I don’t think it’s that misleading honestly, and anything with scarcity in the right quantity can be worth billions, also subjective as to what manufacturers will pay per pound, less than 1000 Tons of material can be worth billions..
If you can make a new material that can be used in ways no other material can, yes, it will be worth billions.
Strange, though. I remember a man about 20 years ago that invented a material that was so durable it couldn't be melted, and was nearly impossible to cut. It was reported, then never heard about again.
And do U remember when they invented a car paint that never got dirty? Never have to wash your car? I was eagerly awaiting for a car like that, never came out…
I think those ideas are taken by agencies like NASA, or the DoD, for "national security reasons". Once they get their use out of it and have advanced it, they release the original version 20 years later as a "new" invention.
It has the potential to be worth billions to the aerospace industry
At this moment the title appears accurate. But, the news cast is being misleading.
The actual NASA employee gave this statement:
This has the potential to generate billions in economic activity.
this shows that the alloy itself is not worth billions, if it were, they wouldn't show exactly how it is made. Instead the technology opens the door for jobs and missions.
Correct, opening the door for jobs which the workers wages will be paid by the sale of powder they are producing, I really don’t see how you’re so hung up on this, it all seems pretty obvious which is why I didn’t refine the headline, anyone can misinterpret something, it happens.
Don't you think that if someone stands for truth, it's best to spread information as truthfully as possible? Spreading truthful information with a headline that could easily be misunderstood to convey something untrue undermines itself.
Truth is that the headline was copy/pasted, Also I gave links for further clarification, if those aren’t also viewed and someone gets duped by not reading into it’s not really my problem, it didn’t seem THAT nefarious. it’s pretty subjective on how you look at it too, Did the inventor of Coca Cola know that his product was going to be worth billions? Who in their right mind would think a single can of coke would be worth billions? But the entirety of their corporate empire? Yes, Billions. It’s silly to even be discussing this anymore. So respectfully I agree to disagree. Happy Friday 👍🏻
Say it’s used in an industry that might send rockets into space to mine asteroids for rare minerals. Would it be worth Trillions now if that was the only tech stopping it from being reality? Not to say that is the case but hypothetically I’d say that would be a reasonable idea we could both agree on
“NASA is 10-15 years ahead of industry.” I call BS. I’ve seen case studies where, when given small financial incentives, private teams regularly outperform NASA.
It’s great, but in getting impatient, wondering when we’ll have the technology of our Jetsons ancient ancestors (we’re the Flintstones btw). The Nazis invented the jet engine and rocket almost a century ago. Why haven’t we advance any further?
I think, once the globohomo boot is off our necks, we will see very rapid development of technology. Maybe we will even catch up to our ancient ancestors.
The jet engine was simultaneously invented by the English (Whittle) and Germans during World War II. They both fielded jet fighters toward the end of the war.
Rockets were invented over the centuries by the Chinese and Indians, in the 18th century by Great Britain (Congreve), and in the 20th century by the U.S. (Goddard), Germany (VfR, Peenemunde), and Russia (Tsiolkovsky et al.). We have advanced a lot further, but not for making Jetson movies. Try to get to the Moon any other way.
To your point, Elon Musk developed reusable launch vehicles and an entirely new engine technology (methane-oxygen). NASA could only wish. To crib a phrase from Newton, they are standing on the shoulders of corpses.
Since when did you accept a cartoon fantasy as a crystal ball?
The cartoon is a metaphor. Our ancient ancestors were MUCH more advanced technologically than we are.
The idea that we are at the “pinnacle” of human existence is an idea promoted by certain groups because it benefits them.
Zero gravity, time travel, free energy - things some of our ancient ancestors had.
So I feel the comparison is fitting - when I drive my ICE car for hours over hundreds of miles, or ride in a fossil fuel powered jet - I might as well be in a foot powered car (compared to the past). We’re much closer to 0 than we are to our ancient ancestors.
Interesting. I wonder who profits? They are gubmint employees. We should profit? I doubt it though. Maybe the gubmint gets royalties. The inventors? All I know is with mailman "under these federal regulations, carriers are permitted to accept a gift worth $20 or less from a customer per occasion."
The key benefit is the ability to 3-D print this material, allowing the single-pass creation of highly complex shapes with lots of interior structure (internal voids).
The key invention is the strengthening of the material by dispersing a metallic oxide along crystal grain boundaries, thus "locking" the crystal structure in place in the presence of high temperatures.
As a bureaucracy, NASA is not remarkable any more. But its individual laboratories are still full of competent people.
Wanna bet this is one of the SSP's projects that's been declassed? We've probably had this alloy for decades.
So two white men made this and they still had to throw the woke fat hog butch dyke in the video like she’s the authority figure on the matter 🤣🤣🤣
as they did every other fucking thing ever invented that was any use.
Wild snorlax appears..
For no possible reason other than DEI.
Headline is slightly misleading. The alloy itself is not worth billions. The alloy will allow for NASA potentially spend billions in new missions.
I don’t think it’s that misleading honestly, and anything with scarcity in the right quantity can be worth billions, also subjective as to what manufacturers will pay per pound, less than 1000 Tons of material can be worth billions..
If you can make a new material that can be used in ways no other material can, yes, it will be worth billions.
Strange, though. I remember a man about 20 years ago that invented a material that was so durable it couldn't be melted, and was nearly impossible to cut. It was reported, then never heard about again.
And do U remember when they invented a car paint that never got dirty? Never have to wash your car? I was eagerly awaiting for a car like that, never came out…
I think those ideas are taken by agencies like NASA, or the DoD, for "national security reasons". Once they get their use out of it and have advanced it, they release the original version 20 years later as a "new" invention.
At first within the video the news cast says:
this shows that the alloy itself is not worth billions, if it were, they wouldn't show exactly how it is made. Instead the technology opens the door for jobs and missions.
Correct, opening the door for jobs which the workers wages will be paid by the sale of powder they are producing, I really don’t see how you’re so hung up on this, it all seems pretty obvious which is why I didn’t refine the headline, anyone can misinterpret something, it happens.
Don't you think that if someone stands for truth, it's best to spread information as truthfully as possible? Spreading truthful information with a headline that could easily be misunderstood to convey something untrue undermines itself.
Truth is that the headline was copy/pasted, Also I gave links for further clarification, if those aren’t also viewed and someone gets duped by not reading into it’s not really my problem, it didn’t seem THAT nefarious. it’s pretty subjective on how you look at it too, Did the inventor of Coca Cola know that his product was going to be worth billions? Who in their right mind would think a single can of coke would be worth billions? But the entirety of their corporate empire? Yes, Billions. It’s silly to even be discussing this anymore. So respectfully I agree to disagree. Happy Friday 👍🏻
Say it’s used in an industry that might send rockets into space to mine asteroids for rare minerals. Would it be worth Trillions now if that was the only tech stopping it from being reality? Not to say that is the case but hypothetically I’d say that would be a reasonable idea we could both agree on
interesting stuff thanks for posting this
Not much information. Alloy of what? Unique properties? Density? Tensile strength? Pah......
A more in-depth interview if you’re interested https://youtu.be/kWEM7YzNExk?si=7TYV5g-0tHddUTR4
https://scitechdaily.com/nasa-licenses-3d-printable-high-temperature-superalloy-that-can-last-2500x-longer/
I just thought it was cool and noteworthy so I decided to post, I’m not an Engineer
Thanks
“NASA is 10-15 years ahead of industry.” I call BS. I’ve seen case studies where, when given small financial incentives, private teams regularly outperform NASA.
It’s great, but in getting impatient, wondering when we’ll have the technology of our Jetsons ancient ancestors (we’re the Flintstones btw). The Nazis invented the jet engine and rocket almost a century ago. Why haven’t we advance any further?
There was a story about an Ion Engine being in development right now.
Wouldn’t be surprised if they were both related to LoneWolf’s comment above.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLAyOkOe/x/c/4ZCZxGDKdLJ
I think, once the globohomo boot is off our necks, we will see very rapid development of technology. Maybe we will even catch up to our ancient ancestors.
The jet engine was simultaneously invented by the English (Whittle) and Germans during World War II. They both fielded jet fighters toward the end of the war.
Rockets were invented over the centuries by the Chinese and Indians, in the 18th century by Great Britain (Congreve), and in the 20th century by the U.S. (Goddard), Germany (VfR, Peenemunde), and Russia (Tsiolkovsky et al.). We have advanced a lot further, but not for making Jetson movies. Try to get to the Moon any other way.
To your point, Elon Musk developed reusable launch vehicles and an entirely new engine technology (methane-oxygen). NASA could only wish. To crib a phrase from Newton, they are standing on the shoulders of corpses.
Since when did you accept a cartoon fantasy as a crystal ball?
The cartoon is a metaphor. Our ancient ancestors were MUCH more advanced technologically than we are.
The idea that we are at the “pinnacle” of human existence is an idea promoted by certain groups because it benefits them.
Zero gravity, time travel, free energy - things some of our ancient ancestors had.
So I feel the comparison is fitting - when I drive my ICE car for hours over hundreds of miles, or ride in a fossil fuel powered jet - I might as well be in a foot powered car (compared to the past). We’re much closer to 0 than we are to our ancient ancestors.
Sorry. I can't trace back to the posting reference, so I don't know exactly what you are replying to.
Interesting. I wonder who profits? They are gubmint employees. We should profit? I doubt it though. Maybe the gubmint gets royalties. The inventors? All I know is with mailman "under these federal regulations, carriers are permitted to accept a gift worth $20 or less from a customer per occasion."
Hidden tech slowly being rolled out thanks to WHs?
Can it hold up to pressure? eg: manned base in the marina trench?
Here's the raw information. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230009039/downloads/GRX-810%20turbo%20expo%20-%202.pdf
The key benefit is the ability to 3-D print this material, allowing the single-pass creation of highly complex shapes with lots of interior structure (internal voids).
The key invention is the strengthening of the material by dispersing a metallic oxide along crystal grain boundaries, thus "locking" the crystal structure in place in the presence of high temperatures.
As a bureaucracy, NASA is not remarkable any more. But its individual laboratories are still full of competent people.
https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/american-companies-to-make-and-sell-nasas-grx-810-superalloy-230377/
Hmm.. Now a gun made out of that stuff
I'm not too sure on this, the material can withstand high heat but nothing was said about pressure.