RED = SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN.... GREEN = JESUS BLOODLINE....
THIS is for people who don't want to comprehend my other posts....
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (205)
sorted by:
Where did it say Eve had sex with Satan? Genesis 4:1 clearly said that Cain was conceived from Adam and Eve. But I've read the Book of Enoch and the Watchers or fallen angels certain did have sex with human females, spawning the Nephilims of Genesis 6.
Agreed. The corrupt blood lines are the result of the hybrid offspring, Nephilim, of 200 fallen angels mating with human women.
Could they be a gene line of psychopaths?
thank you - that confused the heck out of me
Genesis 3:13. The word “ate” is “sex”....the churches teach Eve ate an apple. The churches have been indoctrinated like our schools.
Eve had sex with Satan. Satan deceived Eve. Then in Genesis 3:15 God put enmity between Satans seed and Adams seed. Eve was carrying 2 seeds from different fathers. Yes, it’s possible. Research Superfetation. Cain was from Satan. Abel was from Adam. And while Abel later dies, God prepares her womb to carry Seth later to provide a perfect bloodline for Jesus Christ.
We have been mislead about many things in the Bible. Check out this website for more info: ageofLaodicea.com
Eve took and ate of the fruit, and then she shared with Adam, who took and ate of the fruit. Did Adam have sex with Satan as well?
No Adam also had sex with Eve. Eve was carrying Satans seed (Cain) and Adams seed (Abel). It’s called Superfetation - research it. A woman can carry babies from two different males/sperm. It happens. Then in Genesis 3:15 And I will put ENMITY between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed.... What does ENMITY mean? In the Concordance....it means hatred. The two seedlines will hate each other. Which is what the green and red lines show in the chart above.
Are you suggesting Fraternal twins? wow.
Why would God tell Satan there would be enmity between the serpents seed and the WOMAN's seed? -They're both her seed. If your thesis were true, it would be Satan's seed vs Adam's seed or God's seed.
Superfetation is a rare biological phenomenon in which a woman becomes pregnant while already pregnant. In this unusual situation, two different embryos at different stages of development exist in the woman's uterus. Typically, a woman's body prevents new pregnancies from occurring when she is already pregnant, so superfetation is quite uncommon. It can lead to different due dates for the two fetuses and can present unique challenges for healthcare providers.
Gen 3:13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.
The word eat:
אָכַל
'âkal
aw-kal'
A primitive root; to eat (literally or figuratively): - X at all, burn up, consume, devour (-er, up), dine, eat (-er, up), feed (with), food, X freely, X in . . . wise (-deed, plenty), (lay) meat, X quite.
However, the word beguiled can mean deceived or seduced. Relatively similar.
I am familiar with this theory, and it can make sense. The problem is that the words (that we can look up) don't follow closely. I'm not able to read Hebrew so I'm not able to be definitive on this topic. Perhaps someone who can do better than I can.
So would google translator help? Would it be more correct to say one does not understand Hebrew, that to say one can't read it. Because if you could read it, but then only translate into the nearest English word you may be no better off.
I wouldn't trust google on this, or most , topics.
Thinking about this a bit further:
If "beguiled" takes on the meaning of seduced, then אָכַל (to eat) wouldn't make sense. Since אָכַל is a root word, in the primitive might take the meaning "to bring into" or to "take into the body", "to nourish", or "to nourish life", then that changes EVERYTHING.
If we take it to mean seduced than I would argue it is a spiritual seduction rather than a physical one. Satan got Eve to question the Word of God. At first she got God’s command correct. She told satan she was not supposed to eat from the tree. So satan changed tactics. He then told her that it’s not that you’ll die but become like God. He got Eve to question God’s intention; question if He was really good. Like God was trying to be sneaky and that’s why He really didn’t want them to eat from it. Satan got her to “eat” a new theology, “seduced” her into a new way of thinking. We see that time and time again in the OT where Israel turns their back to God, question His commands and look to other gods. I think God even calls it adultery in Isaiah or Ezekiel (I would have to find the Scripture). So in a way Eve did get “seduced” by satan but I don’t think it was a physically sexual way how the first comment states.
That makes a lot of sense. It could also fit the equation. But, isn't there also some discussion about Cain having a "mark" that separated him and made him "noticeable" from others? I seem to remember something like a horn, or a color. To have that type distinction, wouldn't he need to haver a different father? I'll not travel to far down this path here.
imo, you are both right and wrong.
yes, definitely it was spiritually seduced. The fall that occurred when Eve united with Lucifer was spiritual in nature. BUT, because human love is deeply intertwined with our sexual nature (God created us with two sexes so that through our union male and female - we can experience the profound love of God in that unity of husband and wife) Eve 'eating the fruit' with Lucifer was a sexual form of union BUT in the spirit.
Eve had both a spirit and a body, but Lucifer only had a spirit (no body). So, the fall interaction between them was indeed sexual in nature (because it all hinged on Eve's capacity to love aka 'eating the fruit') and she fell in a sexual love entanglement with Lucifer, but one that was spiritual in nature.
We can correctly understand the sexual relationship between a husband and wife as more than merely physical. It is also extremely spiritual in nature. From that perspective, its possible to understand that in some form, there could be a sexual union between a woman and an angel, but that it would be spiritual in nature only, and not material or physical.
As human beings, we have a fleshly body and a spirit body. Our spirit body has eyes, ears, touch, taste, just as our flesh does. But our spirit sees, hears, touches spiritual things, spiritual reality.
So when Eve ate 'the fruit" (which is the symbol of Eve's capacity to produce the next generation through her sexual love), with Lucifer, it was a sexual entanglement in the spirit. It bound her to him, through the power of (fallen) love. When she did the same thing with Adam, they united also physically, but OUTSIDE of God's blessing, and under Satan's influence.
"know" is often used in the Bible to mean "sexual union". "Adam knew his wife, and she conceived...."
The result of this is that all the descendants of Adam and Eve are born in Satan's lineage (meaning Satan has a claim over it, NOT that we carry Satan's DNA, which isn't possible because Satan has no material DNA). That's why we must be 'reborn', through Christ. But through the cross it is only spiritually reborn into God's spiritual lineage. That's why the second coming is necessary. So that humanity can unite with Christ at the second coming and be 'reborn' also physically, meaning, our flesh would be removed from Satan's jurisdiction, influence and claim.
Rom 8: 23 Not only that, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.
Adoption is only necessary if you are from another lineage.
This was my ah-ha moment...
Take a look at ageofLaodicea.com or thinkoursidethebeast.com
What Bible version are you using - All the versions I have says at Genesis 4:1 Adam knew his wife Eve and she conceived and bore Cain.?
Yes, the post conveniently misses this point.
Satan was Lucifer, and Lucifer was an Angel. The fall of first Eve with Lucifer was spiritual in nature, and then with Adam was fleshly in nature. But the children of Adam and Eve were conceived long after this.
It's more accurate to understand that the lineage of the firstborn SYMBOLIZES the evil and the lineage of the second born symbolizes good. The reason is because salvation = restoration. What we understand as salvation is actual God restoring our original condition by REVERSING the process of the fall itself.
So just as Lucifer the elder creation murdered Adam the younger creation by seducing Eve and using her to seduce Adam, this needs to be reversed at first symbolically by having 'elder brothers' humble themselves (and not murder) their 'younger brothers'. That in a nutshell is the entire history of Israel from the time of Jacob until the time of Jesus. But after reversing the process of the fall symbolically, God could then bring the Messiah in the flesh, who then could gain the victory over Lucifer in substance, in actuality,not only symbolically.
I think its because the Op doesn't quite understand the process and the objective of restoration that he interprets the biblical record to mean literally different bloodlines of Satan and God. The actual bloodline of God is only restored once Jesus came and got the victory spiritually over Lucifer. So we can be reborn spiritually into his lineage. But physically, in the flesh aspect, we still belong to Satan's lineage. This is clear, because even if we are a great believer, we cannot give birth to children who do not need to be 'reborn' themselves.
Rom 8-23 Not only that, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.
IMO, there is a lot of truth in the OP's posting, even if it misses some important points.
OP not only misses important points but has a number of inaccuracies eg Solomon leads to Joseph not Mary and Nathan to Mary per Luke. The distinction is important the royal line from Solomon was cut off at Jeconiah/Coniah at Jeremiah 22:28 thus Jesus could not be enthroned as the King of the Jews by that lineage, but he is of the House of David via Solomon and Lineage through Nathan.
Setting aside for a moment satan == lucifer. Without doubt satan is the serpent of Genesis 3. I like your Eve spiritually ruined then Adam physically ruined for God to reverse that in Christ as physical first then spiritual - 1 Corinthians 15:45/46 alludes but is not explicit as you have explained. This is true of balance we see in many places with God reversing action x with action b.
Re satan is lucifer, nowhere in the Bible - as far as I know but always happy for a source - is satan called lucifer, Revelation 12:9 Great Red Dragon - Serpent of Old - Devil and satan no mention of lucifer. Jesus said 'I saw satan fall like lightning' and not 'I saw lucifer ...'
Isaiah 14 - those translations which say Lucifer are personifying from 'O Day Star son of the Morning', in the Hebrew. This would place this individual on a level with Christ 'Bright and Morning Star Revelation 22:16 thus he becomes the Anti-Christ. Also possibly Job 38:7 'when the morning stars (plural) sang together.
Isaiah 14:16 says this individual is a man, and that he was cast out of his grave v19 - much of the passage speaks of the individual as a man, as for the 'I wills ..' reflect was was happening at Babel. There is also much which speaks of heavenly matters.
As best my research ever reached was Jerome's vulgate translation as Lucifer in Isaiah 14.
If Satan is the anti-christ we then have issues with the Beast from the Sea who we generally call the anti-christ since he is empowered by the Dragon/satan, Revelation 13:2-4.