I have tried this argument with the leftist part of my family, but it is a cult. You cannot change their minds. They also still believe Trump had hookers piss on him in Moscow.
I am kind of inclined to believe Tim Pool, when he says wokeism is not a leftist ideology, but a social media algorithm, or however he called it. These people are not following a political ideology, they are following whatever they are told to follow. Just like in a cult. They are all scared of feeling outside, or outright being cancelled.
I always thought wokeism was a result of the Frankfurt School. But wokeism does not seem to be only leftism today. Example: lefties where all against war, now they have to support Ukraine, even if it'll start WWIII...
Leftards were against war because they were told to.
Leftards always do as they're told.
To be clear: the iraq war was a horrible cabal looting operation (like all US-instigated wars since WW2). But leftards were not against it, or any of the previous ones, because of that reason. They were against it because bush man bad. (Which he was...until he wasn't).
So yes, the whole wokeism thing is the same. Leftards are in a prison of their minds. You can call it brainwashing or whatever, but they're trapped, and they have pavlovian responses to cabal-injected stimulii.
I have studied the workings of cults, and the above post is spot on. Now that I think about the Left this way, it is so obvious! Thank you!! Yes, btw, it is functioning as a mind cult. And, they are grouped together physically, in red states, and cybernetically, on the internet. Remember, Satan is the Prince of the Powers of the Air. This means he is in charge of anything that goes on in the air. That is: TV, radio and especially, the internet, with its porn and mind altering websites.
These rabid ideologues want to cut everything to zero-carbon. Yet, the answer to the question is 0.04% - not 1%, or even 1/2%, but 4 hundredths of a percent. The man points out that if CO2 drops to 0.02% then all plant life will die.
In the prehistoric past, maybe even before the time of dinosaurs, the CO2 content in the air was much higher, and plants have evolved to said content.
The current CO2 content is very damned lean for plants right now. If it gets even lower, plants will actually die, to the point where Mother Nature will scream "BURN THOSE FOSSIL FUELS, YOU STUPID HUMANS!"
Plants survive just fine on what we have now. But, to be clear, photosynthesis as a biochemical process is simply more efficient at higher concentrations of carbon. I've seen anywhere from 1000-2500 ppm being "optimal" though of course that varies by source and target species. Photosynthesis is not just the one textbook pathway. There are plenty of variants across plants, single-celled eukaryotes, and bacteria.
Regardless, in terms of geologic time, we are at a low point. Biological processes have locked up carbon in rocks (limestone) with very high efficiency for over a billion years. We are at a relative low point in terms of Earth's longer history in terms of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Pre-industrial concentrations were ~280-300 ppm. We're at ~420ish now. When the dinosaurs were doing their thing, the Earth was warmer. There were no polar ice caps. Oxygen concentrations were closer to 33% than the 21% we have now and carbon dioxide was 5x higher than now. Go the opposite direction, say, down to 180ish and plants start to starve, some species will die off. By 150 ppm, photosynthesis stops, and then so does all other life dependent on it. The only thing that will be left is the chemosynthesizers like the critters that live around deep sea hydrothermal vents.
Whether we "need" more CO2 is debatable. Rapid changes in anything will mess up a homeostatic system, creating sometimes wild and unpredictable changes within complex systems, so we should take that into account. I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say human should be actively trying to perturb the system. The question is whether what we're doing is intrinsically harmful. As I said before, jarring a homeostatic system can be unpredictable, but right now, we're simply not seeing evidence of the kinds of harm we keep being told about. The corals aren't dying. The polar bears are fine now that we stopped humans from hunting them. The oceans aren't acidifying any more than the rain was in the 80s. There's far more fossil fuels in the ground than anyone thought in the 60s, and since fracking showed up in the 2010s, we've gotten really good at pulling clean-burning methane (natural gas) out of the ground. No, it's not perfect, but we're not all going to die.
I have this image in my head for a couple years now of a nature goddess who is having all of her dryads and nymphs burn coal, oils, and natural gas in an effort to increase CO2 in the air so her plants will grow more bigger and faster.
Said nature goddess will also be driving around in a big hummer...
You know it's all bollocks because they have to keep changing the name every few years. 'greenhouse effect', 'global warming', 'climate change' blah blah blah.
"...and you people who said 5% were off by twelve thousand five hundred percent. You who said it was 8% were wrong by twenty thousand percent. This is the level of your egregious LIES to the world about carbon dioxide, a component of our atmosphere that is ESSENTIAL FOR HUMAN LIFE. You are LYING to people. You have no interest in science and no clue what you're talking about. People are not destroying the planet with CO2. That was a silly lie all along. I yield back."
I have tried this argument with the leftist part of my family, but it is a cult. You cannot change their minds. They also still believe Trump had hookers piss on him in Moscow.
I am kind of inclined to believe Tim Pool, when he says wokeism is not a leftist ideology, but a social media algorithm, or however he called it. These people are not following a political ideology, they are following whatever they are told to follow. Just like in a cult. They are all scared of feeling outside, or outright being cancelled.
I always thought wokeism was a result of the Frankfurt School. But wokeism does not seem to be only leftism today. Example: lefties where all against war, now they have to support Ukraine, even if it'll start WWIII...
Leftards were against war because they were told to.
Leftards always do as they're told.
To be clear: the iraq war was a horrible cabal looting operation (like all US-instigated wars since WW2). But leftards were not against it, or any of the previous ones, because of that reason. They were against it because bush man bad. (Which he was...until he wasn't).
So yes, the whole wokeism thing is the same. Leftards are in a prison of their minds. You can call it brainwashing or whatever, but they're trapped, and they have pavlovian responses to cabal-injected stimulii.
Exactly.
I have studied the workings of cults, and the above post is spot on. Now that I think about the Left this way, it is so obvious! Thank you!! Yes, btw, it is functioning as a mind cult. And, they are grouped together physically, in red states, and cybernetically, on the internet. Remember, Satan is the Prince of the Powers of the Air. This means he is in charge of anything that goes on in the air. That is: TV, radio and especially, the internet, with its porn and mind altering websites.
Tim fool is aids
The panelists guess 5%, 7% and even 8%.
These rabid ideologues want to cut everything to zero-carbon. Yet, the answer to the question is 0.04% - not 1%, or even 1/2%, but 4 hundredths of a percent. The man points out that if CO2 drops to 0.02% then all plant life will die.
So we actually need more CO2
When farmers want to grow plants, what do they build around the plants?
A greenhouse.
Where do most people in Canada live? Up north, or do 90% reside within 300 miles of the US border?
Warmer is better.
As the libtards push for more marijuana grow houses...pumping CO2 into them...while screaming muh global warming...
In the prehistoric past, maybe even before the time of dinosaurs, the CO2 content in the air was much higher, and plants have evolved to said content.
The current CO2 content is very damned lean for plants right now. If it gets even lower, plants will actually die, to the point where Mother Nature will scream "BURN THOSE FOSSIL FUELS, YOU STUPID HUMANS!"
Fire up those CO2 generators...use ‘fossil fuels’ of course!
Plants survive just fine on what we have now. But, to be clear, photosynthesis as a biochemical process is simply more efficient at higher concentrations of carbon. I've seen anywhere from 1000-2500 ppm being "optimal" though of course that varies by source and target species. Photosynthesis is not just the one textbook pathway. There are plenty of variants across plants, single-celled eukaryotes, and bacteria.
Regardless, in terms of geologic time, we are at a low point. Biological processes have locked up carbon in rocks (limestone) with very high efficiency for over a billion years. We are at a relative low point in terms of Earth's longer history in terms of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Pre-industrial concentrations were ~280-300 ppm. We're at ~420ish now. When the dinosaurs were doing their thing, the Earth was warmer. There were no polar ice caps. Oxygen concentrations were closer to 33% than the 21% we have now and carbon dioxide was 5x higher than now. Go the opposite direction, say, down to 180ish and plants start to starve, some species will die off. By 150 ppm, photosynthesis stops, and then so does all other life dependent on it. The only thing that will be left is the chemosynthesizers like the critters that live around deep sea hydrothermal vents.
Whether we "need" more CO2 is debatable. Rapid changes in anything will mess up a homeostatic system, creating sometimes wild and unpredictable changes within complex systems, so we should take that into account. I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say human should be actively trying to perturb the system. The question is whether what we're doing is intrinsically harmful. As I said before, jarring a homeostatic system can be unpredictable, but right now, we're simply not seeing evidence of the kinds of harm we keep being told about. The corals aren't dying. The polar bears are fine now that we stopped humans from hunting them. The oceans aren't acidifying any more than the rain was in the 80s. There's far more fossil fuels in the ground than anyone thought in the 60s, and since fracking showed up in the 2010s, we've gotten really good at pulling clean-burning methane (natural gas) out of the ground. No, it's not perfect, but we're not all going to die.
I have this image in my head for a couple years now of a nature goddess who is having all of her dryads and nymphs burn coal, oils, and natural gas in an effort to increase CO2 in the air so her plants will grow more bigger and faster.
Said nature goddess will also be driving around in a big hummer...
You know it's all bollocks because they have to keep changing the name every few years. 'greenhouse effect', 'global warming', 'climate change' blah blah blah.
They took a normal global warming period and pretended it was the doing of man.
They switched out the annual influenza numbers with covid.
They definitely have an MO of trying to freak people out over normal shit.
They took a normal global COOLING period and pretended it was WARMING, the doing of man.
FTFY
"...and you people who said 5% were off by twelve thousand five hundred percent. You who said it was 8% were wrong by twenty thousand percent. This is the level of your egregious LIES to the world about carbon dioxide, a component of our atmosphere that is ESSENTIAL FOR HUMAN LIFE. You are LYING to people. You have no interest in science and no clue what you're talking about. People are not destroying the planet with CO2. That was a silly lie all along. I yield back."
The same thing happened to Gina McCartthy when she was head of the EPA.
And, as NASA points out:
Co2 = .054%
Another one of those pesky numbers.
Percentage of carbon dioxide in an atmosphere of many gasses.
How much of that could mankind produce?
Grain of sand on a world full of beaches.
.....
Documentary
"The Great Global Warming Swindle"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rrX0mzJ0aZz5/
The whole thing is a fraud, and it's easy to show.
They are all frauds.
all of us should memorize this number, and also the one that predicts plants dying. Good for red pilling crazy climate idiots.
Does anybody have a link to the full sauce? Great material.