Not a Problem When I Watched Moon Landing in 1969! (Sauce in Comments)
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
The slow decent onto the lunar surface - on top of jet engines, in 1969, left ZERO dust on the lander pads and support structure. I saw it on TV and in all the magazines. Dust is not an issue.
I remember they weren't sure if there was a surface dust layer so thick and soft that the lunar lander would sink into it like water.
Yea, that moon “air” will create a lot of dust for sure!
It's the wind! LOL
Lol!!!
If they could go to the moon with slide rules and adding machines, we would have done something similar or better long before now.
Believing in the Apollo Mission is like believing we had Technicolor talking motion pictures for five years fifty years ago, before reverting evermore back to black-and-white silent movies.
The reason we only have a space taxi taking people up to a low-earth orbiting satellite is that is the best we can do.
They had pretty good tech for the day. I saw a vidio on how they stored numbers it was a grid of fine metal wire with individual loop over the intersection. Some very, very smart people worked with what they had.
I've read and I belive that we can't make the Saturn 5 jet engines that the used back in the day. Our modern tech isn't equal to the skill and brains of the men who built it.
Edit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mMK6iSZsAs
This guy has a bunch of vidios on the topic, even several interviews with the men who built and used these systems.
I have my doubts about the moon landing (I tend to lean to yes we did) but the people who most assuredly tell us that it was a hoax have as little real evidence as those that tell us it is not a hoax. This argument is better left to the future, once we have created a just world, because truly it really doesnt matter concerning the problems at hand. The argument at the moment only divides us, and like flat earth, hollow earth and Antarctic Icewall, is interjected continuously into the conversation by our adversaries to keep us that way.
if they are struggling with "dust", they must of had a hell of a time in '69, getting through the Van Allen belt.
space is a vacuum. how does "air" create a "particularly dusty aspect of landing"?
they can't be talking about the actual moon....
perhaps they have dusty landings inside that hangar in which they had lights setup & faked the landing??.....
The surface of the moon is covered with very fine, very sharp, electrostatically-charged powder. Landing rockets blasts that powder everywhere at high velocity. Landing the first rocket is fine, landing next to anything is where the problem starts; now you're sandblasting everything nearby.
STUDENT SOLUTIONS??
The Kennedy Assassination, the Moon Landing, the Plandemic (and those are just the Big Lies!)
NOTHING ADDS UP!
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nasa-seeks-student-solutions-for-managing-moon-landing-dust-cloud-301777827.html
https://operationq.pub/?n=2225
💯🎯❤️
Lol, you mean you couldn't see dust on a 640x480 standard definition CRT receiving a black and white video transmission from the moon?
If you look at the astronauts after a spacewalk, their clothing was covered with it. And the said the air had the odor of gunpowder, so the particles were fine enough to be airborne and got into the lungs. Their spacesuits got it in the mechanical connections and could affect the seals. It’s electrically charged as well due to the solar wind. The built up charge is more concerning near the poles where the next mission is supposed to go. 10’s of thousands of volts.
It was a problem. We didn't stay long enough for it to become a big problem.
I know this post points out the inconsistency between modern concerns and historical “facts”, but here’s an attempt to solve the problem off the top of my head:
It sounds like they could use a solid landing pad, similar to a helipad, like what we would make out of concrete on earth. Carrying water and bags of concrete mix to the moon is costly, so instead try to figure out a way to make a concrete mix out of the moon dust itself, and that uses less water than usual. Bind the particulate together so it doesn’t dust up when disturbed.
I think this has to do with long period stays of moon dust. Like the ability to have a mudroom in your house so you don't bring un dust kinda thing. But moon dust is really sharp unlike dust here on earth
Kind of relevant:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPVAUMHk/moon-landing-hero-this-trick-wit/c/
I wonder what they are really up to…🤔