The problem I have is stupidity. In order for me to have a conversation the person I am talking to needs to be open to listening to another view. So a vaxx-idiot has cemented into the vaxx camp. Gaslit and huffing I'm right your wrong its impossible. They refuse to have another view, or even believe another view. Even with this proof they will refuse to accept that the elites are killing them.
So sad to see so many smart people get brainwashed.. They simply can't fathom that idea that government and big tech/corps don't work in their interest.
These elites ARE killing them, and it's very difficult not knowing how to effectively help without ruining relationships.
I take the slow and steady approach, but it's frustrating at the snails pace it appears to be going.
I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.
I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.
Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.
I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"
If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.
Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"
Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).
But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).
I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.
Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.
I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.
But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.
They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.
Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiments to get the results he wanted.
They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.
So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.
To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.
For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.
But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.
I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.
In addition, the light bulb had recently been invented and cities were installing electricity into their homes. This was a massive increase in electromagnetic frequencies that humans had never been exposed to in history, and may have contributed to sickness, as well.
Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.
I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.
BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganisms is NOT the process used to study viruses.
The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.
And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.
And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.
This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.
This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).
Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.
But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are created outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.
The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.
They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.
The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.
This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (vero cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.
But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.
If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- the Cytopathic Effect.
At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.
It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...
It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.
Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.
I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.
Agree. We have a guy at work still pushing it hard. I don’t know how they can’t see it. I look for anything I can use as “eye openers” but I don’t understand this article. It’s over my head.
It's dense with scientific language. My understanding is that they figured out how to make cells replicate DNA the way they wanted to. CRISP, is a method of inserting DNA sequences into the DNA your manipulating. The golden ( product) is one scientific industry crowing and selling the ability to genetically change DNA! This is a scientific sales ad to sell the golden process to genetically modify human DNA. All viruses are cross genetically related. NOVEL viruses are impossible. As humans we have been fighting off viruses for thousands of years. Our immune systems were incredibly robust. Mothers milk would teach their babies how to fight off illness. However, now the assholes got ahold of a way to create a NOVEL virus to infect humans worldwide. A PANDEMIC. it was artifical and now we are dealing with a novel virus that we never encountered before. Also genetic tampering. Your immune system is destroyed. You are now a lifelong ( short, very shot) customer to the very companies that killed you. They made their customers sick for profit.
Some people are blinded by the fear, some people are blinded by their own pride. Look at what Jesus did with all the miracles and after seeing the thing done, they plotted to kill Jesus!! The vaccinated are too prideful to admit they were wrong and this evil world could do something like that. I doubt nothing anymore!
I knew within the first week it was a scam as I'd been following Fauci and SARs for awhile. Knowing Fauci and Obama had set up Wuhan and Dick Lugar was involved in Ukraine were huge red flags. I tried to tell husband and family and was accused of lying and that I needed to shut up and not talk about conspiracy theories. The last five years (it actually started during Trumps first run for president when he was lapping up the polls showing Trump had zero chances of winning and I disagreed with him then) have been difficult. He at least knows cv jabs were bad now but still vuys into everything else msm and pharma spews. He still buys into pharmas advice on healthy eating and his health is not the best. But won't listen to the truth. He kinda acts like he wants to know but then makes out like im stupid/crazy to not follow big pharma advice.
... was accused of lying and that I needed to shut up and not talk about conspiracy theories.
I found a good way to talk about conspiracy (facts).
I have found that, generally, conversation is much better if I ask a preface question first.
"So, if you want to go down the conspiracy direction, I could tell you something interesting. Do you want to hear it?"
You will know by their answer if they are unwilling to use critical thinking. You will also find a decent amount of people who are EAGER to hear such things, and are fascinated by it.
Make a lead-in statement or question first, and they will sort themselves out. If they don't want to hear it, you know you are dealing with the brainwashed. These are potentially your enemies.
The ones who love talking about this stuff are potentially your friends.
By asking the lead-in question (or statement), you can avoid the brainwashed and not tell them anything because they will only ridicule and they will have no interest in learning the truth about the world. So, who needs 'em?
Altering our DNA is the satanic agenda, for those they don’t outright kill-off first. Whether you’re God-fearing or not it’s the Truth. Their greatest agenda is to destroy God’s favorite creation; mankind. I highly suggest “Birthright” by Timothy Alberino, a Pastor’s son and beyond ufo researcher.
Yes, in other words he’s done much in the ufo Truther movement but some might shoebox him into just that. He’s a deep diver into many fields putting many pieces into the mysteries puzzle. Search his name. Sorry it took me to respond I’ve been on the road…
I have watched 3 friends of mine, over 70 years of age, who have gotten Covid after all the shots, make sure that they got the newest one. They survived, so far, both Covid and the shots. What can I say? They know that I have not gotten ill and that I did not get the shots. I do use precautions, but no different than I have for years, during flu and cold season. I use saline and silver flushes if I have been somewhere indoors, (movies, church, stores) when I gor home. I take a LOT of supplements, I pray and fast and eat good foods, I do not do restaurants due to a restricted low histamine diet, well, maybe a burger or pizza occasionally, but I do take out. I have always been wary of bio weapons, been accused of paranoia, but way before COVID I have known that there would be attacks on populations through certain ways - mass produced vaccines, bioweapons attacking agriculture which would jump to humans (swine flue, etc, avian flu) and through cyber infrastructure. Yes, science has advanced to enormous potential, but it will not be used to anyone's advantage, it is the new nuclear bomb, but sneaky and clandestine and embraced by the majority. I am sad for my friends, because they are pretty cool, older women who live close to nature, garden, old hippies, as it were, but in this case, I think they were scared by the narrative and chose to follow the herd. Meanwhile, I amuse them with my theories and remain free of "the bug."
Good on you. I mean this in the most respectful way possible, but for all the hate my generation (millennials) gets for being lazy, brainwashed, etc. I have noticed those in your age demographic are just as bad if not worse.
My parents, in-laws, and others in their circle (60-80 years old) almost all fully trust our medical system and those running it. It’s mindblowing to me. They truly believe that an industry worth trillions of dollars has their best interest at heart. I guess that’s what a lifetime of propaganda and conditioning gets you.
My parents, in-laws, and others in their circle (60-80 years old) almost all fully trust our medical system and those running it.
They never had access to INFORMATION like today.
If you wanted knowledge outside the mainstream propaganda, you had to go to a library (still controlled) or buy books, magazines, and specialized newsletters to find ANY information that was counter to the TV, radio, newspaper, and government schools.
Today, you can get deep into a subject from a variety of angles by surfing the internet.
It is unthinkable to most people today what a difference that makes. It's like the difference between walking from New York to Los Angeles -- which most people will never bother to do -- and getting on a jet and being there a few hours later.
Columbus could have found the New World a lot faster if he would have just bought a ticket on a 747. What a dummy!
of natural coronaviruses in the lab, researchers often use a method called in vitro genome assembly.
"In vitro" means in a lab, not inside a person or animal.
This method utilizes special enzymes called restriction enzymes to generate DNA building blocks
IOW: These DNA building blocks are CREATED in a lab.
that then can be “stitched” together in the correct order of the viral genome.
HOW do they KNOW it is the "corect order?"
They MUST have an actual sample of the "real thing" from "the wild" to compare it to.
Do they state they DO HAVE this natural-occuring thing to compare this lab-made thing?
NO!
The do NOT have a REAL sample of a REAL "virus" to compare this man-made thing to.
Therefore, they do NOT know if the DNA is "stiched together in the correct order of the viral genome."
That's because the "viral genome" they are working with was MADE IN A COMPUTER, and NEVER TAKEN FROM A REAL "VIRUS."
To make a virus in the lab, researchers usually engineer the viral genome to add and remove stitching sites, called restriction sites. The ways researchers modify these sites can serve as fingerprints of in vitro genome assembly.
Sure, that can show that SOMETHING was created in a lab.
But you still have to COMPARE IT TO THE REAL THING.
They DO NOT have the real thing -- and nobody ever has.
Why? Because the "real thing" has never existed.
They CREATED this thing they studied -- in a lab.
Then, they CONCLUDED that it was made in a lab!
WOW!
What a discovery!
If I tell you that this horse right here is the product of 2 unicorns mating, but for some odd reason it does not have the horn on its head, the FIRST thing you should say is, "Well, show me the REAL unicorns so I can compare this thing to the real thing." And you won't be able to, because unicorns do not exist in the real world.
But you can make an AI-generated computer image.
We found that SARS-CoV
NOTE: Here, they are talking about the lab sample they got, not a "real" SARS-CoV-2 virus.
has the restriction site fingerprint that is typical for synthetic viruses.
RIGHT !!!
Because the man-made SYNTHETIC "virus" is the ONLY thing that any lab has EVER studied.
ALL the samples to study are man-made!
NONE of them are from a REAL virus (because getting a sample of THAT is impossible).
The synthetic fingerprint of SARS-CoV-2 is anomalous in wild coronaviruses, and common in lab-assembled viruses.
And THIS is a claim they CANNOT PROVE.
WHERE is their "wild coronavirus" against which they can compare this sample?
THEY. DO. NOT. HAVE. ONE.
The ONLY thing they have here is a man-made thing, which has something in it that makes it obvious that it is man-made, and then they CLAIM this makes it different from the real thing.
Where is their CONTROL for this study?
Where is their PROOF that the REAL virus is different from this thing?
THEY. HAVE. NO. PROOF.
They just have a claim. Nothing more.
and the concentration of these silent mutations in the restriction sites is extremely unlikely to have arisen by random evolution. Both the restriction site fingerprint and the pattern of mutations generating them are extremely unlikely in wild coronaviruses and nearly universal in synthetic viruses. Our findings strongly suggest a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV2.
WRONG CONCLUSION.
Their findings strongly suggest that the PARTICULAR STUFF they are looking at was man-made -- because THEY made it!
Just look at the "Full Text" under "Materials and Methods."
They tell you right there HOW THEY MADE IT.
WHERE IS THEIR CONTROL?
WHERE IS THEIR DOCUMENTATION OF THE "REAL" VIRUS AND HOW IT DIFFERS FROM THIS STUFF?
The reality is that they used an INVALID method to "find" the virus, and then used computer models to "create" the DNA sequence.
They NEVER found the actual virus -- because nobody has, because it does not exist.
We report a high likelihood that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated as an infectious clone assembled in vitro.
Once again, they offer ZERO PROOF that this thing is INFECTIOUS.
They just make the CLAIM and expect everyone to believe it.
So, the thing they are looking at has obvious signs that it was made in a lab.
So what?
That does NOT mean it is infectious. Where is their evidence for this claim?
THEY. HAVE. NONE.
Full Text - Introduction:
There are currently two hypotheses on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. The first hypothesis posits that SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin and spilled over from animals to people at the Huanan seafood market
The second hypothesis on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 posits that SARS-CoV-2 originated in a lab as a result of coronavirus (CoV) research.
False. There is also a third hypothesis, that the researches themselves are using an INVALID method to "study the virus." They are NOT USING ANY CONTROLS to validate the results of their study.
They have no sample of the "real thing" to compare to.
They (a) create something in a lab, and then (b) conclude that this something was made in a lab.
Duh!
They also CLAIM it is infections, but offer ZERO PROOF of the claim.
If there is no control, then IT IS NOT VALID RESEARCH.
They basically ADMIT this with this sentence:
Researchers would explore the relationship between viral genotypes & human-infectivity phenotypes by a variety of experiments ... Such experiments require making infectious clones, which requires assembling ... in vitro.
They "clone" by way of looking up the DNA sequence in a database -- but they don't tell you that this DNA sequence was NOT taken from the real thing.
The sequence, too, was MAN-MADE.
So, they take a man-made sequence from the database, and CREATE IN LAB something that has the sequence, and CLAIM it is the same as the "real thing."
But what they NEVER do ... is get a sample of the "real thing."
Because it does not exist in any lab anywhere in the world.
Weird ... for such a "deadly virus" ... huh?
ALL of this is manipulation IN THE LAB OF SOMETHING OTHER THAN THE REAL THING -- because nobody has the real thing.
Under their Methods section:
To make infectious clones from wild coronaviruses, one must synthesize a full-length DNA copy of the viral genome.
Do you guys realize how STUPID this statement is?
They are making a CLONE "from wild coronaviruses" ... by SYNTHESIZING (man-made in a lab) a copy of viral genome.
Why do they need to SYNTHESIZE it if they already have the REAL THING? Because they don't have the real thing.
So, they have to CREATE something in a lab and claim it is the real thing.
IOW: They create in a lab something which shows the same DNA profile as the DNA profile that was CREATED in a computer model, and never from a real thing.
IF they had the real thing, they would (a) take the real thing, then (b) add whatever Dr. Evil stuff they wanted to, and (c) produce the evil product.
That evil product could then be reverse-engineered to show that it had something added to it that could only come from a lab.
BUT ... they have to FIRST have the real thing, so they can use that as a control.
Instead, they just start with assumptions, make something in a lab, and then claim it means something.
The only "smoking gun" from this paper is that they NEVER had a REAL virus as a CONTROL so they could COMPARE this thing they were studying with the real thing.
And the reason they never had the real thing is because it does not exist.
The only things that has EVER been studied are these fake man-made concoctions that they CLAIM is the same as the real thing.
Well if it is, then PROVE it.
They never have. There is too much money -- and ego -- tied up in the deception.
ALL samples that are "studied" are of lab origin because the real thing has never existed.
Therefore, they also can NEVER show that the "real thing" is pathogenic or transmissible.
I also find it interesting that they do not even TRY to prove that this lab-created thing is either pathogenic or transmissible.
They only make the CLAIM, and expect the reader to accept it.
But nobody should accept a mere claim.
PROVE that even this lab-made thing is pathogenic or transmissible.
NOBODY WILL DO THAT.
Under "Materials and Metods" --
Coronavirus genomes for our phylogeny were obtained ... Spike gene ORFs were obtained by searching the NCBI Gene database ...
Spike genes were translated ... A maximum likelihood phylogeny was constructed with default settings ...
Notice, they did not say they bought a sample of SARS-CoV-2. Instead, they looked up the genome sequence and CREATED THEIR OWN SAMPLE TO STUDY.
What these "researchers" did was ...
They looked up a computer-generated DNA sequence of something
They created the something -- in their own lab
They studied the something -- in their own lab
They concluded that the something must have been man-made (duh!)
They also claimed it was pathogenic ... but offered no evidence.
And they never so much as MENTIONED the concept that they might want to also get a copy of the REAL THING so they could COMPARE their results with the real thing ... because they already knew that it does not exist.
In conclusion, this is GAW. That means: WAKE THE FUCK UP.
Again -- If I tell you that this horse right here is the product of 2 unicorns mating, but for some odd reason it does not have the horn on its head, the FIRST thing you should say is, "Well, show me the REAL unicorns so I can compare this thing to the real thing." And you won't be able to, because unicorns do not exist in the real world.
Neither does the virus.
ANYONE who wants to debate this MUST explain WHAT THE PROCESS IS to "find a virus."
I can explain it. Can YOU?
If YOU cannot do that, then YOU do not understand this subject -- just like these co-called "researchers."
Once you understand what a virologist ACTUALLY DOES -- the steps he goes through to "find a virus" -- then you will understand how the whole thing is made up.
This is one of the MOST IMPORTANT issues of our time.
This fraud is the ENTIRE BASIS OF TYRANNY. It is the reason for lockdown, face mask mandates, preventing you from having a job, buying groceries, traveling, and possibly soon to use your money for anything.
This lie MUST be understood.
Refusal to look into this subject is the same as accepting your own slavery.
Fren! This is fantastic. If you had a channel, or a like, subscribe, and/or a follow etc button - I'd hit em all. This reply of yours is phenomenal, but all I can give is a simple updoot.
Also, that might not actually "take," as I'm forever handshake lmao. But I tried to hit it for ya, anyway.
Yeah, I'm the perpetual "always stalker, never talker-" been either here, or voat b4 that and r/greatawakening before that. Annnnd.....I'm...
still....waiting...for justice lmao. But yeah, great analysis of what that paper meant for regular boots on the ground types, like me haha. Thx man 👍
Every time I hear another deep explanation of how gain of function research and bioengineering works and that "trust me guys, it's the researchers making deadly contagious particles"...
Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.
I am reminded of the cold hard facts. Masks not only don't work, they are responsible for a net negative effect. PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold. Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease- and that vaccines require a whole host of adjuvants in order to provoke any immune response. Death certificate coding was changed to make nearly every death potentially attributable to Covid. Since all symptoms were assigned to Covid, and things like heart conditions and pneumonia went untreated and people were sent to "quarantine" instead of getting properly evaluated. Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours. And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.
Any defense of the research community and the "novel virus" that does not address the abject institutional fraud and systematic murder and propaganda that was required to convince the public there was a deadly pandemic has zero merit.
If "the science" has any exceptions at all, it is not hard science. It is a flawed hypothesis, at best, that needs to be thrown out and reevaluated. Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.
The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.
Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.
Your second sentence is true, which should make you re-evaluate your first sentence.
PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold.
PCR actually CREATES a lot of DNA sequences. Creates things that were never in the original sample.
This is why cranking up the cycles is sure to eventually create enough small DNA fragments that a computer program will piece enough of them together to "match" something bad in the "Bad Stuff Database."
Fewer cycles means fewer fragments created, which means no "match" to the bad stuff.
This is how they manipulated "Covid cases."
Ramp up the PCR cycles and you will get more "matches" and therefore more "cases."
Roll out the vaxx, and then reduce the PCR cycles, and you will get fewer "matches" and therefore fewer "cases," thereby ... "proving" that the vaxx saved the world !!!
I am not a DeSantis fan, but he has done some good things. One thing he did in 2020 was require testing labs to disclose how many PCR cycles they used to arrive at their result.
And what do ya know? Immediately thereafter, "Covid cases" in Florida dropped a bunch. Wow. Shocking.
I don't know who gave him the idea to do that, but someone might have known something.
Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease
Even worse, no virus has ever been isolated. The word "isolated" is misused by the fraudsters by re-defining the term.
"Gay" used to mean happy, now it means faggot.
"Vaccine" used to mean injecting a "live virus" (no such thing, it turns out) to protect against future infection. Now, it means injecting something into someone to reduce symptoms ... or "cases."
"Isolate" used to mean (and really still does) to separate from all other things. But to virologists, it means mixing it with other things, using a bogus process, and claiming that the end result proves the virus is real. If they take a sample from one person, they call that isolation because it was from one person. This is really dumb, but that's what they do.
Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours.
Probably true. And almost everyone who "died of Covid" did so in a hospital. Nobody just dropped dead in a classroom or on a football field -- until the vaxx rollout.
And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.
Thus, helping to create more "cases."
Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.
True. But what passes for science today rarely ever uses the Scientific Method. Instead, they use "expert consensus" and "peer review" and "trust the science" and other such propaganda.
The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.
Regarding "viral" spread and contagious diseases...
I personally do not think that viruses are a culprit for illness. There is a lot more there, but this is a long comment- the research has been attempted for over a century since the "Spanish Flu", and people or animals do not get make one another sick with bodily fluids. In lab settings, adjuvants are required to make animals sick. Healthy animals cannot be made sick through proximity to unhealthy animals in lab settings. Many experiments also rely on extremely toxic "placebos" that cause allergic reactions in the subjects, and then the "test results" are compared to whatever difference occurs between the toxic placebo and the test.
Our bodies have various detox and healing responses with distinct symptoms and byproducts that are universal and can be tested. But it's a machine producing those byproducts, our very specialized cells are not "hijacked" and lose their essential functions in order to become "virus factories" and then return to their initial form and function suddenly when the "immune system wins". The whole setup is hogwash.
The simplest explanation is energy and electricity. We have energetic fields, and we know how they work in some very limited ways. If you're depressed, your dog knows to snuggle you. If your wife is seething mad about something, you can physically feel her anger and it generates anxiety in you until you deal with it. The female period sync has had a ton of investigation both ways and the general consensus is that it doesn't exist- but there is so much anecdotal evidence to this that I'm skeptical- but I don't use it as a hard piece of evidence. But we share energy, and that energy triggers an immune response- IF YOU NEED IT.
The best test case for this is Tuberculosis. TB is VERY CONTAGIOUS, but only in households where they cook or heat with fire indoors. The primary symptoms are that you cough until you're done- either by clearing out sufficient cumulative smoke inhalation or dying- and have general weakness/fever/chills. Westerners exposed to TB test positive for the rest of their lives (my Dad is one), but they do not get sick- not because they do not "contract" the illness, but rather because they do not generate one. TB has been eradicated from the First World without vaccines, but it is still deadly throughout the Third World.
Another is Hepatitis. You can get hepatitis from things like drug abuse, from drinking too much, from taking too much Tylenol. And the probability that someone tests positive after a Hepatitis needlestick is around 0.5%. The probability that a random person tests positive for Hepatitis is around 0.5%. If you are exposed to Hepatitis- of any form- and you do not have the precondition necessary to generate an immune response- which is simply Hepa (liver) and -titis (swelling/inflammation)- which is your body sending extra resources to your liver in order to process toxins more rapidly because of long-term cumulative toxic exposure, you are no more likely to get sick after a needlestick as you were before the needlestick. My Dad had an accidental needlestick from an unruly Hepatitis patient in the clinic like 15 years ago and had no issues at all.
When you get an AIDS test, you are asked lifestyle questions. Why?
The biggest indicator that disease is generated internally is that nearly every single blood test for illness is a population count, and not a test for the absolute presence of the contagion. You have e.coli, the problem is if you have too much.
You have pneumococcal antibodies, the problem is if you have too many too recently. You have HPV, and a host of all manner of viruses and bacteria. If you look hard enough (or crank the cycles up enough times in Covid's case- and PCR can be magnified far more than 45 cycles), you can find anything in anyone.
"PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody... There's very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of in your body".
-Kary Mullis
By the way, the mechanism of death for Remdesivir is pretty straightforward.
It was a failed Ebola drug, and crazy toxic, killing around 50% people in the trial compared to the baseline 35%.
"Overall, about 50% of people who received either Zmapp or remdesivir died during the trial. In contrast, only about 35% of people who received either Mab114 or REGN-EB3 died. Three participants died of side effects thought to be related to treatment—two in the ZMapp group and one in the remdesivir group."
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/two-drugs-reduce-risk-death-ebola
When your kidneys are overloaded with something extremely toxic, they dump fluid into your lungs as an escape valve, kind of like how your gallbladder dumps bile into your liver to induce vomiting with food poisoning and to help break down excess toxins.
Remdesivir is wildly toxic and induces an extreme kidney response, often accompanied with kidney failure, and since "Covid" was classified a respiratory disease, worsening symptoms were treated with ventilation.
The problem with ventilation, aside from the extreme invasiveness (the general principle is to NEVER ventilate someone without an obstructed airway as it is so dangerous), is that it is so painful and uncomfortable that people have to be sedated with morphine or midazolam for it to work. And sedation prevents you from coughing out the crap that is filling your lungs because your kidneys are boxed. Additionally, with the "quarantine" measures, people were not being appropriately monitored and fluid was not being suctioned from their lungs because a "known" symptom was precipitously low O2 SATs. So their lungs fill up with fluid without any exit point, their blood oxygen dropped to nothing, and they drowned in their own fluids alone in a hospital room with nobody watching them and no family members in the room to raise the alarm.
But we share energy, and that energy triggers an immune response- IF YOU NEED IT.
That is a plausible theory.
The main problem we have today is: So many people have been indoctrinated into the false Germ Theory, that nobody is really testing other ideas to find out the root cause of illness(es).
If we had as much resources into other ideas as "germs," we would find some answers.
TB is VERY CONTAGIOUS, but only in households where they cook or heat with fire indoors.
That indicates to me that it is the indoor fire that causes the problem, and not some communicable disease.
If I do indoor fires, and my whole family gets sick, and then my kids play outdoors with your kids or even in your house, but your kids don't get sick, then it probably means something is going on inside my house that causes the sickness.
TB has been eradicated from the First World without vaccines, but it is still deadly throughout the Third World.
Probably because we don't DO what they do.
You can get hepatitis from things like drug abuse, from drinking too much, from taking too much Tylenol.
... which is simply Hepa (liver) and -titis (swelling/inflammation)- which is your body sending extra resources to your liver in order to process toxins more rapidly ...
Again, seems like an external toxic/poison that is causing it, and not a "virus."
I have read that Hep C is ususually something that happens to people with a lot of tattoos. The ink going into your bloodstream (or maybe just certain inks) cannot be healthy.
When you get an AIDS test, you are asked lifestyle questions. Why?
AIDS is not an illness. There is nothing specific about it. It is just a defninition.
The CDC has a list of 30+ illnesses (maybe more now, since I have not checked in years) that, if (a) you have one of them AND (b) you test positive for HIV, then you are diagnosed with AIDS.
If you have the illness but are HIV- (such as TB, which is on the list), then you "just" have TB. But if you have the illness and are HIV+, then the diagnosis is AIDS.
HIV is a retrovirus, and like ALL viruses has NEVER been isolated and purified, and there is no REAL evidence that it exists at all.
The "10-Year Study" was a study over 10 years of married couples, where one was HIV+ and the other was HIV-. During those 10 years, they had thousands of sexual acts with HIV+/HIV- and in 10 years, ZERO people who were HIV- because HIV+.
The test for HIV was the PCR test, which is NOT a real diagnostic tool. Since then, they have used Western Blot and other tests, all of which are fradulent as diagnostic tools.
Both HIV and AIDS are a scam for money. Neither exists. If you get a sickness that is listed on the CDC AIDS list, then yes, you are sick with that illness. But not AIDS.
The early AIDS patients in the 1980's were given AZT, an extremely toxic cancer drug that WILL kill you if you take it forever -- which is exactly what they were told to do.
Faggots in the West got weird sickness because they used nitrate poppers for loosening the anal muscles. They mixed these very toxic drugs with cocaine and other drugs to party all night, and they got sick from the drugs (not AIDS).
Africans, both male and female, got sick due to diseases of poverty and poor sanitation/hygene, and they got sick with different illnesses, but it became a gravy train for African countries to claim AIDS cases.
$$$$$
The biggest indicator that disease is generated internally is that nearly every single blood test for illness is a population count, and not a test for the absolute presence of the contagion
Right. They ALWAYS use some sort of surrogate method rather than simply finding that actual culprit.
I think illness is created by toxins and poisons, primarily the food/drink we consume, but also these other external influences, some of which are likely EMF's, radiation, etc.
"PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody... There's very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of in your body". -Kary Mullis
Even Mullis himself might not have fully realized -- but it has been shown since -- that PCR itself CREATES additional DNA fragments, which when aligned with primers and then compared with an ever-growing database of so-called harmful pathogens, can be found to be a "match" for something bad in that database.
This is why they want the MRNA method of creating "vaccines." It is so they can claim that anyone has anything, and it can be treated with a custom MRNA injection.
The problem I have is stupidity. In order for me to have a conversation the person I am talking to needs to be open to listening to another view. So a vaxx-idiot has cemented into the vaxx camp. Gaslit and huffing I'm right your wrong its impossible. They refuse to have another view, or even believe another view. Even with this proof they will refuse to accept that the elites are killing them.
This.
So sad to see so many smart people get brainwashed.. They simply can't fathom that idea that government and big tech/corps don't work in their interest.
These elites ARE killing them, and it's very difficult not knowing how to effectively help without ruining relationships.
I take the slow and steady approach, but it's frustrating at the snails pace it appears to be going.
I have talked to quite a few people about this -- IRL.
I usually throw out "that Covid bullshit we had to deal with" when we are talking about whatever random topic.
Some people ignore. Others pick up on it, so the conversation can continue.
I ask, "What do you think that was all about?"
If I get anything other than "oh, muh science! and muh Fauci" kind of drivel, I will go down that path for a minute or so.
Then I will say, "It's even worse than that. What if I told you the virus didn't even exist?"
Most people will pick up on that, but I can tell that some are already tuned out (like here on GAW, as well).
But some will ask about that, either in a truely inquisitive way, or an ok, buddy, I gotta hear THIS (in a not-so-believing way).
I then say it's a bit of a complex topic, so I can't explain it in 2 minutes, but in less than 10, I can tell you how it has been proven in a lab that viruses do not exist, and how you can control your own heath without worrying about the boogeyman of the virus.
Only if they say sure, tell me, do I then proceed.
I start with the history going back to the late 1800's when bacteria were discovered -- and bacteria are real, but not harmful. They are the clean up crew (janitors) of the biological world.
But back then, they thought that bacteria were harmful. They noticed bacteria in the blood samples of sick people, when viewed under a microscope.
They concluded that the bacteria must have caused the sickness.
Louis Pasteur was the one who came up with Germ Theory, but he was a liar. His own personal journals were found where he admitted he rigged his experiments to get the results he wanted.
They also found that some people were sick but they could not find any bacteria.
So, they concluded that something else, too small to see, must have caused the illness. This is because they had already bought into Germ Theory, which turns out was false all along.
To describe these things they thought existed but could not see, they used the latin word for poison -- virus.
For the next 70 years, they tried to prove that viruses existed, that they caused illness, and that they were transmissible and could make other people sick.
But for 70 years and hundreds of trials with thousands of people, they could never prove any of it.
I talk a little about the Spanish Flu of 1918, where they tried to prove virology but never could. BTW, Spanish Flu was not caused by a virus. It was a poison caused by the massive vaccine campaign, which harmed millions of people.
In addition, the light bulb had recently been invented and cities were installing electricity into their homes. This was a massive increase in electromagnetic frequencies that humans had never been exposed to in history, and may have contributed to sickness, as well.
Then, I talk about the 1950's when virology was all but dead, and Enders came up with a PROCESS to supposedly find viruses.
I then talk about the process to find bacteria, which is valid, and is used all the time to study bacteria and other microorganisms.
BUT ... and here is the big deal ... that process to study microorganisms is NOT the process used to study viruses.
The virus process is completely different -- first created by Enders.
And then I talk about the 2021 study by virologist Stefan Lanka, where he proved that what virologists THINK they are looking at is actually nothing more than the harmless artifacts (remnants) of the PROCESS used. Those "spike proteins" are just the dying fragments of dead cells that were killed using the process.
And if you do the EXACT SAME PROCESS ... but DO NOT START WITH ANY BODILY FLUIDS of a human or animal ... you will get THE SAME END RESULT.
This is why the president of Tanzaia was able to send in lab samples for Covid testing and all the samples came back postive for Covid. Only problem was, some of the samples were from a goat, fruit, and motor oil, but they all came back positive for Covid. Why? Because the samples had human names on the label, and the people doing the testing used a false test that they did not realize was false.
This is because the PROCESS TO STUDY VIRUSES by itself CAUSES the positive result. (There's more to it than that, but close enough for an overview).
Those "spike proteins" are said to be the mechanism that allows the virus to get into cells and cause harm.
But those "spike proteins" never actually existed inside the person. How could they, if they are created outside of the person -- in a lab -- when the process to study the "virus" is used? They are CREATED in the lab during the proess to "find a virus," and they never existed inside the person.
The control -- that most virologists have never used -- was doing the same process but NOT starting with any bodily fluids of a person or animal. Yet, they got the SAME spike proteins. Those are the ejections of dead cell material because the PROCESS is what killed the cells and caused the spike proteins to appear in the electron microscope photos.
They were never inside the person -- or at least, nobody has ever provided any evidence they they were. Therefore, the entire thing is a fraud.
The fraud was started by Enders, and no virologist until 2021 ever thought to reinvestigate the fundamental building blocks of virology by using a control test for the process itself. But once Stefan Lanka did, he proved that the process itself (which is ONLY used for viruses, not any other microorganisms) is what creates those spike proteins -- in the lab -- and they were never inside a person.
This is called the "Cytopathic Effect." The process used to "find a virus" causes the breakdown and death of the monkey kidney cells (vero cells), which results in the ejection of cellular material, which is what is claimed to be the "spike protein" seen in the electron microscope photos.
But those cellular ejections (exosomes) were never inside any person.
If the end result is the ONLY proof that a virologist uses to claim that he has found/studied the virus, but you get the SAME end result even if you don't use any DNA from any human, then clearly the process itself is what caused the result -- the Cytopathic Effect.
At that point, either they have questions (but what about chicken pox or the flu? etc.), or they want to know where they can find more info to learn more (and verify or refute), or they have the thousand-yard stare and obviously have no clue WTF I just said.
It is a lot to take in -- asking someone to re-think something they believed their entire lives, and everyone around them and in the media and the doctors' offices also believes it. Change that mindset in 5 minutes? Hard to do, and yet ...
It's around 30%-50% who show some interest, which means at leaast some of those will eventually understand it themselves, and be able to explain it to others.
Once enough people understand the deception, the deception will necessarily end.
I also let them know that it is important for them to learn the truth about this because the virus hoax that has been pushed on us is the entire basis for government tyranny against us -- lock downs, isolation, vaccines, face masks, no grocery buying, no fly lists, etc. and all things they would want to do to control the People.
"viruses aren't real"
Cool story bro. Tell me more about tobacco mosaic.
Presume this is correct, what could cause fast spreading illness then ?
micro parasites jumping like flees from people to people?
If there was anything amiss, the Russians would have told me.
This!!! ☝🏼😂
Agree. We have a guy at work still pushing it hard. I don’t know how they can’t see it. I look for anything I can use as “eye openers” but I don’t understand this article. It’s over my head.
It's dense with scientific language. My understanding is that they figured out how to make cells replicate DNA the way they wanted to. CRISP, is a method of inserting DNA sequences into the DNA your manipulating. The golden ( product) is one scientific industry crowing and selling the ability to genetically change DNA! This is a scientific sales ad to sell the golden process to genetically modify human DNA. All viruses are cross genetically related. NOVEL viruses are impossible. As humans we have been fighting off viruses for thousands of years. Our immune systems were incredibly robust. Mothers milk would teach their babies how to fight off illness. However, now the assholes got ahold of a way to create a NOVEL virus to infect humans worldwide. A PANDEMIC. it was artifical and now we are dealing with a novel virus that we never encountered before. Also genetic tampering. Your immune system is destroyed. You are now a lifelong ( short, very shot) customer to the very companies that killed you. They made their customers sick for profit.
Thank you! I’m going to read this a few more times. It feels important.
Does it mean everyone that got vaxxed has been re-written with Jeffrey Epstein's DNA and now empathize with paedophiles?
Some people are blinded by the fear, some people are blinded by their own pride. Look at what Jesus did with all the miracles and after seeing the thing done, they plotted to kill Jesus!! The vaccinated are too prideful to admit they were wrong and this evil world could do something like that. I doubt nothing anymore!
It's also referred to as the scales over the eyes. The unsaved are under the deception of the serpent.
You are simply misinformed…
“You don’t know what you’re talking about”
~ Nancy Pelosi
Yep. Good explanation of how they act. Huffing, refusing to even look at the evidence.
I knew within the first week it was a scam as I'd been following Fauci and SARs for awhile. Knowing Fauci and Obama had set up Wuhan and Dick Lugar was involved in Ukraine were huge red flags. I tried to tell husband and family and was accused of lying and that I needed to shut up and not talk about conspiracy theories. The last five years (it actually started during Trumps first run for president when he was lapping up the polls showing Trump had zero chances of winning and I disagreed with him then) have been difficult. He at least knows cv jabs were bad now but still vuys into everything else msm and pharma spews. He still buys into pharmas advice on healthy eating and his health is not the best. But won't listen to the truth. He kinda acts like he wants to know but then makes out like im stupid/crazy to not follow big pharma advice.
I found a good way to talk about conspiracy (facts).
I have found that, generally, conversation is much better if I ask a preface question first.
"So, if you want to go down the conspiracy direction, I could tell you something interesting. Do you want to hear it?"
You will know by their answer if they are unwilling to use critical thinking. You will also find a decent amount of people who are EAGER to hear such things, and are fascinated by it.
Make a lead-in statement or question first, and they will sort themselves out. If they don't want to hear it, you know you are dealing with the brainwashed. These are potentially your enemies.
The ones who love talking about this stuff are potentially your friends.
By asking the lead-in question (or statement), you can avoid the brainwashed and not tell them anything because they will only ridicule and they will have no interest in learning the truth about the world. So, who needs 'em?
Altering our DNA is the satanic agenda, for those they don’t outright kill-off first. Whether you’re God-fearing or not it’s the Truth. Their greatest agenda is to destroy God’s favorite creation; mankind. I highly suggest “Birthright” by Timothy Alberino, a Pastor’s son and beyond ufo researcher.
Yes, in other words he’s done much in the ufo Truther movement but some might shoebox him into just that. He’s a deep diver into many fields putting many pieces into the mysteries puzzle. Search his name. Sorry it took me to respond I’ve been on the road…
Can you dumb it down for me?
"DNA modifying enzymes" 👍
I have watched 3 friends of mine, over 70 years of age, who have gotten Covid after all the shots, make sure that they got the newest one. They survived, so far, both Covid and the shots. What can I say? They know that I have not gotten ill and that I did not get the shots. I do use precautions, but no different than I have for years, during flu and cold season. I use saline and silver flushes if I have been somewhere indoors, (movies, church, stores) when I gor home. I take a LOT of supplements, I pray and fast and eat good foods, I do not do restaurants due to a restricted low histamine diet, well, maybe a burger or pizza occasionally, but I do take out. I have always been wary of bio weapons, been accused of paranoia, but way before COVID I have known that there would be attacks on populations through certain ways - mass produced vaccines, bioweapons attacking agriculture which would jump to humans (swine flue, etc, avian flu) and through cyber infrastructure. Yes, science has advanced to enormous potential, but it will not be used to anyone's advantage, it is the new nuclear bomb, but sneaky and clandestine and embraced by the majority. I am sad for my friends, because they are pretty cool, older women who live close to nature, garden, old hippies, as it were, but in this case, I think they were scared by the narrative and chose to follow the herd. Meanwhile, I amuse them with my theories and remain free of "the bug."
Good on you. I mean this in the most respectful way possible, but for all the hate my generation (millennials) gets for being lazy, brainwashed, etc. I have noticed those in your age demographic are just as bad if not worse.
My parents, in-laws, and others in their circle (60-80 years old) almost all fully trust our medical system and those running it. It’s mindblowing to me. They truly believe that an industry worth trillions of dollars has their best interest at heart. I guess that’s what a lifetime of propaganda and conditioning gets you.
They never had access to INFORMATION like today.
If you wanted knowledge outside the mainstream propaganda, you had to go to a library (still controlled) or buy books, magazines, and specialized newsletters to find ANY information that was counter to the TV, radio, newspaper, and government schools.
Today, you can get deep into a subject from a variety of angles by surfing the internet.
It is unthinkable to most people today what a difference that makes. It's like the difference between walking from New York to Los Angeles -- which most people will never bother to do -- and getting on a jet and being there a few hours later.
Columbus could have found the New World a lot faster if he would have just bought a ticket on a 747. What a dummy!
lol this is a great point!! Love the analogies. Now we just gotta get more to jump on the plane and realize boats and walking are a bit slower.
Do you even understand what this is saying?
Read the "Lay Summary" of the acutal paper:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.512756v1
IOW: Something man-made
"In vitro" means in a lab, not inside a person or animal.
IOW: These DNA building blocks are CREATED in a lab.
HOW do they KNOW it is the "corect order?"
They MUST have an actual sample of the "real thing" from "the wild" to compare it to.
Do they state they DO HAVE this natural-occuring thing to compare this lab-made thing?
NO!
The do NOT have a REAL sample of a REAL "virus" to compare this man-made thing to.
Therefore, they do NOT know if the DNA is "stiched together in the correct order of the viral genome."
That's because the "viral genome" they are working with was MADE IN A COMPUTER, and NEVER TAKEN FROM A REAL "VIRUS."
Sure, that can show that SOMETHING was created in a lab.
But you still have to COMPARE IT TO THE REAL THING.
They DO NOT have the real thing -- and nobody ever has.
Why? Because the "real thing" has never existed.
They CREATED this thing they studied -- in a lab.
Then, they CONCLUDED that it was made in a lab!
WOW!
What a discovery!
If I tell you that this horse right here is the product of 2 unicorns mating, but for some odd reason it does not have the horn on its head, the FIRST thing you should say is, "Well, show me the REAL unicorns so I can compare this thing to the real thing." And you won't be able to, because unicorns do not exist in the real world.
But you can make an AI-generated computer image.
NOTE: Here, they are talking about the lab sample they got, not a "real" SARS-CoV-2 virus.
RIGHT !!!
Because the man-made SYNTHETIC "virus" is the ONLY thing that any lab has EVER studied.
ALL the samples to study are man-made!
NONE of them are from a REAL virus (because getting a sample of THAT is impossible).
And THIS is a claim they CANNOT PROVE.
WHERE is their "wild coronavirus" against which they can compare this sample?
THEY. DO. NOT. HAVE. ONE.
The ONLY thing they have here is a man-made thing, which has something in it that makes it obvious that it is man-made, and then they CLAIM this makes it different from the real thing.
Where is their CONTROL for this study?
Where is their PROOF that the REAL virus is different from this thing?
THEY. HAVE. NO. PROOF.
They just have a claim. Nothing more.
WRONG CONCLUSION.
Their findings strongly suggest that the PARTICULAR STUFF they are looking at was man-made -- because THEY made it!
Just look at the "Full Text" under "Materials and Methods."
They tell you right there HOW THEY MADE IT.
WHERE IS THEIR CONTROL?
WHERE IS THEIR DOCUMENTATION OF THE "REAL" VIRUS AND HOW IT DIFFERS FROM THIS STUFF?
The reality is that they used an INVALID method to "find" the virus, and then used computer models to "create" the DNA sequence.
They NEVER found the actual virus -- because nobody has, because it does not exist.
Once again, they offer ZERO PROOF that this thing is INFECTIOUS.
They just make the CLAIM and expect everyone to believe it.
So, the thing they are looking at has obvious signs that it was made in a lab.
So what?
That does NOT mean it is infectious. Where is their evidence for this claim?
THEY. HAVE. NONE.
Full Text - Introduction:
False. There is also a third hypothesis, that the researches themselves are using an INVALID method to "study the virus." They are NOT USING ANY CONTROLS to validate the results of their study.
They have no sample of the "real thing" to compare to.
They (a) create something in a lab, and then (b) conclude that this something was made in a lab.
Duh!
They also CLAIM it is infections, but offer ZERO PROOF of the claim.
If there is no control, then IT IS NOT VALID RESEARCH.
They basically ADMIT this with this sentence:
They "clone" by way of looking up the DNA sequence in a database -- but they don't tell you that this DNA sequence was NOT taken from the real thing.
The sequence, too, was MAN-MADE.
So, they take a man-made sequence from the database, and CREATE IN LAB something that has the sequence, and CLAIM it is the same as the "real thing."
But what they NEVER do ... is get a sample of the "real thing."
Because it does not exist in any lab anywhere in the world.
Weird ... for such a "deadly virus" ... huh?
ALL of this is manipulation IN THE LAB OF SOMETHING OTHER THAN THE REAL THING -- because nobody has the real thing.
Under their Methods section:
Do you guys realize how STUPID this statement is?
They are making a CLONE "from wild coronaviruses" ... by SYNTHESIZING (man-made in a lab) a copy of viral genome.
Why do they need to SYNTHESIZE it if they already have the REAL THING? Because they don't have the real thing.
So, they have to CREATE something in a lab and claim it is the real thing.
IOW: They create in a lab something which shows the same DNA profile as the DNA profile that was CREATED in a computer model, and never from a real thing.
IF they had the real thing, they would (a) take the real thing, then (b) add whatever Dr. Evil stuff they wanted to, and (c) produce the evil product.
That evil product could then be reverse-engineered to show that it had something added to it that could only come from a lab.
BUT ... they have to FIRST have the real thing, so they can use that as a control.
Instead, they just start with assumptions, make something in a lab, and then claim it means something.
The only "smoking gun" from this paper is that they NEVER had a REAL virus as a CONTROL so they could COMPARE this thing they were studying with the real thing.
And the reason they never had the real thing is because it does not exist.
The only things that has EVER been studied are these fake man-made concoctions that they CLAIM is the same as the real thing.
Well if it is, then PROVE it.
They never have. There is too much money -- and ego -- tied up in the deception.
ALL samples that are "studied" are of lab origin because the real thing has never existed.
Therefore, they also can NEVER show that the "real thing" is pathogenic or transmissible.
I also find it interesting that they do not even TRY to prove that this lab-created thing is either pathogenic or transmissible.
They only make the CLAIM, and expect the reader to accept it.
But nobody should accept a mere claim.
PROVE that even this lab-made thing is pathogenic or transmissible.
NOBODY WILL DO THAT.
Under "Materials and Metods" --
Notice, they did not say they bought a sample of SARS-CoV-2. Instead, they looked up the genome sequence and CREATED THEIR OWN SAMPLE TO STUDY.
What these "researchers" did was ...
In conclusion, this is GAW. That means: WAKE THE FUCK UP.
Again -- If I tell you that this horse right here is the product of 2 unicorns mating, but for some odd reason it does not have the horn on its head, the FIRST thing you should say is, "Well, show me the REAL unicorns so I can compare this thing to the real thing." And you won't be able to, because unicorns do not exist in the real world.
Neither does the virus.
ANYONE who wants to debate this MUST explain WHAT THE PROCESS IS to "find a virus."
I can explain it. Can YOU?
If YOU cannot do that, then YOU do not understand this subject -- just like these co-called "researchers."
Once you understand what a virologist ACTUALLY DOES -- the steps he goes through to "find a virus" -- then you will understand how the whole thing is made up.
This is one of the MOST IMPORTANT issues of our time.
This fraud is the ENTIRE BASIS OF TYRANNY. It is the reason for lockdown, face mask mandates, preventing you from having a job, buying groceries, traveling, and possibly soon to use your money for anything.
This lie MUST be understood.
Refusal to look into this subject is the same as accepting your own slavery.
Fren! This is fantastic. If you had a channel, or a like, subscribe, and/or a follow etc button - I'd hit em all. This reply of yours is phenomenal, but all I can give is a simple updoot. Also, that might not actually "take," as I'm forever handshake lmao. But I tried to hit it for ya, anyway.
Thx.
I updooted you, too.
Get rid of that handshake!
I think if you participate on other .win boards (just make normie comments), then your handshake goes away sooner.
Not positive that's how it works, but seems like I read that somewhere.
Yeah, I'm the perpetual "always stalker, never talker-" been either here, or voat b4 that and r/greatawakening before that. Annnnd.....I'm... still....waiting...for justice lmao. But yeah, great analysis of what that paper meant for regular boots on the ground types, like me haha. Thx man 👍
Oh and thx for the make "stupid normie comments on rando threads" ttp man, lmao, good shit
Reynoldmeds.com can buy ivermectin here
Will have to digest this later thanks
Every time I hear another deep explanation of how gain of function research and bioengineering works and that "trust me guys, it's the researchers making deadly contagious particles"...
Obviously contagious diseases exist. But if they were spread by particles, masks would work.
I am reminded of the cold hard facts. Masks not only don't work, they are responsible for a net negative effect. PCR cycles were cranked up above 40 instead of at 25, causing over 90% false positives- and that those tests themselves were never actually based on an isolated virus, but rather components of influenza and cold. Isolated viruses themselves have never been proven to cause disease- and that vaccines require a whole host of adjuvants in order to provoke any immune response. Death certificate coding was changed to make nearly every death potentially attributable to Covid. Since all symptoms were assigned to Covid, and things like heart conditions and pneumonia went untreated and people were sent to "quarantine" instead of getting properly evaluated. Remdesivir plus ventilators were the primary culprit in putting people who checked into the hospital with moderate symptoms into an early grave in a matter of hours. And people had to be tested to know whether they were sick.
Any defense of the research community and the "novel virus" that does not address the abject institutional fraud and systematic murder and propaganda that was required to convince the public there was a deadly pandemic has zero merit.
If "the science" has any exceptions at all, it is not hard science. It is a flawed hypothesis, at best, that needs to be thrown out and reevaluated. Science must be infinitely repeatable with consistent results.
The systematic application of reason and real-world testing has been roundly applied to the theory of diseases and vaccines, and they are both so full of holes, there is nothing of value contained therein.
Your second sentence is true, which should make you re-evaluate your first sentence.
PCR actually CREATES a lot of DNA sequences. Creates things that were never in the original sample.
This is why cranking up the cycles is sure to eventually create enough small DNA fragments that a computer program will piece enough of them together to "match" something bad in the "Bad Stuff Database."
Fewer cycles means fewer fragments created, which means no "match" to the bad stuff.
This is how they manipulated "Covid cases."
Ramp up the PCR cycles and you will get more "matches" and therefore more "cases."
Roll out the vaxx, and then reduce the PCR cycles, and you will get fewer "matches" and therefore fewer "cases," thereby ... "proving" that the vaxx saved the world !!!
I am not a DeSantis fan, but he has done some good things. One thing he did in 2020 was require testing labs to disclose how many PCR cycles they used to arrive at their result.
And what do ya know? Immediately thereafter, "Covid cases" in Florida dropped a bunch. Wow. Shocking.
I don't know who gave him the idea to do that, but someone might have known something.
Even worse, no virus has ever been isolated. The word "isolated" is misused by the fraudsters by re-defining the term.
"Gay" used to mean happy, now it means faggot.
"Vaccine" used to mean injecting a "live virus" (no such thing, it turns out) to protect against future infection. Now, it means injecting something into someone to reduce symptoms ... or "cases."
"Isolate" used to mean (and really still does) to separate from all other things. But to virologists, it means mixing it with other things, using a bogus process, and claiming that the end result proves the virus is real. If they take a sample from one person, they call that isolation because it was from one person. This is really dumb, but that's what they do.
Probably true. And almost everyone who "died of Covid" did so in a hospital. Nobody just dropped dead in a classroom or on a football field -- until the vaxx rollout.
Thus, helping to create more "cases."
True. But what passes for science today rarely ever uses the Scientific Method. Instead, they use "expert consensus" and "peer review" and "trust the science" and other such propaganda.
BINGO.
Regarding "viral" spread and contagious diseases...
I personally do not think that viruses are a culprit for illness. There is a lot more there, but this is a long comment- the research has been attempted for over a century since the "Spanish Flu", and people or animals do not get make one another sick with bodily fluids. In lab settings, adjuvants are required to make animals sick. Healthy animals cannot be made sick through proximity to unhealthy animals in lab settings. Many experiments also rely on extremely toxic "placebos" that cause allergic reactions in the subjects, and then the "test results" are compared to whatever difference occurs between the toxic placebo and the test.
Our bodies have various detox and healing responses with distinct symptoms and byproducts that are universal and can be tested. But it's a machine producing those byproducts, our very specialized cells are not "hijacked" and lose their essential functions in order to become "virus factories" and then return to their initial form and function suddenly when the "immune system wins". The whole setup is hogwash.
The simplest explanation is energy and electricity. We have energetic fields, and we know how they work in some very limited ways. If you're depressed, your dog knows to snuggle you. If your wife is seething mad about something, you can physically feel her anger and it generates anxiety in you until you deal with it. The female period sync has had a ton of investigation both ways and the general consensus is that it doesn't exist- but there is so much anecdotal evidence to this that I'm skeptical- but I don't use it as a hard piece of evidence. But we share energy, and that energy triggers an immune response- IF YOU NEED IT.
The best test case for this is Tuberculosis. TB is VERY CONTAGIOUS, but only in households where they cook or heat with fire indoors. The primary symptoms are that you cough until you're done- either by clearing out sufficient cumulative smoke inhalation or dying- and have general weakness/fever/chills. Westerners exposed to TB test positive for the rest of their lives (my Dad is one), but they do not get sick- not because they do not "contract" the illness, but rather because they do not generate one. TB has been eradicated from the First World without vaccines, but it is still deadly throughout the Third World.
Another is Hepatitis. You can get hepatitis from things like drug abuse, from drinking too much, from taking too much Tylenol. And the probability that someone tests positive after a Hepatitis needlestick is around 0.5%. The probability that a random person tests positive for Hepatitis is around 0.5%. If you are exposed to Hepatitis- of any form- and you do not have the precondition necessary to generate an immune response- which is simply Hepa (liver) and -titis (swelling/inflammation)- which is your body sending extra resources to your liver in order to process toxins more rapidly because of long-term cumulative toxic exposure, you are no more likely to get sick after a needlestick as you were before the needlestick. My Dad had an accidental needlestick from an unruly Hepatitis patient in the clinic like 15 years ago and had no issues at all.
When you get an AIDS test, you are asked lifestyle questions. Why?
The biggest indicator that disease is generated internally is that nearly every single blood test for illness is a population count, and not a test for the absolute presence of the contagion. You have e.coli, the problem is if you have too much. You have pneumococcal antibodies, the problem is if you have too many too recently. You have HPV, and a host of all manner of viruses and bacteria. If you look hard enough (or crank the cycles up enough times in Covid's case- and PCR can be magnified far more than 45 cycles), you can find anything in anyone.
"PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody... There's very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of in your body". -Kary Mullis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmZft4fXhQQ&ab_channel=EduardoCorrochio
By the way, the mechanism of death for Remdesivir is pretty straightforward.
It was a failed Ebola drug, and crazy toxic, killing around 50% people in the trial compared to the baseline 35%.
"Overall, about 50% of people who received either Zmapp or remdesivir died during the trial. In contrast, only about 35% of people who received either Mab114 or REGN-EB3 died. Three participants died of side effects thought to be related to treatment—two in the ZMapp group and one in the remdesivir group." https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/two-drugs-reduce-risk-death-ebola
When your kidneys are overloaded with something extremely toxic, they dump fluid into your lungs as an escape valve, kind of like how your gallbladder dumps bile into your liver to induce vomiting with food poisoning and to help break down excess toxins.
Remdesivir is wildly toxic and induces an extreme kidney response, often accompanied with kidney failure, and since "Covid" was classified a respiratory disease, worsening symptoms were treated with ventilation.
The problem with ventilation, aside from the extreme invasiveness (the general principle is to NEVER ventilate someone without an obstructed airway as it is so dangerous), is that it is so painful and uncomfortable that people have to be sedated with morphine or midazolam for it to work. And sedation prevents you from coughing out the crap that is filling your lungs because your kidneys are boxed. Additionally, with the "quarantine" measures, people were not being appropriately monitored and fluid was not being suctioned from their lungs because a "known" symptom was precipitously low O2 SATs. So their lungs fill up with fluid without any exit point, their blood oxygen dropped to nothing, and they drowned in their own fluids alone in a hospital room with nobody watching them and no family members in the room to raise the alarm.
Agreed.
And Fauci and CDC people should all be tried for manslaughter.
In case you are still reading this thread ...
That is a plausible theory.
The main problem we have today is: So many people have been indoctrinated into the false Germ Theory, that nobody is really testing other ideas to find out the root cause of illness(es).
If we had as much resources into other ideas as "germs," we would find some answers.
That indicates to me that it is the indoor fire that causes the problem, and not some communicable disease.
If I do indoor fires, and my whole family gets sick, and then my kids play outdoors with your kids or even in your house, but your kids don't get sick, then it probably means something is going on inside my house that causes the sickness.
Probably because we don't DO what they do.
Again, seems like an external toxic/poison that is causing it, and not a "virus."
I have read that Hep C is ususually something that happens to people with a lot of tattoos. The ink going into your bloodstream (or maybe just certain inks) cannot be healthy.
AIDS is not an illness. There is nothing specific about it. It is just a defninition.
The CDC has a list of 30+ illnesses (maybe more now, since I have not checked in years) that, if (a) you have one of them AND (b) you test positive for HIV, then you are diagnosed with AIDS.
If you have the illness but are HIV- (such as TB, which is on the list), then you "just" have TB. But if you have the illness and are HIV+, then the diagnosis is AIDS.
HIV is a retrovirus, and like ALL viruses has NEVER been isolated and purified, and there is no REAL evidence that it exists at all.
The "10-Year Study" was a study over 10 years of married couples, where one was HIV+ and the other was HIV-. During those 10 years, they had thousands of sexual acts with HIV+/HIV- and in 10 years, ZERO people who were HIV- because HIV+.
The test for HIV was the PCR test, which is NOT a real diagnostic tool. Since then, they have used Western Blot and other tests, all of which are fradulent as diagnostic tools.
Both HIV and AIDS are a scam for money. Neither exists. If you get a sickness that is listed on the CDC AIDS list, then yes, you are sick with that illness. But not AIDS.
The early AIDS patients in the 1980's were given AZT, an extremely toxic cancer drug that WILL kill you if you take it forever -- which is exactly what they were told to do.
Faggots in the West got weird sickness because they used nitrate poppers for loosening the anal muscles. They mixed these very toxic drugs with cocaine and other drugs to party all night, and they got sick from the drugs (not AIDS).
Africans, both male and female, got sick due to diseases of poverty and poor sanitation/hygene, and they got sick with different illnesses, but it became a gravy train for African countries to claim AIDS cases.
$$$$$
Right. They ALWAYS use some sort of surrogate method rather than simply finding that actual culprit.
I think illness is created by toxins and poisons, primarily the food/drink we consume, but also these other external influences, some of which are likely EMF's, radiation, etc.
Even Mullis himself might not have fully realized -- but it has been shown since -- that PCR itself CREATES additional DNA fragments, which when aligned with primers and then compared with an ever-growing database of so-called harmful pathogens, can be found to be a "match" for something bad in that database.
This is why they want the MRNA method of creating "vaccines." It is so they can claim that anyone has anything, and it can be treated with a custom MRNA injection.
Big money and big control.
What makes you think that?