a message in that.
Maybe like Trump promoting the vaccines: he tells enough that you should know not to take it but holds it up just enough that it cannot be taken advantage of to lock us all down again since there would be no vaxx to "protect muh elderly"
Just guessing, but maybe some substance in the jab needs adrenaline (or similar) to activate (to kill the host), such as when young athletes are running. One would expect older people to not be exercising vigorously like that. Heart rate rise, internal body temp, spike in adrenaline, other physiological changes during activity that an older person is unlikely to experience.
That said, my elderly friend never felt right after getting the jab, progressively worse after boosters then died of SADS. Another got an aggressive cancer out of the blue and died, another had heart issues and died, was previously healthy... so I believe the jabs are still dangerous for older people.
Your hormone-enzyme theory sounds plausible also. I have no idea why these docs are saying the jabs are safe for older people, but they SHOULD be giving their REASONS when they make claims like that.
Are you sure they said it's "Safe" for people over 65. Usually what they mean is the risk of dying from covid over 65 outweighs the risk of getting life threatening blood clots.
They never say it's safe and effective but I've just heard mccullough mainly... say that over 65 it's safe.. I just don't understand that logic yet
I don't either. If ain't safe for 15 year olds cause it may cause a cardiac event than it's not safe 65 year olds either.
You might be remembering something one of them said before they wisened up and took a certain red pill. Malone perhaps?
....similar CFR