Meh I'm not worried about it. Not being sexist, but "young women", and really women in general, are generally much more likely to cave into peer pressure. As such they tend to go with "the current thing" more than men.
Case in point, social media, MSM, and basically every other institution of power is dead set on spewing nothing but liberal propaganda 24/7. More women than men are on these platforms most of the time, and they certainly use it far more on an hourly basis.
Ergo, to most women, the majority of the world is "lefist/liberal", and so to fit in with "the majority" they adapt that mindset to their own personalities. But even then like u/cringerepublic pointed out, most of the time they're super mild about it.
Think about those morons you see in "social experiment" videos where you'll ask them a question about something stupid. Let's say peanut butter. And they'll go on a rant about how peanut butter is racist because of slavery and all this other bull crap, and then the moment you mention that peanut butter was invented by a black guy they IMMEDIATELY back pedal because they realize it violates what's "socially acceptable".
Things like that is what I'm talking about. So once the globohomo media apparatus is done away with, and the fact that people are NOT overwhelmingly liberal, but rather are either middle of the road or conservative leaning for the most part, becomes a known fact of life, especially on social media, then most of the women will do a complete 180 on their opinions and entire life view in order to "fit in with the majority" again.
I'm a gen-z guy who knows a lot of liberal white girls.
Most of them are actually very feminine and mild as far as political issues go. They just follow the culture which is overwhelmingly left. Male online spaces tend to be more less politically correct and everyone's social interactions happen online now.
Do you think upping the exposure of girls in the 10-14 age range to the challenge and complexity of skills required to be a good SAHM would be a good thing?
It won't matter as long as girls are still being raised exactly the same as boys. They're taught to value education and career over motherhood from day one, and it's not even close as far as priorities go.
Maybe this is a minority opinion, but I'll say it anyway - there's a reason our ancestors took centuries to give women the vote.
I'd say it's yet another example of Chesterton's fence.
I'm not saying all women are undeserving of suffrage, but it's become apparent that a good many can't be trusted with self-governance and since there's no real way to tell the good from the bad, it's likely our ancestors reasoned that depriving the few, as bad as that was, was far better than what happens when you allow all of them, as we've finally figured out too late.
I knew and old fellow (older than I am kek) whose philosophy was America went to shit when women were given the right to vote and the pill was invented.
Liberal white women have been the scourge of Western society for decades now. It's nothing new. These women could be our greatest resource, but because they're desperate to feel valuable and charitable through virtue-signaling instead of homemaking, they're our worst enemy.
I'm a woman and it's been a struggle. I quit my job for a year when we moved to a new state a couple of years ago, but that was around the time inflation started skyrocketing. I went back to work to help pay down our debts and our mortgage, but also, my family gave me an attitude about not working, saying things like "it must be nice." Like it's something to be ashamed of. I am praying that once we get everything paid off, I can start building a home business with the farm we have now and never have to work outside the home again. It shouldn't have to be this way, but the system was designed to make women feel like they have to be men.
Here's what's more sinister about social media. You can find many a story of a woman who followed a woman on (for example) Tik Tok that pushes the "open marriage" idea. Practically praising infidelity in a marriage as a good thing. That cheating on her husband is empowering to their marriage. From there a marriage immediately is over because now the current "thing" is constant infidelity. That being "free and allowed to find herself" is empowering. That's the current push to destroy the nuclear family and lonely unmarried/divorced feminists lie to married women that this is what they should have as part of a marriage. That they should be free to sleep with someone that isn't their husband. From there we have another bitter angry old cat lady that regrets divorcing/cheating on her husband and because she can't have a happy marriage she'll do the same with social media to try and convince someone else to make the same mistakes she made. Misery loves company. Angry 40 yr old cat ladies want nothing more than for every other woman to be as miserable as she is.
More and more the deep state wants to destroy the nuclear family. The first step was to go after the wives and promise everything under the sun as long as the father was out of the house. Then came the "free love" movement of the 70s that turned what was supposed to be only for the honeymoon into something that's given away to the first tom dick and harry that wants it. Single motherhood is at an all time high. Unfortunately with the single motherhood comes the fact that we are now paying for those mistakes out of our hard earned dime. California is the worst when it comes to that due to the fact that they offer free government money to single moms. Though I do notice this. You rarely ever hear about single fathers. Single fathers are never praised for raising their kids alone. Only single moms.
Didn't know about the 1800s thanks for the info on that one. As for Cali yeah I hope this whole Q plan completely removes destroys and outright obliterate single mother benefits so the tax burden can finally lighten on those actually working. Single fathers are not praised, single fathers are ignored, and single fathers get out right rejected from government benefits iirc because it's not the main narrative. Most of those guys have no choice but to survive without government health. Yet you don't hear about how strong these fathers are.
And then the drugging or “soma” that everyone takes to make themselves feel better.
I read that as a kid and it sounded so bizarre and that was already in the 90s. I can’t imagine when he wrote that how far from norm his thinking was. Insane.
His brother Julian Huxley was a eugenicists and worked for the UN. Aldous used his brothers Unesco documents for the themes of his books. That’s why he seems like a “futurist”. It’s the globalist future. 1984 type repression is off the books it’s a undeclared technocracy.
Yep and that's what the cabal wants. No more strong father's protecting their children, no more mothers at home nurturing their children, and no more strong nuclear families. With the cost of living requiring both mother and father to work the state will now raise the kids at the indoctrination camp that's called "public school"
Meh I'm not worried about it. Not being sexist, but "young women", and really women in general, are generally much more likely to cave into peer pressure. As such they tend to go with "the current thing" more than men.
Case in point, social media, MSM, and basically every other institution of power is dead set on spewing nothing but liberal propaganda 24/7. More women than men are on these platforms most of the time, and they certainly use it far more on an hourly basis.
Ergo, to most women, the majority of the world is "lefist/liberal", and so to fit in with "the majority" they adapt that mindset to their own personalities. But even then like u/cringerepublic pointed out, most of the time they're super mild about it.
Think about those morons you see in "social experiment" videos where you'll ask them a question about something stupid. Let's say peanut butter. And they'll go on a rant about how peanut butter is racist because of slavery and all this other bull crap, and then the moment you mention that peanut butter was invented by a black guy they IMMEDIATELY back pedal because they realize it violates what's "socially acceptable".
Things like that is what I'm talking about. So once the globohomo media apparatus is done away with, and the fact that people are NOT overwhelmingly liberal, but rather are either middle of the road or conservative leaning for the most part, becomes a known fact of life, especially on social media, then most of the women will do a complete 180 on their opinions and entire life view in order to "fit in with the majority" again.
I'm a gen-z guy who knows a lot of liberal white girls.
Most of them are actually very feminine and mild as far as political issues go. They just follow the culture which is overwhelmingly left. Male online spaces tend to be more less politically correct and everyone's social interactions happen online now.
It won't matter as long as girls are still being raised exactly the same as boys. They're taught to value education and career over motherhood from day one, and it's not even close as far as priorities go.
Shout-out to Call of Duty players keeping society free one slur at a time
Maybe this is a minority opinion, but I'll say it anyway - there's a reason our ancestors took centuries to give women the vote.
I'd say it's yet another example of Chesterton's fence.
I'm not saying all women are undeserving of suffrage, but it's become apparent that a good many can't be trusted with self-governance and since there's no real way to tell the good from the bad, it's likely our ancestors reasoned that depriving the few, as bad as that was, was far better than what happens when you allow all of them, as we've finally figured out too late.
I knew and old fellow (older than I am kek) whose philosophy was America went to shit when women were given the right to vote and the pill was invented.
They say wisdom comes with age. kek
The 19th Amendment and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
Liberal White women are the most dangerous group of civilians
The antidote is beta men evolving and learning not to simp for them
Shut down tic tok
Liberal white women have been the scourge of Western society for decades now. It's nothing new. These women could be our greatest resource, but because they're desperate to feel valuable and charitable through virtue-signaling instead of homemaking, they're our worst enemy.
I'm a woman and it's been a struggle. I quit my job for a year when we moved to a new state a couple of years ago, but that was around the time inflation started skyrocketing. I went back to work to help pay down our debts and our mortgage, but also, my family gave me an attitude about not working, saying things like "it must be nice." Like it's something to be ashamed of. I am praying that once we get everything paid off, I can start building a home business with the farm we have now and never have to work outside the home again. It shouldn't have to be this way, but the system was designed to make women feel like they have to be men.
Here's what's more sinister about social media. You can find many a story of a woman who followed a woman on (for example) Tik Tok that pushes the "open marriage" idea. Practically praising infidelity in a marriage as a good thing. That cheating on her husband is empowering to their marriage. From there a marriage immediately is over because now the current "thing" is constant infidelity. That being "free and allowed to find herself" is empowering. That's the current push to destroy the nuclear family and lonely unmarried/divorced feminists lie to married women that this is what they should have as part of a marriage. That they should be free to sleep with someone that isn't their husband. From there we have another bitter angry old cat lady that regrets divorcing/cheating on her husband and because she can't have a happy marriage she'll do the same with social media to try and convince someone else to make the same mistakes she made. Misery loves company. Angry 40 yr old cat ladies want nothing more than for every other woman to be as miserable as she is.
More and more the deep state wants to destroy the nuclear family. The first step was to go after the wives and promise everything under the sun as long as the father was out of the house. Then came the "free love" movement of the 70s that turned what was supposed to be only for the honeymoon into something that's given away to the first tom dick and harry that wants it. Single motherhood is at an all time high. Unfortunately with the single motherhood comes the fact that we are now paying for those mistakes out of our hard earned dime. California is the worst when it comes to that due to the fact that they offer free government money to single moms. Though I do notice this. You rarely ever hear about single fathers. Single fathers are never praised for raising their kids alone. Only single moms.
Didn't know about the 1800s thanks for the info on that one. As for Cali yeah I hope this whole Q plan completely removes destroys and outright obliterate single mother benefits so the tax burden can finally lighten on those actually working. Single fathers are not praised, single fathers are ignored, and single fathers get out right rejected from government benefits iirc because it's not the main narrative. Most of those guys have no choice but to survive without government health. Yet you don't hear about how strong these fathers are.
It’s like in “brave new world” where everyone fucks everyone and that one guy who wants to have a relationship with just one girl is the weirdo.
That’s what Aldous Huxley was saying could be our future? (Present)
Yea
Ahh yes. The tinder chapter. These peoples plans are so far back and subtle it’s unreal.
And then the drugging or “soma” that everyone takes to make themselves feel better.
I read that as a kid and it sounded so bizarre and that was already in the 90s. I can’t imagine when he wrote that how far from norm his thinking was. Insane.
His brother Julian Huxley was a eugenicists and worked for the UN. Aldous used his brothers Unesco documents for the themes of his books. That’s why he seems like a “futurist”. It’s the globalist future. 1984 type repression is off the books it’s a undeclared technocracy.
Yup. So crazy. And then they link back to the masons and go even further.
Yep and that's what the cabal wants. No more strong father's protecting their children, no more mothers at home nurturing their children, and no more strong nuclear families. With the cost of living requiring both mother and father to work the state will now raise the kids at the indoctrination camp that's called "public school"
Women will learn quick, as their maternal instincts kick in…. And they cant get a man…They will switchback real quick…. Not all, but at least half …
It’s been brainwashed out of them
It could take generation(s) for the healing process to take effect on our world