We now have a “first” in the indictment of a former president by a city prosecutor on state level charges. Liberals are rejoicing now but they don’t realize they have set the stage for the future prosecution of a former or even sitting president by some ultra conservative city or county prosecutor on a state charge based on some novel legal theory. How about accessory to murder when an illegal immigrant kills someone in a state after being allowed entry contrary to existing immigration law. Many other instances could be in play.
Be careful what you ask for as you may get more than you wanted. When you open a locked door you often have no control over what comes in. We all remember when then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid changed longstanding practice and Senate rules to allow confirmation of Obama judicial nominations by simple majority vote. That “first” by a radical democrat resulted in later confirmation of two Trump Supreme Court Justices by simple majority vote which led to overturning Roe v Wade.
This is typical military ambush tactics...one has to smoke the enemy out if they don't want to come out...AND this way, proves that military tactics along with psyops works quite well in reverse...
So let me just play this out, if it's OK to indict Trump for a misdemeanor, then:
a) it's going to be OK for Clinton to be tried for paying 6x the amount to Paula Jones for the same misdemeanor
b) it's going to be OK for Bush to be tried for 9/11
c) And Obama can be hung for creating the Covid genocide
And wouldn't the statute of limitations have expired by now on the others?
And you'd have to get a DA and grand jury to go along with the idea that Bush was responsible for 9/11, something that the general public doesn't believe.
Truthfully, there has been nothing stopping any of the other Presidents to have been indicted for something.
All you need is a DA willing to put their neck on the line and a grand jury to vote to indicte.
Not trying to be a party pooper. I understand the need to feel like this is a win somehow, and we're so used to there being a "gotcha" aspect to pretty much anything involving Trump.
But this isn't some magic wand waving where we're suddenly going to see libs be indicted for stuff. The DS still has too much a hold on the justice system.
Like I said, I hate to be a party pooper, but I hate to see people deluding themselves and setting themselves (and those who believe them) up for a huge letdown even more.
Someone has to be the voice of reason sometimes. 🤷♀️
Who authorised Fauci to go around the ban on gain of function moratorium?
As for 9/11 if the truth comes out, do you honestly think that Bush will be able to argue "Yeah, sorry that single biggest assault on the American people (before Covid), well yah boo - statute of limitations! Suck lemons, 'cos I got away with it!"
But I tend to agree, I struggle to see justice every returning to the US, but one can live in hope.
And not party-pooping, one of the things that I love about this site is it's one of the few places in the universe where consenting adults can disagree civilly. We make each other stronger and better informed thought respectful debate of our shared positions. Much aroha to you!
Faggots vs Trump supporters. They’re fags, or they’re not. They are all wicked and had time to turn it around but if anyone is still enjoying sitting all the way down on a baseball bat then there’s no hope. They’re speed bumps, and not a f+++ is given. They’d kill for pleasure and anyone about now, and I may be off but until they prove otherwise…they’re going to hurt.
I think it also sets a future president!🤣
It amazes me how short game they all are. It’ll make the victory all the sweeter though.
We now have a “first” in the indictment of a former president by a city prosecutor on state level charges. Liberals are rejoicing now but they don’t realize they have set the stage for the future prosecution of a former or even sitting president by some ultra conservative city or county prosecutor on a state charge based on some novel legal theory. How about accessory to murder when an illegal immigrant kills someone in a state after being allowed entry contrary to existing immigration law. Many other instances could be in play.
Be careful what you ask for as you may get more than you wanted. When you open a locked door you often have no control over what comes in. We all remember when then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid changed longstanding practice and Senate rules to allow confirmation of Obama judicial nominations by simple majority vote. That “first” by a radical democrat resulted in later confirmation of two Trump Supreme Court Justices by simple majority vote which led to overturning Roe v Wade.
"You reap what you sow." Longer than you sow, later than you sow. Makes me wonder if they have ever read the Bible.. jk, I already know.
This, to me, is the epitome of 5D chess play. Sometimes, in order to catch an enemy, you must sacrifice yourself
This is typical military ambush tactics...one has to smoke the enemy out if they don't want to come out...AND this way, proves that military tactics along with psyops works quite well in reverse...
Not a future precedent...
A CURRENT PRECEDENT
A President Precedent.
So let me just play this out, if it's OK to indict Trump for a misdemeanor, then: a) it's going to be OK for Clinton to be tried for paying 6x the amount to Paula Jones for the same misdemeanor b) it's going to be OK for Bush to be tried for 9/11 c) And Obama can be hung for creating the Covid genocide
OK - that's a fair trade.
How is Obama responsible for Covid?
And wouldn't the statute of limitations have expired by now on the others?
And you'd have to get a DA and grand jury to go along with the idea that Bush was responsible for 9/11, something that the general public doesn't believe.
Truthfully, there has been nothing stopping any of the other Presidents to have been indicted for something.
All you need is a DA willing to put their neck on the line and a grand jury to vote to indicte.
Not trying to be a party pooper. I understand the need to feel like this is a win somehow, and we're so used to there being a "gotcha" aspect to pretty much anything involving Trump.
But this isn't some magic wand waving where we're suddenly going to see libs be indicted for stuff. The DS still has too much a hold on the justice system.
Like I said, I hate to be a party pooper, but I hate to see people deluding themselves and setting themselves (and those who believe them) up for a huge letdown even more.
Someone has to be the voice of reason sometimes. 🤷♀️
Who authorised Fauci to go around the ban on gain of function moratorium?
As for 9/11 if the truth comes out, do you honestly think that Bush will be able to argue "Yeah, sorry that single biggest assault on the American people (before Covid), well yah boo - statute of limitations! Suck lemons, 'cos I got away with it!"
But I tend to agree, I struggle to see justice every returning to the US, but one can live in hope.
And not party-pooping, one of the things that I love about this site is it's one of the few places in the universe where consenting adults can disagree civilly. We make each other stronger and better informed thought respectful debate of our shared positions. Much aroha to you!
The exact relationship between my mother and i.
im not the same as either of you, im excited due to the galvanization.
Faggots vs Trump supporters. They’re fags, or they’re not. They are all wicked and had time to turn it around but if anyone is still enjoying sitting all the way down on a baseball bat then there’s no hope. They’re speed bumps, and not a f+++ is given. They’d kill for pleasure and anyone about now, and I may be off but until they prove otherwise…they’re going to hurt.
Loses impact when its whiny political opinions.
This was cool cause of how bad ass this character was. The subject chosen isnt bad ass, and loses all of the gusto of the original line.
The guy spoke from a bizarre criminal moral highground that made it respectable and believable.
This meme is so weak.
Feels almost liberal...
Because there's too much text that takes up a significant portion of the meme?