So how many politicians will be disqualified when the true facts of Jan 6th and the stolen election come to light? 90% of all the Dems and Republicans? Uniparty treason.
The justices rejected an appeal by John Anthony Castro, a Texas tax consultant who has mounted a long-shot bid for the Republican presidential nomination, of a lower court's finding that he lacked the legal standing to sue seeking Trump's disqualification under the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment.
Though can an opportunity be grained by this move?
Why did it lack legal standing? Does this court already know that Trump did NOT cause an insurrection? Is there some other reason we don't know about?
To be fair, I read the first paragraph & that stood out to me. Came here to post a comment & yours was a good way to respond anyway.
They should have taken it up. Then the idea of blaming Trump and his patriotic supporters for the FBI's own treasonous insurrection could be squashed at the highest level like the diseased insect it is.
A federal judge in June dismissed Castro's lawsuit, finding that he had failed to show a legal injury, which prompted Castro to appeal both to the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court.
I hope it was rejected with prejudice. Meaning I hope someone used it to blow their nose and then crumpled it up and threw it in the trash bin. Kek. Unfortunately we know that the supreme Court will ultimately fail but when they give us a win we might as well be happy about it.
Because if they allowed this case, they’d have to allow Trump to bring his election cases, since that is the root of why he contested and gave the speeches he did on Jan 6th and then why the “crowd” did what they did, without “encouragement” (typed with overflowing full of sarcasm since we factually know the Glowies led the charge into the Capital).
Trump has never been convicted by a court of engaging in insurrection or rebellion. The Supreme Court cannot deal with hypothetical questions. Without a conviction, there is no controversy for Supreme.
So how many politicians will be disqualified when the true facts of Jan 6th and the stolen election come to light? 90% of all the Dems and Republicans? Uniparty treason.
Too bad.
This would have been an opportunity to show the truth.
I guess the timing is not right, yet.
Though can an opportunity be grained by this move?
Why did it lack legal standing? Does this court already know that Trump did NOT cause an insurrection? Is there some other reason we don't know about?
To be fair, I read the first paragraph & that stood out to me. Came here to post a comment & yours was a good way to respond anyway.
I think because he lives in Texas and cannot be injured by what happens in New Hampshire, by the court's view.
That's another good observation
related gif https://greatawakening.win/p/17r997YFKT/the-gif-uploaded-of-thanq/c/
I got a paywall so here it is without one.
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Fworld%2Fus%2Fus-supreme-court-rebuffs-long-shot-candidates-bid-disqualify-trump-2024-2023-10-02%2F
I believe that this whole initiative will be one of the biggest boomerangs ever!
They should have taken it up. Then the idea of blaming Trump and his patriotic supporters for the FBI's own treasonous insurrection could be squashed at the highest level like the diseased insect it is.
A federal judge in June dismissed Castro's lawsuit, finding that he had failed to show a legal injury, which prompted Castro to appeal both to the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court.
THrEat To DImOcraCY. NEEd MOrE juDgES
That would disqualify a LOT of people in DC
This one needs a LETS GOOOO tag next to it!
YES !
Outstanding!
I hope it was rejected with prejudice. Meaning I hope someone used it to blow their nose and then crumpled it up and threw it in the trash bin. Kek. Unfortunately we know that the supreme Court will ultimately fail but when they give us a win we might as well be happy about it.
Because if they allowed this case, they’d have to allow Trump to bring his election cases, since that is the root of why he contested and gave the speeches he did on Jan 6th and then why the “crowd” did what they did, without “encouragement” (typed with overflowing full of sarcasm since we factually know the Glowies led the charge into the Capital).
makes sense it gets chucked out though, he's only being accused, nothing is proven. typical DS putting the cart before the horse for optics.
Trump has never been convicted by a court of engaging in insurrection or rebellion. The Supreme Court cannot deal with hypothetical questions. Without a conviction, there is no controversy for Supreme.
So this means the disqualification is null and void, or he IS disqualified?