Some here know that I'm an American immigrant living in Japan. This is my second time living here, after moving back nearly 12 years ago. I will say that the best way to be happy living here is by mostly avoiding other foreigners. My first time living in Japan was in an apartment building owned by the city's board of education, in which all residents were either us English teachers working for the city or some foreign exchange adult students at a university or something. It was useful having others to help me learn about using the laundry machines and such, but for the most part nobody was "going native" and we all sort of lived by our own rules. I once had to go downstairs and tell everyone that the party in the parking lot was lasting past 9pm and that they ought to wrap it up. While the benefit of living there was that it was like a commune of sorts, the bad side is that it was essentially like a "gaijin ghetto." Our cohesion did not match the society's cohesion at times.
Whenever you get a bunch of foreigners together here, almost inevitably one starts griping about Japan and then it spreads. That really wears down on your mind. And I have to say that my libtard coworkers are the most vocal about griping about Japan. The whole speck in your brother's eye when you have a plank in your own kind of thing. It's rather absurd. Fortunately, I don't really see them often because we are off doing our own work every day. In any case, I have found that my ability to enjoy living in Japan is by limiting my interaction with other foreigners, and mostly associating with those who truly love Japan. I would much rather live in Japan than in America, and Japanese Christians are by far kinder and more sincere than the majority of so-called Christians in America.
So these immigrant hordes in Europe cling together, refuse to assimilate due to their numbers, create ghettos and even establish no-go zones. You don't see other immigrats behaving so violently because Islam is inherently a violent ideolgy of subjugation.
I did not come to Japan to make this country more like America. These libtard coworkers think that nationalism is somehow a bad thing, but they can't stop to consider why they'd rather live here than teaching English in Cambodia or someplace like that. It's because Japan protects its national identity, and that identity is rather beloved across the world.
Muslims have the same pattern. Immigrate, claim victim status and demand special privileges, then when they grow in numbers, the violence begins. Communism spread in China rather similarly too.
So what I'm saying is that with a population bomb, there is no hope for proper assimilation. But, that's exactly what the globalists want though. To destabilize. Sometimes they get a taste of their own medicine, like when that one (German?) politician's daughter got raped by a rapey-rapey Muslim. For the most part though, this is a problem for us peasants to deal with.
This guy seems ok and he makes some good points, but he’s missing a couple big things in his blind spot:
Culture is downstream from biology. People with different genes for temperament form different kinds of societies.
If he’s against replacing white people in white countries, then he should set a good example by moving to Pakistan. He could do a lot of good by spreading Christianity there. It would have a more profound impact than in Britain.
He would be killed straight away, Muslims do not like people who leave Islam.
Culture being downstream of biology sounds like a justification for eugenics.
Culture being downstream of biology sounds like a justification for eugenics.“
Ah, the old fallacy that knowledge equals misapplication of that knowledge. Observing differences does not mean wanting to kill the different. That is a bizarre and shameful leap of logic for you to attempt. I’ve made no attempts to cull the population of Pakistan.
If that fallacy was an original thought of your own, I would be tempted to think that you weirdly have killing on your mind. But I’m going to cut you some slack because that fallacious thought was not originally yours. It was conceived by the multicult and you were programmed to parrot it.
He would be killed“
Jesus was crucified, John the Baptist was beheaded, St Peter was crucified upside down. Does this guy want to be a real Christian or not? Like I said, he would have a more profound impact in Pakistan than in Britain. You don’t know for sure that he would be killed right away.
If he’s that afraid, he could start in Bangladesh, formerly East Pakistan. The muslims there are more laid back. He could build a strong following there including security, and then head to Pakistan.
Jesus was crucified, John the Baptist was beheaded, St Peter was crucified upside down. Does this guy want to be a real Christian or not? Like I said, he would have a more profound impact in Pakistan than in Britain.
God will place His people where they are needed per His design, and not at the suggestion of some rando on a forum whose members' allegiance to Him is very questionable at times.
Mr. Anwar will go where God direct him to go. If God wants him to stay in GB and carry out his will there, you have no say in the matter.
some rando on a forum whose members' allegiance to Him is very questionable at times.“
If you want to question my allegiance, do it directly instead of trying to get to me by questioning the allegiance of all the other GAW members when they’re probably not reading it.
If I’m just a rando with no say, then why did you take the time to try to convince me of your erroneous, anti-free-will, predestination philosophy?
Anwar will go where God direct him to go.“
Anwar will go where Anwar wants to go and where other people allow him. When instructing us with the Lord’s Prayer, Jesus told us to pray for God’s will to be done on earth as it is in heaven. That means that God’s will is not already being done on earth. Anwar’s decision to avoid Pakistan, the country of his own people that seem in desperate need of Christianization, is most likely not God’s decision.
“Knight”. That’s a laugh. Knights don’t snivel with oblique accusations, and knights don’t advocate for the invaders of Europe.
Muslims kill even other Muslims in Pakistan. I think it was on LiveLeak where I saw a crowd of Muslims, deranged as a swarm of murder hornets, bludgeon a woman to death and set her corpse on fire on the side of the road because she had been accused of stepping on a Quran, that accursed book of theirs. In the end, it turned out she was innocent. In Pakistan, Christians are treated less than 2nd class citizens. Any Muslim can accuse them of heresy and they will be arrested and killed. Islam is an intolerant, hate-filled ideology. I really can't blame him for not wanting to go back.
I really can't blame him for not wanting to go back.
Amen.
God gave us all a brain and the breath of life. It would be an insult to Him if we squandering them by rushing into very obvious danger where the expected payout is very low.
“You shall not put the LORD your God to the test, as you tested Him at Massah. -Deuteronomy 6:16
I'm saying if you think it's possible, be my guest. Even if he did go back to Pakistan, he wouldn't get far. I have a Saudi friend in KSA who is an apostate. He is a closet Christian and has to keep it secret, lest even his own family members murder him. Sure, Paul was arrested for spreading the Gospel and all that. But he wasn't dealing with literal cousin fuckers who behave like rage zombies towards "infidels."
I wasn't programmed with anything in regards to this, no in fact it's the first time, Ive heard the concept of culture being downstream of biology.
But I don't believe that, it's a huge stretch to me that biology has more than 5% of an effect on culture.
That's just me inferring from what I now about the depth of what the word Culture means.
Also I love how your very willing for him to go in to danger, but don't offer yourself to go help him.
Very easy for you to backseat what the man should do with his life based on his biology and because he's Christian he must spread Christianity to the 'brown' people he is related to.
The only way he can be a real Christian is to go get himself killed or to put himself in danger?
I'm sorry but I don't think that's how it works.
It sounds like your making a lot of judgements about what people should do with their life based on their skin colour or where their ancestors come from?
For generations, globalists have been projecting their genocidal desires onto the nations who might stand up for themselves.
You wrote:
Also I love how your very willing for him to go in to danger, but don't offer yourself to go help him.”
After I already wrote:
Paki Anwar would get more traction with pakis than I would.“
… and:
If he’s that afraid, he could start in Bangladesh, formerly East Pakistan. The muslims there are more laid back. He could build a strong following there including security, and then head to Pakistan.“
I'm old enough to remember when the left succeeded in changing Columbus Day to Indigenous People's Day because the evil foreign usurpers came onto the land and displaced the natives. Now, replacing the natives with foreign usurpers is all the rage. And the same people squawking about the unfairness of displacing the natives are actively encouraging the usurping because of the diversity brainwashing. So that they can think they're a good person. Just like all those idiots in broke-down EVs on the side of the road waiting to be rescued by a gas-guzzling meanie. But celebrate the diversity and multi-culturalism!!
Funny as I just listened to Carl's Doomscrolling series and this one was bang on and total fire. Complete on the money analysis of what has happened to Ireland and Europe.
So you’re saying that Christ can’t absolve people of their sins or of generational curses as a result of their ethnicity or of being a stranger in a strange land?
As we get closer to 2024 election, the attacks on this forum will intensify. Deport all of the bastards and have them go back to ConsumeProduct or something.
Got news for you, buddy, “the church” is wherever “two or more are gathered in my name” and not state-endorsed, incorporated formal organizations with hard assets.
If the Anglican Church is doing the same thing the Methodist church did, it deserves and needs to fracture - and this is from someone who hates denominationalism. The Anglican Church ain’t the end-all-be-all, either. Nor is my church for that matter.
Some here know that I'm an American immigrant living in Japan. This is my second time living here, after moving back nearly 12 years ago. I will say that the best way to be happy living here is by mostly avoiding other foreigners. My first time living in Japan was in an apartment building owned by the city's board of education, in which all residents were either us English teachers working for the city or some foreign exchange adult students at a university or something. It was useful having others to help me learn about using the laundry machines and such, but for the most part nobody was "going native" and we all sort of lived by our own rules. I once had to go downstairs and tell everyone that the party in the parking lot was lasting past 9pm and that they ought to wrap it up. While the benefit of living there was that it was like a commune of sorts, the bad side is that it was essentially like a "gaijin ghetto." Our cohesion did not match the society's cohesion at times.
Whenever you get a bunch of foreigners together here, almost inevitably one starts griping about Japan and then it spreads. That really wears down on your mind. And I have to say that my libtard coworkers are the most vocal about griping about Japan. The whole speck in your brother's eye when you have a plank in your own kind of thing. It's rather absurd. Fortunately, I don't really see them often because we are off doing our own work every day. In any case, I have found that my ability to enjoy living in Japan is by limiting my interaction with other foreigners, and mostly associating with those who truly love Japan. I would much rather live in Japan than in America, and Japanese Christians are by far kinder and more sincere than the majority of so-called Christians in America.
So these immigrant hordes in Europe cling together, refuse to assimilate due to their numbers, create ghettos and even establish no-go zones. You don't see other immigrats behaving so violently because Islam is inherently a violent ideolgy of subjugation.
I did not come to Japan to make this country more like America. These libtard coworkers think that nationalism is somehow a bad thing, but they can't stop to consider why they'd rather live here than teaching English in Cambodia or someplace like that. It's because Japan protects its national identity, and that identity is rather beloved across the world.
Muslims have the same pattern. Immigrate, claim victim status and demand special privileges, then when they grow in numbers, the violence begins. Communism spread in China rather similarly too.
So what I'm saying is that with a population bomb, there is no hope for proper assimilation. But, that's exactly what the globalists want though. To destabilize. Sometimes they get a taste of their own medicine, like when that one (German?) politician's daughter got raped by a rapey-rapey Muslim. For the most part though, this is a problem for us peasants to deal with.
This guy seems ok and he makes some good points, but he’s missing a couple big things in his blind spot:
Culture is downstream from biology. People with different genes for temperament form different kinds of societies.
If he’s against replacing white people in white countries, then he should set a good example by moving to Pakistan. He could do a lot of good by spreading Christianity there. It would have a more profound impact than in Britain.
He would be killed straight away, Muslims do not like people who leave Islam.
Culture being downstream of biology sounds like a justification for eugenics.
Ah, the old fallacy that knowledge equals misapplication of that knowledge. Observing differences does not mean wanting to kill the different. That is a bizarre and shameful leap of logic for you to attempt. I’ve made no attempts to cull the population of Pakistan.
If that fallacy was an original thought of your own, I would be tempted to think that you weirdly have killing on your mind. But I’m going to cut you some slack because that fallacious thought was not originally yours. It was conceived by the multicult and you were programmed to parrot it.
Jesus was crucified, John the Baptist was beheaded, St Peter was crucified upside down. Does this guy want to be a real Christian or not? Like I said, he would have a more profound impact in Pakistan than in Britain. You don’t know for sure that he would be killed right away.
If he’s that afraid, he could start in Bangladesh, formerly East Pakistan. The muslims there are more laid back. He could build a strong following there including security, and then head to Pakistan.
God will place His people where they are needed per His design, and not at the suggestion of some rando on a forum whose members' allegiance to Him is very questionable at times.
Mr. Anwar will go where God direct him to go. If God wants him to stay in GB and carry out his will there, you have no say in the matter.
If you want to question my allegiance, do it directly instead of trying to get to me by questioning the allegiance of all the other GAW members when they’re probably not reading it.
If I’m just a rando with no say, then why did you take the time to try to convince me of your erroneous, anti-free-will, predestination philosophy?
Anwar will go where Anwar wants to go and where other people allow him. When instructing us with the Lord’s Prayer, Jesus told us to pray for God’s will to be done on earth as it is in heaven. That means that God’s will is not already being done on earth. Anwar’s decision to avoid Pakistan, the country of his own people that seem in desperate need of Christianization, is most likely not God’s decision.
“Knight”. That’s a laugh. Knights don’t snivel with oblique accusations, and knights don’t advocate for the invaders of Europe.
Is it civil to question all GAW members’ allegiance to God? Is it civil to insult someone as a rando with no say, while blaspheming the will of God?
How did you get involved? I don’t see you admonishing anyone else in this thread. Smells like Sir-Snitch-A-Lot started a joust he couldn’t finish.
Muslims kill even other Muslims in Pakistan. I think it was on LiveLeak where I saw a crowd of Muslims, deranged as a swarm of murder hornets, bludgeon a woman to death and set her corpse on fire on the side of the road because she had been accused of stepping on a Quran, that accursed book of theirs. In the end, it turned out she was innocent. In Pakistan, Christians are treated less than 2nd class citizens. Any Muslim can accuse them of heresy and they will be arrested and killed. Islam is an intolerant, hate-filled ideology. I really can't blame him for not wanting to go back.
Amen.
God gave us all a brain and the breath of life. It would be an insult to Him if we squandering them by rushing into very obvious danger where the expected payout is very low.
Are you saying it’s impossible to Christianize most of the pakis?
I'm saying if you think it's possible, be my guest. Even if he did go back to Pakistan, he wouldn't get far. I have a Saudi friend in KSA who is an apostate. He is a closet Christian and has to keep it secret, lest even his own family members murder him. Sure, Paul was arrested for spreading the Gospel and all that. But he wasn't dealing with literal cousin fuckers who behave like rage zombies towards "infidels."
Paki Anwar would get more traction with pakis than I would.
I wasn't programmed with anything in regards to this, no in fact it's the first time, Ive heard the concept of culture being downstream of biology.
But I don't believe that, it's a huge stretch to me that biology has more than 5% of an effect on culture. That's just me inferring from what I now about the depth of what the word Culture means.
Also I love how your very willing for him to go in to danger, but don't offer yourself to go help him. Very easy for you to backseat what the man should do with his life based on his biology and because he's Christian he must spread Christianity to the 'brown' people he is related to.
The only way he can be a real Christian is to go get himself killed or to put himself in danger? I'm sorry but I don't think that's how it works.
It sounds like your making a lot of judgements about what people should do with their life based on their skin colour or where their ancestors come from?
The part you were programmed to parrot was:
For generations, globalists have been projecting their genocidal desires onto the nations who might stand up for themselves.
You wrote:
After I already wrote:
… and:
See? I already helped.
Why do you think nationalism has to be branded as evil and racist?
Because if you keep immigrants from adapting to our country, you can make sure they fail in every aspect of life.
Immigrants who adapt and change succeed. They can still preserve their culture, even share it with us, but they need to embrace us first.
I'm old enough to remember when the left succeeded in changing Columbus Day to Indigenous People's Day because the evil foreign usurpers came onto the land and displaced the natives. Now, replacing the natives with foreign usurpers is all the rage. And the same people squawking about the unfairness of displacing the natives are actively encouraging the usurping because of the diversity brainwashing. So that they can think they're a good person. Just like all those idiots in broke-down EVs on the side of the road waiting to be rescued by a gas-guzzling meanie. But celebrate the diversity and multi-culturalism!!
Funny as I just listened to Carl's Doomscrolling series and this one was bang on and total fire. Complete on the money analysis of what has happened to Ireland and Europe.
https://rumble.com/v3xug3j-doomscrolling-5-the-rivers-of-blood-are-here.html
I'll wait for someone who isn't a handshake account to weigh in.
So you’re saying that Christ can’t absolve people of their sins or of generational curses as a result of their ethnicity or of being a stranger in a strange land?
So many handshakes and feds lately.
As we get closer to 2024 election, the attacks on this forum will intensify. Deport all of the bastards and have them go back to ConsumeProduct or something.
Ah yes, the fruit of the doctrine of "election" is the absurd notion of justified racism.
Truly incredible doctrine you've got there.
Got news for you, buddy, “the church” is wherever “two or more are gathered in my name” and not state-endorsed, incorporated formal organizations with hard assets.
If the Anglican Church is doing the same thing the Methodist church did, it deserves and needs to fracture - and this is from someone who hates denominationalism. The Anglican Church ain’t the end-all-be-all, either. Nor is my church for that matter.
There still have to be standards. Purge the rot.
Nah mate, Calvin is legit. I've met him twice on marches and even bought him a beer. He's a real one.
Mahyar too as he's from my area and a patriot/ally etc.
The Church of England is Satanist.