"The film stars John Boyega, Teyonah Parris and Jamie Foxx (who also serves as producer) as an unlikely trio uncovering a government cloning conspiracy"
So, I'm interested. What would it take for people to "buy it"? Photos? Nope. Action video? Nope. Contemporaneous presence on social media? Nope.
I mean, what do you think you are entitled to? A personal inspection of his body, extending to TSA searching? His doctor's diagnostic reports? A note from his parents? You can ask for "more proof" but you don't seem to have any idea what it could be.
People here have their heads up their ass. If anyone has evidence to prove that this was not Jamie Foxx, please step forward with it. Otherwise, it is just a bullshit demand based on a groundless doubt.
Jamie Foxx has tattoos on the back of his head - https://bodyartguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Jamie-Foxx-Tattoo.jpg
If you think after the news swirling around for weeks that he is severely injured after the clot shot that these grainy pictures are really him then I could suggest that it is you who has your head up your ass but I would prefer to just say, if you can add any credibility to these photos and perhaps explain were his body and head tattoos have gone, please do.
LOL - that "Death Ray Designer" person probably thinks that the "Joe Biden" we see on TV is the REAL guy too. Same for Epstein's supposed corpse and a slew of other people who we know are imposters/body doubles/actors.
No reason to doubt it. Give me a reason. We do not doubt because we have a first duty to doubt. That is a complete collapse of epistemology. I should doubt you, for example.
Do people permanently tattoo or do they simply maintain applied patterns? I know that is done, all the time. With bad and grainy photos, who can say either way? And if there is doubt, could these be older pictures that have been repurposed?
Thanks for suggesting I have my head up my ass. I was wondering whether to take you seriously as a searcher for truth and you made it all very clear.
At least it was only a suggestion in response to your narcassistic post branding GAW anons as follows, "People here have their heads up their ass". As for your schoolboy response " I was wondering whether to take you seriously as a searcher for truth and you made it all very clear", well I shall not lose any sleep over that. No one on here is eager for your approval nor do they need it. If you want to exchange ideas, best you drop the pompous, self important retorts and I am sure you will get a better response.
Well, you cannot provide any evidence to substantiate a doubt, and therefore your only argument is to throw barbs at me. I don't care about your approval; I care about the fact that you can't form an argument to support your position. And if I want to exchange Ideas, I make a point of addressing them---not making insults. But, yeah, people have their heads up their asses when they demand "more proof" and are speechless to specify what proof is required.
So blurry videos are enough for you? Come on Man! Clearly this isn't enough for either side of the argument. We all just want to know if he is alive and well or dead. I'm going with ded...
That is your default position, not because you have any evidence for doubt. I haven't heard what would be "enough" for you. I suspect you have no idea. You just take the position that what you have isn't "enough."
Not at all. I have no imaginary unspecified requirement for "enough." I see you still cannot specify what would be "enough." I don't have any reason to doubt he is alive...and neither do you.
Blurrier than a Bigfoot sighting.
That's because Bigfoot IS blurry!!! hahaha...one of Mitch Hedberg's greatest bits!
Not buying it. Nice fuzzy photo too!
Noise, not signal
The first thought that occurred to me when my eyes were drawn to the picture in the circle, was Loch Ness...
I doubt that is him. Need more proof
I'm going with "This is not Jamie Foxx and do they think we're that fucking stupid" for $500 Alex.
Photo appears to be a screencap of the TMZ video at 0:07 and 0:21
https://youtu.be/_wv04_GDlfs
"Normies" in the video comments don't believe it's him either.
He looks pretty buff for a guy in a hospital bed the last 3 months.
His new movie has an interesting theme:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/They_Cloned_Tyrone
"The film stars John Boyega, Teyonah Parris and Jamie Foxx (who also serves as producer) as an unlikely trio uncovering a government cloning conspiracy"
He's obviously dead.
So, I'm interested. What would it take for people to "buy it"? Photos? Nope. Action video? Nope. Contemporaneous presence on social media? Nope.
I mean, what do you think you are entitled to? A personal inspection of his body, extending to TSA searching? His doctor's diagnostic reports? A note from his parents? You can ask for "more proof" but you don't seem to have any idea what it could be.
People here have their heads up their ass. If anyone has evidence to prove that this was not Jamie Foxx, please step forward with it. Otherwise, it is just a bullshit demand based on a groundless doubt.
You're vaxxed, aren't you.
No. You're stupid, aren't you?
Jamie Foxx has tattoos on the back of his head - https://bodyartguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Jamie-Foxx-Tattoo.jpg If you think after the news swirling around for weeks that he is severely injured after the clot shot that these grainy pictures are really him then I could suggest that it is you who has your head up your ass but I would prefer to just say, if you can add any credibility to these photos and perhaps explain were his body and head tattoos have gone, please do.
LOL - that "Death Ray Designer" person probably thinks that the "Joe Biden" we see on TV is the REAL guy too. Same for Epstein's supposed corpse and a slew of other people who we know are imposters/body doubles/actors.
No reason to doubt it. Give me a reason. We do not doubt because we have a first duty to doubt. That is a complete collapse of epistemology. I should doubt you, for example.
Do people permanently tattoo or do they simply maintain applied patterns? I know that is done, all the time. With bad and grainy photos, who can say either way? And if there is doubt, could these be older pictures that have been repurposed?
Thanks for suggesting I have my head up my ass. I was wondering whether to take you seriously as a searcher for truth and you made it all very clear.
At least it was only a suggestion in response to your narcassistic post branding GAW anons as follows, "People here have their heads up their ass". As for your schoolboy response " I was wondering whether to take you seriously as a searcher for truth and you made it all very clear", well I shall not lose any sleep over that. No one on here is eager for your approval nor do they need it. If you want to exchange ideas, best you drop the pompous, self important retorts and I am sure you will get a better response.
Well, you cannot provide any evidence to substantiate a doubt, and therefore your only argument is to throw barbs at me. I don't care about your approval; I care about the fact that you can't form an argument to support your position. And if I want to exchange Ideas, I make a point of addressing them---not making insults. But, yeah, people have their heads up their asses when they demand "more proof" and are speechless to specify what proof is required.
So blurry videos are enough for you? Come on Man! Clearly this isn't enough for either side of the argument. We all just want to know if he is alive and well or dead. I'm going with ded...
That is your default position, not because you have any evidence for doubt. I haven't heard what would be "enough" for you. I suspect you have no idea. You just take the position that what you have isn't "enough."
Sure, same thing goes for you.
Not at all. I have no imaginary unspecified requirement for "enough." I see you still cannot specify what would be "enough." I don't have any reason to doubt he is alive...and neither do you.
Dude... totally. My exact initial reaction. 👍