This has been floating around for awhile, some of you have likely seen it. It’s good ammunition to red pill people with. They had no problem admitting Q was real when they were hunting Snowden. A decade later and Q is hunting pedophiles and politicians and the media gets amnesia about it.
This is why they are so scared and desperate. The media, the politicians, they know Q is real. This is why MSNBC is crying about treason charges if Trump wins. They all know in their hearts that Q is real, they are seeing Q drops come to life over and over, and they know what’s coming. But they can’t tell us that. They are stuck.
Within the drops themselves, they refer to themselves only as Q or Q group. Anon would be a reader.Q is Q. The media mixes them up on purpose to equate Q with anything and everything that anons post or say.
C_A started the "Qanon" hoax in order to have the ability to tie "Q" to the [bad] actions of anons, whether real or federal fakes.
As a bonus stroke of pure genius, commissioning thousands of MSM hitpiece articles using the fake "Qanon" moniker was a cunning way to spoil web searches for real info on Q. All anyone would get is the staged "Qanon" garbage. Most would assume that's all there is and, since the articles all agree in lockstep, would conclude that it all must be true. Anons alone know to conclude when 10,000 articles agree that they must be faked.
I was only questioning whether the "Q Group" mentioned by CNN was the same as the Q team on the chans. It's still not entirely clear.
He was referred to as "qanon" by.. everyone. Even before he entered the mainstream news. Just like "fbianon", "ciaanon" and "stafferanon" (a little hazy on that last one).
If I'm mistaken and you're saying this based on something else, not just how you feel, please share.
You are correct about the anons, but the media does only refer to Q as Qanon as a way to obfuscate. They know the drops are signed “Q” & they know that Q is real.
They've always referred to the account as "QAnon". Are you saying they've always used that term as a way to obfuscate (even though anons were using it before the media), or that they didn't change their term as a way to obfuscate. I find the second option a hard sell.
100% True. In 2018 we rarely referred to "Q" it was always "Qanon". Liz Crokin was selling Qanon merch in 2019. I have a hat. Everyone with YouTube channels/Twitter Accts that talked about the drops referred to Qanon. Then they were all shut down.
This has been floating around for awhile, some of you have likely seen it. It’s good ammunition to red pill people with. They had no problem admitting Q was real when they were hunting Snowden. A decade later and Q is hunting pedophiles and politicians and the media gets amnesia about it.
This is why they are so scared and desperate. The media, the politicians, they know Q is real. This is why MSNBC is crying about treason charges if Trump wins. They all know in their hearts that Q is real, they are seeing Q drops come to life over and over, and they know what’s coming. But they can’t tell us that. They are stuck.
NCSWIC, and they know it.
Good stuff Fuckface, as usual. But do we know Q Group and Q ("Anon") are the same?
I was about to downvote you for calling OP Fuckface. Then I checked 🤣
Qeq! Username never checks out, his observations are great and concise
Same! For a split second I was wondering where the hostility came from and then I KEK'd
Within the drops themselves, they refer to themselves only as Q or Q group. Anon would be a reader.Q is Q. The media mixes them up on purpose to equate Q with anything and everything that anons post or say.
Right. "There is Q and there are anons."
C_A started the "Qanon" hoax in order to have the ability to tie "Q" to the [bad] actions of anons, whether real or federal fakes.
As a bonus stroke of pure genius, commissioning thousands of MSM hitpiece articles using the fake "Qanon" moniker was a cunning way to spoil web searches for real info on Q. All anyone would get is the staged "Qanon" garbage. Most would assume that's all there is and, since the articles all agree in lockstep, would conclude that it all must be true. Anons alone know to conclude when 10,000 articles agree that they must be faked.
I was only questioning whether the "Q Group" mentioned by CNN was the same as the Q team on the chans. It's still not entirely clear.
Was going to say, I just don’t think they are the same, but at this point whatever works.
Q = NSA? https://files.catbox.moe/53ut8f.jpeg
Lol damn nice catch. Yes Q is said to the operations department of the NSA. The ones who reach and touch people.
I suspected she is a par of the team since I saw this photo...
And this is why they renamed it QAnon. To avoid this very confirmation.
He was referred to as "qanon" by.. everyone. Even before he entered the mainstream news. Just like "fbianon", "ciaanon" and "stafferanon" (a little hazy on that last one).
If I'm mistaken and you're saying this based on something else, not just how you feel, please share.
The Qanon media directive was referenced by Q in a post. There is Q, and there are anons.
That doesn't make what you said earlier true.
Yes at some point Q decided he didn't want to be referred to as "QAnon" anymore, the media didn't seem to take notice.
You are correct about the anons, but the media does only refer to Q as Qanon as a way to obfuscate. They know the drops are signed “Q” & they know that Q is real.
They've always referred to the account as "QAnon". Are you saying they've always used that term as a way to obfuscate (even though anons were using it before the media), or that they didn't change their term as a way to obfuscate. I find the second option a hard sell.
I have to be honest, you're splitting fucking hairs.
QAnon media interpretation was mainstream after it was widely known that Q was.... Q.
And yes it continues to this day.
The point remains that the reason it continues to this day is the very reason I posted it.
I’m saying it’s the first option. The media always has denigrated Q as some nutty cult.
100% True. In 2018 we rarely referred to "Q" it was always "Qanon". Liz Crokin was selling Qanon merch in 2019. I have a hat. Everyone with YouTube channels/Twitter Accts that talked about the drops referred to Qanon. Then they were all shut down.
And Admiral Rogers was head of the NSA when he met with Trump to tell him his campaign was wiretapped.
Never heard this before. Good info from 2013. Saved. Thanks.
https://news.yahoo.com/nsa-secret-cops-164400070.html