Jury instructions are one of the major ways in how corrupt judges compromise judicial integrity in a jury trial. Now its going to bite them back in their asses.
That's a great question! Trump has said/asked several times when referring to Jack Smith "what's his real name?" so you know there's something there; Trump didn't ask that repeatedly for no reason.
They had dirt on Fani, and I bet they have dirt on Smith, Bragg, and Engeron as well, because I tend to believe that "we have it all."
If it'sa personal note, the jury has no right to view it. If it's classified, the jury has no right to view it without the proper clearances. Sounds like Cannon isn't seeing any crime being committed here based on the evidence presented and is asking a fundamental question regarding the jury's ability to view said evidence. Which is what I think the real question is with regards to investigating a former POTUS and is one of the reasons why a sitting POTUS isn't allowed to be investigated for any potential crimes they may or may not have committed. "Show me the man and I'll show you the crimes he's committed" IS NOT a valid prosecutoeial position, but Cannon is still willing to entertain a trial...most likely for the "show" if it.
...but Cannon is still willing to entertain a trial...most likely for the "show" if it.
Think in terms of Double Jeopardy. If it goes in front of a jury, judge can then rule case dismissed with prejudice if prosecution cannot provide the jury with evidence of a crime, as in, let them see the files and determine if they are covered under the Presidential Records Act or the charges under the Espionage Act can stand. Cabal does not want the contents of the docs made public because it probably implicates THEM. If Smith won't allow the jury to see the docs, case dismissed with prejudice...meaning those charges cannot be filed again. No appeal process for Smith to pursue. Done, Finito, Kaput.
Didn't Trump say he declassified all the documents he took home before he left the WH? So, if that's true, then why wouldn't the jury be able to view the documents? Kek... because Smith and the cabal don't want anyone to view those documents.
Jack Smith needs to pretend that the Presidential Records Act doesn’t say what it says. The President decides what records to keep before leaving office, not Archive officials or Jack Smith. Any disagreements are civil matters settled by a federal judge.
Yep, and thats what it will be. They will be handed a box of crayons to eat threwout the trial. Then 12 ballots will be cast, just like the election. Fake and ghey
a) means that other people than the ex-president must be able to examine the presidential records that are whisked away at the end of the presidency.
OK then, let's open the Bush, Clinton, Obama and Biden libraries. Let the sunshine in, so to speak. Trump wins [check-mate]. No, they won't want that. That would be weird, and possibly dangerous, in case of exposure, and future, country-splitting, ugly lawsuits.
b) means that Presidents retain their authority to decide for themselves what is private or not, and whoops ... JAck loses standing, and Trump wins [also check-mate]. They didn't mean THAAAT.
LOLOL this is the nature of bringing fraudulent lawsuits to try and tamper with an election.
Jury instructions are one of the major ways in how corrupt judges compromise judicial integrity in a jury trial. Now its going to bite them back in their asses.
Really, that concept is so contrary to the point of a jury of your peers and I dislike that it has become that in my lifetime.
Jury nullification is the answer to all this nonsense.
How about the instruction of 'Produce ANY proof of a crime by Trump Now or go to prison'?
Was it EVER Jack from twitter? Or has it always been jack smith..? just asking for a friend.
That is a gude kwestion.
That's a great question! Trump has said/asked several times when referring to Jack Smith "what's his real name?" so you know there's something there; Trump didn't ask that repeatedly for no reason.
They had dirt on Fani, and I bet they have dirt on Smith, Bragg, and Engeron as well, because I tend to believe that "we have it all."
If it'sa personal note, the jury has no right to view it. If it's classified, the jury has no right to view it without the proper clearances. Sounds like Cannon isn't seeing any crime being committed here based on the evidence presented and is asking a fundamental question regarding the jury's ability to view said evidence. Which is what I think the real question is with regards to investigating a former POTUS and is one of the reasons why a sitting POTUS isn't allowed to be investigated for any potential crimes they may or may not have committed. "Show me the man and I'll show you the crimes he's committed" IS NOT a valid prosecutoeial position, but Cannon is still willing to entertain a trial...most likely for the "show" if it.
Think in terms of Double Jeopardy. If it goes in front of a jury, judge can then rule case dismissed with prejudice if prosecution cannot provide the jury with evidence of a crime, as in, let them see the files and determine if they are covered under the Presidential Records Act or the charges under the Espionage Act can stand. Cabal does not want the contents of the docs made public because it probably implicates THEM. If Smith won't allow the jury to see the docs, case dismissed with prejudice...meaning those charges cannot be filed again. No appeal process for Smith to pursue. Done, Finito, Kaput.
Didn't Trump say he declassified all the documents he took home before he left the WH? So, if that's true, then why wouldn't the jury be able to view the documents? Kek... because Smith and the cabal don't want anyone to view those documents.
Truer words never spoken.
Jack Smith needs to pretend that the Presidential Records Act doesn’t say what it says. The President decides what records to keep before leaving office, not Archive officials or Jack Smith. Any disagreements are civil matters settled by a federal judge.
I like your style
Thanks fren. Nice Pepe, wish I had one...
I agree with this. So what is the judge doing?
One thing that occurred to me is this might just be a way to delay because she is asking them to write up replies.
If she comes back and says jurors can read classified info, it's going to be appealed. It's eating up time
TGP Story on it.
Cope and seethe you fucktard wannabe marxists. Teflon Don FTW, faggots.
Oh noooooo. We need lots of black lines on paper.
No more black lines to hide evidence.
Depends on if there are a bunch of psycho leftists on the jury or not. It’s not like they’d have any sense of integrity.
Yep, and thats what it will be. They will be handed a box of crayons to eat threwout the trial. Then 12 ballots will be cast, just like the election. Fake and ghey
We have to also think of the ramifications:
a) means that other people than the ex-president must be able to examine the presidential records that are whisked away at the end of the presidency.
OK then, let's open the Bush, Clinton, Obama and Biden libraries. Let the sunshine in, so to speak. Trump wins [check-mate]. No, they won't want that. That would be weird, and possibly dangerous, in case of exposure, and future, country-splitting, ugly lawsuits.
b) means that Presidents retain their authority to decide for themselves what is private or not, and whoops ... JAck loses standing, and Trump wins [also check-mate]. They didn't mean THAAAT.
LOLOL this is the nature of bringing fraudulent lawsuits to try and tamper with an election.