When the '24 election is over, the flotsam swept out, leaving a 2/3 majority in each house, I want at least one constitutional amendment, that penalizes any gov't employee, permanent or temporary, while under court or congressional subpoena or warrant, who invokes the 5th amendment while discussing his/her official duties, is immediately fired, any/all pension credits are lost/zeroed out, any earned pension revoked, and is forbidden from serving in any elected or appointed position for the rest of their natural life.
The last two questions were 'did you violate any canons of legal ETHICS'?
He therefore couldn't have legally incriminated himself, only ethically incriminated himself.
For that reason, I don't think he should have been able to plead the 5th for those questions.
Also, in order to plead the fifth, he is admitting that he did something wrong (but not providing evidence). The underlying prosecution should be thrown out - with legal fees to Trump reimbursed BY POMERANZ.
We might like to remember that the right to not incriminate oneself is one of our unalienable rights enumerated in the Fifth Amendment. President Trump used that right innumerable times when being questioned by the Marxists demons.
Remove and disbar
How about I knock your fucking teeth out?
"The same response."
Disbar and prison for 20 years.
When the '24 election is over, the flotsam swept out, leaving a 2/3 majority in each house, I want at least one constitutional amendment, that penalizes any gov't employee, permanent or temporary, while under court or congressional subpoena or warrant, who invokes the 5th amendment while discussing his/her official duties, is immediately fired, any/all pension credits are lost/zeroed out, any earned pension revoked, and is forbidden from serving in any elected or appointed position for the rest of their natural life.
Also held in jail for contempt if asked by Congress or any court until they answer the question.
Wait, it’s possible to invoke an amendment that says I cannot avow my crimes lest I would be condemned? 😳
That is not what it says.
Yes.
The last two questions were 'did you violate any canons of legal ETHICS'?
He therefore couldn't have legally incriminated himself, only ethically incriminated himself.
For that reason, I don't think he should have been able to plead the 5th for those questions.
Also, in order to plead the fifth, he is admitting that he did something wrong (but not providing evidence). The underlying prosecution should be thrown out - with legal fees to Trump reimbursed BY POMERANZ.
Not only breaking the law investigating Trump, but ANY law while he was in practice. Tell me you’re guilty, without telling me you’re guilty.
…..same response.
Objection! Objection! Objection!
Screams guilty to me.
Usually we hear “I do not remember” to every question
Script change
I'm surprised the judge let him get away with this "same response" answer for every question. Can't the judge make him answer?
A 72 year old demonrat in the sewers of New York. Go figure lol
I bet he did hours of prep for that! At least he isn't lying by saying "no".
We might like to remember that the right to not incriminate oneself is one of our unalienable rights enumerated in the Fifth Amendment. President Trump used that right innumerable times when being questioned by the Marxists demons.