Yes. Clear treason. He can be charged and tried for treason via military tribunal if there are two affidavits from two separate individuals attesting to identical actions of treason (per Constitution).
If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.
-Article XIII TONA from published 1825 U.S. Constitution (Military Laws)
Once fully ratified, an Amendment can only be removed via another Amendment (such as Prohibition), and this one was never removed, meaning it is still active, just hidden.
American Bar Association is domiciled in Washington D.C. and DC is a "foreign power" by all definitions after the 1861 Military U.S. created by Lincoln [military foreign power], 1871 DC Organic Act [political foreign power], and 1913 creation of Federal Reserve [financial foreign power]. All State Bars are franchises of American Bar Association and also incorporated in Washington, D.C. making them "foreign powers" by association.
A "foreign power" is relative to the "perpetual Union" created by the Articles of Confederation, and the "more perfect Union" created by the 1788 Constitution for the united states of America. If you ain't part of the Union, you are a foreign power.
What IS the kicker here is this: Admirality Law has been the rule for a long time since the Crown assumed the bankruptcy after the Civil War (the War between the States). Common Law went bye bye and now the Lords of the Chamber wear black robes to honor the Crown.
It may take decades to restore Common Law...
Technically, this one is "Constitution for the united states of America" ratified 1788, in effect March 4, 1789. I believe it says that at the front or in the preamble, despite it being labelled "of" in other publications. This appears to be legit Trust I document as opposed to the "of" document which is Trust II, created 1871.
The preamble always closes with “…and establish this constitution for the United States of America.” The table of contents and title of the document say OF THE UNITED STATES.
I too have been seeking to verify a copy with the original wording. I cannot show that edition to someone else and expect it to be compelling enough evidence to convince them. How good of a job did they do burning copies in the 19th century to erase history?
Good question. Is that what the British were burning in War of 1812? Their attack was clearly targeting founding documents and pending amendments, imo.
I’m convinced the original 13th was viewed as an act of class warfare by the old world nobility. Look into the marital history of Jerome Bonaparte and his descendents for the underlying social context behind the amendment. Its not surprising that war ensued with the end result being everyone receiving the classification of labor producing livestock
Isn't the Nevada Bar Association, for example, incorporated in Nevada?
I like how you're thinking, I just have trouble concluding that all lawyers will be stripped of their citizenship because the ABA is headquartered in DC. And calling it a title of nobility seems like a stretch. I mean, we could strip the citizenship of UN Goodwill Ambassadors the same way, or the CEO of Tyco because it's headquartered in the Caymans, right?
It appears to be domiciled in DC. Working on getting sauce. I may have to sue and subpoena Articles of Incorporation or try to get in via deposition.
Not saying that the judges who also are former members of the Bar would ever allow anyone success, but SCOTUS might enforce it as they have original jurisdiction on all Constitutional matters. I believe it would be an emolument, and it might already be covered under other parts of the Constitution as well. Unlikely it could be applied en masse, but could be applied against lawyers who have violated your individual Constitutional Rights, and one win would get all lawyers to back the fuck off and start complying with the Constitution immediately.
I believe you just have to prove it is a "special privilege with benefit" provided by a foreign power. We will see. I may file some lawsuits and see how much damage I can do.
I believe the vector of attack against corporations (excepting STATE BAR CORPS) is the unconstitutional payroll tax and corporations engaging in property theft in violation of the Constitution and accounting fraud (civil/criminal liability via fraud). Constitutionally, individuals have right to property and theft of it is Constitutional violation, so a class action by all employees ever employed could stack a massive liability on the targeted corporation and force liquidation of basically every corporation in America with proceeds paid out to employees. Claim would be all back payroll taxes, plus compounded interest, plus loss of use damages from the 1933 payroll tax inception or inception of the corporation being sued.
So many in Congress are lawyers too. If they have received foreign funds from China, Ukraine, Russia, etc. I guess that strips them too of U.S. citizenship.
If Constitution is suspended right now, the Law of War and UCMJ is in effect. Not conclusive to me that this is the case, but i give it 65% probability that US declared war on CCP in March of 2020, suspended Const, and went into a devolution state.
Didn’t Biden accept and retain money from a foreign power (China? Ukraine?)
Yes. Clear treason. He can be charged and tried for treason via military tribunal if there are two affidavits from two separate individuals attesting to identical actions of treason (per Constitution).
PLEASE ARCHIVE COPIES OF THIS PDF OFFLINE, AS IT IS LIKELY TO BE TARGETED FOR DELETION NOW THAT I FOUND IT.
Page 54 of 320; "Military laws of the United States : to which is prefixed the Constitution of the United States": https://archive.org/details/0262127.nlm.nih.gov/page/n53/mode/2up
-Article XIII TONA from published 1825 U.S. Constitution (Military Laws)
Once fully ratified, an Amendment can only be removed via another Amendment (such as Prohibition), and this one was never removed, meaning it is still active, just hidden.
Evidence of full ratification of Amendment XIII TONA completed multiple times, most recent 1836 by Arkansas accounting for 3/4 of states ratifying: https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9llmBsX/the-battle-to-fully-ratify-amend/
American Bar Association is domiciled in Washington D.C. and DC is a "foreign power" by all definitions after the 1861 Military U.S. created by Lincoln [military foreign power], 1871 DC Organic Act [political foreign power], and 1913 creation of Federal Reserve [financial foreign power]. All State Bars are franchises of American Bar Association and also incorporated in Washington, D.C. making them "foreign powers" by association.
A "foreign power" is relative to the "perpetual Union" created by the Articles of Confederation, and the "more perfect Union" created by the 1788 Constitution for the united states of America. If you ain't part of the Union, you are a foreign power.
What IS the kicker here is this: Admirality Law has been the rule for a long time since the Crown assumed the bankruptcy after the Civil War (the War between the States). Common Law went bye bye and now the Lords of the Chamber wear black robes to honor the Crown. It may take decades to restore Common Law...
For a second I thought you found a copy of the constitution FOR the united states.
Technically, this one is "Constitution for the united states of America" ratified 1788, in effect March 4, 1789. I believe it says that at the front or in the preamble, despite it being labelled "of" in other publications. This appears to be legit Trust I document as opposed to the "of" document which is Trust II, created 1871.
The preamble always closes with “…and establish this constitution for the United States of America.” The table of contents and title of the document say OF THE UNITED STATES.
So you think this is not the original? Is there a 3 level trick being played on us?
I too have been seeking to verify a copy with the original wording. I cannot show that edition to someone else and expect it to be compelling enough evidence to convince them. How good of a job did they do burning copies in the 19th century to erase history?
Good question. Is that what the British were burning in War of 1812? Their attack was clearly targeting founding documents and pending amendments, imo.
I’m convinced the original 13th was viewed as an act of class warfare by the old world nobility. Look into the marital history of Jerome Bonaparte and his descendents for the underlying social context behind the amendment. Its not surprising that war ensued with the end result being everyone receiving the classification of labor producing livestock
Isn't the Nevada Bar Association, for example, incorporated in Nevada?
I like how you're thinking, I just have trouble concluding that all lawyers will be stripped of their citizenship because the ABA is headquartered in DC. And calling it a title of nobility seems like a stretch. I mean, we could strip the citizenship of UN Goodwill Ambassadors the same way, or the CEO of Tyco because it's headquartered in the Caymans, right?
It appears to be domiciled in DC. Working on getting sauce. I may have to sue and subpoena Articles of Incorporation or try to get in via deposition.
Not saying that the judges who also are former members of the Bar would ever allow anyone success, but SCOTUS might enforce it as they have original jurisdiction on all Constitutional matters. I believe it would be an emolument, and it might already be covered under other parts of the Constitution as well. Unlikely it could be applied en masse, but could be applied against lawyers who have violated your individual Constitutional Rights, and one win would get all lawyers to back the fuck off and start complying with the Constitution immediately.
I believe you just have to prove it is a "special privilege with benefit" provided by a foreign power. We will see. I may file some lawsuits and see how much damage I can do.
Thanks for the detailed responses. Interesting to be sure. Good luck!
Thank you—not a lawyer here, but following along as best as I can to see what you’ll find out through your work. Much appreciated.
I believe the vector of attack against corporations (excepting STATE BAR CORPS) is the unconstitutional payroll tax and corporations engaging in property theft in violation of the Constitution and accounting fraud (civil/criminal liability via fraud). Constitutionally, individuals have right to property and theft of it is Constitutional violation, so a class action by all employees ever employed could stack a massive liability on the targeted corporation and force liquidation of basically every corporation in America with proceeds paid out to employees. Claim would be all back payroll taxes, plus compounded interest, plus loss of use damages from the 1933 payroll tax inception or inception of the corporation being sued.
Proof of unconstitutionality of payroll tax: EXHIBIT 1: https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTa2wHK9/proof-that-labor-capital-is-not-/c/
I like how you are thinking. Follow the money.
I like it.
Sounds good to me. I’ll take that deal.
Yeah, well, there are a few good lawyers who defend the 2nd amendment for example. The rest can go...
Q: What do you call a thousand lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
A: A good start.
I call it The Red Sea.
Q: What is black and brown and looks good on a lawyer????
A: A Doberman
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Historically, "Esquire" refers to landed nobleman in training for knighthood.
Attorneys of the BAR have the title Esquire. The BAR is British Accreditation Registry. Therefore Esquire is a foreign title of nobility.
So many in Congress are lawyers too. If they have received foreign funds from China, Ukraine, Russia, etc. I guess that strips them too of U.S. citizenship.
-Will Rogers
-William Shakespeare
Torte reform is gonna really hurt now, fuckers. 😃
I love the info in this post, makes me think more about property rights and hoa's.
Some favorite quotes!
High effort post MTD! 👏
Sound good to me!!
Is this still in effect or was it replaced by the UCMJ?
If Constitution is suspended right now, the Law of War and UCMJ is in effect. Not conclusive to me that this is the case, but i give it 65% probability that US declared war on CCP in March of 2020, suspended Const, and went into a devolution state.
Does that mean Obummer will need to go to Kenya?
It means there is going to be an American Bar Association colony is Kenya with lots of formerly American lawyers. /s
Howls. Yes. The other is in Gitmo.
That is how he might be claiming Kenyan Citizenship.
LOL. Q posts talked about this.