Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

63
Brian Cates with a compelling argument about if the Dems want to replace Bidan, they better do it soon (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by Excelsior 2 years ago by Excelsior +63 / -0
18 comments share
18 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (18)
sorted by:
▲ 12 ▼
– hothousecreekguy 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

"not allowed by law"...we all know that the crooks in DC right now do not follow laws. If they want to replace him and give all the money to another campaign, they won't worry for a split second whether or not it is allowed by law.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

← This many anons understand the cabal puppets of the deepstate don't play by the rules;

that they will use or create loopholes to get that money to whomever, whenever they wish;

that the feds will shut up and focus on prosecuting imagined crimes of Republicans;

and that the democrat candidate, whoever it is, will be declared the winner of the election.

The explanation will be that people easily gravitated toward someone new and younger, instead of voting for the ancient convicted felon.

And that explanation will be swallowed whole by all non-Trump voters.

(Then the White Hats will do whatever they're going to do, and in all likelihood Trump will still get in office somehow :)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Excelsior [S] 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit @drawandstrike If they try to swap out Biden, THEY BETTER HURRY.

There’d be a lot more work to do besides just updating all the 3,000+ county ballot info before they are printed.

This is the one thing most people don’t understand.

The Biden campaign IS NOT ALLOWED to simply HAND ALL THE MONEY IT RAISED to whoever replaces him if he bows out of the race.

As a member of the Biden campaign team, MAYBE Harris could claim it. But Newsom or someone who was never on the Biden campaign team? They can’t have that money.

So if it’s NOT Harris?

THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO LAUNCH A COMPLETELY NEW PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN TEAM FROM SCRATCH.

I mean that.

FROM SCRATCH. With $0 cash on hand. They have to start the fundraising all over again.

People have this fantasy idea that all the Biden campaign $$$ and personnel would just be swapped over to the new campaign team.

That’s…not how it works.

You are NOT ALLOWED by law to raise money for one particular political candidate and then hand it over to a different candidate. THE FEC WOULD STOP YOU if you were brazen enough to try this.

Wire fraud is illegal. Look it up. You’ll see I’m right.

And that is exactly what this would be.

You cannot raise hundreds of millions for one of your party’s candidates in an election, and then hand that donated money to a different candidate on another newly formed campaign team.

Even assuming Democrats would be dumb enough to try to brazenly hand all the Biden campaign donations to a different campaign, the Trump campaign, the FEC, and a dozen other parties would instantly sue and tie up any transfer of the money in court.

Those of you assuming the money transfer between campaigns would happen FIRST and then Democrats would just lawfare the issue past the election:

Learn how things actually work.

The Democratic Party trying a very massive, very public wire fraud crime in full public view before the 2024 election is not in the cards.

I’m not saying they wouldn’t LIKE to attempt it.

Get it right.

I’m saying their attempt to send the money from one campaign to the other would be blocked, and would be unsuccessful.

AT BEST, it’d take the departing/shutting down Biden campaign weeks, if not months, to refund all the donations so the donors could quickly try to send the money to the new campaign team.

That’d be the only way to not only avoid the civil litigation before the election, but also the criminal wire fraud charges that would result from attempting this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Kilowatt2066 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

When do Dems abide by the law?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– WeAreThePlan 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

I was wondering that myself. They just take tax money, funnel it through Ukraine, and spend it on anything they want.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MisprisionIsEvil 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

The Democrats and the law. Hahahaha 😆

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Retaining_H2O 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The FEC would stop it?

Is this the same FEC that watched blatant election cheating nation-wide... and did nothing?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– LightOneSingleCandle 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

So this is just another possible way for them to try to delay the election.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Revodude 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Thank you so much. That was a big question I posed to frens and you came through masterfully.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– 2024TruthSeeker 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

It is my belief that [they] have ZERO intention of winning a November election because they plan to NOT have an election. It could be any number of things or all of the things at once to cause an emergency declaration that halts/cancels or interrupts the scheduled elections.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BeckyDtheAmerican 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Maybe June 28th someone is introduced? (after the debate)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Revodude 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

That narrows the replacement to a billionaire or cheat or both.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– harleytrvlr 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

This will not age well. People should realize not to speak in absolutes. The democrats will change or ignore any applicable laws or rules in their way and swap him out at any point in the process. What I didn’t see coming was Chip Roy (RINO) helping them out.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Excelsior [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Agreed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– harleytrvlr 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Brian Cates basically stated that it is too late to swap out Biden already based on party rules and state laws as well as campaign financing.I completely disagree. The democrats will either change laws and rules or simply ignore them. They have already done this with COVID, election laws and even ignoring SCOTUS rulings.And they could raise plenty of money in short order.I’m certain that they are already getting their ducks in a row.

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy