Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

184
💥👹⚖️ The meltdown is on. Why? As one J6 defense attorney just said to me—“if Cannon gives these jury instructions, [Jack] Smith is f_cked.” Final jury instructions are well within the purview of the court. [If Norm Eisen is pissed, I'm Happy!] 💥👹⚖️ (twitter.com) 😭 Tears of Democrats 😂
posted 1 year ago by MAGA_Patriot_1776 1 year ago by MAGA_Patriot_1776 +184 / -0
23 comments share
23 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 21 ▼
– bubble_bursts 21 points 1 year ago +21 / -0

Jury instructions are one of the major ways in how corrupt judges compromise judicial integrity in a jury trial. Now its going to bite them back in their asses.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Wtf_socialismreally 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Really, that concept is so contrary to the point of a jury of your peers and I dislike that it has become that in my lifetime.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– PlumberFag 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Jury nullification is the answer to all this nonsense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– BufordXL 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

How about the instruction of 'Produce ANY proof of a crime by Trump Now or go to prison'?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– TrumpFan2000 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

Was it EVER Jack from twitter? Or has it always been jack smith..? just asking for a friend.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Sadness 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

That is a gude kwestion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FuckNewsom 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That's a great question! Trump has said/asked several times when referring to Jack Smith "what's his real name?" so you know there's something there; Trump didn't ask that repeatedly for no reason.

They had dirt on Fani, and I bet they have dirt on Smith, Bragg, and Engeron as well, because I tend to believe that "we have it all."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SuckaFree 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

If it'sa personal note, the jury has no right to view it. If it's classified, the jury has no right to view it without the proper clearances. Sounds like Cannon isn't seeing any crime being committed here based on the evidence presented and is asking a fundamental question regarding the jury's ability to view said evidence. Which is what I think the real question is with regards to investigating a former POTUS and is one of the reasons why a sitting POTUS isn't allowed to be investigated for any potential crimes they may or may not have committed. "Show me the man and I'll show you the crimes he's committed" IS NOT a valid prosecutoeial position, but Cannon is still willing to entertain a trial...most likely for the "show" if it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Red_Pill_Pusher_Man 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

...but Cannon is still willing to entertain a trial...most likely for the "show" if it.

Think in terms of Double Jeopardy. If it goes in front of a jury, judge can then rule case dismissed with prejudice if prosecution cannot provide the jury with evidence of a crime, as in, let them see the files and determine if they are covered under the Presidential Records Act or the charges under the Espionage Act can stand. Cabal does not want the contents of the docs made public because it probably implicates THEM. If Smith won't allow the jury to see the docs, case dismissed with prejudice...meaning those charges cannot be filed again. No appeal process for Smith to pursue. Done, Finito, Kaput.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– GDZeus 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Didn't Trump say he declassified all the documents he took home before he left the WH? So, if that's true, then why wouldn't the jury be able to view the documents? Kek... because Smith and the cabal don't want anyone to view those documents.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Red_Pill_Pusher_Man 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Truer words never spoken.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dbsupernova 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Jack Smith needs to pretend that the Presidential Records Act doesn’t say what it says. The President decides what records to keep before leaving office, not Archive officials or Jack Smith. Any disagreements are civil matters settled by a federal judge.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– NOTWOKE 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I like your style

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Red_Pill_Pusher_Man 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Thanks fren. Nice Pepe, wish I had one...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WHOSkiddingWhO 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

If it'sa personal note, the jury has no right to view it. If it's classified, the jury has no right to view it without the proper clearances.

I agree with this. So what is the judge doing?

One thing that occurred to me is this might just be a way to delay because she is asking them to write up replies.

If she comes back and says jurors can read classified info, it's going to be appealed. It's eating up time

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– MAGA_Patriot_1776 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

TGP Story on it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Fucklibswithcactus 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Cope and seethe you fucktard wannabe marxists. Teflon Don FTW, faggots.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mehocmehogan 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Oh noooooo. We need lots of black lines on paper.

No more black lines to hide evidence.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AmazingFlightLizard 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Depends on if there are a bunch of psycho leftists on the jury or not. It’s not like they’d have any sense of integrity.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

We have to also think of the ramifications:

a) means that other people than the ex-president must be able to examine the presidential records that are whisked away at the end of the presidency.

OK then, let's open the Bush, Clinton, Obama and Biden libraries. Let the sunshine in, so to speak. Trump wins [check-mate]. No, they won't want that. That would be weird, and possibly dangerous, in case of exposure, and future, country-splitting, ugly lawsuits.

b) means that Presidents retain their authority to decide for themselves what is private or not, and whoops ... JAck loses standing, and Trump wins [also check-mate]. They didn't mean THAAAT.

LOLOL this is the nature of bringing fraudulent lawsuits to try and tamper with an election.

permalink save report block reply

Welcome

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield - Together We Win

Rules

Q Supporters:
This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"

Follow the Law:
No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!

No Bad Behavior!
No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!

Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].

No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion:
Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.

Questions and Concerns: All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.

Expand your thinking:
Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Topics related to flat earth theory, faked moon landings, and chemtrails are explicitly prohibited on The Great Awakening. Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!

No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD. If you can't use common sense you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding. Q said "We are saving Israel for last," and so are we. And if you're a tard, oh, man.

General Rules:

-Mods used to issue warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. We don't, anymore. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current. We try to keep an open mind, but... c'mon.

-Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum. No crap, off-topic memes

-HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait. Keep your comments high effort. No BS.

-No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, frogs!

-Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info trash, pls. Excessive, low-effort posting may earn users vacations!

-Keep it honest and accurate.

-Patriots.win / Q Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, this train still has no brakes.)

-Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their command of Q, sincerity, and respect to others.

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING! (Hi, Mike! You LOSER!)

Resources

  • WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD
  • "River of Search" script:
  • GAW post formatting tips
  • Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)
  • Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4
  • Browse Drops from the beginning
  • QProofs.com
  • Learn to read the Q map
  • Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)
  • Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources
  • Trumps twitter archive
  • POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm
  • Pedosta and DNC dumps
  • GIFs & QPosts
  • Poll Post Format
  • SPY ON US! See: mod Logs
  • The Greatest Show on Earth!
  • New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?" DO NOT MISS THIS PODCAST!

Disclaimer

Posts and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the GreatAwakening.win or Patriots.win administration.

Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 6 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nndt7 (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy