DJT's Truth account has been posting a lot today. Much of it is criticism re: Ron DeSanctimonious, etc, but about 2 hours ago, he truthed and retruthed a small flurry of "Trump for Speaker" truths.
Knowing that DJT is a master of populist 5G warfare, we can understand that he has reasons for doing this, whether or not he considers this as a real possibility, including (potentially) increasing his profile, stirring up the hornets' nest in DC, and moving a variety of narratives.
Dasting.
Trump TRUTH
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111179710276499538
3min Clip of Bannon Asking people to consider Trump for Speaker
Trump TRUTH
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111179709232101277
Content: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/wayne-root-trump-house-speaker-again-whether-he/
WAYNE ROOT: Trump for House Speaker- Again? Whether He Wants It, or Not, Here’s the Idea That Exposes All the RINOS and Changes Congress Forever!
Trump RETRUTH
https://truthsocial.com/@RepMTG/posts/111177115014378628
MTG: I’m supporting President Donald J. Trump to be the next Speaker of the House!
He has a proven four year record of putting America First and implementing the policies the American people want.
CONTENT: America's Real Voice Clip: "Is Speaker Trump a real possibility?"
Trump RETRUTH
https://truthsocial.com/@MTG/posts/111174447970743697
MTG: President Trump is THE LEADER of the Republican Party.
President @realDonaldTrump should be our Speaker!
EDIT: Disclaimer: In recent days, I've generally poopooed the idea of DJT becoming Speaker. I still think that the idea is not very realistic, but it would be foolish to rule out anything, given how many unknowns there really are.
I will say one thing: If DJT WERE to become speaker, it would detonate such a titanic hydro-bomb across the entire world, it would be time to just sit back, and watch the whole thing crumble. I think it could only happen if indeed Patriots are in control of a LOT more than I suspect. The meltdown would be delicious.
That said, either way, I think it's dasting that he has retruthed the idea. Either way, DJT all the way!
I don’t think Trump as Speaker is gonna play out. Trump has to become (publicly) the President again, in order to clean things up once and for all. But unless he has a direct mandate from the people (voted in beyond any reasonable doubt (and you can argue whether or not the 2020 doubts were “reasonable”)), there will be grassroots retaliation from ordinary people at home and in other countries. Succession isn’t the way to go. Getting in on a technicality doesn’t legitimize the drastic measures to follow.
I suppose he could become speaker as a temporary thing, but that might interfere with his campaign and the public opinion, it’s hard to say. But it’s always good to have options on the table so the enemy doesn’t know what to expect.
I'd say my thinking is basically similar to yours. I don't see how DJT becoming speaker and then president by succession via ousting Biden and then Harris, is a good look optically.
I'm more inclined to think that he's stoking certain narrative fires, in order to flush out the real GOP Establishment.
The only way this could happen is if the RINOs had all been flipped already and they are just acting their parts until the boom. Which, this could be a big boom, but I'm expecting the biggest booms will be things we've not even imagined.
DJT stringing them along will help bring out more RINOS and explode more Leftist’s heads! LOL.
House GOP rules say people under indictment can’t hold leadership positions. That will have to change first.
Although I want him back ASAP, I don't think this will happen.
Plus all that is needed is not just on PDJT's shoulders ... we need real MAGA politicians & people in place to carry on after we all are gone.
Trump showed us how to win and paved the way - especially by exposing the voter fraud and God willing he has a remedy to fix it.
He's said over and over that he is giving the power back to us.
The dems are planning on getting someone of their choosing in as speaker - the MAGA group there is small, but has proven to be very powerful (and pretty brave if you ask me) and they have the support of almost every American.
This type of courage is needed in every person with any authority. Gaetz stood up and challenged a lair, now faces the wrath of the people on a all both sides; Dem/Repubs, and MAGA.
I don't want DJT as speaker, I want a good ol Americans that love our country to be chosen. Before I die I want the country in good hands, not depending on one (fabulous) person to fix this shit. So my grandchildren have a wonderful life.
Not going to happen. Trump is making the Democrats vote for Jim Jordan. If all republicans ---which isn't likely--- vote for Trump, the Dems are screwed but if only 8 or 9 RINOs vote Jordan, the Dems will be forced to vote for him as the lesser threat. KEK 5D chess!
I think it was always an unrealistic hopium-based narrative put out by the click-baiters and alt-media talking heads and then promoted by the emotional responses.
That said, after Nov 2020, pretty much EVERYONE on the scene had no idea what was going on, had all sorts of expectations, and so lots of wild ideas naturally emerged.
Just recently DJT said that this was "my second term, which is sort of what we're having now..... but I don't want the results of this term...."
Pointing directly to the point that the collapse of the Cabal system HAS to take place, and that it needs to take place under Biden and NOT with DJT in the office (of any kind).
I get that many people feel desperate, and are longing so much to have DJT back, but I think they don't realize how necessary all this is.
We don't want DJT as speaker or anything else while the DS system, fiat currency, etc, all melts down. Not the time.
(Which makes me sort of wonder why Bannon is even airing the idea. But I suspect this is all narrative building, and sadly, some of us get caught up in it.)
Sure, many of us just want this thing to be over
Essentially, there has never been anyone caught up in a war that didn't want it to be over, except for the bankers.
So it's obvious and par for the course. But many of us are veterans now, and it takes new and different resources to endure the course.
The question, however, we have to address is; which do we want more: for it to be over, or for us to win?
That control you speak of? Im starting to see actions, or at least statements, taken by the principles that go against their previously blatant disregard for America, the Constitution and the rule of law. Just this morning in Gateway Pundit there is this headline:
CHANGE: Mayorkas Finally Admits ‘Immediate Need’ for More Border Wall in Texas
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/change-mayorkas-finally-admits-immediate-need-more-border/
My opinion on the SOTH issue is that Trump for Speaker is most likely a move to panic the death cult and force mistakes. It could also be to distract from and make more palatable a Speaker such as Jordan.
I dont fully trust Jordan, he seems Gowdyish, all hat no cattle, but that also may be fake. They sure have gone after him hard, similar to Gaetz, if hes merely controlled opposition. This psywar is frustrating for those of us who dont have anything but whats reported to go on.
And what is up with this supposed McCarthy ally Speaker Pro Temp? He slams his gavel and then removes Pelosi and Hoyer from their hideaways. Dad says he researched him yesterday and he is staunchly anti baby murder.
I think these are things pointing to the fact we are well into the end game and that Justice will come soon. I know we can all feel it.
Obviously, she supports Trump, but MTG is doubling down a bit to save face b/c she backed Kevin McCarthy when she had the opportunity to do what was right.
How do you know that it wasn't DJT's plan for her to back McCarthy when he literally said "I back McCarthy for Speaker"?
Do you think she should have gone AGAINST Potus DJT then?
Right. Mccarthy was in for a reason. Let's hope that is revealed at some point
I seriously doubt she’s “in on the plan”.
which "plan" are you referring to?
If nothing else, should get the MAGA base hyped up.
Although I wonder if people get too hyped up and then let down. Remember the Trump card NFTs? There are quite a few anons that gotten pretty burned out because of that.
A lot more anons need to practice heavy duty discernment and introspective reasoning. Cos this is not a game.
There are bound to be some causalities, of course, but their number can be reduced if anons really apply what Q exhorted us to, aka discernment, disengagement from emotion when evaluating, applying critical thinking, and NOT getting unwarranted hype. Hype is for normies.
And even then, I think DJT knows and is generally balancing the overall ocean: hype being peaking waves and let downs being troughs.
Anons should be like oil spreading across the ocean surface, to minimize the volatility of the wave action by applying Q-type steadiness (instead of reacting to and adding to the wave-level volatility)
Oh boy, do I. I also remember all the people who bought into -- and still buy into -- NFTs, and got offended when they were told it's just bullshit ways to screw you. At least the Trump ones were hilarious, but they're just glorified JPGs anyway.
Coming from an old crypto guy, NFT‘s are not just jpg‘s. It shows your ignorance saying that. They can also act as tickets fot events, contain crypto inside (a sort of stealth cover), act as digital representations of physical ownership (certificates of authenticity) and on and on.
Some NFT‘s are just art, sure, but more and more are doing what I mentioned. My best play was buying a Bored Ape for 5 ETH and selling is for 71 ETH. (275k). They are still morphing, as is crypto.
Many will have real world apps and you won‘t know you are using them. But, that said I think the digital world can be evil, so be careful.
You’re right, NFTs are not images. They’re secure digital receipts, commonly with images attached to them. The technology might see some more practical use in the future. But when talking about the ones with images, the hype is a scam. Just like with fiat currency, it’s only worth as much as what you can get rid of it for, and, I hate to break it to you, there’s nothing valuable about an ugly cookie-cutter “unique” animal drawing to make your receipt worth anything. Congratulations on getting out with a net gain. Still a scam though.
There is a scam object and most will be worthless (as many of mine now are.) LOL The thing with new technology is that the ones that succeed will often more than make up for the failures. I made a lot of bad calls but I had a blast collecting this new art form. The BAYC made up for all the losses and then some. And I still have a part of history and a story. We don't take none of it with us, I get that, just having fun.
Anything we desire can be given a value. So, I can easily "hate to break it to you" too that I mademoney on a silly .jpg (that I never liked lol, but I know how to read charts and saw unreasonably high volume coming into that project so bought in and sold near the top.) Same as crypto - most are experimental and have no value.
A scam is something with the intention to deceive. There is a lot of that in crypto. But who are you or me or ? to judge what is art and what has value? Remember pet rocks? trading cards that essentially degrade over time? Or how about cabbage patch dolls? List goes on.
Dude it’s not a “new art form”. It’s a new technology if anything, and digital art has been around for a long time. The scam is that NFT creators mass-produce garbage, and hook up each piece to a program that keeps track of ownership, then try to convince people that it’s worth spending thousands of dollars on. The cult is very profitable to the people who started it.
The difference between NFTs and all these other things is that the only reason given to have an NFT is that you might make money off of it. Pet rocks are inexpensive and fun for a joke. Cabbage patch dolls I don’t know about but I assume they at least function as dolls. The only comparable things here are trading cards, but with trading cards you are paying for meaningful ownership of something- with art NFTs there is no functional difference between someone who bought the NFT and someone who saved the image associated with it, except to participate in the market. The only draw is as a financial investment, and for that reason anyone who presents an art NFT as a financial investment is trying to scam you.
I'm not meaning to make this into a semantic argument but having a unique digital piece of art is certainly new. Yeah, digital art has been around for a decent amount of time, but it was never like this, but again, getting semantic.
You use of the word "cult" seems a bit too strong. I mean I hate it when they call Q a cult when he/they teach us to think for ourselves, so to call a form of art that has no leader, "a cult", seems a bit disengenous.
Trading cards are limited and degrade. NFT (trading cards or the usual 10k collections) are limited and don't degrade. And art is in the eye of the beholder. IF you want to win a semantic award you got it, but I think it is way way too early to put into a box something that we don't know what it is.
A BIG draw for traditional art (e.g. Hunter biden "art") is money laundering. Same could easily be true of NFT's.
IF something is limited, there is a functional difference. By definition the copy will not have the function as NFT's are code. By definition. Copies are copies and CAN'T function as the original.
“never like this” You’re buying into the hype. What does “like this” even mean, and why does that matter?
The only “function” is to trade and make/lose money. There are two separate things going on here: the digital image (which has no function unless you personally like the look of it. And if that’s the reason then I might judge your taste in furry art rather than your financial decisions) and the receipt, which just exists to be traded around. To anyone who, like most people, think these images are atrociously ugly, neither of these two components of an NFT have any value. But suddenly if you couple them together they’re worth investing in? When they can just as easily be decoupled by someone copying the image?
If you buy an art NFT, you own that receipt. Anyone can copy the image. But that doesn’t matter because…? Because you own the receipt. Which proves…? That you paid money. For…? Proof that you spent money… plus that image… which someone else just got for free. How much is that proof worth?
If an NFT was attached instead to, say, a seat reservation at a sports game. That has value, and these two pieces (the receipt and the item) can’t be decoupled (because it’s enforced by the venue). That would be a smart use of NFT technology.
Look, I don’t blame you. These monkey people are great at selling their worthless garbage of the future. But at some point you have to look at things for what they are and admit that it was a scam, but you had fun and came out on top anyway.
Here’s an analogy for you:
Let’s say you’re a straight man (if not, just imagine the words are different), and are single. You meet a lady whose looks are 10/10 and you do everything to earn her favor. She likes you, and changes her status on social media to show the world that you’re her one and only boyfriend. But you notice that every single guy she meets on the street is able to tempt her to the point where basically any man who wants can sleep with her. But she never changes her social media status, you’re still her boyfriend! You still have that receipt to show for your efforts, even though what it’s supposed to be attached to is available to everyone. …congratulations?
(Just imagine the looks are 1/10 and you have an NFT, haha)
Is that Victor Chaos?
LOL, I don't know what that means (or who he is) but it sounds funny. Has a nice ring to it. I give up???
Its butters in the post covid special, was incarcerated in an insane asylum for selling NFTs
You mean southpark?
Yes, but specifically the post covid episodes
NFTs has certain value, sure -- as a technology.
But its application -- including the Trump NFTs -- has been exclusively for art or products related to art (e.g. video games industry trying to adopt them for micro transactions)
The criticism levied at Trump NFTs is well deserved.
I have a TF2 frying pan worth a good stack. Got it for free so I'm good with that
Yeah, NFT's so far are 98% "art" (and some crappy art at that.)
Re video game use, that is a BIG thing I forgot to mention. Imagine OWNING your game skins and such! Instead of it staying in the game, it can just be a specialized NFT (new standard or perhaps existing) that you can take with you. Some game companies are obviously resistant to this as they want to control and keep you in their games.
I see why people can see the Trump NFT's as grifting. But I think the Trump NFT's are a great idea for when this plan all goes down. I have around 30 of them (1st and 2nd gen) just to resell some later. If this plan goes down as planned, those NFT's will go up 100X EASY. The knew Bored Ape Yacht Club they will be. And Trump can give them future use (coupons and such for ???)
They would have to feel the pain, of not having a speaker for a long time. Maybe 10 days after the CR runs out.
People including me were so sure that Gaetz's motion to vacate would fail that at this point I don't rule out anything.
Right?
I wasn't sure. I'm never putting in full bets these days. That approach got thrown out fully with the pasting of Nov, Dec 2020 and Jan 2021.
I expected that the motion would not result in MCarthy leaving, but I cannot say I was sure or certain.
The only thing I'm ruling out at this point is .... nothing.
The best thing about this, even if not possible, the lefty shits and tears. You have to love the level of trolling this is and that it has provoked the left to cry more.😂
It got the liberals foaming at the mouth. President Trump is a great shitposter. I see those Truths as a way of getting the libs to loose their shit.
I had a loose shit yesterday. Only just made it to the po in time.
Haahaa. I did misspell lose.
Then help us understand why you didn't vote to dump McCarthy
Hmmmmmm??
Not really a hard question, is it?
Fact. McCarthy is out. Fact: New Speaker is required. Question: Who do you want as the NEXT speaker of the house?
Wanting DJT to be the next speaker (which is now a necessity) is in no way inconsistent with not wanting to boot McCarthy out in the first place.
FWIW, did Trump ever say in the last week (publicly): "yes, please get McCarthy out!" If not, then how would NOT voting to get him out be in conflict with DJT? If anything, the question might be, WHY did Gaetz and team push to get McCarthy out when DJT did not ever indicate (publicly) that he wanted that outcome?
But you realize we're in a war of narratives, right? Why so much angst about what 'seems' to be MTG's position or actions on anything?
The possibility that DJT could be next speaker seems extremely tiny for starters. Secondly, is it even desirable? (lots of reasons why not, imo)
So perhaps a worthwhile question is: WHY are certain parties floating the narrative of supporting DJT for speaker? What impact does this have?
Imo, we're watching a movie. The movie's objectives include going through various phases to set up DS, disconnect DS, expose DS and then bring in justice. The movie is for waking up and mobilizing the uninformed and the unaware. If we're reacting to the movie story, instead of processing it as expression of a plan and script, then maybe we need to shift out gears.
Could the "change of batter" Q post be about the Speaker of the House position?
Because he knows we love the idea. He knows it's never going to happen, and he doesn't want to be speaker.