No such thing as "QAnon," so his or her statement still stands.
There is the group called Q. And then there are the anonymous researchers called anons. They are two separate groups. Leftists fail in set theory in many ways. They group too much together.
Ok, let’s critique the NYT’s review of SOF. First, the NYT is upset with how police procedures are portrayed in the movie:
“The queasiness derives from the contemporary-thriller vibes of the police procedural material. They feel inappropriate.”
Ironic seeing that they’ve overlooked illegal police procedures this administration is guilty of for three years now!
Next, they criticize the scene where the children are prepped and photographed by the groomer:
“ Then there are the scenes in which actual child actors perform being prepped for provocative pictures by adult groomers. What are the ethics of depiction here?”
Now they’re concerned about how child actors are treated in this movie yet they were silent when it came to the movie “Cuties”.
Finally, they focus on character assassination of the main character in the movie:
“(It should be noted that the real-life Ballard has been accused of exaggerating his rescue narratives.)”
Never once do they address the subject matter of the movie and how this scourge needs to be eradicated from our world. The NYT is the same as it alway has been; worthy of wiping your ass or lining a birdcage.
Oscar winning movies like "A Beautiful Mind," do things like downplay the non-political correctness of their main characters to make them more sympathetic. For instance, the real life John Nash was an anti-Semite which was omitted. He probably didn't also have a cute imaginary little girl as a friend.
If you don't have a Twitter account you're signed into, you're not going to see Twitter links by opening them in a private window, if that's what you mean.
Only way I know of to do that is to take the Twitter link -
I’m seeing a lot of posting claiming conservatives are “astroturfing” The theater’s by buying tickets to sell them out. Why doesn’t the left do that for the WNBA.😂
They call you QAnon, but never a liar.
Ever notice that?
I'm still waiting for someone to sue RFK, Jr. for defamation. But since truth is a defense, it will prolly never happen.
Look up what they say about QAnon if you've never been called a liar
No such thing as "QAnon," so his or her statement still stands.
There is the group called Q. And then there are the anonymous researchers called anons. They are two separate groups. Leftists fail in set theory in many ways. They group too much together.
To quote that piece of shit child-mutilation-supporting CM Punk:
"Tell me where I'm telling lies."
Ok, let’s critique the NYT’s review of SOF. First, the NYT is upset with how police procedures are portrayed in the movie:
“The queasiness derives from the contemporary-thriller vibes of the police procedural material. They feel inappropriate.”
Ironic seeing that they’ve overlooked illegal police procedures this administration is guilty of for three years now!
Next, they criticize the scene where the children are prepped and photographed by the groomer:
“ Then there are the scenes in which actual child actors perform being prepped for provocative pictures by adult groomers. What are the ethics of depiction here?”
Now they’re concerned about how child actors are treated in this movie yet they were silent when it came to the movie “Cuties”.
Finally, they focus on character assassination of the main character in the movie:
“(It should be noted that the real-life Ballard has been accused of exaggerating his rescue narratives.)”
Never once do they address the subject matter of the movie and how this scourge needs to be eradicated from our world. The NYT is the same as it alway has been; worthy of wiping your ass or lining a birdcage.
I hate these 'easy-to-smear' statements. As long as one person in the entire world has 'accused him' of exaggerating, it's a true statement.
But to the untrained (sheep) eye, it smears Ballard.
These people have to hide behind lies, because they have nothing else. And that's why we will win. We have truth.
They probably asked the colleague sitting next to them to make the accusation, so that they can say they are reporting the truth.
It's akin to having the fish dealer toss the fish you bought to you so you can claim to others you caught it.
Oscar winning movies like "A Beautiful Mind," do things like downplay the non-political correctness of their main characters to make them more sympathetic. For instance, the real life John Nash was an anti-Semite which was omitted. He probably didn't also have a cute imaginary little girl as a friend.
But that's acceptable.
Is there any link that gets around the NYT paywall?
NYT is still downing the film but in a more subtle way than screaming "QAnon Bad"
https://archive.ph/J2tRM
Thanks fren!
👍🏼
They got new marching orders because they realized their timeline could be fact checked
One way is to copy/paste the exact link without the tracking info into a private browser window.
In other words, take this link -
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/12/movies/sound-of-freedom-review.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
And delete the parts that identify it came from New York Times Twitter page -
?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
Leaving you with this -
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/12/movies/sound-of-freedom-review.html
Open a private/incognito window and paste the link.
Thank you
would that work on twitter???
Not sure what you mean.
If you don't have a Twitter account you're signed into, you're not going to see Twitter links by opening them in a private window, if that's what you mean.
Only way I know of to do that is to take the Twitter link -
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1680225717794091009?s=20
And replace twitter.com with nitter.net or nitter.nl or some other nitter domain.
https://nitter.net/nytimes/status/1680225717794091009?s=20
https://nitter.nl/nytimes/status/1680225717794091009?s=20
Press refresh and stop loading quickly. One of 3-4 attempts result in paywall not starting properly and you can read.
That works my fren! Thanks!
https://12ft.io/
New York Times blocks that, but doesn't block you turning off Javascript.
Kim Clement prophecy... the media will turn... its happening
He prophesied this would happen before Trump was even elected.
Nothing common sense at all about predicting the New York Times, FOX, CNN and other media outlets would destroy themselves in 2015.
Time,The View and News Week as I recall
Pedos are outing themselves in force over this. It's glorious.
I’m seeing a lot of posting claiming conservatives are “astroturfing” The theater’s by buying tickets to sell them out. Why doesn’t the left do that for the WNBA.😂
The 1%'s fixation on sex involving children https://im1776.com/prints/issue-3/anatomy-of-a-conspiracy-theory/
The technique is called “Disarm the bomb”.
They cannot stop it, so they prepare / discourage potential audience.
The article is short enough for a lazy reader to get to their main point in the last sentence:
Their goal is to program normies not to go to the theatres.
This movie was made several years before “Q” or anons were a thing.
Canned retort for these people:
*it's cute that you think Q-Anon speaks louder than groomer or child-trafficking....'
Editors at the NYT trying to avoid the GITMO gallows?