Honestly I want Garland impeached first. He weaponized the whole DOJ and is trying to take out Trump no matter the cost. Maybe throw Mayorkas in as well, but Garland needs impeached and then prosecuted by the next administration.
If they start the impeachment inquiry of Biden now there is a chance none of the evidence against FJB comes out before a Hunter trial. Remember the whole "active investigation/no evidence" thing.
If (like some of us believe) Hunter actually wants a trial so he can expose all the things his dad made him and his family do, that trial would give far more evidence to use to prosecute Joe. It might even allow us to skip both an impeachment and a 25th and directly arrest the sitting POTUS for treason.
While I don’t disagree with @catturd2 if they can’t get a dozen democrats in the senate, even after impeachment, he isn’t going anywhere. If they could, then you moving Heels Up Harris into the Oval Office, then who will she nominate for VP. They need a plan…
You are missing the bigger picture. Yeah - he won't be removed via impeachment. That isn't what they are worried about anyway. If the House does open a formal impeachment query it means the Judicial Committee (chaired by Jim Jordan) will either investigate themselves or assign another committee to investigate and provide them results. Then once they are satisfied the Judicial committee will vote on whether to send the article(s) to the full House for a vote on impeachment.
Jim will have subpoena powers to question anyone necessary to the inquiry, and it will get massive media attention. Assuming they find whatever they want/need the House will vote to impeach as long as the republicans stick together. I don't see the RINOs voting against it because to them it will be a win/win situation. They will get a chance to show their constituents they aren't really complete RINOs and will remind them leading up to the election that they voted to impeach. At the same time they know the Senate won't vote to convict after a trial, so they won't worry about the deep state getting pissed.
The Senate trial will be the place to enter evidence that will reach the normies since the MSM will have no choice but to cover it - especially since CSPAN will be there. That means everyone will hear about stuff like the laptop, FARA violations, bribes, drugs - everything. That still doesn't mean he will be convicted though. Remember - CJOTUS is the presiding judge. You know - the one with a possible Epstein issue, and a possible illegal Irish adoption issue.
The way I see it is FJB will have 2 choices. Either pardon Hunter and then resign/let his cabinet 25th him, or risk the trial and have all the evidence public. No way he or the dems want the evidence out there, but you never know. If they risk trial then once he is out of office (whether from conviction or resignation/25th) that evidence will still be waiting and will be used to prosecute him criminally under the new republican administration. However - if they 25th him after the evidence is out he will use that as proof of incompetence to stand trial. Note - a trial will bring out damning evidence on other people involved, so I'm sure they won't let that happen.
That's why FJB will pardon Hunter and some other people, then either stage a psychological or medical incident or turn up the acting to appear (even more) incompetent. The cabinet will immediately 25th him and he will avoid prosecution. Kamala will ascend to the 1st spot and Big Mike or Gavin McHair will be chosen as VP, and Kamala will then pardon Joe and step down. That will give Mike or Gavin an air of incumbency to run on - unless the House doesn't confirm either of the VP picks and Kamala can't resign (or McCarthey will become POTUS). The longer they can keep Kamala as POTUS without confirming a VP pick the better chance of her not pardoning Joe.
The good guys just have to make sure to get as much evidence as possible before Joe and the Ho start their scheme, so at least some people can face justice. Even if they don't get the evidence they want the democrat party will have been exposed like never before, and stands to lose a lot of voters and future elections.
The big question - is this plausible or pure hopium?
Personally, I dont believe its time or in Patriots best interests, to impeach the biggest red pilling machine we have at this time. Mayorkas, Blinken, Wray, Garland? For sure, lets get rolling on those.
As for Biden? Start his impeachment late winter or next spring. As for right now continue to threaten it daily. We really dont want Biden out of office right now. If we impeach now he will most likely resign and everything will be memory holed. We need all this criminal depravity front and center for 2024.
Is there sufficient evidence to prove that Joe broke the law; yes/no? Is it the sworn duty of congress to uphold constitutional law; yes/no? Selective enforcement of our laws is not how the rule of law works, it is anarchy.
The fact that these dickless republicans even try to debate about whether or not they should try to impeach Biden tells us everything we need to know about that worse-than-useless party of traitors, and weaklings. We need people in Washington DC who will do their duty, that is their job.
That’s because they were only going to go ahead with the impeachment trial, if Hunter got his sweetheart deal. Then I am sure a lot of the information would not have been able to be submitted in court against Joe.
It’s been told, that the sweetheart deal was supposed to be for Joe Biden not Hunter Biden?
But now that the sweetheart deal did not go through, now they’re not going to do the impeachment. Because it would actually stick.
So let's just get this straight
We don't want him impeached anyway.
It's far better to keep lurching forward into oblivion redpilling the dumbfounded dipshits.
Honestly I want Garland impeached first. He weaponized the whole DOJ and is trying to take out Trump no matter the cost. Maybe throw Mayorkas in as well, but Garland needs impeached and then prosecuted by the next administration.
If they start the impeachment inquiry of Biden now there is a chance none of the evidence against FJB comes out before a Hunter trial. Remember the whole "active investigation/no evidence" thing.
If (like some of us believe) Hunter actually wants a trial so he can expose all the things his dad made him and his family do, that trial would give far more evidence to use to prosecute Joe. It might even allow us to skip both an impeachment and a 25th and directly arrest the sitting POTUS for treason.
VACATE MCCARTHY
Better yet, vaccinate McCarthy. Many many boosters.
While congress is away.
Tomorrow is Friday, another delta.
u/#q3529
.
As if the world just stops and they go on vacation. Despicable.
I'm tired of these Republicants. Vote them all out!!
And Trump gets inducted.
200,000 sealed indictments, are they all for Trump?
While I don’t disagree with @catturd2 if they can’t get a dozen democrats in the senate, even after impeachment, he isn’t going anywhere. If they could, then you moving Heels Up Harris into the Oval Office, then who will she nominate for VP. They need a plan…
You are missing the bigger picture. Yeah - he won't be removed via impeachment. That isn't what they are worried about anyway. If the House does open a formal impeachment query it means the Judicial Committee (chaired by Jim Jordan) will either investigate themselves or assign another committee to investigate and provide them results. Then once they are satisfied the Judicial committee will vote on whether to send the article(s) to the full House for a vote on impeachment.
Jim will have subpoena powers to question anyone necessary to the inquiry, and it will get massive media attention. Assuming they find whatever they want/need the House will vote to impeach as long as the republicans stick together. I don't see the RINOs voting against it because to them it will be a win/win situation. They will get a chance to show their constituents they aren't really complete RINOs and will remind them leading up to the election that they voted to impeach. At the same time they know the Senate won't vote to convict after a trial, so they won't worry about the deep state getting pissed.
The Senate trial will be the place to enter evidence that will reach the normies since the MSM will have no choice but to cover it - especially since CSPAN will be there. That means everyone will hear about stuff like the laptop, FARA violations, bribes, drugs - everything. That still doesn't mean he will be convicted though. Remember - CJOTUS is the presiding judge. You know - the one with a possible Epstein issue, and a possible illegal Irish adoption issue.
The way I see it is FJB will have 2 choices. Either pardon Hunter and then resign/let his cabinet 25th him, or risk the trial and have all the evidence public. No way he or the dems want the evidence out there, but you never know. If they risk trial then once he is out of office (whether from conviction or resignation/25th) that evidence will still be waiting and will be used to prosecute him criminally under the new republican administration. However - if they 25th him after the evidence is out he will use that as proof of incompetence to stand trial. Note - a trial will bring out damning evidence on other people involved, so I'm sure they won't let that happen.
That's why FJB will pardon Hunter and some other people, then either stage a psychological or medical incident or turn up the acting to appear (even more) incompetent. The cabinet will immediately 25th him and he will avoid prosecution. Kamala will ascend to the 1st spot and Big Mike or Gavin McHair will be chosen as VP, and Kamala will then pardon Joe and step down. That will give Mike or Gavin an air of incumbency to run on - unless the House doesn't confirm either of the VP picks and Kamala can't resign (or McCarthey will become POTUS). The longer they can keep Kamala as POTUS without confirming a VP pick the better chance of her not pardoning Joe.
The good guys just have to make sure to get as much evidence as possible before Joe and the Ho start their scheme, so at least some people can face justice. Even if they don't get the evidence they want the democrat party will have been exposed like never before, and stands to lose a lot of voters and future elections.
The big question - is this plausible or pure hopium?
Excellent, that’s exactly what I was looking for. A thorough review of the situation. Thanks.
Aholes think they're Italian....
Get your asses back to work. If we don't get august off, neither do you, servant.
I mean how the hell did we get to this? Govt jobs used to be the last resort... yanno, like if you couldn't get anything better.
Personally, I dont believe its time or in Patriots best interests, to impeach the biggest red pilling machine we have at this time. Mayorkas, Blinken, Wray, Garland? For sure, lets get rolling on those.
As for Biden? Start his impeachment late winter or next spring. As for right now continue to threaten it daily. We really dont want Biden out of office right now. If we impeach now he will most likely resign and everything will be memory holed. We need all this criminal depravity front and center for 2024.
Is there sufficient evidence to prove that Joe broke the law; yes/no? Is it the sworn duty of congress to uphold constitutional law; yes/no? Selective enforcement of our laws is not how the rule of law works, it is anarchy.
The fact that these dickless republicans even try to debate about whether or not they should try to impeach Biden tells us everything we need to know about that worse-than-useless party of traitors, and weaklings. We need people in Washington DC who will do their duty, that is their job.
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1684707254262538240
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/shocker-mccarthy-backtracks-impeachment-joe-biden-during-thurssdays/
Oh hey. I was right again about this.
Trump did say the 25th will come back to bite him.
We all knew he wouldn't be impeached, because impeachment would imply he won lawfully.
That’s because they were only going to go ahead with the impeachment trial, if Hunter got his sweetheart deal. Then I am sure a lot of the information would not have been able to be submitted in court against Joe.
It’s been told, that the sweetheart deal was supposed to be for Joe Biden not Hunter Biden?
But now that the sweetheart deal did not go through, now they’re not going to do the impeachment. Because it would actually stick.
What would actually stick?
EDIT: a downvote for asking a clarification question because of ambiguous wording that can result in multiple different interpretations? Really?
Joe is the easiest candidate to beat. You don’t wanna go up against michael
Yeah, and never turn your back on Big Mike.