Exactly. A SINGLE BATCH had 21% fatality rate (so far); every other batch, even in the "top ten", was significantly lower than that -- still horribly unsafe, but far from 20%.
And the OVERALL death rate (so far) from the injections is MUCH lower than 20%.
yes, the title is misleading, and that is a form of well-poisoning. That leads to the above comment: Oh not all batches were like that! Which leads to the erroneous conclusion that it must be safe after all, or something.
Agreed that not all batches were like that, but one must realize that these are not low numbers. Even a 1% death rate is normally completely unacceptable. That clinic should have been sending smoke signals to the Ministry if even one person died:
So in 2012 there was this study:
Among 13,033,274 vaccinated people, 15,455 deaths occurred between 0 and 60 days following vaccination. The mortality rate within 60 days of a vaccination visit was 442.5 deaths per 100,000 person-years.
That's more like 0.4% death rate (per year of the study), after introducing vaccine. That was considered 'safe' in those days. So for a clinic where n=246, the 'safe' death rate would have been 0.98: less than 1.
Personally, I think that safety rates can go to somewhere the sun don't shine. One would not want to be one of the unlucky ones (those 444.2 individuals per 100000 vaxed).
Oh you only have 0.4% chance of dying if you take this older vax. So much safer.
Motivate your two point contact to listen to the whistleblower. Look at the chart and the numbered batch with results. people were saying massive new graves, one indigenous village nearly wiped out before the Government silenced the people.
I am amazed you noticed anything. Now coming with projection of what you are guilty of. You want to see a time waster take a good look in the mirror and you will fund the right answer every time.
What is the attrition rate from the percentages of combined mRNA batches ? I presented them to you or maybe that is above your pay grade and I send my apologies.
Someone kindly pointed out it was the headline. I did miss that one and my apologies. But that was not my headline. But I should have caught it. Explains my mistake and does not excuse it.
So where are my answers ?
Let make this clear. You do not tell me shit , Unless you are God or Jesus go pound sand. You may be a legend in your own mind but that means nothing to me.
More projection from you. Only meltdown is happening with you. Sadly you do not have the spine to answer my question. So take your AI, script and slither back to the Farm. You fear the facts because the numbers of deaths are showing in that report and you slither away like a coward. Now everybody knows who you are.
20% of the vaxxed population I think. Still it’s a high number.
MTG just made a post about work shortages nationwide and she blamed it on abortion.
HRC said she and her “group” are tracking deaths and climate change is causing a massive increase in deaths. These monsters are hiding the exact excess mortality rate but not for long.
I’m in New Zealand, and honest to God we watched that woman get progressively uglier and uglier each afternoon at her daily Covid briefings. Like the weight of all that evil was twisting her face and body like the one ring.
I noticed early on that they were forever dressing her in giant coats and making her wear her hair down to hide how boney her face was becoming.
Ugh. This kind of low-effort garbage makes us look so terrible. The whistleblower presented a "top 10 worst batches" out of dozens, and the highest top few rates were around 20% fatalities with one above. The vast majority have zero or almost none.
Obviously the vast majority having zero or almost none doesn't make this right, as ALL batches need to have zero adverse impacts (and the "vaccines" were never tested for safety or efficacy), but using sensationalist language that is just incorrect does make people who share this content look absolutely retarded. And it turns off anyone with an inquisitive mind to the underlying potential truth.
Request for the mods to ban anything shared from the domain "slaynews.com". The writers at this site went out of their way to create obviously misleading content that will make anyone who tries to use it as evidence to share with a normie look like a fool.
Listen for yourself and pay attention to the chart. What he shares sounds about right from reports of mass new graves and a indigenous that was almost completely wiped out. this information was coming out before the silenced the people.
pay attention to the chart and batch by number with results found for each batch.
A New Zealand government whistleblower has come forward with explosive official data that shows more than 20% of the nation’s citizens have now died after receiving their Covid mRNA shots.
Like many other countries around the world, New Zealand has suffered an unprecedented spike in excess deaths over the past two years.
Due to strict mandates and heavy government pressure during the Covid pandemic, the vast majority of the New Zealand population is fully vaccinated.
Official data shows that 95.8% of the eligible New Zealand population aged 12 and over have received one dose of the Covid mRNA shots.
While a staggering 94.7% of the eligible New Zealand population aged 12 and over are considered to be fully vaccinated.
A New Zealand government database administrator, who helped to catalog official data on vaccine recipients, has come forward with explosive information.
I like your spirit, but you should read the whistleblowers statement again and delete/repost.
The top batch had 20% deaths, and that’s bad. But not as bad as 1 million+ dead in NZ, we’re far away from those numbers.
You wouldn’t be able to hide 25% overall death. Every 4th teacher, air traffic controller, doctor, policeman, truck driver etc. gone? That would cripple a nation.
This goes back to reports of three batches, one was a quick kill the other two within a couple of years and the rest by the third year. They have hidden the death toll information even today. Citizens were reporting the cemeteries were filling up fast.
I don’t disagree with you that the worst batch had more than 20% deaths (21,38% to be exact).
But there’s a huge difference in claiming that 152 out of 711 people from “batch 1” died, to what you’ve written in the headline.
It’s ~20% from ONE batch, not for the whole population.
It’s still bad, but not 1095212 out of 5123000 bad.
Almost 1,1 million dead in a small country like NZ would be obvious. The entire society would crash.
We don’t disagree about the video, I disagree with the wording in your headline. Barry Young never claimed that 21,38% of ALL people that took the vaccine died, he claims (with great data) that 21,38% of the 711 people that took the deadliest batch died.
The c19 vaccination program was a huge Russian roulette, you could get a batch with 0% chance of death, or one with 1/5 chance.
I missed the headline and on me. But it was copy pasted from the reporters headline story. I should have caught it. I see now where you are coming from. I kept going back to the article and then the video. My apologies. But add up the percentages of all batches. And take into account we still have the walking dead.
In your defence, I’m getting to believe that “journalists” do this on purpose.
It’s an easy win for any “fact checker” out there to disregard the entire article based on the headline, even though the rest of the article is factual.
Keep up the good work, continue to use your “gut feeling” and continue posting.
Exactly. A SINGLE BATCH had 21% fatality rate (so far); every other batch, even in the "top ten", was significantly lower than that -- still horribly unsafe, but far from 20%.
And the OVERALL death rate (so far) from the injections is MUCH lower than 20%.
Very misleading.
yes, the title is misleading, and that is a form of well-poisoning. That leads to the above comment: Oh not all batches were like that! Which leads to the erroneous conclusion that it must be safe after all, or something.
Agreed that not all batches were like that, but one must realize that these are not low numbers. Even a 1% death rate is normally completely unacceptable. That clinic should have been sending smoke signals to the Ministry if even one person died:
So in 2012 there was this study:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23790993/
That's more like 0.4% death rate (per year of the study), after introducing vaccine. That was considered 'safe' in those days. So for a clinic where n=246, the 'safe' death rate would have been 0.98: less than 1.
Personally, I think that safety rates can go to somewhere the sun don't shine. One would not want to be one of the unlucky ones (those 444.2 individuals per 100000 vaxed).
Oh you only have 0.4% chance of dying if you take this older vax. So much safer.
I knew it was bs bc all the people I can’t stand are still alive.
Motivate your two point contact to listen to the whistleblower. Look at the chart and the numbered batch with results. people were saying massive new graves, one indigenous village nearly wiped out before the Government silenced the people.
https://twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1731636276657369379
I noticed you failed to mention the charts and their percentages.
I am amazed you noticed anything. Now coming with projection of what you are guilty of. You want to see a time waster take a good look in the mirror and you will fund the right answer every time.
What is the attrition rate from the percentages of combined mRNA batches ? I presented them to you or maybe that is above your pay grade and I send my apologies. Someone kindly pointed out it was the headline. I did miss that one and my apologies. But that was not my headline. But I should have caught it. Explains my mistake and does not excuse it.
So where are my answers ?
Let make this clear. You do not tell me shit , Unless you are God or Jesus go pound sand. You may be a legend in your own mind but that means nothing to me.
More projection from you. Only meltdown is happening with you. Sadly you do not have the spine to answer my question. So take your AI, script and slither back to the Farm. You fear the facts because the numbers of deaths are showing in that report and you slither away like a coward. Now everybody knows who you are.
20% of the vaxxed population I think. Still it’s a high number.
MTG just made a post about work shortages nationwide and she blamed it on abortion.
HRC said she and her “group” are tracking deaths and climate change is causing a massive increase in deaths. These monsters are hiding the exact excess mortality rate but not for long.
Another media coverup puff piece. https://www.the-sun.com/health/9723429/cold-weather-body-winter-penis-back-pain-blood-clots/amp/
Very low energy post. 20% of certain batches. Not condoning the death vax it but the headline makes us look bad
Listen to the whistleblower and look at the chart by batch number and results.
https://twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1731636276657369379
That NZ ex-PM is starting to resemble Mick Jagger.
Great googly....she's only 43...
I’m in New Zealand, and honest to God we watched that woman get progressively uglier and uglier each afternoon at her daily Covid briefings. Like the weight of all that evil was twisting her face and body like the one ring.
I noticed early on that they were forever dressing her in giant coats and making her wear her hair down to hide how boney her face was becoming.
She sold her soul to Satan, no doubt about it
Here is a vi8deo from the whistleblower. Look at the chart and batch by number with results found.
https://twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1731636276657369379
Death Penalty.
Amen, listen to the whistleblower. Then look at the chart by batch and results.
https://twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1731636276657369379
Ugh. This kind of low-effort garbage makes us look so terrible. The whistleblower presented a "top 10 worst batches" out of dozens, and the highest top few rates were around 20% fatalities with one above. The vast majority have zero or almost none.
Obviously the vast majority having zero or almost none doesn't make this right, as ALL batches need to have zero adverse impacts (and the "vaccines" were never tested for safety or efficacy), but using sensationalist language that is just incorrect does make people who share this content look absolutely retarded. And it turns off anyone with an inquisitive mind to the underlying potential truth.
Request for the mods to ban anything shared from the domain "slaynews.com". The writers at this site went out of their way to create obviously misleading content that will make anyone who tries to use it as evidence to share with a normie look like a fool.
Hear and see it from the whistleblower. look at the batch by number and findings. The Government hid this info and allowed the jabs to go on.
https://twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1731636276657369379
Did anyone get Kirsch's data drop and can spare a link or torrent?
===
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new
IPFS get QmZhThQfd3SQh74oWnms4hJ5rxLQ3S2UyGFf3X5v47VtmA -o test
Special place in hell for these corrupt people.
Those are go directly to Hell losers.
I doubt it.......
Listen for yourself and pay attention to the chart. What he shares sounds about right from reports of mass new graves and a indigenous that was almost completely wiped out. this information was coming out before the silenced the people.
pay attention to the chart and batch by number with results found for each batch.
https://twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1731636276657369379
A New Zealand government whistleblower has come forward with explosive official data that shows more than 20% of the nation’s citizens have now died after receiving their Covid mRNA shots.
Like many other countries around the world, New Zealand has suffered an unprecedented spike in excess deaths over the past two years.
Due to strict mandates and heavy government pressure during the Covid pandemic, the vast majority of the New Zealand population is fully vaccinated.
Official data shows that 95.8% of the eligible New Zealand population aged 12 and over have received one dose of the Covid mRNA shots.
While a staggering 94.7% of the eligible New Zealand population aged 12 and over are considered to be fully vaccinated.
A New Zealand government database administrator, who helped to catalog official data on vaccine recipients, has come forward with explosive information.
I like your spirit, but you should read the whistleblowers statement again and delete/repost.
The top batch had 20% deaths, and that’s bad. But not as bad as 1 million+ dead in NZ, we’re far away from those numbers.
You wouldn’t be able to hide 25% overall death. Every 4th teacher, air traffic controller, doctor, policeman, truck driver etc. gone? That would cripple a nation.
This goes back to reports of three batches, one was a quick kill the other two within a couple of years and the rest by the third year. They have hidden the death toll information even today. Citizens were reporting the cemeteries were filling up fast.
I understand that, the deathvaxx is extreme.
But the death numbers overall are far from 20%.
It’s 20% for the most deadly batch, your headline is gravely misleading; that would mean 1 million deaths from the vaxx
Here is the video by Batch results he reported. Hear it straight from the source.
I have heard almost whole villages have died. and other videos showing many new graves people were reporting until they were silenced.
https://twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1731636276657369379
I don’t disagree with you that the worst batch had more than 20% deaths (21,38% to be exact).
But there’s a huge difference in claiming that 152 out of 711 people from “batch 1” died, to what you’ve written in the headline.
It’s ~20% from ONE batch, not for the whole population.
It’s still bad, but not 1095212 out of 5123000 bad.
Almost 1,1 million dead in a small country like NZ would be obvious. The entire society would crash.
We don’t disagree about the video, I disagree with the wording in your headline. Barry Young never claimed that 21,38% of ALL people that took the vaccine died, he claims (with great data) that 21,38% of the 711 people that took the deadliest batch died.
The c19 vaccination program was a huge Russian roulette, you could get a batch with 0% chance of death, or one with 1/5 chance.
I missed the headline and on me. But it was copy pasted from the reporters headline story. I should have caught it. I see now where you are coming from. I kept going back to the article and then the video. My apologies. But add up the percentages of all batches. And take into account we still have the walking dead.
100%.
In your defence, I’m getting to believe that “journalists” do this on purpose.
It’s an easy win for any “fact checker” out there to disregard the entire article based on the headline, even though the rest of the article is factual.
Keep up the good work, continue to use your “gut feeling” and continue posting.
Stay healthy fren.