Brunson - Looks like we won't know anything until Monday
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Prayers!
I wonder if the next play, in case of refusal to bring the case to hearing, is to file suit against any and all justices who refuse to uphold their own oaths of office.
File suit where? It’s the Supreme Court - there is no higher court to seek judgement from.
This. Military tribunals are the way. When scotus protests, just ask them, yeah you and what army?
Old Hickory style
Civilians can’t file anything in military courts - and any military court is still subordinate to SCOTUS per the Constitution. Not dooming, just giving facts.
Plz convict yourself.
I was told there would be punch and pie 🤔
Good. At least he admits it's going to be denied.
EDIT: LOL @ downvoters
Maybe the Brunson boys know a little more about their case than you or I do. And THEY fully expect a denial from the court. So does anyone paying attention for the past few years FFS.
If we're proven wrong, and 2020 gets corrected, we'll celebrate of course. Never been so happy to be wrong. But hanging hopes and dreams on the 'Supreme Court doing the right thing', setting that expectation, is a recipe for disappointment.
Not sure why people are down voting this. Not sure why anyone has their hopes up given how court cases never seem to rule in our favor ever
I don't think I've seen a single person here with any conviction that this will pan out so I'm not sure what your doomer squad is protesting. It's just fun and interesting and from my perspective it has at least a .00003285% chance of saving the world. I'll take it.
Remember that whole abortion thing?
Highly recommended: Keep your expectations in check, always.
I will be there !
SIGH.
He must have forgot that SCOTUS has a few leaks. Might not have to wait, especially if they decide to take up the case.
I live close enough I’ll actually take him up on that 😂. Would love to meet the men who saved the Republic.
This carrot and stick approach, really gets to me sometimes. Especially when its more often the stick, a hawthorn stick, up the rear end.
Patriots. They will be spoken of with the same reverence as the Founding Fathers.
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/ Sorry, but the sooner we stop getting taken in by the latest hail mary miracle maybe enough of us will get off our keyboards and do something about it.
You really think anything short of miraculous will solve our problems?
Are you doing something more than the Brunson brothers? No. You're not. Whether or not they succeed, knowing that people like them are out there gives me hope.
Every single one of us here could file a completely bullshit lawsuit filled with endless amounts of hyperbole and no cognizable legal theory contained in it, let alone a viable one. But where would that get us, except for time lost that you'll never get back? What exactly is the point of such an exercise? Virtue signaling to the crowd righteously outraged about election fraud? Its like in blazing saddles "I didn't get a harrumph from that guy!" "Give the Governor a harrumph!"
Maybe we could even accuse our own reporters of treason for questioning the viability for the lawsuit like Brunson did to Tracy Beanz. Wouldn't that be a hoot? I love it when we imitate the left by adopting a speech code as it relates to certain sacred cows.
Not a single person in here that cheerleads this utterly bogus lawsuit has actually bothered to read the entirety of the filings and dig into it. They have all been stuck at the intro rants talking about election fraud, treason, aid and comfort to an enemy, and whatever other generalized grievance people have about the 2020 election. Meanwhile, Brunson actually has an "intentional infliction of emotional distress" claim in his lawsuit! 🤣🤣 Nobody ever bothered to get that far to see how stupid this case is.
6 claims for relief; none of which is a claim of treason, aid and comfort, or election fraud:
Now all of you cheerleaders for this case need to go do some digging and explain how all of this is somehow inaccurate, and contract law principles can be applied to people who have never met or spoken with Brunson, let alone formed an agreement with him. And how an official taking an oath of office gives rise to a duty of care to Brunson, specifically. Also, how Brunson himself was victimized by fraud during the electoral college certification - that each member he is suing personally duped him into casting a ballot on false pretenses. Because without any of this, you cannot demonstrate it works. Period.
Not sure if you've considered this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJn62aQzD3I
Is that the inbred version of a mariachi band? Wow. Glad everyone has their hope in these dudes...
You got a lotta hate there dude. Chill
Tracy is that you?
Stop talking like this. You reek of glowie.
If I was a glowie I would have been pushing the Brunson distraction.
What was it a distraction from? Your big terrorist event that’s gonna save America? The basic training of that massive army you raised in silence the past four years?
Shut the fuck up. Rambo.
He wrote in an internet Q forum.....
Working on our keyboards is NOT incompatible with taken action in the local, state or outside arena.
You can do both, and <ahem> the information war is real, btw.
That said, i agree with the sentiment of pinning hopes (expectations) on outside events. What will happen will happen, and there are heaps of disinfo and grifty types ready to exploit expectations. (I personally have no particular expectation that the Brunson case will be anything but not fruitful, but I'm not attached emotionally either way.)
Just a fun lil scene in the movie imo. Ppl so serious out here.
One thing's for sure. If they destroy our ability to hope, we lose.
Personally, I hope the Brunson's save the world, however unlikely that outcome is.
I wonder how many letters the SC received in support of this case. How many here sent letters?
🤚
Brunson isn't quite correct.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/ordersofthecourt
So if they wanted to, the SC could certain release the decision result at any time, not necessarily Monday.
In fact, the SC already issued one order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010623zr_k537.pdf
What that means, I don't know, nor do I know what the implications are re: the Brunson case, if any (i.e. that the order NOT being released immediately means the petition is denied?) but I guess we'll know for sure on Monday after all.
Recommended: Keep your expectations in check.
Two Scoops?!
https://rumble.com/v219eoy-ep.-142-florida-vax-grand-jury-trump-indictment-jfk-files-arizona-update-an.html - 1:46:30
Apparently this is also bullshit.
So who's idea was it to hype me up for today?