Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

350
💥 Something worth smart Anons to look at ! Interesting connections here ! (media.greatawakening.win) Q-analysis!
posted 3 years ago by 7Nick9 3 years ago by 7Nick9 +350 / -0
38 comments download share
38 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (38)
sorted by:
▲ 51 ▼
– MiltonWilliamCooper 51 points 3 years ago +51 / -0

Seems you have made someone unhappy. I’ll donate my upvote to counter their negativity. 👍🏻

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Kek I recon..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 33 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 33 points 3 years ago +33 / -0

Follow the money every time !

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– FractalizingIron 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Nick, what do you think are the interesting connections here? Could you elaborate on them?

Transparently brings accountability is hardly a Q-phrase.

Trust Grassley, well, Grassley has shown by his actions over the past 5 years, that Q's admonition to trust Grassley is well founded. So, well, we know we can trust Grassley, so that's no biggie.

Doesn't seem anything significant about the Deltas.

There doesn't appear to be any special or significant connection between Q's "Trust Grassley" post and "Transparently brings accountability"

So what exactly are the interesting connections?

It's certainly a good thing to bring this information to the minds of newcomers, but apart from the fact that Grassley is doing what we would expect him to do, and that he used a phrase that Q used once in almost 5000 posts, I don't see any "interesting connections" beyond that.

But perhaps I'm missing something? Interested in your thoughts, as OP.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

You answered your own question 👉" It's certainly a good thing to bring this information to the minds of newcomers, but apart from the fact that Grassley is doing what we would expect him to do, and that he used a phrase that Q used once in almost 5000 posts"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FractalizingIron 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Well, maybe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 18 ▼
– dty6 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

Nice!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– surdog 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Just as true now as it was when Q first posted it nearly 3 years ago!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Goldenhawk 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

...doesn't get any clearer than that now does it

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1623808833708519427?s=20&t=tOdcu9wHNoebKCxVfLoTaQ sauce

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Pbman2 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Looks like a good one to me.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Dogsoldier2 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Sweet!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Jak4 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Interesting!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Joys1Daughter 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

The corn is ripe! 🌽

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TrustTheTruth 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Chuck Grassley is absolutely not trustworthy.

He is also a 33rd degree Freemason.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– TrustTheTruth 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

This is common knowledge. It is open and public. You can find examples by searching the most obvious of phrases, like Grassley 33rd degree Freemason.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– TrustTheTruth 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

To the downvoters who do not believe this, here is one of many examples to prove it.

We have known of Chuck’s corruption for decades. We know many secrets, but this is no secret. It just may not be what you want to hear.

https://grandlodgeofiowa.org/docs/publications/December_Bulletin_2015.pdf

Grand Cross of Honor Past Grand Treasurer Shane A. Harshbarger received the Scottish Rite Grand Cross of Honor at the 2015 Biennial Session of the Ancient and Accepted Order of the Scottish Rite of the Southern Jurisdiction Supreme Council. The Grand Cross is the highest honor for a 33rd degree Mason. Brother Harshbarger joins Senator Charles Grassley as the only Iowa Masons to currently hold this honor.

Chuck Grassley is controlled opposition and represents the white square on the checkerboard.

What really happened to Senator Paul Wellstone? Chuck knows about the “accident.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– merf 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I don't think these things are specifically linked, but I got to pulling threads and maybe some other fren will be able to formally link something:

"You didn't think the statement by POTUS re: 'CALM BEFORE THE STORM' was just random did you?"

This statement was made Oct. 6 2017. Throw in Oct 6th Deltas:

u/#q2361

The Robert Byrd kiss here is eerily similar to the Jill/Emhoff makeout session we were just subjected to.

u/#q2358

This one is wild. Pre-dates Ketanji Jackson's appointment but if you're looking to peek ahead in the script it's hard to imagine she won't be impeached for whatever reason with 2/3 Senate vote.

Also the [THEY] in killbox in the quoted post could be relevant.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– escapegoat 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I think Jackson is there for the symbolism, starting with Justices Jackson and Barrett which links many memes back to the Superbowl 38 halftime show in which Justin helped Jackson to bare it.

But there's also Trumps favorite president Andrew Jackson. Ketanji stories could link memes to him and his battles with the bankers. So I think they'll keep her around.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– rherrell 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

The only one I trust is Trump.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– QAnonIsOldSlang 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Lol trust the 88 year old guy whos been in congress for 40+ years with nothing to show but a $3.8 million dollar bag.

Sure totally trustworthy...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yeldarb1983 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

As someone politely skeptical of the Q posts( I simply don't have the time to dive into them, but the basic premise of a secret cabal of super good guys working behind the scenes to root out the corruption sounds a bit farfetched, and a little bit like something tom clancy or michael critchton would have written), I hope you don't mind my two bits worth on this...

One thing to keep in mind is even though the general public views q as some insane cult of violent trump supporters (what else is new, right?), the q posts are public knowledge, so anyone with internet access could have read them, snipped out the useful bits, and forwarded them to a grassley staffer. While I grew up in iowa, I wasn't really keyed into politics at the time, so I can't really personally speak to his political history(though I have a stepdad who referred to tom vilsack as "tom nutsack" 😂), but it might be worth diving into.

Some things to look for while you're digging:

  • has grassley said things like this pre-q/pre-2016?

  • what is grassley's voting record on bills that are pro-government transparency/accountability?

  • what is grassley's record on sponsorship of such bills?

  • how frequently has grassley discussed transparency/accountability pre-trump?

  • has grassley always held the same opinion on such things, or was there a sudden "switch" on the issue when it became popular for an extended period of time?

Also keep in mind politicians are notorious for exploiting political movements for their own ends. Look at Neolib Democrats and the progressive movement for a prominent example.

Again, I don't want to splash water on anyone's opinion, but I feel it would be irresponsible of me as an outsider not to challenge any confirmation bias. Even though I'm ambivalent on Q, I like you guys. you do good research.

(P.S.: sorry for the textwall, I kinda got on a roll. 😅

edit: as some of you pointed out, I made an ass of myself here, and I'm sorry. It wasn't my intent to bash you or what you do, and yeah, I could stand to be a lot less lazy.

again, I'm sorry

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Hunter_Slaptop 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

You're basing all of this off of secondhand knowledge of the Q posts? Why not just read them? Because the "basic premise" you've highlighted here is a cartoonish summary.

Before categorizing the entire plan as "farfetched" you should probably read the posts for yourself. That way you'll actually know what you're talking about, before providing a list of instructions for others.

I think it's irresponsible of you to assume you have a grasp on Q without reading the posts. If you have time to write a textwall, you have time to do your due diligence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– yeldarb1983 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I have tried, but it's a lot to absorb honestly, and most of the links to the post seem to be out of context quotes which makes it a little bit dry. you have a point though, I do need to read into it when I can (my internet is throttled down at the moment by my isp =/ )

for what it's worth, I'm not shitting on you guys or Q. sorry it came off that way in my post. Clearly I need to word things more carefully next time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– NewExpertBread 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

As someone politely skeptical of the Q posts( I simply don't have the time to dive into them, but the basic premise of a secret cabal of super good guys working behind the scenes to root out the corruption sounds a bit farfetched, and a little bit like something tom clancy or michael critchton would have written), I hope you don't mind my two bits worth on this...

Incorrect, the point of the drops is to shine a big spotlight toward things the public needs to know. There is no Tom Clancy novel. Just someone pointing their finger at the bad guy, delivering evidence, and saying "that's the bad guys, and there's more bad guys over there".

That's where you lose interest?

The very basic and initial introduction to Q?

You got it wrong right off the bat?

Interesting.

Good luck out there anon. In the real world.

Do you know that DEEPTHROAT was the former FBI Deputy Director leaking intel?

It's not far fetched. Read some history.


On May 31, 2005, W. Mark Felt’s family ends 30 years of speculation, identifying Felt, the former FBI assistant director, as “Deep Throat,” the secret source who helped unravel the Watergate scandal. Felt's admission, made in an article in Vanity Fair magazine, took legendary reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, who had promised to keep their source’s identity a secret until his death, by surprise. Tapes show that President Nixon himself had speculated that Felt was the secret informant as early as 1973.

The question “Who was Deep Throat?” had been investigated relentlessly in the ensuing years since Watergate in movies, books, televisions shows and on the Internet. America was obsessed with the shadowy figure who went to great lengths to conceal his involvement with the Washington Post reporters. Although his name was often mentioned as a possibility, Felt consistently denied being Deep Throat, even writing in his 1979 memoir, “I never leaked information to Woodward and Bernstein or to anyone else!” Even as recently as six years before the admission, he was quoted as saying, “It would be contrary to my responsibility as a loyal employee of the FBI to leak information.”

After the death of J. Edgar Hoover, then director of the FBI, Felt, who was serving as the bureau’s assistant director, wanted the job and was angry over Nixon’s failure to appoint him. He was also upset over Nixon’s attempts to stall the bureau’s investigation into the Watergate break-ins. So, when Bob Woodward called the veteran FBI employee to request information about the bureau’s Watergate investigation, Felt agreed to talk. But his cooperation came with strict restrictions. Felt refused to be quoted, even anonymously, and agreed only to confirm information already obtained, refusing to provide new information. And, of course, the reporters had to promise to keep his identity a secret. Felt was only contacted on matters of great importance.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/deep-throat-is-revealed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– merf 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Those are all good things to keep in mind. Sometimes there is no connection at all.

Most in the Q community would regard this as more of a shout-out than a proof. Not something to share with the broader public, but an obvious connection to Q themes that could be the foundation for a proof.

I dug on it for an hour or so and couldn't come up with anything, but I always learn other info during my digs so it's no loss.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DontTreadOnIT 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

You have time to write lengthy posts on a forum dedicated to something you don't believe in...but you don't have time to read the source material?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yeldarb1983 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

why not? feminists do it all the time, lmao.

kidding aside, I should look into the stuff again. if I'm being honest with myself, I just suffer from a chronic illness called laziness, lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Greekish 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Kinda defeats the object of being here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Aspie 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

How can anyone datefag properly, when the Grassley message has no timestamp? All posts of online messages should include timestamps.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Chuck Grassley @ChuckGrassley These whistleblower disclosures are exactly why I’m going to follow the facts + $$$ where it leads me. I won’t be deterred TRANSPARENCY BRINGS ACCOUNTABILITY Quote Tweet House Republicans @HouseGOP · 20h "Whistleblower disclosures to my office make clear that the FBI has..evidence with respect to potential criminal conduct by Hunter...[They] also allege that Joe Biden was aware of Hunter Biden's business arrangements and may have been involved in some of them." - @ChuckGrassley 5:19 PM · Feb 9, 2023 · 55.9K Views

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The tweet is above in the thread ☝️

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mister_Winston 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What was the date of the Grassley tweet? We shouldn't be cutting off any timestamps.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 7Nick9 [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1623808833708519427?s=20&t=tOdcu9wHNoebKCxVfLoTaQ

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy