Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

66
Not a Problem When I Watched Moon Landing in 1969! (Sauce in Comments) (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 2 years ago by fponick 2 years ago by fponick +66 / -0
21 comments download share
21 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (21)
sorted by:
▲ 13 ▼
– HotnewRisingtop1 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

The slow decent onto the lunar surface - on top of jet engines, in 1969, left ZERO dust on the lander pads and support structure. I saw it on TV and in all the magazines. Dust is not an issue.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– PhDinNY 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I remember they weren't sure if there was a surface dust layer so thick and soft that the lunar lander would sink into it like water.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Picador_20 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

If they could go to the moon with slide rules and adding machines, we would have done something similar or better long before now.

Believing in the Apollo Mission is like believing we had Technicolor talking motion pictures for five years fifty years ago, before reverting evermore back to black-and-white silent movies.

The reason we only have a space taxi taking people up to a low-earth orbiting satellite is that is the best we can do.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Pbman2 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

They had pretty good tech for the day. I saw a vidio on how they stored numbers it was a grid of fine metal wire with individual loop over the intersection. Some very, very smart people worked with what they had.

I've read and I belive that we can't make the Saturn 5 jet engines that the used back in the day. Our modern tech isn't equal to the skill and brains of the men who built it.

Edit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mMK6iSZsAs

This guy has a bunch of vidios on the topic, even several interviews with the men who built and used these systems.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– EDC1745 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

if they are struggling with "dust", they must of had a hell of a time in '69, getting through the Van Allen belt.

space is a vacuum. how does "air" create a "particularly dusty aspect of landing"?

they can't be talking about the actual moon....

perhaps they have dusty landings inside that hangar in which they had lights setup & faked the landing??.....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– FlamingRain 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The surface of the moon is covered with very fine, very sharp, electrostatically-charged powder. Landing rockets blasts that powder everywhere at high velocity. Landing the first rocket is fine, landing next to anything is where the problem starts; now you're sandblasting everything nearby.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Richone 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Yea, that moon “air” will create a lot of dust for sure!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TheVerboten1 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

It's the wind! LOL

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– n0w0y 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Lol!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– fponick [S] 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

STUDENT SOLUTIONS??

The Kennedy Assassination, the Moon Landing, the Plandemic (and those are just the Big Lies!)

NOTHING ADDS UP!

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nasa-seeks-student-solutions-for-managing-moon-landing-dust-cloud-301777827.html

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– soundguy005 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

https://operationq.pub/?n=2225

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LuvUrNeighbor 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

💯🎯❤️

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LongTimeListener 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

I have my doubts about the moon landing (I tend to lean to yes we did) but the people who most assuredly tell us that it was a hoax have as little real evidence as those that tell us it is not a hoax. This argument is better left to the future, once we have created a just world, because truly it really doesnt matter concerning the problems at hand. The argument at the moment only divides us, and like flat earth, hollow earth and Antarctic Icewall, is interjected continuously into the conversation by our adversaries to keep us that way.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– gnuguy 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

If you look at the astronauts after a spacewalk, their clothing was covered with it. And the said the air had the odor of gunpowder, so the particles were fine enough to be airborne and got into the lungs. Their spacesuits got it in the mechanical connections and could affect the seals. It’s electrically charged as well due to the solar wind. The built up charge is more concerning near the poles where the next mission is supposed to go. 10’s of thousands of volts.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– theW0knessHurts 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I think this has to do with long period stays of moon dust. Like the ability to have a mudroom in your house so you don't bring un dust kinda thing. But moon dust is really sharp unlike dust here on earth

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– raggedyman74 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Lol, you mean you couldn't see dust on a 640x480 standard definition CRT receiving a black and white video transmission from the moon?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MarkusCincinnatus 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I know this post points out the inconsistency between modern concerns and historical “facts”, but here’s an attempt to solve the problem off the top of my head:

It sounds like they could use a solid landing pad, similar to a helipad, like what we would make out of concrete on earth. Carrying water and bags of concrete mix to the moon is costly, so instead try to figure out a way to make a concrete mix out of the moon dust itself, and that uses less water than usual. Bind the particulate together so it doesn’t dust up when disturbed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tossinitrightin 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I wonder what they are really up to…🤔

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FlamingRain 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

It was a problem. We didn't stay long enough for it to become a big problem.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– praying71 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Kind of relevant:

https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPVAUMHk/moon-landing-hero-this-trick-wit/c/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy