Q1881 features Tim Ballard
(twitter.com)
Comments (41)
sorted by:
The cabal and their minions are attacking the movie. The cabal and their minions are attacking the actors. The cabal and their minions are attacking the real life agent.
That's about all I need to know to know which side are the good guys. It seems pretty clear they are trying to stop what is coming for them. NCSWIC
The Cabals decision to invoke The Streisand Effect then put it on steroids really affirms Qs observation that "these people are stupid".
Additionally, stupid people get even dumber when they're in panic mode.
Now playing in theatres " Panic in DC"?
Kek. Yes.
Maybe this is why Jim Caviezel is one of us anons and promotes it.
Whether Caviezel is anon or not - he may have come around only recently. But his statement that there is no 'qanon', that there is Q and Anons. That Speaks Max volume about where he is coming from.
Which is good, because all the stops are being pulled out to attack him, Ballard, SOF, and the whole thing.
he certainly sounds like one. I just saw a vid posted by a normie friend that has Jim talking about adrenochrome and DUMBS.
u/#q1881
Clinton Foundation and Haiti and child trafficking. It's all about to come out. As I have said many times lately I hope Killary does not still have her passport. She owns a hell of a lot of grandeur and comfort in non-extradition Qatar. So does Obama.
Extraordinary rendition might be a way around that.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/extraordinary-rendition
O, the irony!!
Ooh, you touched someone's nerve. Over the target.
Just stop with the Tim Ballard attacks. If you can't see the enemy attacking him in full force then you are blind. This man is a hero. Trump even listens to him. If you are against him, you are for pedophilia and child trafficking. Full stop.
The tricky thing here is that the attacks are dual-pronged. From the 'left' aka the Neo Marxist 'liberal' Propaganda complex, but also from the 'right' aka the disinfo agents, glowies and agents provocateur that have wormed their way into the Great Awakening sphere.
Observe the strategy being used by those attacking Ballard, and deconstruct where they are coming from.
Yes. What I love about this is that it's outed tons of disinfo agents that were pretending to be on our side. Lots of them small influencers. It's a fantastic filter for outing these assholes. Now I'm seeing them on here. There is no debate to be had. If you spread this bullshit you are either fooled or you are knowingly pushing disinformation.
Well, this is really what we used to do in the old days when Q was posting.
Anons and patriots digging on information, bringing it up, raising questions, then arguing or twisting this way and that way to figure out whether someone or something was WH, BH, Gray hat, or what was going on. Not all of its is necessarily disinfo. Legitimate questions are there. But for sure, the disinfo agents will be in there, stirring up trouble and conflict etc.
It's OK, in fact its good, to have different views on a topic or issue. Weeding out the disinfo opps from the legitimate anon research and Q-type practice is the challenge.
Generally, that comes down to 'vibe', attitude, approach and apparent intent, in my experience.
re: Ballard and accusations now being brought forth....
Hmmm... Doing a bit of a dive on this. Lots of fodder there for speculation. However....
You can often ascertain the direction that certain information and messages are coming from by deconstructing the techniques and methods they use to impress, direct and /or manipulate (aka psyop) the audience's response.
So, for me, rather than digging on all the accusations and claims, my first port of call is to look at what is being said, by who, and in what manner.
Sometimes you can just get a sense of the spirit behind things. (If I was unable to do that, i would never have listened to Q or pursued Q in the first place.)
Is it a mean spirit? is it intended to be divisive, to inspire mistrust as opposed to trust? When it inspires trust, is intended to inspire trust that is reactive and emotional, rather than trust through discernment and independence rather than by appealing to authority?
Yes, there are things that can be questioned.
However, a few things I find encouraging, because they are great targets for deconstruction of (psyop) effectiveness:
WHO
Lin Wood and such ilk are heavily attacking Ballard and Caviezel, and Gibson. (apart from anyone or everyone associated with MAGA and Q, etc). I find that encouraging because if Lin wood is attacking it, that's pretty much like CNN attacking it in my book.
HOW
A LOT of people are attacking Ballard, etc. Some of the questioning is valid, but they ALSO rely heavily on set prejudices, association, etc., that trigger (in certain people's minds) reactive and negative responses. Religious prejudice, guilt by association, innuendo, etc.
WHAT
That's another point in the favor of Ballard etc, because the psyop technique of attacking in order to cast doubt by triggering 'bogeymen' and prejudices is well established and by now, hacky.
Finally, I found another "investigative" Mormon Stories piece 'raising concerns' about Ballard, OUR, etc, which in the same breath as certain concerns, also cites
"using false statistic to over-state the prevalence of sex trafficking worldwide to lure donors"
"using excessive emotion and religion manipulation to lure donors by claims to be called by God and being protected by God..."
"Drawing money away from legitimate charities who are meaningfully providing solutions...."
Plus the kicker:
"Associating with and taking advantage of known false conspiracy theories like QAnon."
This is just s small sample. Only a few data points in a big lake, but for my purposes, they are enough to quickly lead me personally to conclusions about what is going on here. (Maybe my training with Q for 5 years has paid off?)
I don't wish to spend much time on this, but at this juncture, it seems clear to me that the disinfo machine and agents (aka the infiltrators on 'our side' whose mission is to sow discord, confusion, blackpills and division) have been activated to attack Ballard, Caviezel, Sound of Freedom, and Mel.
I see the same spirit that attacks Trump (when they can) because he's evil, he's one of the 'elite', he had a photo with Epstein, he's deep state mobilized to keep us all asleep, etc.
Sound of Freedom is a massive red pill for the wider public. Unless of course we have more than 50 million anons in the USA (I guess that's possible, but where are they all?). As such, the DS Cabal will pull out ALL the stops to cast doubt, dismay, discord, distrust, etc.
It will mobilize the 'LEFT' aka the neo marxist propaganda arm of the media world. It will mobilize the 'RIGHT' aka the infiltrators and disinfo agents and provocateurs within the Q movement and the Great Awakening sphere. All attacking the same thing.
If that isn't a tell, I don't know what is.
PS. I'm not posting links etc here. If you spend even a short time digging on Ballard, OUR, i.e. "timothy blain ballard" or Carlos Slim Ballard, etc iv afreespoke or google you'll find the muck. And, it's mucky. So if you want to dive in, do so. What I'm reporting here is simply my own findings and my own conclusions.
One anons opinion. Research for yourself. But be prepared for the muck, and ask yourself "what is the spirit active here?" The masters of deceit are masters for a reason.
Ariel on twitter says Ballard is a Freemason. He’s been warning people about Sound of Freedom saying it’s still Hollywood and you’re not getting the full picture and are even getting false impressions. He talks about Carlos Slim being a human trafficker, but also providing funding for this movie and Mel Gibson’s documentary so he can control what’s exposed. Have a look at his timeline for the tweets talking about this.
https://twitter.com/prolotario1/status/1678750753375109120
Ariel was also falsely posting that the Brazilian military is executing Lula officials. Regardless of who is behind the film, it's going a long way to redpill the normies on this matter.
I noticed Tim Ballard did what appeared to be freemasonic hand gestures which really disappointed me. Maybe it's innocent but you never know nowadays.
*Sigh, if they have THIS level of control then it's pretty much over. It's up to God to do what he wants, whether it's to save this world or destroy it and start over.
yeah, nah, not buying it that Tim Ballard is a black hat.
Neither am I. This smells like a glowie plot to me.
He talks more about Ballard in this thread, pointing out Ballard had an orphanage in Haiti, and worked for the Clintons and Obama.
https://twitter.com/Prolotario1/status/1678503696458547201
I think his point is well made that people are being bamboozled, but I think it's a great thing that the movie is waking up so many people that might otherwise be completely oblivious.
I'm not saying he's one way or the other, but the white hats are sleeper cells. Infiltration into all these groups. Do you really believe General Flynn is a "lifelong Democrat" blah blah or just utilized things to bob and weave his way into certain positions?
If I read you correctly, you are saying that simple association with these 'groups' is not necessarily evidence of evil or bad intentions in itself?
If so, I agree with you.
Think Patriot Front in reverse. We are infiltrating and subverting them as well.
Fog of war. Spiritual discernment is vital. People always do this for anyone that attempts to stand up to the evil. It just pushes doubt. Which only strengthens our side in the end because u are forced to turn to Jesus for all things
Amen. Discern the spirit behind the attacks, from the propaganda Media OR the provocateurs in the Great Awakening. Does the spirit inspire trust? confidence? unity? discernment? Or does it inspire distrust? doubt? accusation?
Wise words right here my fren. Well said. We always need to give it to the Lord and let him guide us however these are solid pillars for discernment
I thought Ariel was The Little Mermaid
With Disney going bust etc, she had to get a new job, and decided to become an 'influencer' on Twitter, it seems.
hahahahaha
Could go either way.
He is a bad guy or he is an official part of the white hats and received all their backing.
I think it's pretty obvious he's part of a team of white hats.
I agree with the comment by KAGdrogo. Not seeing The_Authority's angle.
This one?
https://twitter.com/KAGdrogo/status/1679213259663245313
Seems pretty based to me.
The Authority's angle seems pretty Milo Yiannopoulos Adjacent to me....
(Provocateur)
I meant this one: https://twitter.com/KAGdrogo/status/1678813888853454849
Agree with you about The Authority's comments on SOF. I've gone back and forth about him over time. It may not be intentional but he often is unnecessarily provocative and overly paranoid.
Though I suppose we're all paranoid, or we wouldn't be awake.
Nothing wrong with asking questions, obviously. But it's also important to be aware (beware?) of one's own biases and how the affect or impact your approach, including how you question.
First time to hear anything from the Authority, which is a hilarious oxymoron, obviously.
"They" were all for his story a decade ago. Now it's QAnon nonsense?
Link to ABC interview with him in 2014:
https://twitter.com/Trublood4life/status/1678563399624712192?t=96JFTXlnBKNageS1vkh2eQ&s=19
Sounds like a job for “Fighting soldiers from the sky, Fearless men who jump and die, Men who mean just what they say.”.