President Trump Calls For Jack Smith to be Arrested After Special Counsel Admits HE LIED TO THE COURT About Classified Docs Seiz...
President Trump this weekend called for Jack Smith to be arrested after the Special Counsel admitted in a court filing that he lied to the court about the classified documents seized from Mar-a-Lago.
"Fraud on the Court" is where any officer of the court (attorney or judge) makes any misleading statement that is used by the judge in rendering an opinion.
If Fraud on the Court occurs, it results in a void judgement, which can be overturned by the offended party in a new lawsuit.
Here, the fraud revolves around the evidence presented by the prosecution. With tainted evidence, there is no evidence at all. The judge has no choice but to dismiss the case.
And yes, Jack Smith should be arrested -- by Florida officials, because the crime occurred in Florida.
Of course, the feds will claim that Smith is a federal prosecutor, so it is a federal issue ... BUT ... Smith was never lawfully granted federal authority over this case, and so he has been acting in his own personal capacity, egaging in fraud in the State of Florida.
Will DeSantis have the balls to do it?
That would be a good, redeeming move for DeSantis...
Yes it would. Enough? Probably not, but a great start!
Snowball effect.....
Until the final credits roll we don't know who the white hats and black hats actually are. DeSantis may just be following his script in this drama - and doing it well!
How cool that would be. But, if DeSantis doesn't do it, it shows him as the RINO dumbass we have figured him out to be.
Given that we have yet to have a trial. Are we at this stage yet?
What evidence was tainted? I couldn't follow that article as it was confusing several things including classified cover sheets and placeholder slip sheets.
Evidence from Mar a lago was tampered with and then prosecutors lied to the judge about it. I believe it was Walt Nuatas attorney who brought this to light when he couldnt cross reference what was there with the logs of what should be there.
Is Nauta's attorney claiming a "fraud on the court" because it seems we might be going further than the people actually familiar with the facts.
I think what is being described is tampering with evidence.
I was able to find the motion with the footnote and read it, but haven't found Nauta's original filing, but it appears all he is asking for is more time. He's not claiming some grand big thing.
The deadline is next week. So we will see if the judge grants more time or something else.
The trial date is still set to later this month. She has yet to move it
I didnt say Nuatas lawyer is claiming anything. All he said is that when he tried to cross reference he was stymied. It is others claiming evidence tampering because what Nuatas attorney is describing is exactly that.
Yes, I think other people are exaggerating the extent of the "tampering" but I only read one side which is why I want read what Nauta's lawyers said.
👍 👍
God bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too.🙏
God bless you, moosemeadow!
I like your version of inclusivity.
More than old Smitty needs arresting! Start with entire executive branch of corruptocrats.
If there is going to be live video streaming of the Evil Sci-Fi Guy getting arrested, the Trump people should announce it in advance. That's the only way we could possibly get the popcorn in time.
What exactly was the lie here? From reading the notes of the motion it seems like he originally claimed that all of the evidence presented was
“in their original, intact form as seized” by stating “[t]hey are, with one exception; and that is that the classified documents have been removed and placeholders have been put in the documents”
Based on what I read, the only thing different was that all of the documents were kept in the boxes they were in, but that some of the stuff had shifted when it was moved so it was out of order so not technically "in their original, intact form as seized". I don't know if I'd call that a lie , and it definitely doesn't seem like something Judge Cannon would do anything about. According to the actual motion, the defense has access to all of the files so they should be able to tell if anything is missing but they aren't saying it is. Honestly this really looks like not a big deal if you actually read the motion.
Bless your heart.
Care to tell me where I'm wrong in the comment? I've seen this a couple times from the gateway pundit where their headline says one thing but the story is completely different. I don't trust them as a source anymore and it bothers me every time I see them at the top of the page here.
Why don’t his lawyers call smith to the stand under oath about it and either have him admit the lie or lie some more?
First arrest...
The day he is will be a great day.
Yes, arrest Jack Smith ASAP!