i can see it now.... most of Australia will die off... the global parasites will overtake the land and resources... the remaining survivors will be their slaves. end of story.
Aussies are super brainwashed. Not sure what happened to the stragglers, and how the programming didn't stick to us. I quit most media about 20 years ago. The tide has turned, but very few of the turned are actually speaking out.
It is. This is the same lie the used to create a study in Canada funded by black face Hitler to "prove" that the un-vaccinated are more likely to get into car accidents due to being reckless. That was also essentially the title of the study. For anyone who read the study, it actually had 3 categories: drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. Suspiciously, all 3 groups had about the same elevated chance of being hospitalized if in a car accident. Almost like the baseline vaccination rate of the population they used was a lie which means any study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated would over-estimate the rates among the unvaccinated. Also, the study never publicly released their data so it can't be scrutinized but it had other problems too. The main thing is, from the title, you can tell it was designed as propaganda tool for release to the public. Proper research papers have titles that don't try to draw conclusions and stick to the facts within the paper. As a result, they usually come off as boring and sometimes unclear to the masses due to being very technical.
For the less mathematically inclined, this is a simple example of how you use inflated vaxx numbers to make the vaccinated look bad. It can also be used to make them look good, but oddly enough, I have never seen that:
In area A the vaxx rate is 50%. Inversely, that makes 50% un-vaxxed.
The government lies and says it is 90%. Inversely, that makes 10% un-vaxxed.
You then measure the number of people in car accidents. You get 50% vaxxed in car accidents and 50% unvaxxed in car accidents.
You then draw the conclusion that while the un-vaxxed make up only 10% of the population, they are involved in 50% of the car accidents.
Also, in most areas, the way the government measures the vaxx rate of the population is almost never through a blind survey. It's through how many doses of the death shot they think they have administered and compares that to what they think the population is. This is a method highly prone to error, manipulation, and geared more towards over-estimating the vaxx rate. At one time, their website claimed that 100% of people over 80 in my area were fully vaxxed. I can tell you, I knew 1 person who was well over 80 and was not vaxxed at all. Furthermore, if I knew 1, there had to be more. They pulled those numbers out of their rear ends.
I really didn't realise how different I was till I was the only person not wearing a mask through all that shit.. arguing with security.. nearly getting arrested...
96.2% um, nope, that too is a big lie. If that were the case there would only be around 90 - 100 ppl in my town who are unjabbed. There are literally thousands of purebloods here, admittedly it is an area known for its anti jab sentiments pre plandemic.
i feel like i'm the only one to have never even had this thing once. And I've never masked up or avoided public gatherings/transport etc. Just lived my life normally and nada.
Unfortunately, those numbers don't point to a vaccine being shit if it was effective:
A vaccine being administered to 96.2% of Australia means it was administered to roughly 24,700,000 people. If it was indeed the direct cause of 20,000 deaths for those double-vaxxed citizens, that means the vaccine only had a kill rate of 0.07%. I wouldn't call that shit by any stretch of the imagination, considering that is only assuming that all 20,000 deaths can be blamed on the vaccine.
Africa is unvaxxed and has barely been affected by Covid, long Covid or massive increases in heart attacks
Long covid is the name they gave to vax side effects that destroyed immune systems.
Africa is a stunning example when mosquitoes can reduce the risk of blood clots and myocarditis.
and SADS.
"That's because Africa has a young population" - retarded idiot.
So you admit that COVID is no problem for young people and there was no need for them to take the COVID "vaccine"?
"REEEEEEEE" - retarded idiot.
i can see it now.... most of Australia will die off... the global parasites will overtake the land and resources... the remaining survivors will be their slaves. end of story.
Queensland is already bringing in foreign police recruits; 500 a year. So I think you're more right than you know.
Good luck to them, my inner Harambe will be released at this point.
Here is a another article from the UK paper, The Sun, about the same article.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/health/21618494/australians-deaths-excess-uk/
In the Sun article, the medico in Australia completely discounts the Vaxx as the cause of any problems except for the very rare cases of Myocarditis!
It's all Covid!
It's the slow,quiet kill by the Covid Vaccines and the sheeple have no idea it is happening!
Is it any wonder why the sheeple in Australia are so completely in the dark and comfortable in their ignorance!
Canberra, we have a problem!
Aussies are super brainwashed. Not sure what happened to the stragglers, and how the programming didn't stick to us. I quit most media about 20 years ago. The tide has turned, but very few of the turned are actually speaking out.
It's very logical, the only answer would be that millions would have died without the vax, but that didn't happen in Africa where vax uptake was low.
I choose the 96.2% is a lie
It is. This is the same lie the used to create a study in Canada funded by black face Hitler to "prove" that the un-vaccinated are more likely to get into car accidents due to being reckless. That was also essentially the title of the study. For anyone who read the study, it actually had 3 categories: drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. Suspiciously, all 3 groups had about the same elevated chance of being hospitalized if in a car accident. Almost like the baseline vaccination rate of the population they used was a lie which means any study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated would over-estimate the rates among the unvaccinated. Also, the study never publicly released their data so it can't be scrutinized but it had other problems too. The main thing is, from the title, you can tell it was designed as propaganda tool for release to the public. Proper research papers have titles that don't try to draw conclusions and stick to the facts within the paper. As a result, they usually come off as boring and sometimes unclear to the masses due to being very technical.
For the less mathematically inclined, this is a simple example of how you use inflated vaxx numbers to make the vaccinated look bad. It can also be used to make them look good, but oddly enough, I have never seen that:
In area A the vaxx rate is 50%. Inversely, that makes 50% un-vaxxed.
The government lies and says it is 90%. Inversely, that makes 10% un-vaxxed.
You then measure the number of people in car accidents. You get 50% vaxxed in car accidents and 50% unvaxxed in car accidents.
You then draw the conclusion that while the un-vaxxed make up only 10% of the population, they are involved in 50% of the car accidents.
Also, in most areas, the way the government measures the vaxx rate of the population is almost never through a blind survey. It's through how many doses of the death shot they think they have administered and compares that to what they think the population is. This is a method highly prone to error, manipulation, and geared more towards over-estimating the vaxx rate. At one time, their website claimed that 100% of people over 80 in my area were fully vaxxed. I can tell you, I knew 1 person who was well over 80 and was not vaxxed at all. Furthermore, if I knew 1, there had to be more. They pulled those numbers out of their rear ends.
The number is actually higher than 20k. 20k is how many excess deaths, not how many are attributed to covid or the vax.
I really didn't realise how different I was till I was the only person not wearing a mask through all that shit.. arguing with security.. nearly getting arrested...
96.2% um, nope, that too is a big lie. If that were the case there would only be around 90 - 100 ppl in my town who are unjabbed. There are literally thousands of purebloods here, admittedly it is an area known for its anti jab sentiments pre plandemic.
Please don't forget that there are wildly varying "batches" of vaxxes. Calling it "the vax" is not enough. They are not all the same.
i feel like i'm the only one to have never even had this thing once. And I've never masked up or avoided public gatherings/transport etc. Just lived my life normally and nada.
Both. And will only get worse.
Bravo ....the 3.2%!
Unfortunately, those numbers don't point to a vaccine being shit if it was effective:
A vaccine being administered to 96.2% of Australia means it was administered to roughly 24,700,000 people. If it was indeed the direct cause of 20,000 deaths for those double-vaxxed citizens, that means the vaccine only had a kill rate of 0.07%. I wouldn't call that shit by any stretch of the imagination, considering that is only assuming that all 20,000 deaths can be blamed on the vaccine.
Door number 2 does it for me.
OP - Why the link with tracking (it looks like)? https://twitter.com/OzraeliAvi/status/1633372825624141824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1633372825624141824%7Ctwgr%5Eae83c9cfd9231f265e4a33ef66c36a5049fe0b9f%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreatawakening.win%2Fp%2F16aTM03YgT%2F962-of-australia-is-doublevaxxed%2Fc%2F
ASK TWITTER
NO. IT IS FROM HERE.
LOOK AT THE LINK HERE.