From the chans via X. Dont know if it is true..but SOMETHING happened.
(media.greatawakening.win)
✈️ Planefags ✈️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (194)
sorted by:
Makes a great case against the the 2A , if your a guvmint commie pushing muh right WiNg extremist FF garbage.
Nothing would surprise me though. Look at the Whitmer debacle. No one believes they'd junk a f - 35 for the cause? We leave shit everywhere we go. What's an f-35 worth?70 m or 700m? Chump change. Printer go brrrr
They don't have to actually down or lose one. They just have to tell us they did
Imagine building and charging for an 80+ million dollar airplane that doesn’t exist, then crashing it at a fake crash sight. 80+ million put in your pockets.
Toss bits and pieces from previously damaged F35's and then add a wee bit of Avgas, you've got the setting for some nicely doctored pics.
Yeh, just like what they did on 911 for the Pentagon.
1st reporter on scene reported live there was no evidence of aircraft wreckage hitting. Then they shut the site down for 24hrs due to "safety", then reopened for photos next day and magical plane parts appeared...and many not even belonging to the airframe they said hit.
Same thing for the gash in Pennsylvania where another augered in, but if you compared google maps, that gash was always there as part of the landscape. They also shut that for 24hrs, lit it on fire and trucked in cadavers and plane junk to spread around as whistleblowers from 1st responders leaked.
In short, no plane hit either spot.
Sauce? I don't for a minute believe that any "reporters" were able to access the physical scene initially. Nothing "magical" about identification of airplane components that had been mixed in with the building destruction. Did you expect them to pop out all on their own? And how would any be identified as "not even belonging to the airframe" when passenger accommodations (for example) are not matched to the airframe serial number?
Same question for the Pennsylvania crash. What "whistleblowers"? And how are they verified? Frankly, conspiracy zealots are not above perpetrating a hoax (e.g., chemtrails). Interesting how much factual information they have to deny and push under the rug. Where did the airplane go? What happened to all the passengers? And the passenger attack on the killer pilots was all part of the conspiracy to cause a seeming crash? These questions are more serious than any puzzlement over the crash, and any alternative "theory" must have answers for them. Or it's all just a brain fart.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-911-pentagon-attack-footage-415983695442
Yeah you fell for a fake video
That shouldn't be the real question. They say an F-355 costs between 75 and 80M. The real question should be - what would an F-35 be worth to our adversaries. I bet China or even possibly Russia would pay into the low billions for an intact F-35 so they could reverse-engineer it and catch up on the technology. Hell - they gave Hunter 1.5B for whatever corruption they were purchasing. An F-35 would have to be higher than that.
These planes cost nothing close to what they report they do.
They cost what they are quoted to cost. You may say that's too much, and it would probably be true, but that is what they cost regardless. It is tough to meet requirements. Especially when the customer wants to change them partway through the program. And also especially when the vendor didn't have a complete grasp of their problems. (Lots of time and expense went into perfecting the clutch for the vertical fan on the -B model.) My perspective? I only worked for the military side of the Boeing Company for 40 years.
I worked for General Dynamics for a good period of time and they would push projects onto me and tell me to require X an hour for them insanely out of my pay grade to cover next year's funding. Or they would tell me to sit on things and pretend I was still doing them to cover for this reckless spending.
I'm not saying everyone was totally on the up and up. Problems of that sort in the 1980s (cross-charging between Space Shuttle and B-1B contracts) gave rise to increased financial scrutiny in the defense industry. Don't assume that it all goes without notice or correction nowadays. Congress has never been happy with such costs, but they want the products.
There may have been a lot of military toothbrushes on that plane.
Seems to me like a case for 1) showing that military might against citizenry may have some serious limits, 2) that the F-35 really is nothing but a big money pit (the F-22 was a big money pit, but it did eventually do its job as promised), and 3) if they can't secure the ground at home, what hope do they have when every foreign brown 12-50 year old might be willing to die to take one of these babies out? If they try to make this a 2A killer, it will backfire hilariously (even before evidence comes out about what actually happened).