He wasn’t “elected” twice, the 2020 election certified by the House went to Biden, albeit wrongly. Therefore , Trump was not “officially “ elected more than once (2016). Sorry, no sale.
I wouldnt characterize it that way. This ruling named the "Gordon Challenge" and defined it as contesting Trumps qualification under the 22nd Amendment. But it concludes Trumps petition is invalid due to the Section 3 of the 14th.
It is interesting though, that someone challenged his petition under the 22nd.
There is only one problem with that logic, Joe Biden was the one sworn into office By the same standard, we could say that Stacey Abrams is the current Governor of Georgia.
So on this, they're just being petty by using that as justification. They're not acknowledging that he is serving his second term, but rather saying that since Trump claims he won in 2020 then he should be ineligible by his own statements...
Like an angry child shoving everything on the floor into his closet then arguing with his parents that they didn't say he had to put everything where it belongs; so his room is clean.
22nd amendment: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."
Well u maggots in maine certified joe biden not trump so eat a bag of lobstah dicks. My whole family are there and most are woke morons who wear pussy hats and vote for homos.
Rules of evidence, according to the SoC, are quite laxed and must be judged on the basis of "a reasonable person relying on it to conduct serious business".
This in relation to reliance of the Rosen challenge on J6 information. Since it is contained in a Congressional report, it is quite clear that Pencil Neck Shifty Schiff (vessel) and his cohorts, have on purpose released it, to set the stage of challenges to be on the ballot.
Since, the SoC argues, "many" of the facts have been corroborated. The SoC does not even consider that these so called facts have been debunked over and over, especially since the release of the J6 videos to Tucker and by the Speaker of the House.
The SoC takes the Anderson case as evidence Trump conducted an insurrection on January 6th. Wow!
So, this goes to appeal.
As for the Gordon challenge, that Trump had won the 2020 election, during the hearing he retracted that statement, and said there to be consensus between the parties that Biden had won.
Really, this is ....laughable.
To all those who would see this a s a positive sign that Trump indeed is still CiC as claimed by the twitter poster, should read carefully and comprehensively! Click-bait is destructive to logical thinking if relied upon.
He wasn’t “elected” twice, the 2020 election certified by the House went to Biden, albeit wrongly. Therefore , Trump was not “officially “ elected more than once (2016). Sorry, no sale.
Exactly
In other words, Maine is acknowledging that Donald Trump is the rightful winner in 2020.
I wouldnt characterize it that way. This ruling named the "Gordon Challenge" and defined it as contesting Trumps qualification under the 22nd Amendment. But it concludes Trumps petition is invalid due to the Section 3 of the 14th.
It is interesting though, that someone challenged his petition under the 22nd.
I congratulate you on your comprehensive reading ability!
Chapeau!
for those wanting to read the whole thing: https://www.maine.gov/sos/news/2023/Decision%20in%20Challenge%20to%20Trump%20Presidential%20Primary%20Petitions.pdf
Seems so https://x.com/thereal40_head/status/1740597504960495775?s=46&t=Nwg1vy4jg3_JlX1SQMYB9A
This is the interesting part. Much better than ariel's cover page screenshot.
Attorney Paul Gordon is a registered voter of Portland....
The logic behind his claim is that Trump expressed he won the 2020 election so he's barred from a third term.
There is only one problem with that logic, Joe Biden was the one sworn into office By the same standard, we could say that Stacey Abrams is the current Governor of Georgia.
So on this, they're just being petty by using that as justification. They're not acknowledging that he is serving his second term, but rather saying that since Trump claims he won in 2020 then he should be ineligible by his own statements...
Like an angry child shoving everything on the floor into his closet then arguing with his parents that they didn't say he had to put everything where it belongs; so his room is clean.
Ahh, this makes sense. I couldn't figure out why they would even put this in their lawsuit.
22nd amendment: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."
KEK, he has served one term as POTUS and is currently in his first term as President of the Republic so in fact he has only served one term!
Er... This might wake up a few Normies, and may frighten a few Cabal underlings not in the "know" echelons.
RT & Gateway are saying 14th.
Well u maggots in maine certified joe biden not trump so eat a bag of lobstah dicks. My whole family are there and most are woke morons who wear pussy hats and vote for homos.
While their is a complaint listed there for the 22nd amendment. It states the reason for the removal is the 14th.
SO FAR IT APPEARS AS MANY STATE ELECTED OFFICE HOLDERS IN BLUE STATES HAVE NOT READ OR UNDERSTOOD THE CONSTITUTION. "THEY HAVE NO STANDING"
WHAT AND WHEN WILL THE ROBERTS COURT ACT TO STOP THIS DISTRACTION?
If DJT was still President, this country would not be going to hell in a handbasket like it is now, even in the effort to wake up the brain dead.
sauce/twatter link please!
We wont be election a President of the corporation. So neither time will count when electing for The Republic. 8 more year!!
Interesting tidbits:
Rules of evidence, according to the SoC, are quite laxed and must be judged on the basis of "a reasonable person relying on it to conduct serious business".
This in relation to reliance of the Rosen challenge on J6 information. Since it is contained in a Congressional report, it is quite clear that Pencil Neck Shifty Schiff (vessel) and his cohorts, have on purpose released it, to set the stage of challenges to be on the ballot.
Since, the SoC argues, "many" of the facts have been corroborated. The SoC does not even consider that these so called facts have been debunked over and over, especially since the release of the J6 videos to Tucker and by the Speaker of the House.
The SoC takes the Anderson case as evidence Trump conducted an insurrection on January 6th. Wow!
So, this goes to appeal.
As for the Gordon challenge, that Trump had won the 2020 election, during the hearing he retracted that statement, and said there to be consensus between the parties that Biden had won.
Really, this is ....laughable.
To all those who would see this a s a positive sign that Trump indeed is still CiC as claimed by the twitter poster, should read carefully and comprehensively! Click-bait is destructive to logical thinking if relied upon.
"Maine Judge Bellows made a brave decision..." She says: "I smiled , we have same day voter registration"
Even CNN says she is not a lawyer and that she is relying on evidence that would never be considered admissible in court..."