WEF Pushes Ban on Home-Grown Food to ‘Fight Climate Change’
🤡 CLIMATE CONTROL 🤡
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Source for "The World Economic Forum (WEF) is calling on governments to ban the general public from growing their own food at home" ?
I see the research study linked, but I dont see any sauce for anyone from WEF saying what the title claims.
This seems to be yet another source-less clickbait site like warned by u/Fatality?
Calling our resident fact checker u/FractalizingIron too!
Note: Claiming "WEF said this" or "WEF said that" seems to be a favorite way of pushing disinfo by these sites, and this one fits the bill.
Note to the Bubble:
Please, "fact checker" and "Fact check" is a narrative creation of the Cabal (around 2015) in their preparation for building the Censorship Industrial Complex.
note the double meaning, too.
Check 1) Verify vs. Check 2) hold back, stop or slow the progress of something
Thus, "fact check" also has the potential meaning of "prevent the facts from getting out there".
As a linguist and an anon, I can see how the narrative war is waged, partly by introducing memetic concepts so that they take hold in popular consciousness. When they do, they advance the narrative agenda.
Examples:
"Right side of history" - popularized by Barak Obama - Bust: there is no 'right side of history' except in the relativistic, humanistic "winner is always right". It's good vs evil.
"Capitalism" - popularized (made mainsteam) by Marx / Engels - Bust; Capitalism actually means concentration of capital in greater and greater concentration. Money and capital define the framework. But Hayek talks about "free market economies" where participants are free to make choices. That's what we want, but people continue to use the term defined by and large via Marx, thus playing on Marx's battlefield under his terms.
It's not capitalism vs Communism (Marx): its free market economy vs govt controlled economy (communism is not shared economy, it is economy concentrated in the central power, i.e. capitalism).
I belabor the point, but please, not "fact checker" (ugh)
If anything, I'm a simple information and data investigator!!! Possibly a "narrative buster"?
Well spotted. A good red flag, BB.
I can see why the dirty word "fact checker" would make you cringe so much. I like the "narrative buster" - good replacement.
kek. Thanks BB!
PS. Thank for linking me in to that thread. It became a good source of inspiration, so I made a post of the research:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17shvnzKTQ/know-your-disinfo--know-your-cli/
A bit cluttered, but the idea is to present an applicable simple methodology that pedes can use to check their sauces. Stickworthy, nest ce pas?
Actually its Federal Reserve controlled economy vs Commmitteee controlled economy!
Haha. Yeah, but I mean what we want is a free market economy, not a govt or other centralized control economy.
Yeah, what we want we havent gotten yet. We will though.
^ removal reason..
newsaddicts.com says this: conducted by WEF-funded scientists at the University of Michigan, was published in the journal Nature Cities. but it doesn't link to that.. and lo behold Nature Cities is a new monthly, online journal to be launched in January 2024.
You're going to need better sauce than this u/winn and that's 28d
I'm surprised, cos u/winn has been a stalwart supporter in my digs regarding TPV. Hmmm....
Still am fren, I feel like a complete idiot for this lol. I gotta do better
Did you get el bannerino from Fat?
I think you've shown enough good faith that it might be reconsidered. Maybe a rap on the knuckles, but....
I did, got my 1 warning. Got to be vigilant now!
Well technically I got a 4 week ban but when I sent the remaining context that my dumbass forgot to post before I went to the grocery, they let me off with a warning
Cool. I'm glad Fatality is bringing the hammer, but fair warning is warranted too.
yep I'd have banned my own ass too
Crock of 🐴 💩
They want you totally dependent on them so you can eat the bugs.
Plus I don’t want to eat the food they’ve possibly altered/ “infected / injected all kinds of mean nasty stuff “ ( a take from Alice’s Restaurant) 😂
Love it!
I listen to Alice's Restaurant every Thanksgiving!
Just when you think they could not be more insane.
If you plant a seed to the ground, water and compost the seedling, grow it into a veg, pick it and eat it, then that is worse for the environment, than if the plant is grown in a huge field, treated with whatever, and transported multiple times before eating?
Also, what they want is to starve all of us.
And once again, I'm glad I don't live in a city.
Hahahahahaha they can suck so much dick, as always this will not go well for them.
YOU FIRST, WEF members:
Read more response: so as a fellow Washingtonian and Bill gates sun blocking sh1t. MFr better run that by Joe and his Solar power Green BS. They knock out the gas and coal, then they block the sun. Leaves wind and dams to provide the power, wood for heating. MFrs better put us all back in Kenya with Big O and Mike. Before it gets to this it’ll be a FAFO moment. There’s more of us then them.
Hmmm....
Note: The following is a cursory review using a few (not extensive) resources.
Step One: search for same text from other publications > attempt to find original source or verify that the article / text is original here.
=
Almost identical text found published on "News Addicts" (N/A)
https://newsaddicts.com/wef-warns-home-grown-food-causes-climate-change-demands-ban/
Slay date: March 1, 2024 vs. N/A date: February 3, 2024
Step Two: verify or investigate authors > check avatars, names, etc.
=
Slay author : Frank Bergman
https://slaynews.com/author/frank-bergman/
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8cba3174a095e11a787c2b1268dc9916?s=100&d=mm&r=g
No other images on web for "Frank Bergman" with any journalist connection.... "writer" "slay" "author"
N/A author : Hunter Fielding
https://newsaddicts.com/author/hunterfielding/
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d0285a67d14cc3301b877cc335719bc1?s=100&d=mm&r=g
No other images on web for "Hunter Fielding" with any journalist connection, including "writer" "news addicts" "author"
DATA:
Both identities use https://gravatar.com/ for their avatar.
Neither avatar appears anywhere else on the web (source: google, tineye)
Bergman has a very generic "blurb" for his profile in addition to stories he 'authored', no concrete information or data provided. In other words, he is anonymous.
Fielding has no blurb at all for his profile, only stories he 'authored'. Anonymous.
Step Three: Investigate publishing bodies
Slay News
https://who.is/whois/slaynews.com
Registered 2021-10-30
Check registering provider using TUCOWS, INC. (http://tucowsdomains.com) >
Registration Service Provider: Fasthosts Internet Limited [email protected] +44.3330142700 http://www.Fasthosts.co.uk
Contact, admin : Great Britain, East Sussex.
Name Servers based in the UK : livedns.co.uk
Address on website: 63 Us Hwy #21 Jonesville, North Carolina(NC), 28642
Google maps
Note: From memory, I have seen this address and location before, including street view, in digging into TPV, NewsPunch etc.
News Addicts
https://who.is/whois/newsaddicts.com
Check registering provider using TUCOWS, INC. (http://tucowsdomains.com) >
Registration Service Provider: Fasthosts Internet Limited [email protected] +44.3330142700 http://www.Fasthosts.co.uk
Contact, Admin : Great Britain, East Sussex
Address on Website: P.O. Box 20989 West Palm Beach Florida 33416
Tel: 561-686-1165
SEARCH Address:
belongs to Newsmax (Google)
https://www.newsmax.com/contact/
Newsmax Tel: 561-686-1165
Questions:
Who uses anonymous avatars and profiles with zero concrete information or verifiable sources, but presents themselves as "journalists" writing articles on publications presenting themselves as legitimate sources of news?
Who copies texts from other 'authors' but presents it as their own, with little or zero modification, etc?
What publications paint themselves as "pro-american, patriotic, American values," describe themselves as "the world’s leading independent media source for political news junkies" (N/A) and "one of the nation’s fastest-growing alternative media companies" (Slay News), and are "designed for patriots" (N/A) and "promises to always prioritize its most valuable asset – our readers"?
Sauce: https://slaynews.com/about-us/ https://newsaddicts.com/about-news-addicts/
What publications would provide a fake or false address and contact information in the US, while being based overseas (i.e. UK)?
Is there a pattern or are there patterns of activity/behavior similar or identical between these two 'sauces'? (hint: yes)
I'll dig in more on the Slay Address, as I have seen it before, somewhere (but not related to Slay).
Conclusions
Often, the first place to start myth-busting disinfo or clickbait operations is to check their details, looking for hints of legitimacy or otherwise.
Often, even a cursory check can turn up red flags that make it easy to bring the information being published into doubt. Remember, the BEST disinfo always combines X amount (larger amount, normally) of truth with Y amount of disinfo.
Disinfo is most effectively delivered by wrapping it up in a bundle of seemingly legitimate information, in order to disguise the disinfo.
In addition, information that is presented while appealing to people's emotional biases (aka "We're patriots!) often seeks to circumvent otherwise critical thinking.
I think the data re: these two publications is pretty damning, to start with. So who do you think they are, and what do you think their motive is? To spread the truth?
Think about it.
Addendum: obviously, one might go into the text itself to check the information and see how robust it is (sauces, reasoning, style, information), but given what I've found here, BOTH these websites would go on my Red Flag list, and be treated as hostile until proven otherwise.
Also: we are anonymous here, but we do not present ourselves as anything other than anonymous. Who is anonymous but at the same time presents themselves as not anonymous? Why?
u/Fatality u/bubble_bursts u/winn
Edit: small modifications, formatting
They got me good with this, I can see the circular reporting between the two now that I think on it, never heard of either of these and they linked back to this:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/22/carbon-footprint-homegrown-food-allotment-increase/
Which certainly seems like a pre-cursor to WEF official policy in a few years as they ramp up their climate crap. (tho I could not locate the actual study I also didn't look for it very hard, was on the run. Note to self don't post from new sources while on the run! kek
I found where I saw the fake SLAY address before. It was here:
https://demo.hashthemes.com/viral-mag/news/
I'm pretty sure I found that when investigating the (bogus, imo) Son of WEF co-founder narrative that came out a few weeks ago, but I'm not certain at this point (only that I had seen it previously).
The Viral Mag thing follows the pattern of Newspunch and also CNBCUS, which Present themselves (originally) as a legit general news or interest website, before then being used for disinfo deployments.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240127123325/https://cnbcusa.com/
This website lasted from late 2021 to last month, when it published "Pascal Najadi" piece. The Najadi identity burst on to the scene one or two months prior, and displayed close connections with the guy who has been ripping of Patel Patriots research and presenting it as his own.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240127123207/https://cnbcusa.com/world-news/pascal-najadi-global-us-military-operation-storm-reality-in-2024/
CNBCUSA.com is now gone. I suspect they came to the attention of CNBC and got shut down.
I see a consistent pattern of disinfo websites being established in one form and then later activated as if on a mission.
I remember that CNBCUSA! I reported it to CNBC kek! With all the fake news we can't be havin fake fake news. Now I'm curious if they still have their Instagram acct
You may have single-handedly taken down the CNBCUSA operation!!!
And I agree. "can't be havin fake fake news" Fake news is having enough trouble already, without fake, fake news.
PS. The rubric is classic NewsPunch style: Bogus sensationalist headline, 2-3 sentences with bold but sourceless assertions about <despised group/individual>, then copy/paste or presentation of actual legitimate information.
If it wasn't for the publication title and different formatting of the website, I say this was Al-tabooli Newspunch (or Baxter) for sure. Same pattern, 100%.
i mean, "WEF-funded scientists at the University of Michigan". Er, really? WEF-Funded? I mean, he might be, but where is the evidence?
Now I'm gonna go look into the people who did the study, if I can find the damn thing. So irritating these stories dont link the actual study
found it https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-023-00023-3
it looks they don't list the funding for the study, of course not why would they.
about to read yours, I meant to include this with op. Should definitely have done more digging on it and altered the way it was presented. Sorry again!
WEF gardening bunarchived some just in case they try to 180 and say home gardens are bad for the climate. There may be more but this was what I found on first 4 pages of search engine.
https://archive.fo/RA6ii These bus stops are a sanctuary for bees
https://archive.fo/SlZ5r How gardens can boost biodiversity and help tackle climate change
https://archive.fo/qBDCo Community gardens boost well-being and biodiversity
https://archive.fo/WuV5U Rooftop gardens can help alleviate heat in cities, study finds
https://archive.fo/eebhH Why urban gardens are a lifeline for the world's pollinators
https://archive.fo/S2swn The mini-gardens cheering up London's commuters?
https://archive.fo/3wUgM How Mexico is protecting its hummingbird population
https://archive.fo/gIWHY Community gardens can fight food insecurity and boost tolerance
https://archive.fo/AQeZv Experts think putting plants in your garden could be as effective as mindfulness at reducing stress
https://archive.fo/pF3Gv Grow your own: Urban farming is flourishing during the coronavirus lockdowns
https://archive.fo/WJ8d4 Pollinators are struggling to survive - these gardening tips can help them
https://archive.fo/ky6di This is how to reap the benefits of making our cities greener
https://archive.fo/sLZPl What are the UN's plans for developing and managing more urban forests
https://archive.fo/zlgiF Cities are warming 29% faster than rural areas. Could urban greening? fix this?
It may not be on the WEF website, but can see them potentially gearing up towards this. archived a bunch of WEF shit just in case they go through with it later, for DefiantL's and such.
This
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/22/carbon-footprint-homegrown-food-allotment-increase/
"The study, published in the journal Nature Cities, recruited 73 urban agriculture sites around the world, including Europe, the US, and the UK, and conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment on the site's infrastructure, irrigation and supplies.
Fruit was found to be 8.6 times more eco-friendly when grown conventionally compared to in a city, whereas vegetables were 5.8 times better for the environment when left to the professionals.
But some crops have a lower carbon footprint than others and can help green-fingered members of the public make their allotment or garden better for the environment.
Tomatoes grown domestically, for example, have a lower carbon footprint than conventional farming, as does asparagus.
A serving of urban tomatoes makes, on average, 0.17kg of CO2, compared to 0.27kg in a conventional farm which would use an energy-intensive greenhouse. Likewise asparagus, which is most often flown in from abroad and thousands of air miles, is a source of large carbon emissions if grown conventionally."
So at a minimum, they may try to choose what you can grow and what you cannot. Or so they would like