Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

221
Brunson - Looks like we won't know anything until Monday (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 3 years ago by truthyDOTchurch 3 years ago by truthyDOTchurch +221 / -0
48 comments download share
48 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (48)
sorted by:
▲ 18 ▼
– Responsible1 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

Prayers!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– MAG768720 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

I wonder if the next play, in case of refusal to bring the case to hearing, is to file suit against any and all justices who refuse to uphold their own oaths of office.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Madrashro 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

File suit where? It’s the Supreme Court - there is no higher court to seek judgement from.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– SmolPedeBestPede 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

This. Military tribunals are the way. When scotus protests, just ask them, yeah you and what army?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MarkusCincinnatus 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Old Hickory style

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Madrashro 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Civilians can’t file anything in military courts - and any military court is still subordinate to SCOTUS per the Constitution. Not dooming, just giving facts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– lash 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Plz convict yourself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– boataholic 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/ Sorry, but the sooner we stop getting taken in by the latest hail mary miracle maybe enough of us will get off our keyboards and do something about it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– truthyDOTchurch [S] 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

You really think anything short of miraculous will solve our problems?

Are you doing something more than the Brunson brothers? No. You're not. Whether or not they succeed, knowing that people like them are out there gives me hope.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Every single one of us here could file a completely bullshit lawsuit filled with endless amounts of hyperbole and no cognizable legal theory contained in it, let alone a viable one. But where would that get us, except for time lost that you'll never get back? What exactly is the point of such an exercise? Virtue signaling to the crowd righteously outraged about election fraud? Its like in blazing saddles "I didn't get a harrumph from that guy!" "Give the Governor a harrumph!"

Maybe we could even accuse our own reporters of treason for questioning the viability for the lawsuit like Brunson did to Tracy Beanz. Wouldn't that be a hoot? I love it when we imitate the left by adopting a speech code as it relates to certain sacred cows.

Not a single person in here that cheerleads this utterly bogus lawsuit has actually bothered to read the entirety of the filings and dig into it. They have all been stuck at the intro rants talking about election fraud, treason, aid and comfort to an enemy, and whatever other generalized grievance people have about the 2020 election. Meanwhile, Brunson actually has an "intentional infliction of emotional distress" claim in his lawsuit! 🤣🤣 Nobody ever bothered to get that far to see how stupid this case is.

6 claims for relief; none of which is a claim of treason, aid and comfort, or election fraud:

  1. Promissory estoppel - a bogus claim that attempts to apply contract law principles to election fraud...nope, fail
  2. Promissory estoppel - almost identical to the first one. nope, fail.
  3. Breach of duty - bogus theory that an oath of office gives rise to a duty to Brunson. Nope. Taking an oath does not magically make the entirety of government owe a duty to Brunson. Fail.
  4. Intentional infliction of emotional distress - 🤣🤣
  5. Fraud - a generalized grievance about how the 2020 election was "conducted" sprinkled in with more faulty logic trying to connect it to the failed theory there is some duty to him arising out of an oath.
  6. Civil conspiracy - no underlying tortious acts that are viable have been alleged; accordingly no civil conspiracy claim can be viable. Fail.

Now all of you cheerleaders for this case need to go do some digging and explain how all of this is somehow inaccurate, and contract law principles can be applied to people who have never met or spoken with Brunson, let alone formed an agreement with him. And how an official taking an oath of office gives rise to a duty of care to Brunson, specifically. Also, how Brunson himself was victimized by fraud during the electoral college certification - that each member he is suing personally duped him into casting a ballot on false pretenses. Because without any of this, you cannot demonstrate it works. Period.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– truthyDOTchurch [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Not sure if you've considered this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJn62aQzD3I

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Is that the inbred version of a mariachi band? Wow. Glad everyone has their hope in these dudes...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– truthyDOTchurch [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You got a lotta hate there dude. Chill

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Papatriot12 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Tracy is that you?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Stop talking like this. You reek of glowie.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– boataholic 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

If I was a glowie I would have been pushing the Brunson distraction.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What was it a distraction from? Your big terrorist event that’s gonna save America? The basic training of that massive army you raised in silence the past four years?

Shut the fuck up. Rambo.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– FractalizingIron 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

He wrote in an internet Q forum.....

Working on our keyboards is NOT incompatible with taken action in the local, state or outside arena.

You can do both, and <ahem> the information war is real, btw.

That said, i agree with the sentiment of pinning hopes (expectations) on outside events. What will happen will happen, and there are heaps of disinfo and grifty types ready to exploit expectations. (I personally have no particular expectation that the Brunson case will be anything but not fruitful, but I'm not attached emotionally either way.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– truthyDOTchurch [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Just a fun lil scene in the movie imo. Ppl so serious out here.

One thing's for sure. If they destroy our ability to hope, we lose.

Personally, I hope the Brunson's save the world, however unlikely that outcome is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– CQVFEFE 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Good. At least he admits it's going to be denied.

EDIT: LOL @ downvoters

Maybe the Brunson boys know a little more about their case than you or I do. And THEY fully expect a denial from the court. So does anyone paying attention for the past few years FFS.

If we're proven wrong, and 2020 gets corrected, we'll celebrate of course. Never been so happy to be wrong. But hanging hopes and dreams on the 'Supreme Court doing the right thing', setting that expectation, is a recipe for disappointment.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– redlotus69 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Not sure why people are down voting this. Not sure why anyone has their hopes up given how court cases never seem to rule in our favor ever

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– truthyDOTchurch [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I don't think I've seen a single person here with any conviction that this will pan out so I'm not sure what your doomer squad is protesting. It's just fun and interesting and from my perspective it has at least a .00003285% chance of saving the world. I'll take it.

court cases never seem to rule in our favor ever

Remember that whole abortion thing?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– FractalizingIron 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Highly recommended: Keep your expectations in check, always.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– nolasquid33 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

I was told there would be punch and pie 🤔

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– 307Sleeper 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I will be there !

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SirSaturday 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

SIGH.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TSearch 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

He must have forgot that SCOTUS has a few leaks. Might not have to wait, especially if they decide to take up the case.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SirSaturday 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

So who's idea was it to hype me up for today?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I live close enough I’ll actually take him up on that 😂. Would love to meet the men who saved the Republic.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– JustRetired 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

This carrot and stick approach, really gets to me sometimes. Especially when its more often the stick, a hawthorn stick, up the rear end.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AngelCole 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I wonder how many letters the SC received in support of this case. How many here sent letters?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Rebelmom 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

🤚

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LongTimeListener 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Patriots. They will be spoken of with the same reverence as the Founding Fathers.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SirSaturday 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

https://rumble.com/v219eoy-ep.-142-florida-vax-grand-jury-trump-indictment-jfk-files-arizona-update-an.html - 1:46:30

Apparently this is also bullshit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FractalizingIron 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Brunson isn't quite correct.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/ordersofthecourt

The vast majority of cases filed in the Supreme Court are disposed of summarily by unsigned orders. Such an order will, for example, deny a petition for certiorari without comment. Regularly scheduled lists of orders are issued on each Monday that the Court sits, but "miscellaneous" orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled order lists are posted on this Website on the day of their issuance, while miscellaneous orders are posted on the day of issuance or the next day.

So if they wanted to, the SC could certain release the decision result at any time, not necessarily Monday.

In fact, the SC already issued one order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010623zr_k537.pdf

FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 2023

ORDER IN PENDING CASE

21-887 PEREZ, MIGUEL L. V. STURGIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ET AL.

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument is granted.

What that means, I don't know, nor do I know what the implications are re: the Brunson case, if any (i.e. that the order NOT being released immediately means the petition is denied?) but I guess we'll know for sure on Monday after all.

Recommended: Keep your expectations in check.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BilleeBeene 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Two Scoops?!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy