Dershowitz: Jack Smith Could be Indicted for Fraud for Omitting Trump’s ‘Peaceful’ Statement
(www.breitbart.com)
🧠 These commies are stupid!
Comments (51)
sorted by:
The other night while downtown playing music in a jam session, there was a guy there wearing a black "Jack Smith Fan Club" t-shirt. I thought to myself, I'm going to be so happy when this asshole sees what happens to Jack Smith and the entire cabal. If I ever see him again after that happens, I'll be sure to ask him, "Hey, where's your Jack Smith t-shirt?"
There is a old Lakota teaching. Everyone is a teacher. Good or bad if we pay attention we can see what happens good or bad and follow the good hopefully . The other one is words have no power until we decide to give those words power. If we decide to give the word power then who in the end allowed ourselves to be mad ?
Love it.
He keeps incriminating himself more each day. Watch how this goes from president Trump on trial to Jack Smith on trial.
I think that's what all of us are hoping for.
Feels like a declass in progress.
So much wisdom
I couldn't have looked at it without saying something.
But that is me.
I am tired of tolerating these assholes.
If you had a pro Trump shirt on I damn well guarantee he would tell you something.
Well, I follow the "gray man" way of life. No one knows precisely how radical I am in my conservatism, it's of the Minuteman Militia type. When the time comes I will gladly do what has to be done, but these folks just think I'm a harmless conservative. They would be absolutely shocked to know how deeply I loathe their politics and ideologies. They should pray that they never find out. And I trust you will keep my secret, especially with certain people we know in common.
About the Gray Man philosophy.... it's protective coloration in the modern world. Read all about it here: https://www.tactical.com/how-to-be-a-gray-man/
I move among these people, with the amiability of the gray man, courteous and civil to all, preferring not to confront them over needless, useless "debates" with folks who don't have the mental capacity to think critically. But if a time is coming that I sincerely DO believe is coming, they will suddenly see the Barbarian version of me that I have been feeding and caring for for most of my life. I can be one's best friend...or worst enemy..it all depends on who they turn out to be. And I have these people pegged perfectly.
[They] are the people who have shown their true colors in the covid hoax, they are the first people who would have lined up gladly at their government's orders to get into the cattle cars heading to work camps. And they would have insisted that I do the same...in fact they DID insist that I get "vaccinated" or wouldn't have anything to do with me. Ha... that didn't quite work out, did it?
So that's my long-ish reply, sorry if I got a little rabid there. But it IS true. I hide a well-fed Barbarian inside me, and I pray that I never have to release it. But he's there, just biding his time.
My husband read this and he said to tell you that you are brothers from another mother 🤣🤣.
Remember I told you I don't repeat to anyone what you say to anyone especially people you know.
Hehehe, thanks, I appreciate that.
Never heard the term "gray man" but I'm intrigued. I may fall inside that myself. I don't go rabid on anyone - but that means when my kids or family or friends have questions, they are comfortable asking me. Some things tho they need to see themselves - I see why the 2020 election went like it did - they however do not have that ability yet and I lost credibility in their eyes at that time. So, for all my lack of patience, I am patiently biding my time. Thank GOD my kids listened on the jab hoax. The rest is irritating but not yet life or death. EDIT: I seem to naturally follow some of those points but I'm lacking in many areas lol. Time to work on it. I appreciate this post
The 'gray man' is more of a self-defense mode. When in public, never draw attention to yourself because a predator will notice you if you wear flashy clothing, tshirts that label you as an NRA member or a Trump supporter. The rule is to become invisible. Of course, if you can in your state, always go armed, concealed, and be ready to defend yourself, but appear to all outward appearances as "harmless" or better, invisible. Thus the name, "gray man."
Thanks for the link it is interesting.
I never knew that.
Remind me to never piss you off.
We need to visit again and have some real discussions.
I read the article in the link you posted and it greatly appeals to me.
"I'm going to be so happy when this asshole sees what happens to Jack Smith and the entire cabal."
Naw, the True Believers never learn. He'll just grumble to himself that "Hitler Drumpf wriggled off the hook again," and double down.
Was he playing a pink strat? Probably a squire? Yes...... Definitely remember that dickhead
Was his Alvin Bragg foundation shirt in the wash?
In the WASH?! This guy rarely even bathes and looks like a street bum. I'm sure he does his laundry at least once a year. I've seen him around for several years, but really want nothing to do with him as a person. His "values" (whatever they are) do not align with mine, especially in the spiritual realm. I'm trying to draw closer to God, he doesn't believe in God and will go out of his way to tell you that.
Like I said elsewhere, first time the prosecutor will be pleading guilty for his case rather than the defendant.
It's like they wrote their own indictment and handed it right over.
Now they are fighting for it to be televised live because they think Trump would somehow weasel his way out behind closed doors.
I hope they get it on prime time.
He should try a insanity plea. It may work.
How will claiming to be insane work with him running for President? Or will he claim to be insane for the trial, but sane when running for President?
I was referring to Jack Smith when this case turns on him.
Sorry. I was half asleep when I made that post. But yeah, it was a dunderhead comment. 😳
Dunderhead - that word needs to be brought back and used more.
Really? Pretty sure LakotaPride meant Smith...
I like that.
Hope it comes true.
Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz says that under his own “fraud” standard, Special Counsel Jack Smith could be indicted for omitting a key portion of then-President Donald Trump’s speech in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021.
The games have already begun
The power of subpoenas.
I hope these traitors receive the harshest punishment for Treason.
Shows why the Military was the only way.
But he won’t be we all know this
Time will tell.
My question is, Who has the power to indict other than the DOJ? I know there has to be other remedies than the DOJ, but who?
This is why the Military was the only way.
That's my thinking..... unless it is within the jurisdiction of a State.
Exactly. A good example is with cases where a person can be charged under Federal law and also State law and there is no double jeopardy. You see this often with Military personnel. The State will charge them and the Military comes in and charges them also. As one was a Federal law violated the other was a State law.
I see a problem here
Trump is not being charged for his speech.
It's not one of the charges.
But it does show he instructed them to go home peacefully.
It can be raised as a defense argument, but it's not going to get the indictment thrown out
This is true to a point. If it is to clear the person was innocent from the evidence and you charged and withheld this evidence. This is why the charge of prosecutorial misconduct exists.
Yes, Brady material needs to be turned over even if the person is guilty. And the prosecution doesn't decide how exculpatory the evidence is.
In general, I think people underestimating these cases and trying to magic wand them away.
Exactly. This follows the same pattern in investigations. How many suspects are cleared because the evidence in the investigation clears them. So as we used to say time to wear out more shoe leather as we have a obligation and duty to bring the correct suspect to trial.
I refused to do the PC from DC by claiming a person of interest. I always referred to them as suspects. I know a lot of interesting people but I do not waste my time with them if it does not pertain to the case.
Some exculpatory evidence may or may not clear a suspect. But your case before going to trial should be strong enough to overcome this. But trials must be fair and all evidence provided to allow a proper defense for the suspect. Otherwise it is no longer a fair trial.
BYE BITCH!!!
He is incriminating himself each passing day.
Wouldn't that be karma?
In the end nobody escapes Gods justice.
If I was a child, I’d watch out for this guy.