I couldnt' figure out why election fraud was mentioned in a stormy daniels hush money case much older than 2020. DA bragg argued the hush money was election fraud in 2016 because the revelation could have altered the 2016 election, and so it was a cover up.
This argument has now established precedent for another Trump supportive DA to bring a case against Hunter Biden and the 51 ex-intelligence officers who false-testified that the Biden laptop was 'Russian disinformation' which absolutely would have swayed the election since we have exit polls showing exactly that it would have. Therefore, covering up the hunter laptop story was willful attempt to sway the election--which it did--in 2020; The judicial precedent of this Trump case is going to be used against Hunter.
This happens via Stare Decisis and judicia Precedent
In the American legal system, stare decisis, or the doctrine of precedent, holds that courts should follow established precedents in similar cases.
Braggs case is unique and if it stands they've basically decimated the law and will make it so Rs that grow a pair can do this back to democrats.
They should start now though.
THEY SHOULD START NOW THOUGH.
I'm wanting murder charges against Obama!!
Now we can do it. Thanks democrats lol
Only our charges and trials will have actual facts, evidence, and true verdicts-using people with common sense and intelligence-not "elites" who hold grudges against political enemies.
Does a “Republican/MAGA DA” exist? Looking forward to this.
Only MAGA Attorney General I can think of is Ken Paxton in TX.
Missouri AG Andrew Bailey is another.
We only need 1. But i wanna say the red states supporting texas border politics are also onboard
Jeff Landry of Louisiana is also possible.
Keep naming them you guys
We need to contact their offices and ask them to prosecute the 51 ex-intelligence officials for meddling in the 2020 election
Deep-red Tennessee has an AG with a serious case of pedoface, so I don’t think we’ll get any help there.
How does precedent work if cases get overturned on appeal, a very likely scenario?
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDO IT...just do it
They always could. Laws apply whether you make a big show of them in public or not.
One of the 51 was on the news, he said "Learn how to Read" all we said was earmarked like russian disinfo?
What about Hillary?
If Trump committed 34 felonies in a document error to interfere in the 2016 election - what did Hillary do when she deleted a whole server filled with classified information, smashed laptops & cells phones and also assassinated Seth Rich?
Oh... remember when Comey said that no one would reasonably prosecute that?
But here we are on much less of an issue finding 34 felonies which could equal over a hundred years in prison.
Statute of limitations
The 51 ex-intel are still game
It was with a cloth or something.
I can't remember who it was, but I did see one of the lawfare bigwigs saying this verdict is proof that Trump committed election fraud in 2016.
They don't know what they are talking about
Of course, but it goes to your point about precedence.